Biffi, Alessandro

Background New antiamyloid therapies (AAT) for treating patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD) have become available in the past 3 years. Although AAT can be beneficial in slowing progression of AD, they also come with potentially serious side effects, particularly for patients requiring anticoagulation or thrombolysis for cardiovascular conditions. Given that most patients with AD are older and likely to have cardiovascular risk factors, there is urgent need for additional guidance for clinicians about potential risks and benefits associated with AAT for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, best practices for management of these patients, and special considerations with respect to emergency evaluation and treatment of patients on AAT who develop acute neurological symptoms. Methods The American Heart Association convened 75 multidisciplinary experts for the Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities Summit: Cardiovascular and Stroke Considerations for β‐Amyloid Immunotherapy in AD in July 2025. These experts were divided into 8 work groups to evaluate the current evidence related to AAT usage in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and conditions and develop consensus‐based guidance for clinicians. Results This statement outlines the outcomes of the Summit, including considerations for prescribers, primary care professionals, emergency personnel, and health care system stakeholders. These considerations are intended to improve identification of patients as appropriate candidates for AAT, management of patients with co‐occurring AD and cardiovascular conditions, and their emergency evaluation and treatment. The statement also includes guidance for shared decision‐making, implementation of system changes for improving dementia care, and recommendations for future research and data collection to add to the body of evidence for treating patients with concomitant AD and cardiovascular conditions. Conclusions Building on lessons learned from the establishment of stroke systems of care, the consensus‐based considerations outlined in this document can serve as a foundation for AD systems of care aimed at ensuring optimal use of these ground‐breaking therapies.

Background: Epsilon (e) variants in the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene are well-established risk factors for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (s-ICH). We tested the hypothesis that APOE-e variants are also associated with warfarin-related ICH (w-ICH) and examined interactions between APOE and warfarin. Methods: Prospective multicenter 2-stage (discovery and replication) study. ICH was classified as lobar and non-lobar based on admission head CT. In the discovery stage, w-ICH cases were matched with warfarin-exposed controls (w-controls). In replication, w-ICH cases were matched with non-warfarin controls (nw-controls). APOE was directly genotyped. Association testing was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Gene-environment interaction between APOE and warfarin was formally tested using a case only approach (combining s-ICH and w-ICH cases). Results: The discovery stage included 316 w-ICHs (43% lobar and 57% non-lobar) and 355 w-controls. Results are presented in the Table: APOE-e2 was associated with lobar and non-lobar w-ICH, and APOE-e4 was associated with lobar but not with non-lobar w-ICH. In case-only analysis, 885 s-ICHs were combined with w-ICHs (total n=1201) and no evidence of interaction between APOE and warfarin was found (all p>0.20). The replication included 63 w-ICHs (44% lobar and 56% non-lobar) and 990 nw-controls. The distribution of APOE variants was similar in w-controls (discovery) and nw-controls (replication) for both e2 (p=0.81) and e4 (p=0.88). In replication, APOE-e2 and e4 were associated with lobar but not with non-lobar w-ICH. Conclusions: APOE-e variants constitute strong risk factors for lobar w-ICH. An effect may also exist between APOE-e2 and non-lobar hemorrhages, but given the lack of replication larger sample sizes are required to properly assess this association. APOE exerts its effect independently of warfarin, although power limitations render this absence of interaction preliminary.

Objectives: Genetic and environmental influences contribute to differences in ischemic stroke phenotype across race-ethnic groups. The Causative Classification System (CSS) is an ischemic stroke phenotype characterization tool developed for etiological and causative classification. The CCS phenotypes across ethnic groups were analyzed and compared. Methods: The NINDS S troke G enetics N etwork (SiGN) is a large consortium aimed at identifying subtype-specific ischemic stroke susceptibility genes. Over 12,000 subjects at 22 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with CSS locally adjudicated. Central CCS quality control was performed on all participants. Analysis was performed on 7,674 patients with complete workups. Findings: Significant ethnic differences were found in stroke etiology across ethnic groups (p <0.0001) with large artery atherosclerosis present most commonly in Asians, cardioembolic sources among Caucasian Europeans, and lacunar strokes among African Americans. African Americans were the youngest ethnic cohort analyzed (see Table 1). Conclusion: Significant differences in stroke subtypes are present across ethnic groups. Future genetic analyses may contribute to our understanding of these differences.

Purpose: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the acute manifestation of a progressive disease of the cerebral small vessels. The severity of this disease appears to influence not only risk of ICH, but also the size of the hematoma. As the burden of high blood pressure(BP)-associated alleles is associated with hypertension-related end-organ damage, we sought to determine if this burden influences ICH admission hematoma volume (AHV). Methods: Prospective study undertaken in 441 ICH patients of European ancestry (210 deep and 231 lobar intracranial hematomas). Forty-three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to be associated with high BP were genotyped in Illumina610-Quad. Single-SNP association analyses with AHV were performed using linear regression. Subsequently, a genetic risk score was calculated as the sum of the products generated by multiplying, at each of the 43 loci, the number risk alleles times the reported effect of that allele on BP. The score was utilized as the independent variable of univariate and multivariate regression models for 2 outcomes: AHV and poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6). Principal components analysis was utilized to account for population structure. Results: Individually assessed, no single SNP was associated with AHV. In univariate linear regression, the genetic risk score was associated with AHV in all (deep and lobar) and deep locations (Figure 1), but not in lobar hemorrhages. In multivariate regression analyses, each additional standard deviation of the genetic risk score increased mean deep AHV by 21% (or 2.7-milliliter increase, beta=0.21, standard error=0.08, p=0.01) and risk poor clinical outcome by 55% (odds ratio=1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.28, p=0.03). No significant associations were observed when considering all (deep and lobar) and lobar hemorrhages. Conclusion: In deep ICH, increasing numbers of high BP-related alleles are associated with larger AHV and poor clinical outcome.

Background: Prior studies have shown an association between mutations within the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathway and familial ischemic stroke syndromes. We investigated whether common autosomal and mitochondrial genetic variants within OXPHOS genes were associated with sporadic ischemic stroke in case-control. Methods: This multicenter association study was performed using a discovery cohort of 1643 individuals and a validation cohort of 2432 individuals from sites participating in the International Stroke Genetics Consortium. We employed a gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using all 95 genes structurally involved in OXPHOS to determine the probability that the OXPHOS gene-set harbored more variants associated with stroke than predicted by chance. We then constructed a genetic score consisting of common variants within these genes. This genetic score was developed in the discovery cohort, and then tested for association with ischemic stroke in the validation cohort. Results: GSEA identified an aggregate association between the OXPHOS gene-set and ischemic stroke (p = 0.012). Based on this result, we constructed and validated a genetic score which demonstrated an association between OXPHOS genetic variation and ischemic stroke (odds ratio (OR) = 1.17, p = 0.008). In order to further distill the association between OXPHOS and stroke, we developed and tested additional scores for each of the five OXPHOS respiratory complexes. This sub-analysis revealed an independent association between OXPHOS Complex I and ischemic stroke (OR = 1.06, p = 0.050). Conclusions: This pathway-based study, informed by GSEA, employing independent discovery and validation cohorts, establishes an association between common genetic variants within OXPHOS genes and ischemic stroke. Analysis of variants within each OXHPOS Complex suggests that Complex I mediates this effect. Further studies are needed to identify the individual variants which influence ischemic stroke risk. Such discoveries offer the promise of new therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of stroke.

Background: Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) system is a novel, web-based, and fully-computerized algorithm that integrates clinical, diagnostic, and etiologic stroke characteristics in an evidence-based manner (available at http://ccs.mgh.harvard.edu ) and provides in a given patient both phenotypic subtypes where abnormal evaluation findings are simply organized in major etiologic categories and causative subtypes where abnormal evaluation findings are filtered through a decision making process to identify the most likely cause of stroke. In this study, we sought to identify the concordance between phenotypic and causative CCS subtypes in the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN). Methods: A total of 24 adjudicators from 15 US and European sites certified in CCS retrospectively determined CCS subtypes through chart review in 7134 patients. The CCS software provided causative subtypes in 3 confidence levels as “evident”, “probable” or “possible” based on the weight of causal evidence. We estimated how often CCS classified a given major abnormal evaluation finding as the causative stroke mechanism. Results: CCS assigned 55% of patients with the phenotype of moderate-to-severe atherosclerotic stenosis into the causative category of “evident large artery atherosclerosis”. Likewise, 50% of patients with a major cardiac source (such as atrial fibrillation) were classified into “evident cardio-aortic embolism”, and 74% of those with imaging evidence of a typical lacunar infarct into “evident small artery occlusion”. In 20% to 30% of patients, phenotypic and causative categories were the same but the causative subtype was assigned with a lower level of confidence. Six to 20% of patients with a given phenotypic feature were classified into a different causative category. Failure to investigate for other subtypes in the presence of a positive test finding and the presence of multiple competing etiologies were key contributors to the observed disconcordance between phenotypic and causative subtypes. Conclusions: Our findings show that the presence of a major abnormality in stroke evaluation does not necessarily mean that it is always the cause. The ability of CCS system to discriminate between phenotypic and causative characteristics of stroke etiology provides the opportunity to refine stroke phenotypes for use in research studies.

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the stroke subtype with the worst prognosis and has no established acute treatment. ICH is classified as lobar and non-lobar based on the location of the hemorrhage, with genetic variation contributing to risk of both subtypes. We report the first genome wide association study (GWAS) of this condition. Methods: The discovery phase included GWAS data (Illumina 610 or Affymetrix 6.0) from 6 ICH studies that enrolled subjects of European ancestry in the US and Europe. Cases were classified as lobar or non-lobar ICH based on head CT. ICH-free controls were selected from ambulatory clinics or by random digit dialing. Standard quality controls filters were applied and principal component analysis was used to account for population structure. Unobserved genotypes were inferred by imputation to 1000 genomes references panels. Association testing was carried out using logistic regression, assuming additive effects, and including age, gender and principal components in the model. Meta-analyses were completed using the inverse normal method, weighting by sample size. Replication of signals with p<1x10E-6 was pursued in an independent multi-ethnic study utilizing direct genotyping. Results: The discovery phase included 1545 cases (664 lobar and 881 non-lobar) and 1481 controls, and tested 5,358,103 SNPs. Two loci were identified: for lobar ICH, an intergenic region located on chromosome 12q21.1 (rs11179580: minor allele frequency [MAF] 0.22, OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.33 - 1.84; p = 6.7x10E-8); and for non-lobar ICH, a region on chromosome 1q22 encompassing the PMF1 and SLC25A44 genes (rs2984613: MAF 0.31, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.64; p = 8.9x10E-9). Replication included 1256 cases (329 whites, 506 blacks and 421 Hispanics) and 760 controls (237 whites, 346 blacks and 177 Hispanics) and confirmed both loci: 12q21.1 (p = 0.037, meta-analysis p = 2.3x10E-8) and 1q22 (p = 3.0x10E-4, meta-analysis p = 2.2x10E-11). Conclusions: Two new susceptibility loci for ICH were identified, both showing location-specificity. These results confirm the presence of biological heterogeneity across ICH subtypes and highlight that different genetic risk factors may contribute to the small vessel diseases that underlie each ICH subtype.

Objectives: Identification of gene variants of stroke subtypes is important for the development of tailored ischemic stroke therapies among various ethnic groups. Valid and reliable determination of ischemic stroke subtype is essential for achieving this goal and to standardize a classification scheme across multi-center studies and different populations. Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) is a novel computerized subclassification tool developed to improve reliability and accuracy of classifying stroke types. The CCS algorithm relies on both phenotypic and causative stroke variables. A Hispanic subset of the SiGN, an important and distinct target population with greater risk of certain stroke subtypes, was evaluated with Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and CCS and the agreement between the two classification systems was analyzed. Methods: Over 6000 subjects at 15 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with TOAST and CCS locally adjudicated. Blood collection and central data quality control (10% central readjudication) were performed on all participants. A subset of Hispanics was analyzed for the purpose of this study and the agreement between the TOAST and CCS were assessed by kappa statistic. Findings: Hispanics (n=595, 10.9%) compared to non-Hispanics (n=5457) were more likely to be younger (63.7 vs. 64.0), male (55% vs. 46%) and have fewer of the traditional stroke risk factors HTN (54% vs. 64%), Afib (11% vs. 14%), DM(23% vs. 25%), CAD(16% vs. 20%) and smoking(19% vs. 22%). While the TOAST showed no differences between stroke subtypes for Hispanic vs. non-Hispanics, in CCS, Hispanics were classified with more of large vessel (22% vs. 20%), cardioembolic (37% vs. 30%) and small vessel strokes (13% vs. 9%) and fewer with undetermined etiology (28% vs. 40%) as compared to non-Hispanics. TOAST and CCS offered moderate correlation across all stroke types in Hispanics: kappa of 0.66 for large artery atherosclerosis, 0.58 for cardioembolic, and 0.58 for small artery occlusion. Conclusion: CCS offers a more sensitive and accurate system for subphenotyping of strokes in Hispanics who tended to have relatively fewer risk factors and unclassified strokes. Further studies correlating the two classification systems and their relation to genotyping data are warranted.