Plumhoff, Elizabeth

AbstractBackgroundLaboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is complex. Reliance on laboratory testing can be problematic as different VWD screening panels, assays and methodologies can produce analytic variability in test results.ObjectivesTo compare the degree of imprecision among the VWD assays and within the platelet binding activity (PBA) assays, to determine the consensus among the VWD assays for correct classification of sample results, and to determine consensus among laboratories’ von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer interpretations and final interpretations of the VWD panels.Patients/MethodsProficiency testing results from the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) submitted by laboratories from 2010 to 2019 for all normal, type (T) 1 VWD and T2 VWD samples were analysed.Results and ConclusionsImprecision was lowest for VWF antigen and highest for collagen binding activity (CBA) with median coefficient of variation (CV) of 12% (interquartile range (IQR) 7%) and 23% (IQR 21%) respectively. Within the VWF PBA assays, the gain‐of‐function mutant GP1b binding (VWF: GP1bM) methods had the least imprecision (CV 9%, IQR 10%). All assays, including the various PBA methods had excellent consensus. The majority of laboratories agreed that normal (median consensus‐82%, IQR 16%) and T1 VWD (median consensus‐100%, IQR 9%) samples had normal multimer distribution. Consensus among laboratories for final interpretations was excellent for normal samples (median 81%, IQR 8%), good for T1 VWD samples (median 59%, IQR 9%), and fair for T2 VWD samples (median 44%, IQR 21%). Consensus on final interpretation decreased as sample complexity increased.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Coagulation factor XIII deficiency, in either its acquired or inherited form, is a rare cause of abnormal bleeding. In patients with Factor XIII (F XIII) deficiency, recommended means of factor replacement include infusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitated plasma (Cryo), or F XIII concentrates1. Comparisons of F XIII concentration in FFP and Cryo are not well defined. To aid management of F XIII deficiency, we measured F XIII activity and antigen in FFP and Cryo. In addition, we determined concentrations of fibrinogen, factor VIII (F VIII) and von Willebrand factor (VWF), including antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and collagen binding activity (VWF:CB). STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS: 10 bags each of FFP and of Cryo from blood group O donors obtained from the Mayo Clinic Division of Transfusion Medicine blood bank, were analyzed. F XIII activity was assayed by ELISA detecting activated F XIII-mediated amine incorporation into solid phase fibrinogen (Pefakit, Pentapharm). F XIII antigen was measured using radial immunodiffusion (The Binding Site). Fibrinogen was measured by Clauss kinetic clotting assay (Fibriquik, Biomerieux) and also by endpoint delta OD derived from the prothrombin time (ACL, Instrumentation Lab). F VIII was measured by 1-stage APTT-based assay; VWF:Ag by automated LIA (Diagnostica Stago); VWF:RCo by aggregometry of washed platelets; and VWF:CB by ELISA (Corgenix). RESULTS: Mean concentrations of F XIII activity were 60 U/bag (+/−30) in Cryo and 288 U/bag (+/− 77) in FFP. F XIII antigen concentrations paralleled the activity results and are depicted in Table 1, which also includes results for the other analytes. The mean fluid volumes of Cryo and FFP were 21.3 ml/bag (+/− 2.7) and 245 mL/bag (+/− 29), respectively. Table 1. Comparison of Hemostatic Components in Cryoprecipitated Plasma (Cryo) versus Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) Cryoprecipitate Fresh Frozen Plasma Component Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Factor XIII activity 60 U/bag (+/− 30) 288 U/bag (+/− 77) Factor XIII antigen 0.65 mg/bag (+/− 0.23) 2.36 mg/bag (+/− 0.76) Factor VIII 133 U/bag (+/− 36.5) 265 U/bag (+/− 83) Fibrinogen Clauss 184 mg/dl (+/− 44) 725 mg/dl (+/− 199) Fibrinogen ACL 319 mg/dl (+/− 76) 864 mg/dl (+/− 327) VWF:Ag 181 U/bag (+/− 53) 218 U/bag (+/− 70) VWF:RCo 168 U/bag (+/− 34) 221 U/bag (+/− 65) VWF:CB 165 U/bag (+/− 40) 208 U/bag (+/− 71) Bag volume 21.3 ml/bag (+/− 2.7) 245 ml/bag (+/− 29) CONCLUSION: In contrast to some of the other cryoprecipitable coagulation proteins, F XIII is only mildly enriched in Cryo when compared with FFP (about 2- to 3-fold). Although both products are practical means of F XIII replacement, and F XIII is somewhat enriched in Cryo, FFP may be a preferred product for F XIII replacement when infusion volume is not a major consideration (eg, in adults versus small children) and risks of exposure to multiple donors are considered. While Cryo is no longer recommended as the product of choice for VWF (or F VIII) replacement, our studies also demonstrate that Cryo is significantly enriched in VWF (which is not routinely assayed as a quality control measure for Cryo, in contrast to requirements for F VIII and fibrinogen content).

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated drug reaction in which heparin-dependant IgG antibodies (HIT-IgG) to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes form with the potential for platelet activation with resultant thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis (HITT). The frequency of HIT-IgG formation and clinically apparent HIT or HITT varies considerably, according to the patient population (surgical versus medical) and type of heparin (unfractionated [UFH] vs low molecular weight [LMWH]). One large prospective study showed a frequency of HIT-IgG formation of 7.5% with clinical HITT in 34.5% of these orthopedic patients receiving prophylactic LMWH and corresponding figures in cardiac surgery patients receiving UFH were 50% and 2%, respectively [Warkentin et al. Blood2000;96: 1703]. Due to daily exposure to heparin flushes (UFH) and prophylactic LMWH (to prevent venoocclusive disease) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients may be at risk for HIT/HITT. However, due to anticipated post-transplant thrombocytopenia, clinical cases of HIT/HITT may be overlooked. We retrospectively determined the incidence of HIT-IgG formation and its clinical significance in this population. Methods: HIT-IgG was measured retrospectively using a commercially available ELISA kit in samples collected from patients prior to conditioning therapy and on day 14 post-HSCT. Medical records were reviewed to in order to determine the clinical significance (development of clinical HIT/HITT) in those with detectable HIT-IgG. Patients Samples from a total of 103 HSCT recipients with hematologic malignancy (including 25 myeloma, 17 lymphoma, 16 AML, 14 amyloid, 10 MDS, 10 ALL, 8 CML and 3 CLL) were tested, of which 52 and 49 underwent allogeneic and autologous HSCT, respectively. All patients were exposed to UFH flushes during line care. In addition, all allogeneic recipients received prophylactic subcutaneous dalteparin 5000U daily beginning with conditioning until engraftment. Conditioning regimens included high dose melphalan (n=34), cyclophosphamide/TBI (n=30), carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (n=15), busulfan/cyclophosphamide (n=9), fludarabine/melphalan (n=10) and fludarabine/TBI (n=4). The median age was 51.5 years (20–72) and 68 were male. Results: The median platelet count prior to initiation of conditioning therapy and at day 14 was 157 × 109/L (range: 10–672) and 40 × 109/L (range: 9–289), respectively. Prior to conditioning, two of 103 (1.9%) patients had a positive HIT-IgG assay, that became negative in one and equivocal in the other by day 14 post-HSCT, and one patient had an equivocal HIT assay that became negative by day 14. All 3 were autologous recipients. None of the previously negative patients had a positive HIT-IgG assay at day 14, although 3 patients (2 autologous and one allogeneic) had an equivocal result of uncertain significance. No patients developed clinical or symptomatic thrombosis (HITT). Conclusion: In spite of frequent exposure to heparin, the frequency of seroconversion is low, and in those patients with preexisting HIT-IgG, no patient developed symptomatic thrombosis, including the 2 patients with positive HIT IgG assays prior to conditioning. The low frequency of HIT-IgG formation may reflect the profound immunosuppression of the conditioning regimens employed. Nevertheless, in this population, a high index of clinical suspicion must be maintained.

Abstract Abstract 1415 Poster Board I-438 Introduction: Critical laboratory values (CVs) are those that indicate the patient is in danger of death unless corrective action is initiated immediately. CVs are an important feature of laboratory practice parameters, standards of regulatory agencies (including the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals), and national and institutional quality improvement studies. However, there has been no research into CVs in coagulation laboratories. Our objectives were to determine: 1) The current policies on CVs in specialized coagulation laboratories 2) Current patterns of practice for reporting CVs for coagulation parameters; and 3) If there is any consensus, based on practice, on CVs for coagulation tests. Methods: A web-based survey on CVs was distributed to members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association in February 2009. Results: 38 laboratories participated. 97% had CVs for coagulation tests in place. 85% of laboratories used local opinion or consensus to set their CV policies, likely reflecting a lack of published data. 9% of laboratories were unsure where their CVs came from. CV reporting practices were fairly uniform. 97% of surveyed laboratories authorized technologists to report CVs, and only a minority (<40%) involved senior technologists or laboratory physicians in reporting. CV policies at almost all sites (97%) authorized the patient's nurse or MD, or the ordering MD to receive CV results. Medical students, clerical staff, or uninvolved staff nurses were rarely authorized to receive CVs (3%, 13%, and 37%, respectively). Policies in all participating laboratories required documentation of CV communication. Telephone was the primary method of communication, with 39% of sites used electronic broadcast or forced print as an adjunct. Inconsistency was noted in strategies to handle repeat CVs on the same patient, ranging from reporting all CVs, to reporting worsening CVs, to not reporting CVs on certain patient populations (e.g. critical FVIII:C levels in known hemophiliacs). After-hours communication of CVs on outpatients and referred clients was identified as challenging. All sites first attempted to telephone the patient's on-call MD, and if unsuccessful, sent a report by facsimile, contacted the Laboratory Chief of Service, or delayed reporting until the next day. When laboratories were asked about their CV values, over 80% had CVs for the INR (mean > 5, range > 2 - 6), aPTT (mean > 100 sec, range > 45 - 150 sec) and fibrinogen level (mean < 90 mg/dL, range < 50 - 100 mg/dL). Fewer laboratories (< 25%) had CVs for less commonly performed coagulation tests, including anti-Xa levels, factor and inhibitor assays, and thrombophilia testing. These CVs were more heterogeneous. Conclusion: This survey identified several potential areas for improvement in the way specialized coagulation laboratories handle CVs. Consensus data would assist laboratories in standardizing their policies, and establishing benchmarks for CV reporting and policy review. It would also ensure that a laboratory's CVs are in line with those of its peers, and are clinically relevant. The workload associated with CVs for coagulation assays is unknown, and it is possible that some of the current reporting strategies lead to inefficiencies and delays (e.g. reporting CVs for tests that are not truly life threatening; lack of established policies for after-hours handling of CVs when an on-call physician cannot be reached). Our study identifies an important need for further evaluation and standardization of CVs for coagulation tests. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

AbstractIntroductionPlatelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis.MethodsThis review summarizes the authors’ experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD.ResultsBlood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high‐quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD.ConclusionPFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.

SummaryIntroductionThe performance of factor XI activity (FXI) by laboratories in the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association proficiency testing program was analyzed.MethodsOver 10 years (2003–2013), 80 samples were distributed; 33–55 laboratories participated per exercise providing 3833 total responses. Analysis was performed on numeric results and qualitative classification of results.ResultsThe sample FXI levels ranged from 3.8 to 154.0 IU/dL. The overall interlaboratory average coefficient of variation (CV%) was 17.5%; the CV was higher for a sample with low (3.8 IU/dL) FXI. Results were correctly classified as abnormal (100%) for a sample with 3.8 IU/dL FXI and normal/borderline normal (97.7%) for 45 samples with 80 to < 140 IU/dL FXI. The classification was heterogeneous for samples with FXI of 50 to < 80 IU/dL. Six specimens were repeat‐tested from 2007 to 2013. The mean FXI was not significantly different in laboratories using the same method on both exercises, suggesting good intralaboratory precision over time. Univariate analysis of data from 2011 to 2012 did not find a consistent significant difference among the activators, analyzers, calibrators, and FXI‐deficient plasmas.ConclusionLaboratories generally performed well in assessment of FXI based on interlaboratory precision when FXI >30 IU/dL and on classification of samples with very low or normal FXI.

ABSTRACT We surveyed national Helicobacter pylori diagnostic testing practices and diagnoses using commercial and Medicare medical claims data from Optum Labs (Cambridge, MA). Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains the most commonly ordered diagnostic test despite recent expert recommendations. Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider ordering practices.