Fernandez, Jenelle

Objectives:Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently have extraintestinal manifestations. The goal of this pilot study was to assess exocrine pancreatic function in cases with suspicion for or an established diagnosis of IBD.Methods:Direct stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) was performed in 74 children with IBD, in both newly diagnosed and established cases. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were entered into a database and analyzed.Results:Among the 74 children, 49 were newly diagnosed and 25 had an established diagnosis of IBD. A majority had the diagnosis of Crohn disease (CD) (n = 48; 32 new and 16 established cases) with male predominance (64.6%). Altogether, 42 (56.7%) children had either generalized or partial exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Twenty‐four of the 48 CD children (50%) had abnormal ePFT. In those with ulcerative colitis (UC), 18 of the 26 (62.9%) had abnormal ePFT. The highest abnormality rate was in lipase enzyme activity. Weight z scores were significantly lower in those with abnormal ePFT (Crohn cases: P = 0.008; UC cases: P = 0.046). Peak protein concentration in collected pancreatic fluid was significantly lower in children with CD who had abnormal ePFT (P = 0.013).Conclusions:This pilot study revealed a relatively high prevalence of EPI in children with IBD through use of ePFT. EPI can result in maldigestion, with decreased capacity to digest fat. Further prospective studies are needed to assess need and efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in children with IBD and abnormal ePFT.

Objectives:Coffee and caffeinated products have been widely consumed for many centuries. Previous adult studies have suggested that both coffee and decaffeinated beverages induce colonic motility. However, no study has been conducted in pediatrics, and the role of caffeine alone in pediatric colonic motility needs to be explored.Methods:A prospective study of pediatric patients undergoing standard colonic motility testing that were able to consume caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine tablet during colonic manometry. Patients who had a gastrocolonic reflex and high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) in response to intraluminal administration of bisacodyl in the colon were included in the final analyses.Results:Thirty‐eight patients were recruited, 22 of which were excluded, 11 due to abnormal studies (no HAPC seen in response to intraluminal response to bisacodyl), and 11 due to inability to consume all study agents or complete the study. Sixteen patients met criteria for final analyses. Intracolonic bisacodyl produced a larger area under the curve (AUC) compared to all other agents. Caffeinated coffee resulted in a higher AUC, motility index (MI), and time to HAPC compared with decaffeinated coffee (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between caffeinated coffee and caffeine tablet, or caffeine tablet and decaffeinated coffee.Conclusions:Caffeine is indeed a colonic stimulant; however, other components of caffeinated and non‐caffeinated beverages likely induce colonic response and require further evaluation for possible use as a colonic stimulant.