Back to Authors

Geiger, XJ

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 2

Abstract P1-05-24: Pharmacologic reversion of epigenetic silencing of the PRKD1 promoter blocks breast tumor cell invasion and metastasis.
Borgés, Sahra, Döppler, Heike, Andorfer, CA, Perez, EA, Anastasiadis, PZ, Thompson, AE, Geiger, XJ, Störz, Peter , Andorfer, Cathy, Sun, Zhifu

Cancer Research | August 14, 2014 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 24_Supplement | Pages: P1-05-24-P1-05-24

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p1-05-24 Get It

Abstract Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressing genes by promoter-specific DNA methylation is common in many types of cancer. As an early event, this process has been well shown to promote tumor initiation and progression; however little is known how such epigenetic silencing can contribute to tumor metastasis. The PRKD1 gene encodes Protein Kinase D1 (PKD1), a serine/threonine kinase expressed in epithelial cells of the normal mammary gland that maintains the epithelial phenotype of normal breast cells and prevents epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). PKD1 is also a critical suppressor of tumor cell invasion and is silenced in expression and activity during breast tumor progression. Here, we show that aberrant methylation of PRKD1 promoter region is not only correlated with the silencing of its expression but is also associated with invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines and with aggressiveness of breast tumors. Using the highly invasive MDA-MB-231 cells, we show that the inhibition of PRKD1 promoter methylation with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine restores PKD1 expression and significantly decreases their invasive abilities in vitro. More importantly, in a tumor xenograft model it dramatically blocks tumor spread and metastasis to the lung in a PKD1-dependent fashion. Our data suggest that the status of epigenetic regulation of the PRKD1 promoter can provide valid information on the invasiveness of breast tumors, and therefore could serve as an early diagnostic marker. Moreover, targeted upregulation of PKD1 expression may be used as a therapeutic approach to reverse the invasive phenotype of breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-24.
PD05-03: Impact of Quantitative Measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN Protein Expression on Benefit to Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients in NCCTG N9831.
Perez, EA, Ballman, KV, Reinholz, MM, Dueck, A. C. , Jenkins, RB , McCullough, AE, Chen, B, Davidson, NE, Martino, Silvana, Kaufman, PA, Kutteh, LA, Sledge, GW, Geiger, XJ, Ingle, JN, Tenner, K., Harris, LN, Gralow, JR, Rimm, DL, Perez, EA, Cheng, Heather H. , Kaufman, Patricia

Cancer Research | June 27, 2012 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 24_Supplement | Pages: PD05-03-PD05-03

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-pd05-03 Get It

Abstract Background: Prediction of benefit from trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer remains an important goal. We sought to investigate the predictive value of quantitative measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN protein expression on the benefit of trastuzumab in the phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 study for pts randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C). Methods: For each marker, we evaluated quantitative expression, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of pts. Freshly cut tissue microarray slides with up to three-fold redundancy per specimen from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA (Camp, et al; Nat Med 2002, JCO 2008) method of quantitative immunofluorescence for each marker. HER2 was tested with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) and preliminary results were available for 698 of nearly 1400 pt specimens to be tested. The minimum value per pt was used in statistical analysis. Specimens were classified with high versus low expression based on a median value cutpoint for each marker. Median follow-up was 7.0 yrs. Results: Quantitative HER2 was compared with centrally performed HER2 testing by IHC and FISH. Median quantitative HER2 via AQUA was 10,017 units for the HER2 IHC 3+ group (n=607) versus 1058, 831, and 970 for the HER2 IHC 2+ (n=68), 1+ (n=11), and 0 (n=11) groups, respectively. The Spearman correlation between quantitative HER2 and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio was 0.32 (p<0.001). High quantitative HER2 was associated with lower percentage of hormone receptor positivity (48% vs 59%, chi-sq p=0.003) but not associated with age, race, nodal positivity, tumor histology, grade, or size. High HER2 did not impact DFS in any arm of the study (See Table). Data for additional HER2 testing, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN are in process and will be ready by September, 2011. Conclusions: Similar to results based on standard HER2 testing by IHC and FISH in N9831, quantitative HER2 did not impact benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Results for additional markers will be presented. Our complete quantitative results for a second epitope on HER2, HER3, HER4, ER and EGFR will be the first report of these markers in a large patient cohort in the adjuvant setting. Disease Free Survival Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-03.