Kanaan, Christopher

Background Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with adverse cardiac events. Although troponin elevation is a diagnostic criterion for ICI‐related myocarditis (ICIrM) and myocardial infarction, data on other causes of troponin elevation and their outcomes in ICI‐treated patients are limited. Methods All patients treated with ICI who had hs‐TnT (high‐sensitivity troponin T) measured at a multicenter institution from 2011 to 2022 were included. Clinical data, outcomes (cardiac death, heart failure (HF), major adverse cardiovascular events [myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure]), and cause of hs‐TnT elevation were assessed. Risks of cardiac events were compared across hs‐TnT elevation causes. Results Of 5423 patients treated with ICI, 1669 had post‐ICI hs‐TnT measurement (mean age 68.7±11.3 years, 58.3% male), with 1‐year follow‐up. Hs‐TnT elevation in patients with ICIrM (n=59) was associated with the highest risk for cardiac death (hazard ratio [HR], 52.7 [95% CI, 11.7–238.0], P <0.001), followed by hs‐TnT elevation due to heart failure (HR, 15.9), myocardial infarction/type 2 ischemia (HR, 11.6), and infection/sepsis (HR, 5.7), compared with those with no hs‐TnT elevation. ICIrM also carried highest risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 8.2, [95% CI, 4.4–15.3], P <0.001), followed by myocardial infarction/type 2 ischemia (HR, 8.1), heart failure (HR, 7.6), pulmonary embolus (HR, 5.1), infection/sepsis (HR, 4.1), and indeterminate cause (HR, 2.4). Among ICIrM, HsTnT value >576 ng/L best predicted risk for cardiac death and >319 ng/L for major adverse cardiovascular events. Conclusions Hs‐TnT elevation after ICI therapy is associated with increased risk of cardiac events, particularly in ICIrM, and a graded prognostic association depending on the cause of hs‐TnT elevation. Identifying the underlying cause and troponin thresholds may guide risk stratification and management.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenses. Meanwhile, effective management of AF requires a comprehensive, patient-centered approach that includes risk factor modification, rate and rhythm control strategies, and prevention of thromboembolic events. Multidisciplinary AF clinics have emerged as a model for comprehensive management to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare burden. This review discusses the rationale, structure, benefits, challenges, and future directions of multidisciplinary AF clinics, emphasizing their role in optimizing AF management.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, impacting approximately 6.1 million adults in the United States, with projections to increase two-fold by 2030. AF significantly increases the risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guidelines present a paradigm shift in AF management, moving from a duration-based classification to a more comprehensive, patient-centered approach. This includes a novel AF classification system that emphasizes early detection and intervention, including risk factors and lifestyle modification tailored to each patient’s risk profile. Moreover, the recommendations advocate for a multidisciplinary care model, ensuring coordinated management involving primary care providers and specialists. Primary care providers play a crucial role in initiating risk factor management and lifestyle interventions, even before the development of AF. This review aims to thoroughly examine the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF and equip general internists with the necessary insights to navigate the evolving landscape of AF care effectively.

Background: ICI-related myocarditis is challenging to diagnose and associated with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality. ICI therapy has also been associated with acute coronary events. There is limited data regarding cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and its association with these cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: All patients treated with ICI at a tertiary institution from 2011 to 2022 were identified, and the charts of those with cTnT measurements were reviewed. In patients with cTnT elevation (cutoff of >14 ng/L), if the Bonaca criteria for myocarditis were met, these patients were labeled as cTnT+/myocarditis+, otherwise as cTnT+/myocarditis-. Patients with non-elevated cTnT values were labeled cTnT-. Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and long-term outcomes, including cardiac death, new heart failure (HF) diagnosis, and MACE (myocardial infarction, TIA/stroke, new HF diagnosis). Kaplan-Meier curves were created to plot the comparison between the three groups. Results: A total of 1669 cancer patients who received ICI therapy had post-ICI cTnT measurements. Mean age was 68.7±11.3, 58.3% were male, with follow-up at 1 year post ICI administration. Of these, 59 patients were cTnT+/myocarditis+, 1077 patients were cTnT+/myocarditis-, and 533 were cTnT-. Survival free of cardiac death, MACE and new HF diagnosis showed a graded response from worst in cTnT+/myocarditis+ patients and best in cTnT- patients; cTnT+/myocarditis- patients had a more favorable but still worse prognosis than cTnT- patients (Figure 1). A cTnT value of 95 ng/L was identified as the best cutoff for the diagnosis of ICI-related myocarditis (AUC 0.82, sensitivity 81.36%, specificity 81.62%). The optimal cTnT cutoff for cardiac death was 576 ng/L (0.70, sensitivity 72%, specificity of 61%) and for MACE 319 ng/L (AUC 0.61, sensitivity 70%, specificity of 52%). Conclusion: In cancer patients receiving ICI therapy cTnT elevations indicate a higher risk of MACE, HF, and cardiac mortality even in patients without myocarditis. Although worst outcomes are seen in those meeting diagnostic criteria for myocarditis.

Cardiogenic shock is the most common cause of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction with an increase in incidence over the last 15-years. Recent classification systems of cardiogenic shock (CS) have improved categorization of patients into subsets of acuity and begun to integrate phenotypes and etiologies in addition to risk modifiers. Early revascularization with PCI or CABG has been the most important advance in the management of AMI-CS patients with improvements in survival. Despite this initial progress, mortality remains high at approximately 40%, with a significant proportion of patients dying of neurological causes, especially in the cohort with cardiac arrest and multi-organ dysfunction despite cardiac recovery. Mechanical circulatory support devices are an attractive strategy to ameliorate the cardio-metabolic spiral but have thus far failed to show survival benefits in randomized trials during revascularization of AMI-CS patients with IABP and ECMO use, although many aspects of their use have yet to be studied, including their role as part of an escalation or bridging strategy along the continuum of CS care. Randomized trials in Impella percutaneous LVAD use are pending. Cardiac arrest patients represent an important cohort with specific challenges of care and familiarity with management including the use of mechanical CPR devices, temperature optimization, MCS use and pharmacotherapy issues are critical to successful outcomes.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an underdiagnosed form of infiltrative cardiomyopathy caused by abnormal amyloid fibrils deposited extracellularly in the myocardium and cardiac structures. There can be high variability in its clinical manifestations, and diagnosing CA requires expertise and often thorough evaluation; as such, the diagnosis of CA can be challenging and is often delayed. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to different diagnostic modalities is rapidly expanding and transforming cardiovascular medicine. Advanced AI methods such as deep-learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) may enhance the diagnostic process for CA by identifying patients at higher risk and potentially expediting the diagnosis of CA. In this review, we summarize the current state of AI applications to different diagnostic modalities used for the evaluation of CA, including their diagnostic and prognostic potential, and current challenges and limitations.

Background Patients who experience in-hospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (iSTEMI) represent a uniquely high-risk cohort owing to delays in diagnosis, prolonged time to reperfusion and increased mortality. Quality initiatives aimed at improving the care of this vulnerable, yet understudied population are needed. Methods This study included consecutive patients with iSTEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 1 January 2011 and 15 July 2019 at a single, tertiary referral centre. A comprehensive iSTEMI protocol (CSP) was implemented on 15 July 2014, incorporating: (1) cardiology fellow activation of the catheterisation lab using standardised criteria, (2) nursing chest pain protocol, (3) improved electronic access to electrocardiographic studies, (4) checklist for initial triage and management, (5) 24/7/365 catheterisation lab readiness and (6) radial-first PCI approach. Key metrics and clinical outcomes were compared before and after CSP implementation. Results Among 125 total subjects, the post-CSP cohort (n=81) was younger, had more males and were more likely to be hospitalised for cardiac-related reasons relative to the pre-CSP cohort (n=44) who were more likely hospitalised for operative-related aetiologies. After CSP adoption, median ECG-to-first-device-activation time decreased from 113 min to 64 min (p<0.001), goal ECG-to-first-device-activation time increased from 36% to 76% of patients (p<0.001), administration of guideline-directed medical therapy prior to PCI increased from 27.3% to 65.4% (p<0.001), trans-radial access increased from 16% to 70% (p<0.001) and rates of discharge home increased from 56.8% to 76.5% (p=0.04). Statistically insignificant numerical reductions were observed post-CSP in in-hospital mortality (18.2% vs 9.9%, p=0.30), 30-day mortality (15.9% vs 12.3%, p=0.78) and 1-year mortality (27.3% vs 21.0%, p=0.57). Conclusions The implementation of a CSP was associated with marked enhancements in key care metrics among patients with iSTEMI. Among a larger cohort, the use of a CSP yielded a significant reduction in ECG-to-first-device-activation time in a particularly vulnerable population at high risk of death.