Brown, Paul D.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: TTFields are electric fields that disrupt processes necessary for cancer cell survival and can stimulate an antitumor immune response in preclinical NSCLC models. TTFields therapy is a noninvasive and locoregional treatment approved for glioblastoma, which has recently demonstrated a survival benefit when applied to the thorax with standard of care (SOC) systemic therapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC that progressed on/after platinum. Here we describe the pivotal METIS study (EF-25, NCT02831959) evaluating the efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy applied to brain metastases from NSCLC. TRIAL DESIGN: Patients (270) with 1–10 brain metastases from NSCLC will receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), followed by 1:1 randomization to TTFields (NovoTTF-200M [150 kHz] applied to the head ≥ 18 h/day) with best SOC, or best SOC alone. Key inclusion criteria are life expectancy ≥ 3 months, a new diagnosis of 1 inoperable or 2–10 supra and/or infratentorial brain metastases from NSCLC, that are amenable to SRS. Patients who had prior whole brain radiotherapy, or have single operable, leptomeningeal, or recurrent brain metastases, certain genetic mutations, or severe comorbidities or contraindications, are not eligible. The primary endpoint is time to first intracranial progression. Secondary endpoints include time to neurocognitive failure, overall survival, radiological response rate, time to second intracranial progression, time to first/second intracranial progression by modified RECIST v1.1, rate of intracranial progression, time to distant progression, rate of cognitive decline, quality of life, neurocognitive failure-free survival, and safety. The study is powered at 80% (2-sided alpha of 0.05) to detect a hazard ratio of 0.57. In July 2021, an independent Data Monitoring Committee reviewed the study data and recommended continuation. The study includes 128 sites in Europe, Israel, mainland China, North America, and Hong Kong. The final patient was enrolled in March 2023.

Abstract OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the hemorrhagic risk of melanoma brain metastases following SRS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using a prospective institutional database between 1990 and 2021. Lesional hemorrhage was categorized as definite or possible, and hemorrhage severity was graded using CTCAE. RESULTS The study identified 291 patients with 1083 lesions. The mean age of patients was 60 ± 15 years, with 61% being male. Median follow-up was 11 months, corresponding to 581 patient-years. Among the patients, 82 (28%) experienced 135 lesional hemorrhages (13%). Of these, 88 lesions in 61 patients were grade 1-2 hemorrhages, 42 lesions in 25 patients were grade 3, and five lesions in five patients progressed from grade 1 to 3. Surgical intervention was required for 17 lesions (2%) in 16 patients (5%). Lesional hemorrhage was associated with radiosurgery performed between 2015 and 2021 (OR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.231-0.60; p < 0.001), increasing marginal dose (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; p = 0.017), antiplatelet use (OR, 0.192; 95% CI, 0.082-0.45; p < 0.001), and WBRT (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.330-0.77; p = 0.0017). The cumulative lesional hemorrhage risk reached 17–20% at 36 months following radiosurgery, with 95-96% of hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Median OS was 11 months (95% CI, 9-13 months). Patients who received radiosurgery between 2015 and 2021 exhibited a median OS of 17 months (95% CI, 10-24 months; p < 0.001), while those without hemorrhage had a median OS of 12 months (95% CI, 10-14 months; p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS Definitive hemorrhage risk was 17% for melanoma brain metastases after SRS within the first three years, with 95% of lesional hemorrhages occurring within the initial year. Surgical intervention was necessary in 5% of patients. Hemorrhage risk and overall survival improved after 2015.

Abstract PURPOSE Previous analysis of NRG-CC001 suggested pre-treatment WMI volume was a significant imaging-biomarker predictor of post-treatment neurocognitive decline at 4-and 12-months following HA-WBRT+Memantine. This suggested patients with greater pre-treatment WMI were more susceptible to neurocognitive decline, specifically when undergoing HA-WBRT, but not standard-WBRT. The current analysis examined the relationship between changes in MR-determined WMI and NCF 6-months following WBRT+memantine+/-HA. METHODS NCF-testing was performed at baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months post-WBRT, and included Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised (HVLT-R), Trail Making Test (TMT) Parts A and B, and Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA). Pre-treatment WMI was measured by FLAIR-volume corrected for whole brain volume and corrected for the FLAIR volume associated with metastases (met vol) (FLAIR-volume/(whole brain volume–met-vol). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the correlation between pre-treatment WMI and change from baseline to 6-months for each standardized NCF score. RESULTS Of the 518 randomized patients, 443 (217 patients WBRT+Memantine and 226 HA-WBRT+Memantine) had WMI data available at baseline, and of those, 162 patients (89 patients WBRT+Memantine and 73 HA-WBRT+Memantine) had both baseline and 6-month imaging available. For these patients, there was only a trend toward significance for change in corrected FLAIR-volume from baseline to 6-months (p = 0.174) but no significant change in met-vol (p = 0.438) or whole brain volume (p = 0.977). The change in standardized TMT Part A and B and the change in composite 6-month change scores were moderately correlated with change in corrected FLAIR volume adjusted for met-vol but only in the WBRT+Memantine arm (rho=-0.35, -0.34, -0.39 and p-value = 0.003, 0.006, 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite an increase in post-WBRT MR-WMI at 6-months, analysis did not show strong correlation between NCF and MR-WMI as determined by FLAIR-volume change between baseline and 6-months. Similar analyses are underway for the NRG-CC003 imaging data.

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniopharyngiomas, primary brain tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, can cause significant clinical sequelae. Treatment using surgery, radiation, or both often entails significant morbidity. In prior work, we demonstrated that ninety-five percent of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) harbor BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). In this multicenter National Cancer Institute cooperative group trial (Alliance A071601), we evaluated the safety and efficacy of BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with PCP without prior irradiation. METHODS Eligible patients, with measurable disease and whose PCP screened positively for BRAF mutations, without prior radiation, received the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib/cobimetinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint of objective response rate at 4 months based on centrally determined volumetric data was evaluated in 16 patients on this single arm phase 2 trial. RESULTS Based on volumetric response criteria by central radiology review, 15 of 16 patients (94%; 95% CI: 70% to 100%) had a durable objective partial response to therapy. Thus, this study met primary endpoint for overall response rate. The median tumor reduction was 91% (range of 68% to 99%). Median follow-up was 22 months (95% CI: 19 to 30 months) and median number of treatment cycles was 8. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were not yet reached. Three patients progressed during follow-up after therapy was discontinued; none have died. The sole non-responder stopped treatment after eight days due to toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities at least possibly related to treatment occurred in 12 patients (rash in 6 patients). Grade 4 toxicities were observed in two patients: hyperglycemia (n=1) and increased creatine phosphokinase (n=1). Three patients discontinued treatment for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Our study indicates that BRAF/MEK inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for PCP without prior irradiation. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180868 (NRG); Genentech; . ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03224767.

Abstract PURPOSE Hippocampal volume (HV) is a predictor of neurocognitive function (NCF) in neurodegenerative disease. The role of patient-specific anatomic variables has not been well investigated in patients with brain metastases. This work aimed to evaluate HV at baseline and 6 months as a predictor of NCF and differential benefit from HA-WBRT for patients enrolled on CC001. MATERIALS HV was calculated at baseline and 6 months. HV at baseline and 6 months were correlated with baseline and 2, 4, and 6-month NCF scores (HVLT-R Total and Delayed Recall, Delayed Recognition, TMT Parts A and B, and COWA) using Pearson correlation. Correlation was defined as weak if ρ ≤0.35. A cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of baseline HV on time to NCF failure. RESULTS Of 518 patients randomized on CC001, 277 had baseline imaging, and 135 had 6-month imaging. However, only 87 patients were analyzable at both baseline and 6-month periods. At baseline, HV was not significantly associated with NCF score for any measure (p-value range: 0.06-0.72). Additionally, there was no association between baseline HV and time to NCF failure (p = 0.16). Additionally, the impact of treatment arm allocation on HV was examined but found to be non-significant (p = 0.06). Lastly, baseline HV and NCF scores were noted to have weak correlation at 2, 4, 6, and 12 month timepoints (ρ: range, -0.17-0.15; P-value range, 0.04-0.98). At 6 months, the correlation between HV, baseline NCF change, and 6 month standardized NCF change were also noted to be weak (ρ: range, 0.05-0.16; P-value range, 0.06-0.76). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy is known to have deleterious effects on neurocognition. In neurodegenerative disease, HV and rate of HV change are known predictors for NCF. However, baseline HV is not an independent predictor of neurocognitive changes after WBRT or HA-WBRT for patients with brain metastases.

Abstract Stereotactic radiation therapy yields high rates of local control for brain metastases, but patients in rural or suburban areas face geographic and socioeconomic barriers to its access. We conducted a phase II clinical trial of frameless, fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases in an integrated academic satellite network for patients 18 years of age or older with 4 or fewer brain metastases. Dose was based on gross tumor volume: less than 3.0 cm, 27 Gy in 3 fractions and 3.0 to 3.9 cm, 30 Gy in 5 fractions. Median follow-up was 10 months for 73 evaluable patients, with a median age of 68 years. Median intracranial progression-free survival was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval = 5.3 to not reached), and median survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval = 5.4 to not reached); there were no serious adverse events. Outcomes of this trial compare favorably with contemporary trials, and this treatment strategy provides opportunities to expand stereotactic radiation therapy access to underserved populations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Schwannomas originating from the lower cranial nerves (LCNS) are rare and pose a significant surgical challenge. Resection is the mainstay treatment; however, risk of treatment morbidity is considerable, and the available literature regarding differential treatment outcomes in this vulnerable population is sparse. METHODS: A single-institution cohort study and systematic literature review of LCNS were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included: 34 underwent surgical resection and 24 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 17-74). Presenting symptoms were dysphagia (63%), dysarthria/hypophonia (47%), imbalance (33%), and hearing loss/tinnitus (30%). Tumor size was associated with surgical resection, as compared with initial SRS (4.1 cm vs 1.5 cm, P = .0001). Gross total resection was obtained in 52%, with tumor remnants predominantly localized to the jugular foramen (62%). Post-treatment worsening of symptoms occurred in 68% of surgical and 29% of SRS patients ( P = .003). Postoperative symptoms were mostly commonly hypophonia/hoarseness (63%) and dysphagia (59%). Seven patients (29%) had new neurological issues after SRS treatment, but symptoms were overall milder. The median follow-up was 60 months (range 12-252); 98% demonstrated meaningful clinical improvement. Eighteen surgical patients (53%) underwent adjuvant radiation at a median of 5 months after resection (range 2-32). At follow-up, tumor control was 97% in the surgical cohort and 96% among SRS patients. CONCLUSION: Although LCNS resection is potentially morbid, most postoperative deficits are transient, and patients achieve excellent tumor control—particularly when paired with adjuvant SRS. For minimally symptomatic patients undergoing surgical intervention, we advise maximally safe resection with intracapsular dissection to preserve nerve integrity where possible. For residual or as a primary treatment modality, SRS is associated with low morbidity and high rates of long-term tumor control.

ABSTRACT Introduction Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. Methods In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma. Results The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. Conclusion Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to analyze the hemorrhagic risk of melanoma brain metastases after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS A prospective institutional database was retrospectively queried to identify patients who underwent GKRS for melanoma brain metastases between 1990 and 2021. Lesional hemorrhage was defined as definite or possible based on radiologists’ readings, and severity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-one patients with 1083 lesions treated in 419 sessions were identified. The mean (± SD) patient age was 60 ± 15 years, and 61% were male. The median follow-up period for overall survival (OS) was 11 (range 0–214) months with 581 patient-years. Definite/possible lesional hemorrhages occurred in 13% of lesions, with grade 3 hemorrhages observed in 4% of lesions. Surgical intervention was required in 2% of cases (5% of patients), and all resected lesions were pathologically consistent with melanoma. A decreased risk of definite/possible lesional hemorrhage was associated with a later time period between 2015 and 2021 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.266–0.75, p = 0.0021), increased marginal dose (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99, p = 0.037), antiplatelet use post-GKRS (OR 0.195, 95% CI 0.083–0.46, p < 0.001), and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.344–0.82, p = 0.0042). After 2015, more patients received anticoagulation, B-Raf proto-oncogene inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and fewer received bevacizumab (p < 0.001). The cumulative risk of lesional hemorrhage was 17%–20% at 36 months from GKRS, with 95%–96% of cases occurring within 12 months. The median patient OS was 11 (95% CI 9–13) months, and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that antiplatelet agents (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% CI 0.45–0.96, p = 0.031) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26–0.48, p < 0.001) were associated with longer OS, while WBRT (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.02–1.81, p = 0.037) and definite/possible hemorrhage (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04–1.85, p = 0.024) were associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS The definite hemorrhage risk of melanoma brain metastases after GKRS was 17% in the first 3 years and 95% of the lesional hemorrhage occurred within the 1st year. Surgical intervention was needed in 5% of patients. Antiplatelet agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with improved OS, while definite/possible hemorrhage was associated with worse OS.