Cheville, John C.

Context.— Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. Objective.— To update grading recommendations. Data Sources.— Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. Conclusions.— Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace “tertiary grade pattern” in radical prostatectomy (RP) with “minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5),” and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC-P) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) “atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)” is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the timing and distribution of first renal cell carcinoma metastasis after nephrectomy stratified by nodal status.MethodsWe evaluated patients treated with nephrectomy for sporadic, unilateral renal cell carcinoma between 1970 and 2011 who subsequently developed distant metastasis to three or fewer sites. Site‐specific metastases‐free 2‐year survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Associations of nodal status with time to metastasis were evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models.ResultsA total of 1049 patients met the inclusion criteria (135 pN1, 914 pN0/x patients). The median time to identification of first distant metastasis for pN1 patients was 0.4 years (interquartile range 0.2–1.1 years) versus 2.2 years (interquartile range 0.6–6.0 years) in pN0/x patients. The most common site of metastasis was to the lung, but this occurred earlier in pN1 patients (median 0.3 years vs 2.0 years). pN1 was associated with significantly lower site‐specific 2‐year metastases‐free survival when compared with pN0/x for lung (37% vs 70%, P < 0.001), bone (63% vs 87%, P < 0.001), non‐regional lymph nodes (60% vs 96%, P < 0.001) and liver metastases (79% vs 91%, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, pN1 status remained significantly associated with lung, bone, and non‐regional lymph node (all P < 0.001) metastases, but it was no longer associated with liver metastases (P = 0.3).ConclusionspN1 nodal status in M0 patients treated with nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma is associated with more frequent early metastasis to sites conferring poor prognosis when compared with pN0/x. Our findings highlight the importance of rigorous, early surveillance though the multimodal use of a comprehensive history, physical, laboratory and radiological studies, as outlined in societal guidelines.

Ambiguity exists regarding the definition of a level III inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC-TT), limiting comparisons between open and minimally-invasive series. We assessed 253 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with IVC-TT from 2000-2015 and proposed a modified classification based on associations between intraoperative IVC clamp position and need for cardiopulmonary bypass with complications, length of stay, and blood transfusions. Predictive ability of the modified system was not meaningfully improved (AUCs 0.59–0.58; 0.61–0.61; 0.72–0.72). Nevertheless, we advocate for standardization of the border of a level III thrombus at or above the major hepatic veins to facilitate meaningful comparisons between techniques.

4567 Background: Trials combining anti-PDL1 and anti-VEGF therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are underway; however the relationship between the expression of PDL1 and genes in the VEGF pathway is poorly understood. Using the Affymetrix platform, we observed an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway. Herein, we validate this inverse association using an independent set of 100 primary ccRCC tumors. Methods: From our registry database we sampled 100 ccRCC tumors with varying PDL1 protein expression (0%-100%) determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We extracted RNA from FFPE slides and performed RT-PCR to quantify gene expression of PDL1, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. All genes were normalized to the POLR2a gene. We evaluated the association of PDL1 protein expression and VEGF gene expression using Spearman rank correlation. In addition, we employed a linear mixed effects model to compare the fold-change in expression of VEGF genes between PDL1 low (0-5%, n=68) and PDL1 high (>5%, n=32) tumors. Results: As expected, PDL1 protein expression positively correlates with PDL1 geneexpression (corr=0.42, p<0.001). Validating our array data, PDL1 protein expression inversely correlates with expression of key VEGF genes: VEGF (corr=-0.23, p=0.01), VEGFR1 (corr=-0.34, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (corr=-0.23, p=0.01). In our dichotomized analysis, we noted significantly higher expression of VEGF genes in the PDL1 low compared to the PDL1 high group: VEGF (fold change=1.82, p<0.001), VEGFR1 (FC=2.63, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (FC=2.13, p=0.001). Conclusions: We independently validate an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway in primary ccRCC. If validated further in larger studies, the existence of an immune evasive and an angiogenic phenotype within ccRCC could inform current clinical trials targeting these two pathways. Ultimately, whether VEGF signaling affects PDL1 expression, or whether angiogenic or immune evasive phenotypes predict response to anti-PDL1, anti-VEGF, or a combination of the two therapies remains unclear.

e15539 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 1,380 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/16/1990 and 4/14/2009. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher MayoSSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001), and this association remained strong after after multivariate adjustment for well-known predictors of RCC aggressiveness. Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.62 95% CI 1.95-3.54; p<0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.48 95% CI 1.56-7.76; p =0.002). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.

725 Background: The impact of surgical resection of renal tumors on peripheral immune related cells is not well characterized, and has potential implications as biomarkers for systemic immune therapy are being developed. We sought to assess the effect of surgical resection on circulating cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs) for patients with renal tumors. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients undergoing partial, radical, or cytoreductive nephrectomy (PN, RN, CN) for unilateral primary renal tumors between 2016 and 2018. Blood draws were performed pre-op, 1 day post-op, and 3 months post-op. Flow cytometry was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The % of PBMCs expressing CD11a/CD8 (CTLs) were assessed. The % of CTLs expressing PD-1, Bim (a downstream PD-1 pathway pro-apoptotic mediator), CX3CR1/GZMB (an effector memory T-cell phenotype), and Ki67 (a proliferation marker) were assessed. Median changes in % of CTLs were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Comparisons between aggressive (pT3-4, N1, M1, or aggressive histology (high-grade, coagulative necrosis, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation, or specific RCC-variant histologies)) versus indolent tumors were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results: Twenty, 12, and 8 patients underwent RN, PN, and CN, respectively. Thirty, 7, and 3 patients had clear-cell RCC, non-clear cell RCC, and oncocytoma, respectively. Twenty-three and 17 patients had aggressive and indolent tumors, respectively. While there was no significant change at 1 day, by 3 months there were significantly increased CTLs among PBMCs (+1.3%; p=0.004). There was significant decrease in CX3CR1+GZMB+ CTLs (-2.9%; p<0.001) and significant increase in Bim+ CTLs (+3.0%; p=0.03) at 1 day but not 3 months. Interestingly, Ki67+ CTLs increased at day 1 (+0.6%; p<0.001) but decreased by 3 months (-0.6%; p=0.001). There were no significant changes in PD-1+ CTLs at either time point. There were no significant changes in any CTL characteristics at 1 day or 3 months between aggressive and indolent tumors. Conclusions: These findings characterize changing CTL profiles over time with surgical resection of renal tumors which may help guide biomarker development.

483 Background: We evaluate the impact of salvage intravesical therapy on survival in patients with NMIBC previously treated with BCG who ultimately underwent radical cystectomy (RC). Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with NMIBC who received at least 1 complete induction course of BCG and subsequently underwent RC for bladder cancer between 2000-2018. Patients were stratified by receipt of salvage intravesical therapy following BCG prior to RC. Oncologic outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 371 patients who underwent RC after receiving BCG, of whom 55 (15%) received salvage intravesical therapy, most commonly Mitomycin C (n = 26), Valrubicin (n = 8), Gemcitabine (n = 7), and CG0070 (n = 6). Median follow-up among survivors was 1.1 (IQR 0-4.3) years. Patients who received salvage intravesical therapy were more likely to initially present with CIS (27% vs 17%) and less likely to present with T1 disease (33% vs 50%, both p < 0.05). Receipt of salvage intravesical therapy was not associated with increased risk of adverse pathology (≥pT2 or pN+) at RC (33% vs 41%, p = 0.27). Furthermore, on Kaplan-Meier analysis, receipt of salvage intravesical therapy was not associated with cancer-specific or overall survival. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, clinical stage prior to RC, but not receipt of salvage intravesical therapy, was associated with inferior cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Conclusions: Our results suggest that RC following carefully managed salvage intravesical therapy after BCG is not associated with inferior oncologic outcomes, which can improve patient counseling. [Table: see text]

Background and Aims Lifetime risk of biliary tract cancer (BTC) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) may exceed 20%, and BTC is currently the leading cause of death in patients with PSC. To open new avenues for management, we aimed to delineate clinically relevant genomic and pathological features of a large panel of PSC‐associated BTC (PSC‐BTC). Approach and Results We analyzed formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tumor tissue from 186 patients with PSC‐BTC from 11 centers in eight countries with all anatomical locations included. We performed tumor DNA sequencing at 42 clinically relevant genetic loci to detect mutations, translocations, and copy number variations, along with histomorphological and immunohistochemical characterization. Regardless of the anatomical localization, PSC‐BTC exhibited a uniform molecular and histological characteristic similar to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. We detected a high frequency of genomic alterations typical of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, such as TP53 (35.5%), KRAS (28.0%), CDKN2A (14.5%), and SMAD4 (11.3%), as well as potentially druggable mutations (e.g., HER2/ERBB2). We found a high frequency of nontypical/nonductal histomorphological subtypes (55.2%) and of the usually rare BTC precursor lesion, intraductal papillary neoplasia (18.3%). Conclusions Genomic alterations in PSC‐BTC include a significant number of putative actionable therapeutic targets. Notably, PSC‐BTC shows a distinct extrahepatic morpho‐molecular phenotype, independent of the anatomical location of the tumor. These findings advance our understanding of PSC‐associated cholangiocarcinogenesis and provide strong incentives for clinical trials to test genome‐based personalized treatment strategies in PSC‐BTC.

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) has been recently recognized by the World Health Organization classification of prostatic tumors as a distinct entity, most often occurring concurrently with invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa). Whether documented admixed with PCa or in its rare pure form, numerous studies associate this entity with clinical aggressiveness. Despite increasing clinical experience and requirement of IDC-P documentation in protocols for synoptic reporting, the specifics of its potential contribution to assessment of grade group (GG) and cancer quantitation of PCa in both needle biopsies (NBx) and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens remain unclear. Moreover, there are no standard guidelines for incorporating basal cell marker immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the diagnosis of IDC-P, either alone or as part of a cocktail with AMACR/racemase. An online survey containing 26 questions regarding diagnosis, reporting practices, and IHC resource utilization, focusing on IDC-P, was undertaken by 42 genitourinary subspecialists from 9 countries. The degree of agreement or disagreement regarding approaches to individual questions was classified as significant majority (>75%), majority (51% to 75%), minority (26% to 50%) and significant minority (≤25%). IDC-P with or without invasive cancer is considered a contraindication for active surveillance by the significant majority (95%) of respondents, although a majority (66%) also agreed that the clinical significance/behavior of IDC-P on NBx or RP with PCa required further study. The majority do not upgrade PCa based on comedonecrosis seen only in the intraductal component in NBx (62%) or RP (69%) specimens. Similarly, recognizable IDC-P with GG1 PCa was not a factor in upgrading in NBx (78%) or RP (71%) specimens. The majority (60%) of respondents include readily recognizable IDC-P in assessment of linear extent of PCa at NBx. A significant majority (78%) would use IHC to confirm or exclude intraductal carcinoma if other biopsies showed no PCa, while 60% would use it to confirm IDC-P with invasive PCa in NBx if it would change the overall GG assignment. Nearly half (48%, a minority) would use IHC to confirm IDC-P for accurate Gleason pattern 4 quantitation. A majority (57%) report the percentage of IDC-P when present, in RP specimens. When obvious Gleason pattern 4 or 5 PCa is present in RP or NBx, IHC is rarely to almost never used to confirm the presence of IDC-P by the significant majority (88% and 90%, respectively). Most genitourinary pathologists consider IDC-P to be an adverse prognostic feature independent of the PCa grade, although recommendations for standardization are needed to guide reporting of IDC-P vis a vis tumor quantitation and final GG assessment. The use of IHC varies widely and is performed for a multitude of indications, although it is used most frequently in scenarios where confirmation of IDC-P would impact the GG assigned. Further study and best practices recommendations are needed to provide guidance with regards to the most appropriate indications for IHC use in scenarios regarding IDC-P.