Le, Yuan

AbstractPurposeWhile standard MR elastography (MRE) uses harmonic mechanical waves, there are some applications in which imaging and analysis of transient mechanical motion are of interest. Wavelet MRE has been developed for detecting broadband motion from transient excitation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of wavelet MRE for transient displacement detection in brain MRE applications.MethodsTransient motion was induced in a gel phantom, while MRE images were acquired using bipolar motion‐encoding gradient (MEG) at multiple frequencies (20–200 Hz). Displacements were estimated using (1) combinations of multiple MEGs forming the wavelet MRE and (2) deconvolution from a single MEG. These estimated displacements were used to calculate the MRE phase for each MEG. Correlation (r2) between the calculated and acquired phases was evaluated.Three healthy volunteers were scanned twice in a clinical scanner using wavelet MRE with an occipital impact. Time‐resolved brain translation, rotation, and maximal principal strain were calculated. Repeatability was assessed both qualitatively and through Pearson correlation.ResultsWavelet MRE outperformed standard MRE in displacement estimation, showing higher correlations between calculated and acquired phase, even with fewer phase offsets. In the volunteer study, consistent temporal motion dynamics and spatial maximal principal strain distributions across repeated scans demonstrated the repeatability of wavelet MRE.ConclusionThis study validated the accuracy and efficiency of wavelet MRE for broadband motion detection and demonstrated its feasibility and repeatability in vivo. This technique shows promise for advancing our understanding of the injury risks and mechanisms associated with sports‐related head trauma.

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the test–retest repeatability of a rapid, free‐breathing two‐dimensional (2D) MR elastography (MRE) technique and to assess the reliability of the liver‐stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold MREs. Methods Fifteen and 115 participants were enrolled in the technical repeatability and measurement equivalence assessment cohorts, respectively. All participants underwent rapid free‐breathing and conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE (twice in repeatability cohort) on 1.5T scanners. Both methods have four phase offsets over one harmonic motion cycle at 60 Hz; one and 10 cycles were collected and processed in breath‐hold and free‐breathing MREs, respectively. The liver stiffness measurements of free‐breathing (LS F ) and breath‐hold MRE (LS B ) were calculated from manually drawn regions of interest. The repeatability coefficients and Spearman correlation were used to assess technical repeatability and measurement agreement between LS F and LS B . Univariable and multivariable linear regressions were performed to identify potential influencing factors, including age, sex, body mass index, and fat fraction, in the measurement agreement between LS B and LS F . Results The repeatability coefficient of free‐breathing 2D MRE is comparable to breath‐hold MRE (LS F : 20.8%, LS B : 20.4%). LS F showed a strong agreement and significant correlation with LS B (LS F = 1.01 × LS B , ρ = 0.94, p < 0.001). The measurement agreement between LS F and LS B was only significantly affected by sex ( p = 0.047) after adjusting for confounding factors of age, body mass index, and fat fraction. Conclusions The nongated, free‐breathing, multislice 2D MRE technique can provide reliable liver stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE. It could provide a comfortable alternative method with reliable liver stiffness measurements for patients who have difficulty in suspending respiration.

AbstractPurposeTo demonstrate a novel MR elastography (MRE) technique, termed here wavelet MRE. With this technique, broadband motion sensitivity is achievable. Moreover, the true tissue displacement can be reconstructed with a simple inverse transform.MethodsA wavelet MRE sequence was developed with motion‐encoding gradients based on Haar wavelets. From the phase images' displacement was estimated using an inverse transform. Simulations were performed using a frequency sweep and a transient as ground‐truth motions. A PVC phantom was scanned using wavelet MRE and standard MRE with both transient (one and 10 cycles of 90‐Hz motion) and steady‐state dual‐frequency motion (30 and 60 Hz) for comparison. The technique was tested in a human brain, and motion trajectories were estimated for each voxel.ResultsIn simulation, the displacement information estimated from wavelet MRE closely matched the true motion. In the phantom test, the MRE phase data generated from the displacement information derived from wavelet MRE agreed well with standard MRE data. Testing of wavelet MRE to assess transient motion waveforms in the brain was successful, and the tissue motion observed was consistent with a previous study.ConclusionThe uniform and broadband frequency response of wavelet MRE makes it a promising method for imaging transient, multifrequency motion, or motion with unknown frequency content. One potential application is measuring the response of brain tissue undergoing low‐amplitude, transient vibrations as a model for the study of traumatic brain injury.