Back to Authors

Schiebinger, Londa

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3438-3081

Mayo Clinic

Stanford University

Citations 3

Reflecting on Progress in and Establishing Benchmarks for Sex and Gender Health Education
Barr, Elizabeth , Chin, Eliza Lo, Rojek, Mary K., Sleeper, Rebecca B. , Temkin, Sarah M. , Clayton, Janine A. , Kantarci, Kejal , Kling, Juliana M. , McGregor, Alyson J. , Schiebinger, Londa , Viggiano, Thomas R., Wood, Susan F. , Werbinski, Jan, Temkin, Sarah M , Clayton, Janine A , Kantarci, Kejal , Kling, Juliana M , Schiebinger, Londa , Templeton, Kimberly , Newman, Connie B. , Templeton, Kimberly

Academic Medicine | September 23, 2023 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 16-21

10.1097/acm.0000000000005444 Get It

Abstract Sex and gender influence every aspect of human health; thus, sex- and gender-related topics should be incorporated in all aspects of health education curricula. Sex and gender health education (SGHE) is the rigorous, intersectional, data-driven integration of sex and gender into all elements of health education. A multisectoral group of thought leaders has collaborated to advance SGHE since 2012. This cross-sector collaboration to advance SGHE has been successful on several fronts, primarily developing robust interprofessional SGHE programs, hosting a series of international SGHE summits, developing sex- and gender-specific resources, and broadening the collaboration beyond medical education. However, other deeply entrenched challenges have proven more difficult to address, including accurate and consistent sex and gender reporting in research publications, broadening institutional support for SGHE, and the development and implementation of evaluation plans for assessing learner outcomes and the downstream effects of SGHE on patient care. This commentary reflects on progress made in SGHE over the first decade of the current collaboration (2012–2022), articulates a vision for next steps to advance SGHE, and proposes 4 benchmarks to guide the next decade of SGHE: (1) integrate sex, gender, and intersectionality across health curricula; (2) develop sex- and gender-specific resources for health professionals; (3) improve sex and gender reporting in research publications; and (4) develop evaluation plans to assess learner and patient outcomes.
Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research
Miller, Leah, Marks, Cheryl L., Hurn, Patricia D., Woodruff, Teresa K. , Sohrabji, Farida , Schiebinger, Londa , Wetherington, Cora Lee, Makris, Susan L. , Arnold, Arthur P. , Einstein, Gillian , Miller, Virginia M. , Sandberg, Kathryn , Maier, Susan, Cornelison, Terri L., Becker, Jill B. , Chen, Wei‐Jung , McCarthy, Margaret M. , Clayton, Janine A. , Schiebinger, Londa

The FASEB Journal | September 28, 2016 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 29-34

10.1096/fj.201600781r Get It

In June 2015, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released a Guide notice (NOT‐OD‐15–102) that highlighted the expectation of the NIH that the possible role of sex as a biologic variable be factored into research design, analyses, and reporting of vertebrate animal and human studies. Anticipating these guidelines, the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health, in October 2014, convened key stakeholders to discuss methods and techniques for integrating sex as a biologic variable in preclinical research. The workshop focused on practical methods, experimental design, and approaches to statistical analyses in the use of both male and female animals, cells, and tissues in preclinical research. Workshop participants also considered gender as a modifier of biology. This article builds on the workshop and is meant as a guide to preclinical investigators as they consider methods and techniques for inclusion of both sexes in preclinical research and is not intended to prescribe exhaustive/specific approaches for compliance with the new NIH policy.—Miller, L. R., Marks, C., Becker, J.B., Hurn, P.D., Chen, W.‐J., Woodruff, T., McCarthy, M.M., Sohrabji, F., Schiebinger, L., Wetherington, C.L., Makris, S., Arnold, A. P., Einstein, G., Miller, V. M., Sandberg, K., Maier, S., Cornelison, T. L., Clayton, J. A. Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research. FASEB J. 31, 29–34 (2017) www.fasebj.org
Embedding Concepts of Sex and Gender Health Differences into Medical Curricula
Miller, Virginia M. , Rice, Morrisa, Schiebinger, Londa , Jenkins, Marjorie , Werbinski, Janice L., Núñez, Ana E. , Wood, Susan F. , Viggiano, Thomas R., Shuster, Lynne T., Schiebinger, Londa

Journal of Women's Health | February 15, 2013 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 194-202

10.1089/jwh.2012.4193 Get It

Sex, a biological variable, and gender, a cultural variable, define the individual and affect all aspects of disease prevention, development, diagnosis, progression, and treatment. Sex and gender are essential elements of individualized medicine. However, medical education rarely considers such topics beyond the physiology of reproduction. To reduce health care disparities and to provide optimal, cost-effective medical care for individuals, concepts of sex and gender health need to become embedded into education and training of health professionals. In September 2012, Mayo Clinic hosted a 2-day workshop bringing together leading experts from 13 U.S. schools of medicine and schools of public health, Health Resources and Services Administration Office of Women's Health (HRSA OWH), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH), and the Canadian Institute of Health and Gender. The purpose of this workshop was to articulate the need to integrate sex- and gender-based content into medical education and training, to identify gaps in current medical curricula, to consider strategies to embed concepts of sex and gender health into health professional curricula, and to identify existing resources to facilitate and implement change. This report summarizes these proceedings, recommendations, and action items from the workshop.