Zagatina, A

Background: Lung ultrasound detects pulmonary congestion as B-lines at rest, and more frequently, during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE). Methods: We performed ESE plus lung ultrasound (4-site simplified scan) in 4392 subjects referred for semi-supine bike ESE in 24 certified centers in 9 countries. B-line score ranged from 0 (normal) to 40 (severely abnormal). Five different populations were evaluated: control subjects (n=103); chronic coronary syndromes (n=3701); heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=395); heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=70); ischemic mitral regurgitation ≥ moderate at rest (n=123). In a subset of 2478 patients, follow-up information was available. Results: During ESE, B-lines increased in all study groups except controls. Age, hypertension, abnormal ejection fraction, peak wall motion score index, and abnormal heart rate reserve were associated with B-lines in multivariable regression analysis. Stress B lines (hazard ratio, 2.179 [95% CI, 1.015–4.680]; P =0.046) and ejection fraction <50% (hazard ratio, 2.942 [95% CI, 1.268–6.822]; P =0.012) were independent predictors of all-cause death (n=29 after a median follow-up of 29 months). Conclusions: B-lines identify the pulmonary congestion phenotype at rest, and more frequently, during ESE in ischemic and heart failure patients. Stress B-lines may help to refine risk stratification in these patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT 03049995.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. OnBehalf Stress Echo 2020 study group of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) Background The classical pathophysiological cornerstone of stress cardiac imaging is the ischemic cascade: alterations in coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) come first, regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) second, and global alterations of left ventricular diastolic and systolic function last. Aim To evaluate the ischemic cascade with stress echo (SE) assessed with ABCDE protocol. Methods We analyzed 1616 patients (age 66 ± 10 years, 1156, 72% males) with chest pain and angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD): 928 (57.4%) with previous myocardial infarction and 1451 (89.8%) with previous coronary revascularization. CAD patients were studied with ABCDE-SE protocol by 13 certified laboratories of 5 countries. Stress modality was exercise in 427 (26.4%) dobutamine in 173 (10.7%) and vasodilator stress in 1016 (62.9%) patients (dipyridamole in 982 – 60.8% and adenosine in 34 – 2.1% patients). Step A assessed RWMA; step B, B-lines (diastolic function); step C, left ventricular contractile reserve based on force; step D, CFVR in left anterior descending artery; step E, heart rate reserve. SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). Follow up was obtained in all patients. Results Results were abnormal in 350 (21.7) % for step A, 572 (35.4%) for B, 666 (41.2%) for C, 546 (33.5%) for D and 643 (39.8%) for E. The distribution of positivity is shown in figure. The dominant "solitary phenotype" (only one biomarker abnormal during the test) was step A in 10 (0.6%), step B in 124 (7.7%) step C in 100 (6.2%), step D in 64 (4.0%) and step E in 157 (9.7%) patients. The overall sensitivity for CAD detection including each step of ABCDE score (≥1) was 95.7%. During median follow-up of 22 months [IQ range: 13-37 months] 279 coronary revascularizations occurred. ABCDE score predicted coronary revascularization with score 1: HR: 3.182, 95% CI: 1.699-6.067; score 2: HR: 4.921, 95% CI: 2.571-9.420; score 3: HR: 7.234, 95% CI: 3.743-13.979; score 4: HR: 24.570, 95% CI: 13.390-45.086; and score 5: HR: 38.720, 95% CI: 20.975-71.478 Conclusion Inducible ischemia with CAD is characterized by the complexity and multiplicity of diagnostic phenotypes. The overall ABCDE score predicts clinically driven revascularization. Abstract Figure. The 5 circles of ischemia biomarkers

Abstract Background Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B-lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, EKG-based heart rate reserve. Aim: to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicenter, international, effectiveness study. Methods From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3,574 all-comers (age 65±11 years, 2,070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60±10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n=952, with semi-supine bike, n=887, or treadmill, n=65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n=2,622, with vasodilator, n=2,151; or dobutamine, n=471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only end-point. Results Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D and 37% for E step. During a median follow-up of 21 months, 73 deaths occurred. At univariable analysis, predictors of all-cause mortality were step B (hazard ratio, HR: 2.621, 95% Confidence Intervals, CI: 1.654–4.152, p&lt;0.001), step D (HR: 2.578, 95% CI: 1.624–4.093, p&lt;0.001), and step E (HR: 2.955, 95% CI: 1.848–4.725, p&lt;0.001), but not step A (HR: 1.333, 95% CI: 0.731–2.430, p=0.349) and step C (HR1.581, 95% CI: 0.997–2.506, p=0.051). At multivariable analysis, ABCDE-SE was an independent predictor of mortality with score 3 (HR: 3.472, 95% CI: 1.483–8.135, p=0.004), 4 (HR: 4.045, 95% CI: 1.595–10.259, p=0.003) and 5 (HR: 5.678, 95% CI: 2.106–15.313, p=0.001) (Figure). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person/year for score 0 up to 2.4% person/year for score 5. Conclusion ABCDE-SE allows an effective risk stratification of patient global vulnerability. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Survival curves based on ABCDE score

With stress echo (SE) 2020 study, a new standard of practice in stress imaging was developed and disseminated: the ABCDE protocol for functional testing within and beyond CAD. ABCDE protocol was the fruit of SE 2020, and is the seed of SE 2030, which is articulated in 12 projects: 1-SE in coronary artery disease (SECAD); 2-SE in diastolic heart failure (SEDIA); 3-SE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (SEHCA); 4-SE post-chest radiotherapy and chemotherapy (SERA); 5-Artificial intelligence SE evaluation (AI-SEE); 6-Environmental stress echocardiography and air pollution (ESTER); 7-SE in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (SETOF); 8-SE in post-COVID-19 (SECOV); 9: Recovery by stress echo of conventionally unfit donor good hearts (RESURGE); 10-SE for mitral ischemic regurgitation (SEMIR); 11-SE in valvular heart disease (SEVA); 12-SE for coronary vasospasm (SESPASM). The study aims to recruit in the next 5 years (2021–2025) ≥10,000 patients followed for ≥5 years (up to 2030) from ≥20 quality-controlled laboratories from ≥10 countries. In this COVID-19 era of sustainable health care delivery, SE2030 will provide the evidence to finally recommend SE as the optimal and versatile imaging modality for functional testing anywhere, any time, and in any patient.

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of ABCDE-SE in a prospective, large scale, multicentre, international, effectiveness study. Stress echocardiography (SE) was recently upgraded to the ABCDE protocol: step A, regional wall motion abnormalities; step B, B lines; step C, left ventricular contractile reserve; step D, Doppler-based coronary flow velocity reserve in left anterior descending coronary artery; and step E, electrocardiogram-based heart rate reserve. Methods and results From July 2016 to November 2020, we enrolled 3574 all-comers (age 65 ± 11 years, 2070 males, 58%; ejection fraction 60 ± 10%) with known or suspected chronic coronary syndromes referred from 13 certified laboratories. All patients underwent clinically indicated ABCDE-SE. The employed stress modality was exercise (n = 952, with semi-supine bike, n = 887, or treadmill, n = 65 with adenosine for step D) or pharmacological stress (n = 2622, with vasodilator, n = 2151; or dobutamine, n = 471). SE response ranged from score 0 (all steps normal) to score 5 (all steps abnormal). All-cause death was the only endpoint. Rate of abnormal results was 16% for A, 30% for B, 36% for C, 28% for D, and 37% for E steps. During a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range: 13–36), 73 deaths occurred. Global X 2 was 49.5 considering clinical variables, 50.7 after step A only (P = NS (not significant)) and 80.6 after B–E steps (P &lt; 0.001 vs. step A). Annual mortality rate ranged from 0.4% person-year for score 0 up to 2.7% person-year for score 5. Conclusion ABCDE-SE allows an effective prediction of survival in patients with chronic coronary syndromes.

Stress echo (SE) 2030 study is an international, prospective, multicenter cohort study that will include >10,000 patients from ≥20 centers from ≥10 countries. It represents the logical and chronological continuation of the SE 2020 study, which developed, validated, and disseminated the “ABCDE protocol” of SE, more suitable than conventional SE to describe the complex vulnerabilities of the contemporary patient within and beyond coronary artery disease. SE2030 was started with a recruitment plan from 2021 to 2025 (and follow-up to 2030) with 12 subprojects (ranging from coronary artery disease to valvular and post-COVID-19 patients). With these features, the study poses particular challenges on quality control assurance, methodological harmonization, and data management. One of the significant upgrades of SE2030 compared to SE2020 was developing and implementing a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)-based infrastructure for interactive and entirely web-based data management to integrate and optimize reproducible clinical research data. The purposes of our paper were: first, to describe the methodology used for quality control of imaging data, and second, to present the informatic infrastructure developed on RedCap platform for data entry, storage, and management in a large-scale multicenter study.

Background: Two-dimensional volumetric exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) provides an integrated view of left ventricular (LV) preload reserve through end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV contractile reserve (LVCR) through end-systolic volume (ESV) changes. Purpose: To assess the dependence of cardiac reserve upon LVCR, EDV, and heart rate (HR) during ESE. Methods: We prospectively performed semi-supine bicycle or treadmill ESE in 1344 patients (age 59.8 ± 11.4 years; ejection fraction = 63 ± 8%) referred for known or suspected coronary artery disease. All patients had negative ESE by wall motion criteria. EDV and ESV were measured by biplane Simpson rule with 2-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiac index reserve was identified by peak-rest value. LVCR was the stress-rest ratio of force (systolic blood pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/ESV, abnormal values ≤2.0). Preload reserve was defined by an increase in EDV. Cardiac index was calculated as stroke volume index * HR (by EKG). HR reserve (stress/rest ratio) <1.85 identified chronotropic incompetence. Results: Of the 1344 patients, 448 were in the lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve with stress. Of them, 303 (67.6%) achieved HR reserve <1.85; 252 (56.3%) had an abnormal LVCR and 341 (76.1%) a reduction of preload reserve, with 446 patients (99.6%) showing ≥1 abnormality. At binary logistic regression analysis, reduced preload reserve (odds ratio [OR]: 5.610; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.025 to 7.821), chronotropic incompetence (OR: 3.923, 95% CI: 2.915 to 5.279), and abnormal LVCR (OR: 1.579; 95% CI: 1.105 to 2.259) were independently associated with lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve at peak stress. Conclusions: Heart rate assessment and volumetric echocardiography during ESE identify the heterogeneity of hemodynamic phenotypes of impaired chronotropic, preload or LVCR underlying a reduced cardiac reserve.