Hopson, Puanani

ABSTRACT Introduction Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts (LTEC) are aspiration‐related lesions often assessed using swallow studies and symptoms like respiratory or feeding difficulties. However, these indicators are unreliable predictors of disease severity. Lung inflammation and injury, though significant concerns, are rarely and inconsistently evaluated or reported. As a result, the correlation between swallow study findings and actual pulmonary disease remains unclear. Methods A retrospective cohort of children with LTEC seen in our Aerodigestive Program between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2023, who underwent videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) or flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were included. Data collected included clinical history, risk factors, BAL, chest CT, impedance probe, VFSS/FEES findings, and FOIS‐P/I scores at baseline and follow‐up. Results Eight‐two subjects identified. Lung inflammation and bronchiectasis were common and correlated. Clinical factors, impedance probe, and the presence/severity of swallowing abnormalities on VFSS/FEES were not predictive of lung disease. Fifty‐seven patients underwent LTEC repair for a range of indications, only 49% based on CT and/or BAL findings. Of 57 children who had LTEC repair, only 49% were based on CT or BAL findings. LTEC repair was associated with modest improvement feeding and swallowing. Discussion Children with LTEC have a high prevalence of inflammatory lung disease and injury and undergo repair for a variety of reasons. Swallow studies detect functional swallowing issues but do not reliably identify lung disease. Despite this limitation, LTEC repair is linked to improved feeding and swallowing in some patients, though not all benefit.

Introduction: Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts (LTEC) are well-known aspiration-associated lesions. Results of swallow studies, and respiratory, feeding, and swallowing symptoms are commonly used indications for repair, despite being unclear predictors of disease. Although lung inflammation and injury are primary concerns, such findings are uncommonly and inconsistently evaluated and reported and therefore it remains unclear how well swallow studies predict lung disease. Methods: Children seen in our Aerodigestive program 10/1/2012 and 9/30/2023, with a LTEC and a videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) or flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were included. Data regarding clinical history and risk factors, BAL, chest CT, and impedance probe results were abstracted, along with VFSS/FEES results and functional oral intake scale (FOIS-P/I) at baseline and follow-up. Results: 82 subjects identified. Lung inflammation and bronchiectasis were common and correlated. Clinical factors, impedance probe, and the presence/severity of swallowing abnormalities on VFSS/FEES were not predictive of lung disease. 57 patients underwent LTEC repair for a range of indications, only 49% based on CT and/or BAL findings. LTEC repair was associated with a trend towards improvement feeding and swallowing, yet none of these met statistical significance. Discussion: Children with LTEC have a high prevalence of inflammatory lung disease and injury and undergo repair for a variety of reasons. The insufficient ability of swallow study to identify patients with lung disease suggests that such studies identify functional abnormalities but not a disease state, per se. Nevertheless, LTEC repair is associated with improvements in feeding and swallowing in a subset of patients.

AbstractObjectivesEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is often diagnosed in school‐age children between 6‐ and 9‐year‐old. There is less known about those who are diagnosed with EoE that are younger than 6 years old. The objective of this study is to compare clinical presentation, comorbidities, and outcomes based on age at diagnosis of EoE.MethodsSingle‐center retrospective chart review of children (<18 years) diagnosed with EoE between 2005 and 2020. We recorded demographics, clinical presentation, family history, past medical history, treatment, and endoscopic findings. Children in this cohort were classified based on age into three age groups: <2 years, 2−<6 years, and 6−<18 years.ResultsWe identified 256 children with EoE, the mean age (SD) at the time of diagnosis was 9 (5.2) years and 184 (72%) were male. We had 164 (64%) patients with available follow‐up esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGDs) data (495 EGDs in total) of those 99/164 (60%) reached mucosal remission. In the very young children (<2 years) vomiting was the most common presentation, while poor weight gain was seen more in the 2−<6‐year group in comparison to the >6‐years. Food impaction and abdominal pain were most likely to present in older children 6−18 years. Combination therapy, as opposed to a single therapy, induced remission at a higher frequency in the <6‐year group in comparison to the 6−<18‐year group (85% vs. 66%).ConclusionEoE should be considered in younger children presenting with feeding difficulty and poor weight gain. Combination therapy seems to be more effective in younger children with EoE, but further studies with bigger sample size are needed to study the efficacy of the different combination therapies.

AbstractObjectivesEosinophil‐derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a viable marker of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) disease activity. We studied the utility of measuring EDN from esophageal epithelial brushings for diagnosing EoE, focusing on two scenarios: (1) cases of exclusive distal eosinophilia and (2) cases of discrepancy between endoscopy and histology.MethodsRecords of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with EDN measured via esophageal brushings at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children in Orlando, Florida from January 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected.ResultsWe reviewed 231 patient records (66.7% male, mean age 10.3 years, range 1–22 years). EDN values correlated with endoscopic reference score (EREFS) and peak eosinophil count (PEC) (Spearman's rho = 0.756 (p < 0.001) and 0.824 (p < 0.001) respectively). Average PEC, EREFS, and EDN concentrations were higher in patients with active EoE than in controls or patients with EoE in remission (inactive). When grouping patients based on esophageal eosinophilia distribution, EDN mirrored PEC, and EREFS. Patients with exclusive distal eosinophilia had lower EDN concentrations than those with eosinophilia in >1 level of the esophagus (23.8 ± 46.1 mcg/mL vs. 171.3 ± 205.8 mcg/mL respectively, p < 0.001). EDN values were more consistent with EREFS in cases of discrepancies between endoscopic findings and pathology (p < 0.001).ConclusionEDN measured in esophageal brushing samples reflects disease activity objectively and accurately. It also offers significant value in cases of exclusive distal esophageal eosinophilia and when discrepancies exist between endoscopy and histology.

Objectives:Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently have extraintestinal manifestations. The goal of this pilot study was to assess exocrine pancreatic function in cases with suspicion for or an established diagnosis of IBD.Methods:Direct stimulated endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) was performed in 74 children with IBD, in both newly diagnosed and established cases. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were entered into a database and analyzed.Results:Among the 74 children, 49 were newly diagnosed and 25 had an established diagnosis of IBD. A majority had the diagnosis of Crohn disease (CD) (n = 48; 32 new and 16 established cases) with male predominance (64.6%). Altogether, 42 (56.7%) children had either generalized or partial exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Twenty‐four of the 48 CD children (50%) had abnormal ePFT. In those with ulcerative colitis (UC), 18 of the 26 (62.9%) had abnormal ePFT. The highest abnormality rate was in lipase enzyme activity. Weight z scores were significantly lower in those with abnormal ePFT (Crohn cases: P = 0.008; UC cases: P = 0.046). Peak protein concentration in collected pancreatic fluid was significantly lower in children with CD who had abnormal ePFT (P = 0.013).Conclusions:This pilot study revealed a relatively high prevalence of EPI in children with IBD through use of ePFT. EPI can result in maldigestion, with decreased capacity to digest fat. Further prospective studies are needed to assess need and efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in children with IBD and abnormal ePFT.

Objectives:Coffee and caffeinated products have been widely consumed for many centuries. Previous adult studies have suggested that both coffee and decaffeinated beverages induce colonic motility. However, no study has been conducted in pediatrics, and the role of caffeine alone in pediatric colonic motility needs to be explored.Methods:A prospective study of pediatric patients undergoing standard colonic motility testing that were able to consume caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeine tablet during colonic manometry. Patients who had a gastrocolonic reflex and high amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs) in response to intraluminal administration of bisacodyl in the colon were included in the final analyses.Results:Thirty‐eight patients were recruited, 22 of which were excluded, 11 due to abnormal studies (no HAPC seen in response to intraluminal response to bisacodyl), and 11 due to inability to consume all study agents or complete the study. Sixteen patients met criteria for final analyses. Intracolonic bisacodyl produced a larger area under the curve (AUC) compared to all other agents. Caffeinated coffee resulted in a higher AUC, motility index (MI), and time to HAPC compared with decaffeinated coffee (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between caffeinated coffee and caffeine tablet, or caffeine tablet and decaffeinated coffee.Conclusions:Caffeine is indeed a colonic stimulant; however, other components of caffeinated and non‐caffeinated beverages likely induce colonic response and require further evaluation for possible use as a colonic stimulant.

AbstractBackground and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling is the standard of care for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. While many two-way comparisons between needle types have been made in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear which size and type of needle offers the best probability of diagnosis. We therefore performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different sized and shaped needles to rank the diagnostic performance of each needle.Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases through August, 2020 for RCTs that compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) needles in solid pancreatic masses. Using a random-effects NMA under the frequentist framework, RCTs were analyzed to identify the best needle type and sampling technique. Performance scores (P-scores) were used to rank the different needles based on pooled diagnostic accuracy. The NMA model was used to calculate pairwise relative risk (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals.Results Review of 2577 studies yielded 29 RCTs for quantitative synthesis, comparing 13 different needle types. All 22G FNB needles had an RR > 1 compared to the reference 22G FNA (Cook) needle. The highest P-scores were seen with the 22G Medtronic FNB needle (0.9279), followed by the 22G Olympus FNB needle (0.8962) and the 22G Boston Scientific FNB needle (0.8739). Diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different between needles with or without suction.Conclusions In comparison to FNA needles, FNB needles offer the highest diagnostic performance in sampling pancreatic masses, particularly with 22G FNB needles.

ABSTRACTObjectives:The COVID‐19 pandemic has significantly affected graduate medical education with redistribution of trainees, altered clinical care, and decreased research. For graduating trainees, there remains concern that financial stability of health systems will affect the availability of new positions and hiring practices. This survey aims to evaluate the pandemic's impact from pediatric gastroenterology fellows’ perspectives.Methods:An anonymous survey was distributed by e‐mail from June 11 to July 1, 2020 to all North American pediatric gastroenterology and advanced training fellows. The survey was tailored for the fellows’ year of training including questions on education, clinical experience, research, and job outlook.Results:Of the 434 pediatric gastroenterology fellows, 145 completed the survey. Of all respondents, negative impact was reported in 52% on clinical training, 46% research projects, and 41% procedural confidence. A majority (93%) of third‐year respondents had a job contract signed at the time of the survey; however, 18% of those contracts were subsequently altered with 5 respondents having job contracts rescinded due to hiring freezes. Fifty‐four percent of first‐ and second‐year fellow respondents reported concern regarding finding a job with the majority being second‐year fellows (78%).Conclusions:The COVID‐19 pandemic continues to affect the medical system and healthcare professionals. This survey identified significant impact on job acquisition for graduating pediatric gastroenterology fellows and other critical components of training, which are likely applicable to other pediatric trainees. The survey results raise questions about potential strategies to improve medical education and job search success for graduating trainees.