Koka, Kanthaiah

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) amplitude parameters during cochlear implantation (CI) using a novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm. Methods A multi‐institutional, prospective cohort study was performed at 18 high‐volume CI centers. The inclusion criteria were adults with sensorineural hearing loss and audiometric thresholds of ≤ 90 dB hearing level at 500 Hz undergoing CI with Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) Ultra 3D devices between 2024 and 2025. ECochG recordings were performed with simultaneous multi‐frequency stimulation of four frequencies between 125 and 4000 Hz during cochlear implant insertion. Concurrent multi‐frequency recording allowed extraction of amplitude and phase of each frequency individually. Post hoc analysis was performed to determine the difference in the number of drop alarms between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. An ECochG amplitude drop of 6 dB was defined as a drop alarm. Insertion track patterns were compared between single‐ and multi‐frequency ECochG. Results One hundred ninety‐five ears were included. Mean number of drop alarms for the single‐frequency algorithm was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.52, 1.92; median 1) compared to 0.42 (95% CI: 0.31, 0.53; median 0) for multi‐frequency; p < 0.001. The number of Type C patterns (rise in amplitude during insertion followed by a drop) decreased with the multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm compared to the single‐frequency ECochG algorithm. The number of Type D patterns (no‐response) decreased, indicating that multi‐frequency ECochG generated more responses across the cochlea than single‐frequency ECochG. Conclusions A novel multi‐frequency ECochG algorithm during CI is associated with fewer drop alarms and altered insertion track patterns, which may provide a more accurate assessment of the cochlear microenvironment. Level of Evidence 3.

Objective To analyze the use of electrical field imaging (EFI) in the detection of extracochlear electrodes in cochlear implants (CI) Study Design Retrospective cohort study Setting Tertiary academic medical center Methods EFI patterns from 6 recipients with extracochlear electrodes were compared with 10 recipients with all intracochlear electrodes to identify differences in EFI patterns between these two groups. For the extracochlear group, EFI patterns were analyzed using two methods: visual inspection and calculation of the average impedance difference (AID) between specific EFI curves. These results were then compared with information from CT and plain film imaging, surgical notes, and audiology tests to confirm the placement of the electrodes in each recipient. Results An average AID of 0.06 kΩ was calculated from the EFI patterns for recipients with complete electrode insertion, whereas an average AID of 0.15 kΩ was calculated from the EFI curves measured for the extracochlear electrodes. Visual analysis of the EFI impedance curves for extracochlear electrodes showed a distinct separation from those measured for intracochlear electrodes. Based on AID analysis and visual inspection the EFI, patterns were in close agreement with the number of extracochlear electrodes detected based on either imaging, intraoperative surgical note, or audiological findings. Conclusion EFI is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and time-efficient measurement that can be used to detect extracochlear electrodes and monitor electrode migration from the cochlea.

Objectives: During cochlear implant (CI) electrode placement, single low-frequency (e.g., 500 Hz) cochlear microphonics (CM) measurements are used to monitor hair-cell function and provide feedback to avert insertion trauma. However, it can be difficult to differentiate between trauma and the electrode’s progression through the cochlea when monitored with a single frequency. Multi-frequency CM measurements, while more complex to analyze, can provide more accurate feedback by measuring CM from various locations along the basilar membrane. Methods: A new algorithm was developed to analyze multi-frequency CM tracings by comparing amplitude and phase changes across different test frequencies. The new algorithm was evaluated as to its ability to identify drop-alarm instances with the multi-frequency approach, as compared to single-frequency 500 Hz tracings. Results: The algorithm presented in this manuscript uses the relationship between CM amplitude and phase changes across frequencies to provide real-time feedback during CI electrode placement. The results show that multi-frequency CM tracings raised an alarm only 0.5 times, as compared to 2.8 instances of alarm raised for the single-frequency 500 Hz CM measurements. Conclusions: Multi-frequency CM tracings can help reduce the number of alarms which may be false positives prompting unnecessary electrode manipulations, thereby minimizing the risk of insertion trauma.

Intraoperative electrocochleography (ECOG) is performed using a single low-frequency acoustic stimulus (e.g., 500 Hz) to monitor cochlear microphonics (CM) during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. A decrease in CM amplitude is commonly associated with cochlear trauma and is used to guide electrode placement. However, advancement of the recording electrode beyond the sites of CM generation can also lead to a decrease in CM amplitude and is sometimes interpreted as cochlear trauma, resulting in unnecessary electrode manipulation and increased risk of cochlear trauma during CI electrode placement. In the present study, multi-frequency ECOG was used to monitor CM during CI electrode placement. The intraoperative CM tracings were compared with electrode scan measurements, where CM was measured for each of the intracochlear electrodes. Comparison between the peak CM amplitude measured during electrode placement and electrode scan measurements was used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decrease in CM amplitude during CI electrode insertion. Analysis of the data shows that both multi-frequency electrocochleography and electrode scan could potentially be used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decreasing CM amplitude and providing appropriate feedback to the surgeon during CI electrode placement.

Objectives: In adult cochlear implant patients, conventional audiometry is used to measure postoperative residual hearing which requires active listening and patient feedback. However, audiological measurements in pediatric cochlear implant patients are both challenging as well as time consuming. Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECOG) offers an objective and a time-efficient method to measure frequency-specific cochlear microphonic or difference thresholds (CM/DIF) thresholds that closely approximate auditory thresholds in adult cochlear implant patients. The correlation between CM/DIF and behavioral thresholds has not been established in pediatric cochlear implant patients. In the present study, CM/DIF thresholds were compared with audiometric thresholds in pediatric cochlear implant patients with postoperative residual hearing. Design: Thirteen (11 unilateral and 2 bilateral) pediatric cochlear implant patients (mean age = 9.2 years ± 5.1) participated in this study. Audiometric thresholds were estimated using conventional, condition play, or visual reinforcement audiometry. A warble tone stimulus was used to measure audiometric thresholds at 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. ECOG waveforms were elicited using 50-msec acoustic tone-bursts. The most apical intracochlear electrode was used as the recording electrode with an extra-cochlear ground electrode. The ECOG waveforms were analyzed to determine CM/DIF thresholds that were compared with pediatric cochlear implant patients’ audiometric thresholds. Results: The results show a significant correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.01) between audiometric and CM/DIF thresholds over a frequency range of 125 to 2000 Hz in pediatric cochlear implant patients. Frequency-specific comparisons revealed a correlation of 0.82, 0.74, 0.69, 0.41, and 0.32 between the audiometric thresholds and CM/DIF thresholds measured at 125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz, respectively. An average difference of 0.4 dB (±14 dB) was measured between the audiometric and CM/DIF thresholds. Conclusions: Intracochlear ECOG can be used to measure CM/DIF thresholds in pediatric cochlear implant patients with residual hearing in the implanted ear. The CM/DIF thresholds are similar to the audiometric thresholds at lower test frequencies and offer an objective method to monitor residual hearing in difficult-to-test pediatric cochlear implant patients.

Objective: Determine if changes in middle ear absorbance measured with wide-band tympanometry (WBT) occur following hearing-preservation cochlear implantation (CI). Such measures may provide insight into the mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss postimplantation. Study Design: Clinical capsule report. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Design: WBT absorbance was measured bilaterally during pre- and postoperative clinical office visits in five unilaterally-implanted cochlear implant recipients. Pre- and postoperative WBT measures were compared within each subject in the implanted and contralateral, unimplanted ears. Results: In general, WBT absorbance measurements show a broad spectral pattern including two or three distinct peaks measured over a frequency range of 226 to 8000 Hz. Grand average and linear mixed model comparisons between the pre- and postoperative WBT patterns show significantly reduced (p < 0.05) low-frequency absorbance in the implanted ears in the frequency region over 0.6 to 1.1 kHz, but not in the unimplanted ears. The maximum effect occurred at 1 kHz with absorbance decreasing from ∼0.8 to ∼0.5 after implantation. The limited data are consistent with expected relationships between WBT absorbance and air- and bone-conduction thresholds, assuming an increased air-bone gap reflects conductive hearing loss. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation can result in reduction of low-frequency acoustic absorbance as measured by WBT. WBT may be a useful and sensitive tool for monitoring the mechanical status of the middle and inner ears following cochlear implantation.

Objective: To report the use of multi-frequency intra-cochlear electrocochleography (ECOG) in monitoring and optimizing electrode placement during cochlear implant surgery. An acoustic pure tone complex comprising of 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz was used to elicit ECOG, or more specifically cochlear microphonics (CMs), responses from various locations in the cochlea. The most apical cochlear implant electrode was used as the recording electrode. Study Design: Clinical capsule report. Setting: Tertiary academic referral center. Results: ECOG measurements were performed during cochlear implant surgery in an adult patient with significant residual acoustic hearing. The 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz CM tracings from the most apical electrode showed an amplitude peak at three different instances during the early phase of cochlear implant electrode insertion. These results are consistent with the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. During final electrode placement a slight advancement of the electrode array resulted in a correlated decrease in 250, 500, and/or 1000 Hz CM amplitude. The electrode array was retracted and repositioned which resulted in a recovery of CM amplitude. Intraoperative CM thresholds revealed a correlation of r = 0.87 with preoperative audiometric thresholds. Conclusion: We present a report on simultaneous multi-frequency ECOG monitoring during cochlear implant surgery. Multi-frequency ECOG can be used to differentiate between electrode trauma and the advancement of the apical electrode beyond the CM source in the cochlea.