Glaspy, John A.

Abstract Introduction: Epigenetic modulators may sensitize platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) to immune checkpoint inhibition by reprogramming the tumor microenvironment. Methods: We report clinical and translational findings from a phase II non-randomized study of pembrolizumab and oral azacitidine in 34 women with PROC (NCT02900560). Key eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, ECOG performance status of 0-1, measurable disease and platinum-resistant, histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Primary endpoints included safety, tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included CA-125 response. The effect of combined epigenetic modulation and immunotherapy was evaluated by transcriptomic analyses of 72 serially biopsied tumors. Target gene expression analyses were used to identify differentially expressed genes and pathways, and bulk RNA sequencing was used for gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) and to infer T cell receptor (TCR) assemblies. Results: The combination of azacitidine and pembrolizumab was moderately well tolerated, and the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects and anemia. ORR was 2.9% and DCR was 50%; with 3 of the 27 evaluable patients attaining a CA-125 response. Differential gene expression analyses revealed an upregulation of inflammatory and cytolytic genes (FDR-adjusted p=0.005) and co-inhibitory checkpoints (p=0.005) 6 weeks on-therapy. Upregulation of interferon signaling (p=0.006), antigen presentation (p=0.003), costimulatory signaling (p=0.002), and immune cell adhesion and migration (p=0.005) pathways were prominent on-therapy, together with an increase in CD8+ T-cell density (p=0.05). GSEA analyses were concordant with these findings, showing enrichment of immune and inflammatory gene sets on-therapy and upregulation of gene sets linked to IFN-γ response, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and immunoregulatory interactions (p < 10e-13). Findings were not confounded by histological subtype. TCR abundance analyses evaluating significant TCR clonotypic expansions and regressions showed that intra-tumoral TCR repertoires were reshaped on-therapy. Furthermore, patients with a CA-125 and/or clinical response showed enrichment of hallmark inflammatory gene sets at baseline (p < 10e-10) and of adaptive and conserved immune response gene sets on therapy (p < 10e-09). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of epigenetic modulators to reshape the tumor microenvironment of PROC toward a more inflammatory phenotype and may point to approaches to augment immunotherapy response. Citation Format: Blair V. Landon, Julia L. Boland, Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, Deborah K. Armstrong, Boris Winterhoff, Jaime Wehr, Akshaya V. Annapragada, Christopher Cherry, Archana Balan, Guneet Kaleka, Victor E. Velculescu, Stephen B. Baylin, Cynthia A. Zahnow, Dennis J. Slamon, Gottfried E. Konecny, John A. Glaspy, Valsamo (Elsa) Anagnostou. Pembrolizumab and epigenetic modification with azacitidine reprogram the tumor microenvironment of platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: clinical and translational findings from a phase II study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT260.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor. Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 10 6 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 10 8 PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported. At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297 .

The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors provide recommendations for the appropriate use of growth factors in the clinical management of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT), and chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Management and prevention of these sequelae are an integral part of supportive care for many patients undergoing cancer treatment. The purpose of these guidelines is to operationalize the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of FN, CIT, and CIA in adult patients with nonmyeloid malignancies and to enable the patient and clinician to assess management options for FN, CIT, and CIA in the context of an individual patient’s condition. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of the important recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Growth Factors, with particular emphasis on the incorporation of a newly developed section on CIT.

Background Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here. Methods Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients. Results For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)). Conclusions Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas. Trial registration number NCT01546571.

1005 Background: B in combination with weekly paclitaxel or docetaxel (D) as 1st-line therapy for MBC has improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with the respective taxane alone in two large Phase III trials. This study investigated the addition of B to standard 1st-line chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive B + chemotherapy or placebo (pl) + chemotherapy. Prior to randomization, investigators chose capecitabine (Cap) (2000 mg/m2 x 14d), taxane (T) (nab-paclitaxel [260 mg/m2] or D [75 or 100 mg/m2], q3wk), or anthracycline (Ant)-based chemotherapy (q3wk). B or pl was administered at 15 mg/kg q3wk. Key eligibility criteria included MBC or locally-recurrent disease, no prior cytotoxic treatment, ECOG PS 0 or 1, HER2-negative disease and no CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), independent review of PFS, and safety. At progression, all patients were eligible for B with 2nd line chemotherapy. The Cap cohort and the pooled T or Ant (T + Ant) cohort were independently powered and analyzed in parallel using two-sided stratified log-rank test (Cap: 80% power to detect HR=0.75; T + Ant: 90% power to detect HR=0.7). Results: RIBBON-1 enrolled 1237 patients (Cap, 615; T, 307; Ant, 315) from 12/05 to 8/07 in 22 countries with a median follow-up of 15.6 months in the Cap cohort and 19.2 months in the T + Ant cohort. The results are summarized below. OS data are limited with only 33% of events. Safety was consistent with results of prior B trials. Conclusions: The addition of B to Cap, T; or Ant-based chemotherapy regimens used in 1st-line treatment of MBC resulted in statistically-significant improvement in PFS with a safety profile comparable to prior Phase III studies. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

5515 Background: IGF signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of ovarian cancer (OC). Single agent activity and safety of ganitumab (AMG 479), a fully human monoclonal antibody against IGF-1R that blocks binding of IGF1 and IGF2, were evaluated in asymptomatic patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. Differential expression of IGF-1R pathway genes in OC underscores the potential of developing predictive biomarkers for patient selection. Methods: Pts with CA125 progression (GCIG criteria) and/or measurable disease per RECIST failing primary platinum-based therapy received 18 mg/kg of ganitumab q3w. Objective response rate per RECIST or CA125 criteria was the primary end point (complete response, CR; partial response, PR). Secondary end points included, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Tumor tissue was collected for gene expression profiling (Nanostring) and sequencing. Results: From 02/2009 to 05/2010, 61 pts were accrued from 20 centers. Pt characteristics were: Serous (77%), median platinum-free interval (11 months), measurable disease (74%), and ECOG performance status 0 (67%). According to CA125 criteria median PFS was 6.8 months (95%CI, 2.8-10.8); 2 CR (3.4%) 2 PR (3.4%), and 38 stable disease (SD, 64%) were observed. When using RECIST criteria, median PFS was 2.1 months (95%CI, 2.0-2.8), 2 PR (3.4%) and 22 SD (38%) were observed. Toxicity has been mild; grade 2 hyperglycemia was seen in 5 pts (8.2%). Grade 3 related events included hearing loss (1), nausea (1), asthenia (2), fatigue (1), and hypersensitivity (5). There were no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events. Efficacy is being correlated with gene expression profiles and mutational data. Conclusions: IGF-1R inhibition with ganitumab was well tolerated and demonstrated modest single-agent activity in unselected patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent OC. However, encouraging activity was seen in a subset of patients. Ongoing predictive biomarker analyses may facilitate patient selection. Clinical trial information: NCT00719212.

Purpose We evaluated the combination of talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase II study. To our knowledge, this was the first randomized trial to evaluate addition of an oncolytic virus to a checkpoint inhibitor. Methods Patients with unresectable stages IIIB to IV melanoma, with no more than one prior therapy if BRAF wild-type, no more than two prior therapies if BRAF mutant, measurable/injectable disease, and without symptomatic autoimmunity or clinically significant immunosuppression were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Talimogene laherparepvec treatment began in week 1 (first dose, ≤ 4 mL × 10 6 plaque-forming units/mL; after 3 weeks, ≤ 4 mL × 10 8 plaque-forming units/mL every 2 weeks). Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; up to four doses) began week 1 in the ipilimumab alone arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was objective response rate evaluated by investigators per immune-related response criteria. Results One hundred ninety-eight patients were randomly assigned to talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab (n = 98), or ipilimumab alone (n = 100). Thirty-eight patients (39%) in the combination arm and 18 patients (18%) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5; P = .002). Responses were not limited to injected lesions; visceral lesion decreases were observed in 52% of patients in the combination arm and 23% of patients in the ipilimumab arm. Frequently occurring adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (combination, 59%; ipilimumab alone, 42%), chills (combination, 53%; ipilimumab alone, 3%), and diarrhea (combination, 42%; ipilimumab alone, 35%). Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 45% and 35%, respectively. Three patients in the combination arm had fatal AEs; none were treatment related. Conclusion The study met its primary end point; the objective response rate was significantly higher with talimogene laherparepvec plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone. These data indicate that the combination has greater antitumor activity without additional safety concerns versus ipilimumab.