Dueck, A. C.

Purpose Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptoms are troublesome to patients, and alleviation of this burden represents a paramount treatment objective in the development of MPN-directed therapies. We aimed to assess the utility of an abbreviated symptom score for the most pertinent and representative MPN symptoms for subsequent serial use in assessing response to therapy. Patients and Methods The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score (MPN-SAF TSS) was calculated as the mean score for 10 items from two previously validated scoring systems. Questions focus on fatigue, concentration, early satiety, inactivity, night sweats, itching, bone pain, abdominal discomfort, weight loss, and fevers. Results MPN-SAF TSS was calculable for 1,408 of 1,433 patients with MPNs who had a mean score of 21.2 (standard deviation [SD], 16.3). MPN-SAF TSS results significantly differed among MPN disease subtypes (P < .001), with a mean of 18.7 (SD, 15.3), 21.8 (SD, 16.3), and 25.3 (SD, 17.2) for patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and myelofibrosis, respectively. The MPN-SAF TSS strongly correlated with overall quality of life (QOL; r = 0.59; P < .001) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) functional scales (all P < .001 and absolute r ≥ 0.50 except social functioning r = 0.48). No significant trends were present when comparing therapy subgroups. The MPN-SAF TSS had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .83). Factor analysis identified a single underlying construct, indicating that the MPN-SAF TSS is an appropriate, unified scoring method. Conclusion The MPN-SAF TSS is a concise, valid, and accurate assessment of MPN symptom burden with demonstrated clinical utility in the largest prospective MPN symptom study to date. This new prospective scoring method may be used to assess MPN symptom burden in both clinical practice and trial settings.

Abstract Background: Unstained recuts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues are commonly collected for cooperative group studies. There is concern among pathologists that improper storage conditions can lead to antigen degradation. In an effort to quantify this effect, we compared the expression of HER1 and HER2 on two sets of identical cohort tissue microarrays (TMAs) from the N9831 HER2+ adjuvant phase III trial (NCT00005970; www.clinicaltrials.gov); one freshly cut set (cut April 18, 2011) and a second set stored at 4 degrees for over two years (cut between Nov, 2007 and Jan, 2008). Methods: The two sets of TMA slides containing 1580 tumor samples from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA method of quantitative immunofluorescence. HER1 was tested with D38B1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and HER2 with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) on tumors from 695 patients (712 specimens) in the fresh TMAs and 779 patients (800 specimens) in the old TMAs in up to three-fold redundancy per specimen. Results: Frequency distributions of the expression of HER2 revealed bimodality in the fresh TMAs compared to an attenuated distribution of the old cases. The average score of the entire cohort was significantly lower in old TMAs compared to fresh cuts (paired t-test, p&lt;0.0001). Linear regression of the average HER2 scores from new TMAs versus the average scores from old TMAs showed a slope term of 0.52, which is statistically significantly different from the hypothetical value of 1 (p&lt;0.0001). Regressions between any two fresh slides showed slopes close to 1.0. Similar results were seen for HER1, but fewer positive cases made the changes less dramatic. Conclusions: The storage condition of tissue slides is a critical pre-analytical variable that can dramatically lower the score of HER1 and HER2, artificially. Thus, studies done on inadequately stored slides, either whole sections or TMAs, must be interpreted with caution. Tissue collection and analysis of biomarkers for cooperative group studies should not include unstained recuts, but rather, entire blocks or large cores from tissue blocks. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-04.

Abstract Background: Prediction of benefit from trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer remains an important goal. We sought to investigate the predictive value of quantitative measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN protein expression on the benefit of trastuzumab in the phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 study for pts randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C). Methods: For each marker, we evaluated quantitative expression, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of pts. Freshly cut tissue microarray slides with up to three-fold redundancy per specimen from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA (Camp, et al; Nat Med 2002, JCO 2008) method of quantitative immunofluorescence for each marker. HER2 was tested with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) and preliminary results were available for 698 of nearly 1400 pt specimens to be tested. The minimum value per pt was used in statistical analysis. Specimens were classified with high versus low expression based on a median value cutpoint for each marker. Median follow-up was 7.0 yrs. Results: Quantitative HER2 was compared with centrally performed HER2 testing by IHC and FISH. Median quantitative HER2 via AQUA was 10,017 units for the HER2 IHC 3+ group (n=607) versus 1058, 831, and 970 for the HER2 IHC 2+ (n=68), 1+ (n=11), and 0 (n=11) groups, respectively. The Spearman correlation between quantitative HER2 and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio was 0.32 (p&lt;0.001). High quantitative HER2 was associated with lower percentage of hormone receptor positivity (48% vs 59%, chi-sq p=0.003) but not associated with age, race, nodal positivity, tumor histology, grade, or size. High HER2 did not impact DFS in any arm of the study (See Table). Data for additional HER2 testing, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN are in process and will be ready by September, 2011. Conclusions: Similar to results based on standard HER2 testing by IHC and FISH in N9831, quantitative HER2 did not impact benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Results for additional markers will be presented. Our complete quantitative results for a second epitope on HER2, HER3, HER4, ER and EGFR will be the first report of these markers in a large patient cohort in the adjuvant setting. Disease Free Survival Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-03.

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the associations between baseline and posttreatment circulating tumor cell (CTC) gene expression and outcome of patients enrolled in four North Central Cancer Treatment Group metastatic breast cancer (MBC) trials in which specimens were shipped (at 4°C) from community-based sites to a reference laboratory (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). Experimental Design: Blood was collected at treating sites from MBC patients before (baseline), during, and at the end of treatment with erlotinib + gemcitabine (N0234), sorafenib (N0336), irinotecan + cetuximab (N0436), or paclitaxel-poliglumex + capecitabine (N0437). CTCs from 10 mL of EDTA blood were enriched with CD45 depletion, 24 to 30 hours postblood collection. Reverse transcription/quantitative PCR was used to determine cytokeratin-19 (CK19) and mammaglobin (MGB1) mRNA levels in CTCs from up to 13 (N0234), 16 (N0336), 18 (N0436), and 39 (N0437) patients. The gene expressions were normalized to β2-microglobulin and calibrated to healthy blood using the 2–ΔΔCq algorithm; positivity was defined as 2 or more. Results: CK19+mRNA cells were detected in 56% to 75% and MGB1+mRNA cells in 23% to 38% of 86 patients at baseline. CK19+mRNA cells were detected in 30% to 67% and MGB1+mRNA cells in 14% to 64% of 110 postbaseline serial samples. The presence of baseline CK19+mRNA cells (P = 0.01) but not MGB1+mRNA cells (P = 0.14) was significantly associated with shorter overall survival. A decrease in MGB1+mRNA levels (baseline-week 8) seemed to be associated with clinical response (P = 0.05). Conclusions: CTC gene expression analysis conducted by a reference laboratory is feasible when blood is collected from treating sites and processed 24 to 30 hours postcollection. The presence of baseline CK19+mRNA CTCs was associated with poor prognosis; a decrease in MGB1+mRNA CTCs may help predict response to therapy of MBC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 17(22); 7183–93. ©2011 AACR.

OBJECTIVE New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation (NODAT) has adverse clinical and economic implications. A risk score for NODAT could help identify research subjects for intervention studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study using pretransplant clinical and laboratory measurements to construct a risk score for NODAT. NODAT was defined by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5%, fasting serum glucose ≥126 mg/dL, or prescribed therapy for diabetes within 1 year posttransplant. Three multivariate logistic regression models were constructed: 1) standard model, with both continuous and discrete variables; 2) dichotomous model, with continuous variables dichotomized at clinically relevant cut points; and 3) summary score defined as the sum of the points accrued using the terms from the dichotomous model. RESULTS A total of 316 subjects had seven pretransplant variables with P &lt; 0.10 in univariate logistic regression analyses (age, planned corticosteroid therapy posttransplant, prescription for gout medicine, BMI, fasting glucose and triglycerides, and family history of type 2 diabetes) that were selected for multivariate models. Areas under receiver operating curves for all three models were similar (0.72, 0.71, and 0.70). A simple risk score calculated as the sum of points from the seven variables performed as well as the other two models in identifying risk of NODAT. CONCLUSIONS A risk score computed from seven simple pretransplant variables can identify risk of NODAT.

Abstract Background. Half of all breast cancers are early stage, lymph node negative, and hormone receptor positive. A 21-gene (Oncotype DX®; Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA) recurrence score (RS) is prognostic for recurrence and predictive of chemotherapy benefit. We explored the ability of oncologists to predict the RS using standard prognostic criteria. Methods. Standard demographic and tumor prognostic criteria were obtained from patients with an available RS. Two academic pathologists provided tumor grade, histologic type, and hormone receptor status. Six academic oncologists predicted the RS category (low, intermediate, or high) and provided a recommendation for therapy. The oncologists were then given the actual RS and provided recommendations for therapy. Analysis for agreement was performed. Results. Thirty-one cases, including nine additional cases with variant pathology reads, were presented. There was substantial agreement in oncologists' ability to discriminate between true low or true intermediate and true high (κ = 0.75; p &lt; .0001). Predictions between low and intermediate were not consistent. The most common discrepancies were predictions of a low RS risk when cases were true intermediate and predictions of an intermediate RS risk when cases were true low. The actual RS resulted in a change in the treatment recommendations in 19% of cases. Of the 186 scenarios and six oncologists in aggregate, five fewer chemotherapy recommendations resulted with the actual RS. Conclusions. Oncologists are able to differentiate between a low or intermediate RS and a high RS using standard prognostic criteria. However, provision of the actual RS changed the treatment recommendations in nearly 20% of cases, suggesting that the RS may reduce chemotherapy use. This effect was observed in particular in intermediate-risk cases. Prospective clinical trials are necessary to determine whether decisions based on the RS change outcomes.

Abstract Symptomatic burden in myeloproliferative neoplasms is present in most patients and compromises quality of life. We sought to validate a broadly applicable 18-item instrument (Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form [MPN-SAF], coadministered with the Brief Fatigue Inventory) to assess symptoms of myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera among prospective cohorts in the United States, Sweden, and Italy. A total of 402 MPN-SAF surveys were administered (English [25%], Italian [46%], and Swedish [28%]) in 161 patients with essential thrombocythemia, 145 patients with polycythemia vera, and 96 patients with myelofibrosis. Responses among the 3 administered languages showed great consistency after controlling for MPN subtype. Strong correlations existed between individual items and key symptomatic elements represented on both the MPN-SAF and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. Enrolling physicians' blinded opinion of patient symptoms (6 symptoms assessed) were highly correlated with corresponding patients' responses. Serial administration of the English MPN-SAF among 53 patients showed that most MPN-SAF items are well correlated (r > 0.5, P < .001) and highly reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.7). The MPN-SAF is a comprehensive and reliable instrument that is available in multiple languages to evaluate symptoms associated with all types of MPNs in clinical trials globally.

Abstract Identification of HER2 as an important cellular marker in the biology and treatment of breast cancer has highlighted the importance of reliable testing methodology. Controversy exists regarding type of test, reliability, definition of positivity, and which test may best predict for patient (pt) efficacy to anti-HER2 therapies. Purpose: To determine the concordance between HER2 results by 3 central laboratories, impact of round-robin adjudication of discordant cases, and heterogeneity in HER2 results using specimens from 3 adjuvant trials where HER2 testing was performed by local and central laboratories for enrollment. Methods: We performed a blinded round-robin exchange of randomly sampled, HER2-normal (IHC-& FISH-) and HER2-positive breast tumors among 3 central laboratories (NCCTG, BCIRG and NSABP) for confirmatory HER2 testing. The 3 laboratories performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2 using the HercepTest kit (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit/HER2/CEN17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL) on 389 tumor specimens obtained from N9831/BCIRG006 (37 IHC+/FISH+, 33 IHC+/FISH-, 36 IHC-/FISH+, 62 IHC-& FISH-) and BCIRG005 (96 IHC-& FISH-); 123 cases had ≥2 blocks examined from the same pt. HER2 positivity was defined according to FDA-approved guidelines used in the clinical trials (IHC+: 3+ complete membrane staining in &gt;10% cells; FISH+: HER2/CEN17 ratio ≥2.0). The HER2 status (IHC: 3+ vs 0-2+; FISH: amplified vs not) for each block was independently determined at each site; discordant IHC and FISH cases were adjudicated at a face-to-face meeting. Results: Independent reads were concordant across pathologists in IHC status in 351/381 (92%) cases and in FISH status in 343/373 (92%) cases. Upon adjudication, a consensus was reached on 16 and 18 of the discordant IHC and FISH cases, respectively. Among 96 BCIRG005 cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in all 96 cases. Among 59 evaluable N9831 HER2-normal cases, IHC-and FISH-were confirmed in the primary block in 57 (97%) cases (but another block tested HER2+ for 4 cases). Among 102 N9831/BCIRG006 HER2+ cases, HER2 positivity was confirmed in the primary block in 73 (72%) cases. Among 118 cases with IHC results for &gt; 1 block, the adjudicated IHC result agreed across blocks in 106 (90%) cases. Among 113 cases with FISH results for &gt;1 block, the adjudicated FISH result agreed in 107 (95%) cases. Among 53 N9831 HER2-normal cases adjudicated as IHC-& FISH-(although they all had a previous local HER2+ test), there was significant improvement in disease-free survival associated with trastuzumab given concurrently with paclitaxel after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared to chemotherapy alone (HR=0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.91; A 23 pts, 10 events; C 30 pts, 5 events). Conclusions: Excellent agreement (96%) was observed among the pathologists at adjudication, suggesting that standardized methods improve assay proficiency. HER2 heterogeneity across blocks was observed more at the protein than at the gene level. In the small subset of N9831 pts adjudicated as HER2-normal trastuzumab benefit was observed. This work was supported by NCI and Genentech. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-02.

Abstract Background: Trastuzumab (H) improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with HER2 positive breast cancer (BR Ca) when used with adjuvant chemotherapy. We herein compare the rates of local regional recurrence (LRR) in pts randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without adjuvant H. Methods: The phase 3 randomized trial NCCTG N9831 enrolled 3505 pts with high risk HER2 positive Br Ca to evaluate the effect of adjuvant H on DFS. Pts were randomized to either doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel (T); or AC→TH→H. RT was given concurrently with H after ACT chemotherapy. Pts analyzed underwent lumpectomy (L) + radiotherapy (RT), mastectomy (M) alone, or M+RT. All pts underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and/or axillary dissection. 2816 pts were eligible for competing risk analysis of LRR as a first event (competing risks were distant recurrence, contralateral Br Ca, second primary cancer, or death). Median follow-up is 5.3 years. Results: Primary breast therapy included L+RT 1062 (38%), M 711 (25%), and M+RT 1043 (37%). Axillary dissection was performed in 90% of pts but less frequently with L+RT (83%) compared to M (88%) or M+RT (98%), chi-sq P&lt;0.001. Stage at presentation was I 41%, II 51%, and III 8% with a significant greater proportion of higher stage pts undergoing M+RT, chi-sq P&lt;0.001. Overall the 5-year LRR rate was 4.1% (95% CI 3.5-4.9%) and similar among the treatment groups: L+RT 4.7% (95% CI 3.6-6.1%), M 3.5% (95% CI 2.4-5.1%), and M+RT 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-3.4%). Among pts with a LRR, 66% were local recurrence only, 11% were local-regional, and 23% were regional only. In the L+RT patients with a LRR, the corresponding rates were 74%, 7%, and 19%, respectively. In the M patients with a LRR, the corresponding rates were 40%, 23%, and 37%, respectively. In the M+RT patients with LRR, the rates were 79%, 4%, and 17%, respectively. H is associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in the risk of LRR for pts who receive L+RT or M+RT (Table 1). No such trend was seen in the M alone group but the number of events was low. Table 1. LRR According to Local and Adjuvant Treatment Groups Conclusion: The LRR as the first reported site of failure was low with a median 5. 3 year follow-up. Adjuvant H was associated with a trend of lower LRR in the pts treated with L + RT or M+RT. This observation suggests an additive effect of RT and H on LRR that warrants further investigation. The small number of local-regional events in this one randomized trial supports further investigation of LRR across other adjuvant trastuzumab trials. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-02.

Abstract In the Breast International Group (BIG) and North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) co-led phase III adjuvant breast cancer trial, ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation), two central laboratories, the European Institute of Oncology (IEO; Milan, Italy) and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), are responsible for confirming the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), estrogen receptor α(ER), and progesterone receptor status of the primary breast tumors for the Rest of World (excluding China, which conducts a separate central review) and North American patients, respectively, prior to patient study entry. As of December 2009, discordance in HER2 and ER testing between local and central laboratories was observed by both central laboratories. For IEO, 14.5% of 8,037 HER2 cases locally positive [by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive; whereas for Mayo, 5.8% of 412 HER2 cases locally positive were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive (Table 1). Central and local IHC ER discordance was 12.1% and 11.7% for 9,021 IEO screened cases and 419 Mayo screened cases, respectively (Table 2). In particular, IEO observed more false-positive (locally positive/centrally negative) HER2 findings than Mayo and Mayo observed more false-positive ER findings than IEO. Purpose: Motivated by the above findings, we launched a ring study to assess whether the central lab results of a subset of local/central discordant ALTTO cases could be confirmed in the other central lab. Methods: IEO and Mayo exchanged and retested a subset of FFPE breast tumors collected in ALTTO. IEO sent 20 HER2 false-positive, 5 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative (locally negative/centrally positive) ALTTO breast tumors to Mayo. Mayo sent 5 HER2 false-positive, 20 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative ALTTO breast tumors to IEO. IEO and Mayo performed IHC for ER according to their own methodology: DAKO cocktail of ER 1D5 and 2.123 monoclonal antibodies and monoclonal ER 1D5 antibody, respectively. The two laboratories performed IHC for HER2 according to the HercepTest® manufacturers’ instructions (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and FISH for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit and the HER2/centromere 17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL). Results: IEO and Mayo confirmed the central HER2-negative result in 100% of 25 cases. Analyses of ER are ongoing and ER results will be presented. Conclusions: In this subset of patients, enrollment ineligibility did not change when HER2 testing was performed by either IEO or Mayo Clinic central laboratories. Table 1. HER2 Local/Central Lab Results Table 2. ER Local/Central Lab Results Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-36.