Obrzut, Marzanna

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the test–retest repeatability of a rapid, free‐breathing two‐dimensional (2D) MR elastography (MRE) technique and to assess the reliability of the liver‐stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold MREs. Methods Fifteen and 115 participants were enrolled in the technical repeatability and measurement equivalence assessment cohorts, respectively. All participants underwent rapid free‐breathing and conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE (twice in repeatability cohort) on 1.5T scanners. Both methods have four phase offsets over one harmonic motion cycle at 60 Hz; one and 10 cycles were collected and processed in breath‐hold and free‐breathing MREs, respectively. The liver stiffness measurements of free‐breathing (LS F ) and breath‐hold MRE (LS B ) were calculated from manually drawn regions of interest. The repeatability coefficients and Spearman correlation were used to assess technical repeatability and measurement agreement between LS F and LS B . Univariable and multivariable linear regressions were performed to identify potential influencing factors, including age, sex, body mass index, and fat fraction, in the measurement agreement between LS B and LS F . Results The repeatability coefficient of free‐breathing 2D MRE is comparable to breath‐hold MRE (LS F : 20.8%, LS B : 20.4%). LS F showed a strong agreement and significant correlation with LS B (LS F = 1.01 × LS B , ρ = 0.94, p < 0.001). The measurement agreement between LS F and LS B was only significantly affected by sex ( p = 0.047) after adjusting for confounding factors of age, body mass index, and fat fraction. Conclusions The nongated, free‐breathing, multislice 2D MRE technique can provide reliable liver stiffness measurements compared with conventional breath‐hold 2D MRE. It could provide a comfortable alternative method with reliable liver stiffness measurements for patients who have difficulty in suspending respiration.

AbstractMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an accurate noninvasive diagnostic tool for assessing the stiffness of parenchymal organs, including the spleen. However, this measurement may be biased due to postprandial changes in splenic stiffness. The aim of the current study was to evaluate postprandial changes in spleen stiffness assessed by MRE in a large sample of healthy volunteers. This was a prospective institutional research ethics board‐approved study. Healthy volunteers with no history of liver disease were recruited for an MRE test and blood draw from December 2018 to July 2019. Each participant underwent spleen MRE after at least 4 h of fasting and again 30 min after a 1000 kcal meal. Also, 14 randomly selected volunteers underwent additional MRE examinations at 1.5 and 2.5 h after food intake. The MRE data were acquired at 60 Hz using a 1.5‐T MRI scanner. The spleen stiffness was assessed using a weighted mean of stiffness values from regions of interest manually drawn on three to five spleen slices. Spearman's rank correlation, Wilcoxon signed‐rank, Friedman, and Mann–Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis. A total of 100 volunteers met the inclusion criteria and were eventually enrolled in this study (age 23 ± 2 years; 65 women). The mean spleen stiffness for the whole group increased by 7.9% (p < 0.001) from the mean ± SD value of 5.09 ± 0.63 (95% CI: 4.96–5.21) kPa in the fasting state to 5.47 ± 0.66 (95% CI 5.34–5.60) kPa 30 min after the meal and then gradually decreased. However, even 2 h 30 min after the meal, the spleen stiffness was higher than in the fasting state. This difference was statistically significant at p less than 0.001. It was concluded that meal intake results in a statistically significant elevation of spleen stiffness that persists for 2.5 h. This finding supports the recommendation for routine fasting for more than 2.5 h prior to assessing MRE‐based spleen stiffness.

Purpose: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has been established as the most accurate noninvasive technique for diagnosing liver fibrosis. Recent publications have suggested that the measurement of splenic stiffness is useful in setting where portal hypertension may be present. The goal of the current study was to compile normative data for MRE-assessed stiffness measurements of the spleen in young adults. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 healthy young Caucasian volunteers (65 females and 35 males) in the age range of 20 to 32 years were enrolled in this study. The participants reported no history of chronic spleen and liver disease, normal alcohol consumption, and a normal diet. The MRE data were acquired by using a 1.5 T whole-body scanner and a 2D GRE pulse sequence with 60 Hz excitation. Spleen stiffness was calculated as a weighted mean of stiffness values in the regions of interest manually drawn by the radiologist on three to five spleen slices. Results: Mean spleen stiffness was 5.09 ± 0.65 kPa for the whole group. Male volunteers had slightly higher splenic stiffness compared to females: 5.28 ± 0.78 vs. 4.98 ± 0.51 kPa, however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Spleen stiffness did not correlate with spleen fat content and liver stiffness but a statistically significant correlation with spleen volume was found. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide normative values for 2D MRE-based measurement of spleen stiffness in young adults, a basis for assessing the value of this biomarker in young patients with portal system pathologies.