Belbin, Olivia

AbstractINTRODUCTIONSelf‐reported sex influences brain resilience, but its role in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains unclear.METHODSWe analyzed 394 genetic‐FTD patients and 279 controls from the ALLFTD consortium, assessing annual neuropsychological performance and MRI‐based cortical thickness. Clinical characteristics and cortical thickness were compared between sexes. We used the residuals of linear regression models, which predict each participant's cognitive and behavioral performance levels relative to cortical thickness, as a proxy for reserve. We then modeled sex differences in longitudinal trajectories with linear mixed‐effects models.RESULTSSymptomatic females with genetic FTD had lower frontal cortical thickness than males, and the C9orf72 subgroup showed lower‐than‐expected frontal cortical thickness for a given level of executive functioning. Differences in cognitive reserve between sexes peaked near symptom onset but diminished thereafter.DISCUSSIONFemales with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males, suggesting that self‐reported sex modulates resilience to frontotemporal neurodegeneration.Highlights Females with genetic FTD showed higher cognitive reserve than males. Those differences were particularly pronounced in the C9orf72 and GRN subgroups. The higher cognitive reserve in females declined as the disease progressed.

Abstract Background: Alterations in innate immunity are pathologically associated with and genetically implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the whole exome sequence (WES) dataset generated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), only the previously identified p.R47H variant in the innate immunity gene, TREM2, shows study-wide association with risk of AD. Using a novel approach, we searched the ADSP WES data to identify additional immune pathway genes with deleterious variants that, like TREM2.pR47H, show strong association with AD. Methods: Using polygenic risk scores (PRS) to analyze association with AD, we evaluated deleterious variants (CADD Phred-scaled score > 20) with a minor allele count of 20 or more in 228 genes comprising an immune co-expression network containing TREM2 (CENTREM2). A significant polygenic component composed of deleterious stop-gain and non-synonymous variants was identified, and false discovery rates were determined for the variants in this component. In genes harboring a significant variant, PRS for all variants in the genes were then analyzed. Results: The PRS for the 182 deleterious variants in CENTREM2 showed significant association with AD that was driven by 142 deleterious variants (136 non-synonymous, 6 stop-gain). In the 142 variant polygenic component, four variants had significant AD risk association: TREM2.pR47H, two deleterious stop-gain variants (FCGR1A.pR92X, and LILRB1.pY331X) in novel AD genes and 1 non-synonymous variant (ATP8B4.pG395S). Remarkably, PRS for the 36 additional variants in these four genes also showed significant association with AD. The PRS for all 40 variants in the 4 genes, showed significant, replicable association with AD and 3 additional variants in this polygenic component had significant false discovery rates: ATP8B4.pR1059Q, LILRB1.pP7P, and LILRB1.pY327Y. Conclusions: Here, we identify 3 immune pathway genes (ATP8B4, LILRB1, and FCGR1A) with a variant that associates with AD. Like TREM2.pR47H, each of the variants has a minor allele frequency less than 1% and is a deleterious, protein altering variant with a strong effect that increases or decreases (LILRB1.pY331X) risk of AD. Additional variants in these genes also alter risk of AD. The variants identified here are ideally suited for studies aimed at understanding how the innate immune system may be modulated to alter risk of AD.

The most recent late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) genome-wide association study revealed genome-wide significant association of two new loci: rs744373 near BIN1 (p = 1.6 × 10 −11 ) and rs597668 near EXOC3L2/BLOC1S3/MARK4 (p = 6.5 × 10 −9 ). We have genotyped these variants in a large (3,287 LOAD, 4,396 controls), independent dataset comprising eleven case-control series from the USA and Europe. We performed meta-analyses of the association of these variants with LOAD and also tested for association using logistic regression adjusted by age-at-diagnosis, gender, and APOE ε4 status. Meta-analysis results showed no evidence of series heterogeneity and logistic regression analysis successfully replicated the association of BIN1 (rs744373) with LOAD with an odds ratio (OR = 1.17, p = 1.1 × 10 −4 ) comparable to that previously reported (OR = 1.15). The variant near EXOC3L2 (rs597668) showed only suggestive association with LOAD (p = 0.09) after correcting for the presence of the APOE ε4 allele. Addition of our follow-up data to the results previously reported increased the strength of evidence for association with BIN1 (11,825 LOAD, 32,570 controls, rs744373 Fisher combined p = 3.8 × 10 −20 ). We also tested for epistatic interaction between these variants and APOE ε4 as well as with the previously replicated LOAD GWAS genes (CLU: rs11136000, CR1: rs3818361, and PICALM: rs3851179). No significant interactions between these genes were detected. In summary, we provide additional evidence for the variant near BIN1 (rs744373) as a LOAD risk modifier, but our results indicate that the effect of EXOC3L2 independent of APOE ε4 should be studied further.