Jenkins, Marjorie

Abstract Differences in patient characteristics, including age, sex, and race influence the safety and effectiveness of drugs, biologic products, and medical devices. Here we provide a summary of the topics discussed during the opening panel at the 2018 Johns Hopkins Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation symposium on Assessing and Communicating Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects for Patient Subpopulations: Challenges and Opportunities . The goal of this session was to provide a brief overview of FDA‐regulated therapeutics, including drugs, biologics and medical devices, and some of the major sources of heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) related to patient demographics, such as age, sex and race. The panel discussed the US Food and Drug Administration's role in reviewing and regulating drugs, devices, and biologic products and the challenges associated with ensuring that diverse patient populations benefit from these therapeutics. Ultimately, ensuring diverse demographic inclusion in clinical trials, and designing basic and clinical research studies to account for the intended patient population's age, sex, race, and genetic factors among other characteristics, will lead to better, safer therapies for diverse patient populations.

Abstract Objective: To evaluate menopausal symptoms and sexual problems in Hispanic and non-Hispanic women in two Southwest areas. Methods: An anonymous survey including the Green Climacteric Scale (GCS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and demographics was distributed to English and Spanish-speaking women age 40 to 60 in Scottsdale, Arizona, and West Texas. FSFI for sexually active women and GCS scores for the Hispanic and non-Hispanic women in Texas were analyzed with multivariable analysis and compared between Texas and Arizona for Non-Hispanic participants. Results: Predominantly non-Hispanic women (70%), average age 51.5 (SD = 7.25) completed questionnaires (199 West Texas, 163 Scottsdale). A majority of sexually active women (88%) were found to be at risk of sexual dysfunction. Within the Texas cohort, GCS score was estimated to be 3.49 points lower (less symptoms) in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic participants [95% CI −6.58 to −0.40, P = 0.03], and FSFI score was estimated to be 2.31 points lower (more symptoms) in Hispanic versus non-Hispanic participants [95% CI −4.49 to −0.14, P = 0.04]. Among non-Hispanic women, GCS scores were lower (less symptoms) in Texas versus Arizona by 10.25 points [95% CI −14.83 to −5.66, P < 0.01], while FSFI scores were higher overall (less symptoms) in Texas by 3.65 points [95% CI 0.53-6.77), P = 0.02]. All FSFI and GCS scores were adjusted for multiple variables. Conclusions: In a group of menopausal women from the Southwest, most reported symptoms were consistent with FSD, and the degree of sexual problems appeared to be greater in the Hispanic participants from Texas. Video Summary: http://links.lww.com/MENO/A781.

Background: The sex- and gender-specific health (SGSH) multimedia case-based learning modules (MCBLMs) were developed to address the absence of validated or peer-reviewed material that incorporates topics of sex and gender differences into medical curricula. This article provides the methodology for development of the modules and reports the results of a field test of the modules in different medical educational settings. Methods: MCBLMs were created by a multidisciplinary committee of scientists, health profession educators, and students. Two modules, osteoporosis and diabetes, were tested in various settings based on the curricular needs at each of the five accredited institutions. Each module consisted of a pretest and three interactive, multimedia stand-alone sections with post-tests. Scores on the tests were compared using a paired-samples t -test. A postmodule survey was used to evaluate the format. Results: Four hundred eighteen students participated in the field testing. For the 194 who completed the osteoporosis module, the post-test scores (M = 13.71, standard deviation [SD] = 2.09) were significantly higher than the pretest scores (M = 10.54, SD = 2.41), p < 0.001. Post-test scores for the 285 who completed the diabetes module (M = 16.55, SD = 2.46) were also significantly higher than the pretest scores (M = 13.71, SD = 2.09), p < 0.001. The postmodule survey showed positive acceptance of the format with an average score of 3.54/4 for osteoporosis and 3.45/4 for diabetes. Conclusion: The SGSH MCBLM field testing results show that the modules have a positive effect on content knowledge in multiple settings and are well accepted by learners.

In this report, sex/gender research relevant to reproduction on Earth, in conjunction with the extant human and animal observations in space, was used to identify knowledge gaps and prioritize recommendations for future sex- and gender-specific surveillance and monitoring of male and female astronauts. With overall increased durations of contemporary space missions, a deeper understanding of sex/gender effects on reproduction-related responses and adaptations to the space environment is warranted to minimize risks and insure healthy aging of the men and women who travel into space.

Sex, a biological variable, and gender, a cultural variable, define the individual and affect all aspects of disease prevention, development, diagnosis, progression, and treatment. Sex and gender are essential elements of individualized medicine. However, medical education rarely considers such topics beyond the physiology of reproduction. To reduce health care disparities and to provide optimal, cost-effective medical care for individuals, concepts of sex and gender health need to become embedded into education and training of health professionals. In September 2012, Mayo Clinic hosted a 2-day workshop bringing together leading experts from 13 U.S. schools of medicine and schools of public health, Health Resources and Services Administration Office of Women's Health (HRSA OWH), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH), and the Canadian Institute of Health and Gender. The purpose of this workshop was to articulate the need to integrate sex- and gender-based content into medical education and training, to identify gaps in current medical curricula, to consider strategies to embed concepts of sex and gender health into health professional curricula, and to identify existing resources to facilitate and implement change. This report summarizes these proceedings, recommendations, and action items from the workshop.