Hawse, JR

Abstract Background: Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, and usually managed by extrapolation from female breast cancer. We report on the characteristics and survival outcomes of MBC patients from Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR). Methods: Medical records of MBC patients treated at MCR during a 25-year period (1990-2015) were reviewed. Demographic variables, tumor characteristics, recurrences, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression was used to identify predictors of OS. Results: One hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 58 months after diagnosis. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. Eighty percent of patients with ER-positive tumors received endocrine therapy. Among men with stage I-III disease, approximately 90% underwent mastectomy, and 44% received adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year locoregional and distant recurrence rates for patients with stage I-III disease were 4.4% and 21.5%, respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS for patients with stage I-III disease were 65.5% and 80.1%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis assessing predictors of OS in patients with stage I-III disease, older age (HR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02 – 1.09), stage II (HR 11.06; 95% CI: 3.84 – 31.85) or stage III disease (HR 14.74; 95% CI (3.99 – 54.45), and omission of surgery (HR 45.33; 95% CI: 3.97 – 517.32) were associated with poorer OS, while endocrine therapy (HR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.09 – 0.51) was associated with better OS. ER, PR, HER2 and grade were not independently prognostic. The median OS for stage IV patients was 10 months, though this 11-man cohort was too small to allow assessment of prognostic factors in advanced male breast cancer. Conclusions: MBC remains an understudied condition. Prognostic factors in this stage I-III disease are consistent with those identified in other MBC retrospective cohorts. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the unique clinical features of MBC, and to improve outcomes, particularly for advanced disease. Table 1:Baseline characteristics N=167 Median age at diagnosis (Years)64.4 Ethnicity/Race: Caucasian131 (78.4%)African American4 (2.4%)Other or unknown32 (19.2%) Overall AJCC 7th edition stage: Stage I39 (23.4%)Stage II80 (47.9%)Stage III32 (19.2%)Stage IV11 (6.6%)Unknown5 (3.0%) Grade: 18 (4.8%)247 (28.1%)3101 (60.5%)Unknown12 (7.1%) ER status: Negative8 (4.8%)Positive153 (91.6%)Unknown6 (3.6%) PR status: Negative17 (10.2%)Positive141 (84.4%)Unknown9 (5.4%) HER-2 status: Negative70 (41.9%)Positive12 (7.2%)Unknown85 (50.9%) Citation Format: Yadav S, Leon-Ferre RA, Jimenez RE, Hawse JR, Hieken TJ, Couch FJ, Boughey JC, Ruddy KJ. Clinical characteristics and survival of patients with male breast cancer: The Mayo Clinic experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-19-05.

Abstract Background: Despite the prevalent treatment options for ERα-positive breast cancer patients, and their initial efficacy for many women, ERα-positive disease still accounts for more breast cancer related deaths than any other subtype. Relapse in these patients is largely due to the development of resistance to anti-estrogen therapies such as tamoxifen. While tamoxifen and its resistance mechanisms have been extensively studied from both the bench and the bedside, relatively little is known about its active metabolite endoxifen. Our group has provided evidence that endoxifen is the most potent and clinically relevant metabolite of tamoxifen, suggesting that its characterization may be crucial to understanding tamoxifen resistance. Methods: We have developed novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 and T47D cell lines through chronic exposure to endoxifen during a period of 12-24 months. Using these models and their respective controls, we compared global gene expression profiles of endoxifen resistant cells to tamoxifen resistant cells and found marked differences between the two models. Additionally, we subjected treatment naïve cells to a genome-wide, CRISPR-mediated knockout screen to identify genes, and their associated pathways, that are likely involved in mediating endoxifen resistance. Results: Analysis of CRISPR guide RNAs enriched or depleted in response to chronic endoxifen treatment revealed that disruption of genes regulated by dexamethasone (Dex), a potent glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist, enhanced cells' ability to survive and proliferate in the presence of endoxifen. These data suggest that GR activation may inhibit endoxifen resistance, and that treatment of resistant cells with Dex may restore endoxifen efficacy. Indeed, Dex treatment significantly inhibited the proliferation rates of endoxifen resistant cells by 50-60% with little to no inhibitory effects in endoxifen sensitive models. Further, Dex was shown to synergize with endoxifen in resistant cells to further suppress cell proliferation, implying that Dex treatment could be utilized as an effective therapy for endocrine resistant disease. Conditioned media harvested from cells chronically exposed to Dex also resulted in substantial inhibition of endoxifen resistant cell proliferation rates. To explore potential mechanisms of these effects, we performed RNA-seq on both treatment-naïve and endoxifen resistant cells following Dex treatment. Out of 246 genes significantly regulated by Dex in endoxifen resistant cells, we identified 61 genes that were not differentially regulated in treatment naïve cells. These genes may provide insights into the mechanisms of GR activity specific to endoxifen resistant cells. Conclusions: To our knowledge, we have developed the first models of endoxifen resistance and have demonstrated that global transcriptomic changes that occur during this process are substantially different than those observed in tamoxifen resistant models. We have shown that activation of GR signaling elicits significant growth-inhibitory effects specifically in the setting of endoxifen resistance. These data identify the GR pathway as a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of endocrine resistant breast cancer. Citation Format: Jones CJ, Goetz MP, Ingle JN, Hawse JR. Glucocorticoid receptor activation inhibits proliferation of endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells and resensitizes cells to hormonal therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-05.

Abstract Background: The primary mechanism by which tamoxifen (Tam) and its metabolites exert their biologic effects is through estrogen receptor (ER) binding and inhibition of ER signaling. We and others demonstrated that endoxifen (Endx) has greater antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo compared to Tam and the first-in-human Endx phase I study demonstrated its antitumor activity in patients with prior progression on Tam (Goetz SABC 2015). PKCs are a family of serine/threonine-specific protein kinases that regulate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation. Our prior protein docking studies suggested endoxifen may be a substrate for PKCs. Here we report the effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 binding, kinase activity, as well as interactions between PKCβ1 and ERα. Methods: Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR, Biacore T200, GE Healthcare) was used to evaluate binding of Tam, N-desmethyl Tam (NDMT), 4-HT, and Endx to PKCβ1 and PKCβ2. The effects of Tam and Endx on PKCβ1 kinase activity were determined. Proliferation and colony formation in MCF7 parental and PKCβ1 overexpressing cells were evaluated. siRNA silencing was used to knockdown PKCβ1 expression in the following cells: MCF7 aromatase expressing cells that were either sensitive (MCF7/AC1) or resistant to letrozole (MCF7/AC1 L-resistant); T47D; and MDA-MB-361. Coimmunoprecipitation assay and DUOlink in situ proximity ligation were used to investigate the interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα. Results: Endx more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to Tam ( IC50 350 nM vs 47.8 μM ) with KDs for PKCβ1 binding as follows: Endx (100 nM ), Tam ( 2 μM ), 4-HT ( 2 μM ) and NDMT (> 7 μM ). None of the SERMs exhibited PKCβ2 binding. In the MCF7/AC1 and MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, PKCβ1 knockdown resulted in ERα degradation and potently inhibited cell proliferation. These results were confirmed in T47D and MDA-MB-361 cells. Notably, PKCβ1 knockdown in MCF7/AC1 cells resulted in significantly greater E2 induced proliferation comparing siRNA knockdown vs. control. To further explore these effects, we evaluated the effects of PKCβ1 overexpression in MCF7 cells and demonstrated that PKCβ1 overexpression reduced cell proliferation and colony formation compared to parental MCF-7 cells without affecting ERα protein stability. Coimmunoprecipitation assays in transient transfected MCF-7 cells with exogenous PKCβ1 as well as PKCβ1 expressing MDA-MB-231 cells transiently or stably transfected with ERα demonstrated PKCβ1 and ERα interaction, with confirmation by Duolink assay that this interaction occurs in the cytoplasm. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that endoxifen binds and inhibits PKCβ1 at relevant concentrations achieved in the endoxifen clinical trial studies. PKCβ1 interacts with cytoplasmic ERα and PKCβ1 knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and enhances ERα turnover. However, in PKCβ1 overexpressing cells, PKCβ1 may exhibit tumor suppressive effects. These data suggest a complex interaction between PKCβ1 and ERα and that endoxifen's effects on PKCβ1 may alter drug response of endocrine therapy. Further studies are ongoing to characterize the role of PKCβ1 and its role in ER biology and response to endoxifen. Citation Format: Guo C, Kuffel MJ, Kudgus RA, Huang Z, Bode AM, Cheng J, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Bruinsma ES, Subramaniam M, Ames MM, Hawse JR, Goetz MP. Identification and characterization of a novel endoxifen substrate, PKCβ1, and its interaction with the estrogen receptor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-03.

Abstract Background: AI's are more effective than TAM in ER+ breast cancer. In AI refractory MBC, the response rate to TAM is 0% (Osborne 2011). Z-Endx is an active metabolite of TAM and among TAM treated women in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, reduced CYP2D6 metabolism and low Endx concentrations (Css <20 nM) have been associated with increased likelihood of disease recurrence. Preclinical studies have demonstrated greater Z-Endx exposure and anti-tumor activity with oral Z-Endx compared to equivalent doses of oral TAM (Reid 2014) Methods: We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Z-Endx in patients (pts) with ER+, AI refractory MBC. Unlimited prior endocrine regimens were allowed. An accelerated titration schedule was applied (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, followed by a 3+3 design and then to expansion cohorts (40, 80, and 100 mg/day). Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, and end of cycles 2 and 6. PK was performed during cycle 1 and prior to subsequent cycles. For pts in the expansion cohorts, tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline for DNA sequencing (Foundation Medicine). Plasma cholesterol levels were obtained at baseline and after 1 cycle. Results: From March 2011 to Dec 2014, 41 pts (38 evaluable), median age 60, received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (20-160 mg/daily). The median number of prior hormonal regimens was 2 and 3 for the dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Dose escalation was stopped at 160 mg/day given MTD not reached and attainment of mean Endx Css of 3.6 uM. Cycle 1 DLT (PE) was observed in one patient (60 mg). No eye toxicity was observed. PK demonstrated mean Endx Css of > 1 uM at all dose levels ≥ 40 mg/day. Antitumor activity was observed at multiple dose levels including 3 confirmed partial responses and an additional 7 with stable disease for ≥6 cycles. Of these 10 pts, 9 had prior progression on both AI and fulvestrant and 3 additionally on TAM. After 1 cycle, total and LDL cholesterol decreased > 20 points in 54% and 40% of pts, respectively. Tumor sequencing in the expansion cohorts (n=14) did not identify ESR1 mutations; however, ESR1 amplification was identified in 1 pt with prolonged stable disease (>200 days). Of 6 pts with rapid progression (≤2 cycles), 4/6 had either CCND1 amplification (n=1) or at least one of the following activating mutations: ERBB2 L755S (n=1), AKT1 E17K (n=1), MTOR E1799K (n=1). Conclusions: The direct administration of Z-END provides substantial drug exposure, acceptable toxicity, and "proof of principle" antitumor activity in endocrine resistant MBC. While the MTD was not determined, the goal of achieving Endx Css concentrations of > 1 uM was achieved. Tumor sequencing identified pts with predicted and confirmed endocrine resistance. A randomized phase II comparing endoxifen (80 mg/day) with TAM in AI refractory MBC was recently activated (NCT02311933). Supported in part by CA 133049, CA186686, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Citation Format: Goetz MP, Suman VJ, Reid JM, Northfelt DW, Mahr MA, Dockter T, Kuffel M, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, McGovern RM, Collins JM, Streicher H, Hawse JR, Haddad TC, Erlichman C, Ames MM, Ingle JN. Final results of a first-in-human phase I study of the tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, Z-Endoxifen hydrochloride (Z-Endx) in women with aromatase inhibitor (AI) refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01327781). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.

Abstract Background: In AI refractory MBC, TAM anti-tumor activity is limited (median PFS 4.5 months). In patients (pts) receiving TAM in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, breast cancer recurrence has been shown to differ based upon CYP2D6 genotype and Endx exposure. In collaboration with NCI, Z-Endx (NSC #750393) was synthesized and preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that oral Z- Endx resulted in > 20 fold Endx exposure compared to an equivalent dose of TAM and significantly greater anti-tumor activity than TAM in AI sensitive and resistant MCF7 xenografts. We conducted a phase I study of Z-Endx in women with ER+, AI refractory MBC to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and a dose associated with steady state concentrations (Css) of ≥ 2 uM, based on the IC50 of recently identified Endx substrates: PKC and PI3K. Methods: Pts were enrolled to an accelerated titration schedule (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, and then to a 3+3 design. Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, end of cycle 2, and after 6 cycles. PK was performed on days 1-2, 3, 7, 14, and 28, and prior to subsequent cycles. Results: 23 women with AI refractory MBC (median 56 yrs, range 41-83) received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (Table 1). The median number of prior chemotherapies and hormonal therapies in the metastatic setting were 2 and 2, respectively. Dose escalation continues at 160 mg/day and the MTD has yet to be determined. Cmax and AUC increased in a dose-dependent manner. A 20 and 100 mg/day dose yields Css of 0.39 and 2.48 uM, respectively. Significant anti-tumor activity was observed including 1 pt (100 mg/day) with a PR lasting 225 days; 1 pt (80 mg/day) with a 30% reduction in tumor size (PFS 169 days) and 2 pts (60 and 80 mg/day) with stable disease for >270 days. No eye toxicity was observed. Conclusions: In women with AI refractory MBC, the MTD of Z-Endx HCl has not been determined but Endx Css concentrations of > 2 uM and substantial anti-tumor activity has been observed. Following completion of the 160 mg/day dose, expansion at 20 and 100 mg/day will commence to perform translational studies and further characterize Endx pk. A randomized phase II examining two different doses of Z-Endx is planned in AI refractory MBC. Supported in part by CA 133049, CA69912, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Table 1Dose Level (mg/day)Number of Treatment CyclesModerate or Severe Toxicities ReportedTumor ResponseProgression-free Survival (days)28 day Z-Endx Css (uM) 20 (n = 2)2; 3Gr 2 hot flashes (1 pt)----60; 850.39 40 (n = 2)2; 6noneStable (1 pt)61; 1670.66 60 (n = 6)1; 2; 2; 5; 8; 14Gr 4 Triglycerides (1 pt);Gr 3 thromboembolic event (1 pt); Gr 2 hot flashes, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia (1 pt)Stable (3 pts)125+; 56; 57; 132; 232; 4331.01 80 (n = 3)4; 6; 10Gr 2 hot flashesStable (3 pts)113; 169; 2961.61 100 (n = 3)1; 2; 8Gr 2 nausea (1 pt); Gr 2 irritability (1 pt)PR (1 pt)30; 56; 2252.48 120 (n = 3)1; 2; 4Gr 2 hypersomnia, paresthesia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (1 pt)—39; 54; 1082.18 * Bold face toxicities occurred during cycle 1 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD3-4.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

Abstract Background: Endoxifen (Endx) is being developed as a drug for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer (BC). We previously demonstrated that Endx was superior to TAM in both a letrozole (L) sensitive and resistant MCF7/AC1 model. Tamoxifen (TAM) and its most commonly studied metabolite, 4-hydroxy TAM (4HT), are known to activate critical ER co-regulators such as SRC3, which are oncogenic, and contribute to acquired and de novo endocrine resistance. While both Endx and 4HT are more potent inhibitors of genomic ERα functions compared to TAM, the effects of Endx on non-genomic signaling have not been characterized and its efficacy as an anti-cancer agent compared to RAD001 in AI resistant BC is unknown. Methods: We evaluated the 1 hour in vitro effects of TAM, 4HT, Endx, and L, in terms of activation of multiple signaling cascades using an MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells and long term estrogen deprived (LTED) cells (MDA 361 and ZR75). Protein Docking studies (shape screening, pharmacophore modeling and ligand-protein docking) for oncogenic kinases, and their associated IC50's were determined for TAM and Endx. The in vivo activity of Endx (50 mg/kg, oral) was determined in MCF/AC1 L-resistant xenograft tumors and compared with L control (10 ug/day, sc), Exemestane (E) (250 ug/d, sc) and E+RAD001 (2.5 mg/kg/d, oral). Results: In MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, 1 hr treatment with either TAM (100 nM or 5 uM) or 4HT (100 nM or 5 uM) phosphorylated SRC3 (AIB1) and resulted in downstream activation (phosphorylation) of IGF1R, PDK1, AKT, and p70S6K. In contrast, Endx (100 nM and 5 uM) did not phosphorylate SRC3 nor any downstream kinases but resulted in a dose dependent decrease in AKT phosphorylation. Similar findings were observed in LTED cells MDA 361 and ZR75. Docking studies identified a significant decrease in the binding energy (>2 kcal/mol) of Endx compared to TAM for PKC and PI3K and subsequent kinase profiling demonstrated that Endx more potently inhibits PKCβ1 (IC50 357nM) and PI3KΔ (2.5uM) compared to TAM (IC50 4.8μM and 6.2μM respectively). Therefore, we evaluated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of Endx with E and E+RAD001 in MCF7 L-resistant xenograft tumors. After 9 weeks, the% change in tumor volume relative to baseline was significantly lower for both Endx (median -34%, p = 0.0002) and E+RAD001 (median +1.5%, p = 0.0002) as compared to L controls (median +301%). In contrast, E alone was non-significantly lower (median +172%, (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed comparing Endx and E+RAD001 (p = 0.56). Conclusions: Endx inhibits PKCβ1 and PI3KΔ at concentrations that are pharmacologically relevant, and unlike TAM and 4HT, does not activate SRC3 nor induce oncogenic signaling pathways in AI resistant cells. Importantly, Endx elicits substantial anti-tumor effects in AI resistant models that are similar to the current standard of care of E+RAD001. These data suggest that Endx may be superior to TAM for the treatment of ER+ BC and may result in clinical benefit for patients with AI resistant disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-09-08.

Abstract Background: Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We and others have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-cancer effects of this drug and that endoxifen concentrations are an important factor with regard to tamoxifen efficacy. These studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which phase I clinical trials are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast gene expression profiles were compared to that of estrogen, tamoxifen, raloxifene and lasofoxifene by microarray and RT-PCR analyses in both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ expressing cell lines. The in vivo effects of an anti-cancer dose of endoxifen (50mg/kg/day) on the skeleton were first analyzed in 3-month-old ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, micro-Computed Tomography and histomorphometry. In a second set of studies, a pre-clinical rat model was used to determine the effects of endoxifen (10mg/kg/day) on the skeleton in both a pre- and post-menopausal setting. Results: Endoxifen treatment of ERα and ERβ expressing mouse osteoblast cells led to dramatically different gene expression profiles when compared to that of estrogen and other anti-estrogens. In ovariectomized mice, daily administration of endoxifen led to significant increases in bone mineral density and content throughout the skeleton relative to vehicle control treated animals. The numbers and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts were also found to be significantly higher in endoxifen treated mice. In the pre-clinical model system, endoxifen treatment of 4 month-old ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats significantly protected against bone loss following estrogen depletion primarily due to suppression of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Importantly, in sham operated rats (thus retaining ovarian function), endoxifen treatment enhanced bone volume and trabecular thickness and did not suppress osteoclast activity. Conclusions: These data are the first to examine the effects of the novel breast cancer therapy, endoxifen, on bone and reveal that the molecular mechanisms of action of this compound are substantially different than that of other SERMs. Endoxifen was shown to protect against bone loss following estrogen depletion in both mice and rats and interestingly, enhanced bone mass in ovary intact rats, an observation that is in stark contrast to the known effects of tamoxifen which induces bone loss in the “pre-menopausal” setting. These studies suggest that endoxifen may have superior bone-beneficial effects compared to tamoxifen, and if efficacy is confirmed in later phase trials, endoxifen may represent a better drug of choice for a sub-set of breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-05-01.

Abstract Background The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively; yet, much less is known about full-length ERβ (ERβ1) and even less about its 4 variant forms (ERβ2-5). We have recently implicated a role for ERβ1 in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to anti-estrogens. However, the ability of ERβ2-5 to modulate ERα and ERβ1 activity, and their association with cancer development, progression, and response to estradiol (E2) and anti-estrogens are not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that the presence of ERβ variants may be of diagnostic and clinical relevance for breast cancer patients and describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody (MC10) that is able to detect their expression in tumor biopsies. Methods: Transient transfection and luciferase assays were used to determine the transcriptional activity of ERβ2-5 in response to E2 and anti-estrogens alone or in combination with ERα and ERβ1. A novel monoclonal antibody targeting all ERβ variants (MC10) was developed and characterized. The sub-cellular localization of ERβ2-5 was determined via confocal microscopy. Finally, the MC10 antibody was used to assess ERβ positivity in breast tumors and was compared to that of another monoclonal antibody which only detects ERβ1. Results: Unlike ERβ1, ERβ2-5 do not activate an estrogen response element (ERE) in response to E2 and instead, slightly repress the activity of this reporter construct. Expression of ERβ2-5 does not significantly alter the transcriptional activity of ERβ1 following E2 treatment. However, ERβ2, 3 and 5, but not ERβ4, significantly enhance the E2-induced transcriptional activity of ERα. Interestingly, expression of ERβ3, 4 and 5, but not ERβ2, enhance the ability of anti-estrogens to block ERα mediated transcriptional activity. Confocal microscopy revealed that ERβ1 and 2 are almost exclusively localized to the cell nucleus. However, ERβ3-5 exhibit significant cytoplasmic and peri-nuclear localization. Immunohistochemistry of breast cancer biopsies using the MC10 antibody revealed multiple staining patterns including tumors which exhibit primarily nuclear staining and others primarily cytoplasmic, both in the presence and absence of ERα. These results are in contrast to the almost exclusive nuclear staining obtained on the same tumors with an ERβ1-specific antibody. Conclusions: ERβ variants exhibit variable sub-cellular localization patterns and can influence the function of ERα, both in response to E2 and anti-estrogens. Therefore, the differential expression of ERβ variants and their cellular localization may influence breast cancer progression and/or therapeutic responses. The use of ERβ antibodies which do not detect all ERβ variants, or the use of a single ERβ antibody which does not discriminate between ERβ1 and its variants, is unlikely to reveal the complete biological significance of total ERβ expression in breast cancer and may in part explain the conflicting studies which have been reported for ERβ in the field. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-03.

Abstract Background Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We have recently demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite with regard to inhibiting the growth of ERα+ breast cancer cells and these studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which first-in-human studies are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast (OB) and osteoclast (OC) maturation and gene expression were monitored by cell differentiation assays and real-time PCR. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) and micro-Computed Tomography (μCT) were used to determine changes in bone density, mass and architecture following 45 days of oral endoxifen administration (50mg/kg/day) to 3-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) C57BL/6 mice relative to vehicle control treated animals. Alterations in the numbers and activity of OBs and OCs were determined by histomorphometry and serum levels of P1NP and CTX-1 respectively. Results: Endoxifen treatment of mouse derived bone marrow stromal cells and human OBs led to significant increases in the expression of critical bone marker genes such as Runx2, osterix, osteocalcin, osteoprotegerin and alkaline phosphatase in a dose dependent manner. Daily administration of endoxifen to OVX mice led to significant increases in total body bone mineral density (BMD) (6%) and content (BMC) (9%), which was accompanied by a 50% decrease in fat tissue mass as determined by DXA. pQCT analysis of the tibial metaphysis revealed dramatic increases in BMD (35%) and BMC (20%), as well as trabecular density (52%), cortical content (62%), cortical area (60%) and cortical thickness (78%). μCT analysis of the femoral metaphysis revealed increases in bone volume/total volume (200%), trabecular number (38%) and trabecular thickness (18%), as well as decreased trabecular spacing (29%). Interestingly, there was nearly a 50% increase in the numbers of OCs derived from endoxifen treated mice which was associated with elevated expression of OC marker genes such as NFATcl, RANK, c-fms and cathepsin-K compared to control treated animals. Approximately 4 times as many OBs and OCs were observed on the bone surfaces of endoxifen treated mice which correlated with nearly 2-fold increases in serum levels of the bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (CTX-1) markers. Conclusions: These data are the first to demonstrate that endoxifen has anabolic effects on the mouse skeleton which are similar to that of estrogen. Additionally, these data reveal that endoxifen's mechanism of action in bone is different than that reported for tamoxifen and other selective estrogen receptor modulators in mice as it increases, rather than decreases, bone formation and remodeling. Therefore, the use of endoxifen for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer may avoid the detrimental skeletal effects of many conventional endocrine therapies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-09.