Gores, Gregory J.

Background and Aims: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy arising from the biliary epithelium with limited therapeutic options and poor long-term survival rates. To address the limitations of CCA treatment, we investigated cell-targeted nanovesicles as a delivery platform for transcriptome-targeting therapeutics. Approach and Results: Milk-derived nanovesicles were loaded with short interfering RNAs targeting Yes-associated protein (YAP), the downstream effector of the Hippo pathway; LCK, an upstream regulator of YAP; and tafazzin, a protein critical for the integrity of the inner mitochondrial membrane. These transcriptome-targeting nanovesicles were decorated with a lipid-coupled RNA aptamer to epithelial cell adhesion molecule, including a tracking fluorophore. In vitro studies were conducted using multiple CCA cell lines. In vivo studies were performed using C57BL/6 and non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice to evaluate delivery and efficacy in both an immunocompetent syngeneic murine and a patient-derived xenograft model. We demonstrated that transcriptome-targeting nanovesicles were selectively taken up by liver tumor cells, which was augmented by the incorporation of a targeting aptamer, and that milk-derived nanovesicles loaded with short interfering RNA effectively downregulated target gene expression, both in vitro and in vivo. Downstream effects of target gene inhibition were observed, including downregulation of YAP-TEAD target genes and an increase in reactive oxygen species production at the mitochondrial level. Administration of transcriptome-targeting nanovesicles targeting YAP, LCK, and tafazzin inhibited CCA growth and further synergized with chemotherapy in 2 preclinical CCA models. Conclusions: Herein, we show that aptamer-directed, nanovesicle-mediated targeting of YAP, LCK, and tafazzin potentiates chemosensitivity in 2 CCA models when delivered using aptamer-guided milk-derived nanovesicles.

Background and Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the performance of UroVysion® FISH based on the different definitions of a positive result used in published literature with the goal of determining the optimal FISH definition for detecting pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Methods: A systematic literature search identified studies from database inception to Sept 2024 that evaluated the diagnostic performance of FISH in determining malignancy among patients with biliary strictures. All thresholds for positive FISH, as defined by the individual study, were included in this review. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the definitions of positive FISH as follows: (1) polysomy only; (2) polysomy, tetrasomy, or trisomy; and (3) polysomy or 9p deletion. Results: Eighteen studies comprising 2516 FISH specimens were analyzed, including 1133 (45.0%) with malignancy. Using a threshold for positivity as defined in individual studies, the overall sensitivity of FISH was 57.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4–65.4%), and the overall specificity was 87.8% (95% CI, 79.2–93.2%). Subgroup analysis showed that polysomy as the threshold for positive FISH yielded a sensitivity of 49.4% (95% CI, 43.2–55.5%), with an increased specificity of 96.2% (95% CI, 92.7–98.1%), while polysomy + tetrasomy/trisomy as positive FISH resulted in an increased sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI 55.4–72.2%) but a decreased specificity of 78.9% (95% CI 64.4–88.5%). The addition of 9p deletion to polysomy as the criteria for a positive test resulted in a non-significant increase in sensitivity (54.7% (95% CI 42.4–66.5%) while maintaining specificity (95.1% (95% CI 84.0–98.6%). Conclusions: Based on these findings, polysomy only or polysomy/9p deletion should be considered as the criterion for defining a positive FISH test to improve diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly aggressive form of liver cancer and is an increasing cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Despite its increasing incidence globally and alarming mortality, treatment options for CCA have largely remained unchanged, stressing the importance of developing new effective therapies. YAP activation is common in CCA, and its major transcriptional signaling partners are the TEAD proteins. CA3 is a small‐molecule YAP‐TEAD disrupter discovered utilizing a TEAD reporter assay. Utilizing CCA, gastric cancer cell lines, and patient‐derived xenograft models (PDX), we demonstrate that CA3 is effective in inducing cell death and delaying tumor growth in both FGFR2 fusion and wild‐type models. CA3 was associated with on‐target decreases in YAP‐TEAD target gene expression, TEAD reporter activity, and overall TEAD levels. Hippo pathway signaling was not altered as there was no change in YAP phosphorylation status in the cells exposed to CA3. RNA sequencing of gastric cancer and CCA models demonstrated upregulation of an androgen receptor–mediated transcriptional program following exposure to CA3 in five unique models tested. Consistent with this upstream regulator analysis, CA3 exposure in CCA cells was associated with increased AR protein levels, and combinatorial therapy with CA3 and androgen receptor blockade was associated with increased cancer cell death. CA3 behaves functionally as a YAP‐TEAD disrupter in the models tested and demonstrated therapeutic efficacy. Exposure to CA3 was associated with compensatory androgen receptor signaling and dual inhibition improved the therapeutic effect.

Abstract Background The authors previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI) to assist cytologists in the evaluation of digital whole‐slide images (WSIs) generated from bile duct brushing specimens. The aim of this trial was to assess the efficiency and accuracy of cytologists using a novel application with this AI tool. Methods Consecutive bile duct brushing WSIs from indeterminate strictures were obtained. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed all relevant information and provided a central interpretation for each WSI as being “positive,” “negative,” or “indeterminate.” The WSIs were then uploaded to the AI application. The AI scored each WSI as positive or negative for malignancy (i.e., computer‐aided diagnosis [CADx]). For each WSI, the AI prioritized cytologic tiles by the likelihood that malignant material was present in the tile. Via the AI, blinded cytologists reviewed all WSIs and provided interpretations (i.e., computer‐aided detection [CADe]). The diagnostic accuracies of the WSI evaluation via CADx, CADe, and the original clinical cytologic interpretation (official cytologic interpretation [OCI]) were compared. Results Of the 84 WSIs, 15 were positive, 42 were negative, and 27 were indeterminate after central review. The WSIs generated on average 141,950 tiles each. Cytologists using the AI evaluated 10.5 tiles per WSI before making an interpretation. Additionally, cytologists required an average of 84.1 s of total WSI evaluation. WSI interpretation accuracies for CADx (0.754; 95% CI, 0.622–0.859), CADe (0.807; 95% CI, 0.750–0.856), and OCI (0.807; 95% CI, 0.671–0.900) were similar. Conclusions This trial demonstrates that an AI application allows cytologists to perform a triaged review of WSIs while maintaining accuracy.

Biliary tract cancers, including cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder, and ampulla of Vater cancers, rank second among hepatobiliary cancers, known for their poor prognoses. The United States has witnessed a notable increase in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma incidence. This study examines the incidence and survival outcomes of biliary tract cancers in Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1976 to 2018. Using data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP), residents aged 20 and above were analyzed across four eras. Incidence rates were calculated and adjusted for age and sex, and temporal trends were assessed using Poisson regression. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma exhibited a significant escalation in incidence rates over time, while gallbladder cancers showed a decline among women. Median survival times for biliary tract cancers notably improved. These findings confirm the rising incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and suggest improving survival rates. Nevertheless, the overall prognosis for biliary tract cancers remains very poor, emphasizing the continual need for enhanced management strategies and further research.

Background: The epigenome, the set of modifications to DNA and associated molecules that control gene expression, cellular identity, and function, plays a major role in mediating cellular responses to outside factors. Thus, evaluation of the epigenetic state can provide insights into cellular adaptions occurring over the course of disease. Methods: We performed epigenome-wide association studies of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) using the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip. Results: We found evidence of increased epigenetic age acceleration and differences in predicted immune cell composition in patients with PSC and PBC. Epigenetic profiles demonstrated differences in predicted protein levels including increased levels of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B in patients with cirrhotic compared to noncirrhotic PSC and PBC. Epigenome-wide association studies of PSC discovered strongly associated 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′ sites in genes including vacuole membrane protein 1 and SOCS3, and epigenome-wide association studies of PBC found strong 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′ associations in genes including NOD-like receptor family CARD domain containing 5, human leukocyte antigen-E, and PSMB8. Analyses identified disease-associated canonical pathways and upstream regulators involved with immune signaling and activation of macrophages and T-cells. A comparison of PSC and PBC data found relatively little overlap at the 5′-C-phosphate-G-3′ and gene levels with slightly more overlap at the level of pathways and upstream regulators. Conclusions: This study provides insights into methylation profiles of patients that support current concepts of disease mechanisms and provide novel data to inspire future research. Studies to corroborate our findings and expand into other -omics layers will be invaluable to further our understanding of these rare diseases with the goal to improve and individualize prognosis and treatment.

Objectives: Determine whether the timing of transplantation affects patient mortality. Background: Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation have emerged as an excellent treatment option for select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the optimal timing of transplantation is not known. Methods: We reviewed all patients registered for a standardized pCCA protocol between 1996 and 2020 at our center. After adjusting for confounders, we examined the association of waiting time with patient mortality in an intention-to-treat cohort (n=392) and those who received a liver transplant (n=256). Results: The median (interquartile range) time from registration to transplant or dropout was 5.74 (3.25–7.06) months. Compared with a short wait time (0–3 mo), longer waiting times did not affect all-cause mortality: (3–6 mo) hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% CI: 0.52–1.84; (6–9 mo) HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.39–1.65; (9–12 mo) HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.26–1.22. Subgroups with a shorter waiting time had similar survival to those with long waiting times: living donor available HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.67–1.42; AB or B blood group HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.62–1.39. Longer waiting times were associated with decreased all-cause mortality after transplantation (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.87–0.97). This benefit began after a 6-month waiting time minimum (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.26–1.10) and increased further after 9 months (HR: 0.43 95% CI: 0.20–0.93). Waiting time was not associated with residual adenocarcinoma in the explant (odds ratio 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98–1.00). Conclusions: A waiting time of at least 6 months will optimize results with transplantation without affecting overall (intention-to-treat) patient survival.

Background and Aims: Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort. Approach: Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology. Results: Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%–95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Conclusions: The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.

e15146 Background: Wnt/ß-catenin signaling dysregulation is found in approximately 25% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. The impact of B-catenin activation on HCC overall survival has remained controversial. Prior studies suggest activating CTNNB1 mutations may predict for immunotherapy (IO) resistance while others did not corroborate this finding. Here we describe the clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients (pts) with CTNNB1 (+) and without CTNNB1 (-) mutations treated with novel first line IO/anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of pts with HCC who had molecular analysis performed between 2019 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida. The study was reviewed and approved by the IRB. Clinical and molecular features were compared descriptively. The primary outcomes were time to treatment failure (TTF), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to off treatment or death, and overall survival (OS), defined as time from first-line treatment initiation to death, compared between the two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 29 CTNNB1+ and 62 CTNNB1- (wt) pts with HCC. Median age at diagnosis was 66 (range 30-86), 80 (88%) were Caucasian, 68 (75%) were male gender, and 22 (24%) had etiology as hepatitis B/hepatitis C, 82 (90%) were Child-Pugh A and 77 (85%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Clinic (BCLC)=C at diagnosis. Eighteen (90%, n=20) CTNNB 1+ pts received first-line IO (Atezolizumab/bevacizumab [AB]) vs 39 (72%, n=54) in CTNNB1- pts. All pts were microsatellite stable (MSS). CTNNB1+ had a similar median tumor mutational burden (TMB), higher rate of TERT co-mutation, and lower rate of TP53 co-mutation (table) compared to CTNNB-. Of 57 AB pts, 5 (27%) of CTNNB1 + had an objective response, compared to 6 (16.7%) CTNNB1- pts. Time to treatment failure with first-line AB and overall survival were similar between the two cohorts (Table). Conclusions: Our study suggests CTNNB1 status is not prognostic in HCC pts receiving IO based therapy. Prospective study is warranted to further investigate predictive biomarkers for HCC sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors and VEGF-targeted therapy. [Table: see text]