Back to Authors

Thomas, Jessina

Mayo Clinic

Orlando Health

Citations 3

Addressing diagnostic dilemmas in eosinophilic esophagitis using esophageal epithelial eosinophil‐derived neurotoxin
Thomas, Jessina, Hopson, Puanani , Deb, Chirajyoti , Bornstein, Jeffrey D. , Mehta, Devendra I. , Bittar, Khaled, Smadi, Yamen

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | December 27, 2023 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 304-312

10.1002/jpn3.12054 Get It

AbstractObjectivesEosinophil‐derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a viable marker of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease activity. We studied the utility of measuring EDN from esophageal epithelial brushings for diagnosing EoE, focusing on two scenarios: (1) cases of exclusive distal eosinophilia and (2) cases of discrepancy between endoscopy and histology.MethodsRecords of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with EDN measured via esophageal brushings at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children in Orlando, Florida from January 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected.ResultsWe reviewed 231 patient records (66.7% male, mean age 10.3 years, range 1–22 years). EDN values correlated with endoscopic reference score (EREFS) and peak eosinophil count (PEC) (Spearman's rho = 0.756 (p < 0.001) and 0.824 (p < 0.001) respectively). Average PEC, EREFS, and EDN concentrations were higher in patients with active EoE than in controls or patients with EoE in remission (inactive). When grouping patients based on esophageal eosinophilia distribution, EDN mirrored PEC, and EREFS. Patients with exclusive distal eosinophilia had lower EDN concentrations than those with eosinophilia in >1 level of the esophagus (23.8 ± 46.1 mcg/mL vs. 171.3 ± 205.8 mcg/mL respectively, p < 0.001). EDN values were more consistent with EREFS in cases of discrepancies between endoscopic findings and pathology (p < 0.001).ConclusionEDN measured in esophageal brushing samples reflects disease activity objectively and accurately. It also offers significant value in cases of exclusive distal esophageal eosinophilia and when discrepancies exist between endoscopy and histology.
S562 Addressing Diagnostic Dilemmas in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using Esophageal Epithelial Eosinophilic-Derived Neurotoxin
Thomas, Jessina, Hopson, Puanani , Deb, Chirajyoti , Bornstein, Jeffrey D. , Mehta, Devendra I. , Bittar, Khaled, Smadi, Yamen

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 18, 2023 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 10S | Pages: S411-S412

10.14309/01.ajg.0000951888.49608.68 Get It

Effect of Caffeine on Colonic Manometry in Children
Mehta, Vijay, Hopson, Puanani , Irastorza, Laura, Rizvi, Syed Ahsan, Fernandez, Jenelle , Thomas, Jessina, Nabar, Shruti , Safder, Shaista , Rizvi, Syed Ahsan

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition | December 27, 2022 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 20-24

10.1097/mpg.0000000000003627 Get It

Objectives:Coffee and caffeinated products have been widely consumed for many centuries. Previous adult studies have suggested that both coffee and decaffeinated beverages induce colonic motility. However, no study has been conducted in pediatrics, and the role of caffeine alone in pediatric colonic motility needs to be explored.Methods:A prospective study of pediatric patients undergoing standard colonic motility testing that were able to consume caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine tablet during colonic manometry. Patients who had a gastrocolonic reflex and high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) in response to intraluminal administration of bisacodyl in the colon were included in the final analyses.Results:Thirty‐eight patients were recruited, 22 of which were excluded, 11 due to abnormal studies (no HAPC seen in response to intraluminal response to bisacodyl), and 11 due to inability to consume all study agents or complete the study. Sixteen patients met criteria for final analyses. Intracolonic bisacodyl produced a larger area under the curve (AUC) compared to all other agents. Caffeinated coffee resulted in a higher AUC, motility index (MI), and time to HAPC compared with decaffeinated coffee (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between caffeinated coffee and caffeine tablet, or caffeine tablet and decaffeinated coffee.Conclusions:Caffeine is indeed a colonic stimulant; however, other components of caffeinated and non‐caffeinated beverages likely induce colonic response and require further evaluation for possible use as a colonic stimulant.