Sampson, Brandon P.

OBJECTIVE The role of amputation and myoelectric prosthetic fitting for hand function in traumatic pan–brachial plexus injury (pBPI) continues to evolve. This study evaluated the function and activity performance of patients with traumatic pBPI who underwent amputation and prosthetic fitting with a myoelectric prosthesis (MEP) for hand function. METHODS A retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent elective amputation after sustaining a pBPI followed by MEP for hand function was performed. Demographics, mechanisms of injury, amputation details, and outcomes were collected from medical records. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was used to evaluate the impact of impairment, the visual analog scale (VAS) to assess pain, and the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA) to determine functional activity performance pre- and post-MEP usage. Follow-up time, prosthesis usage, satisfaction, and site of electrical signal used were recorded. Paired t-tests were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one adult patients with pBPI (90% male, mean age 32 years at the time of BPI) underwent amputations and were fitted with MEPs for hand function controlled by nonintuitive signals. Fifteen patients underwent a trans-radial amputation and 6 underwent a trans-humeral amputation. While all patients sought improved terminal grasp function, 3 patients subsequently declined prosthetic fitting after amputation. Of the 18 patients who underwent myoelectric prosthetic hand fittings, linear transducers activated by the contralateral shoulder protraction were used in 66% of patients, and traditional electrode signals from ipsilateral nonintuitive muscle were used in 33% to control MEP grasp function. Disability (DASH) and pain (VAS) scores significantly improved after amputation (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). AM-ULA scores showed a significant improvement in activity performance after application of the MEP, with an average increase of 23 points from 0 points on a 40-point scale before amputation and prosthetic fitting (p < 0.0001). Daily users of the MEP averaged 6 hours per day and reported the prosthesis was useful during daily activities with great satisfaction at an average of 22 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Amputation followed by MEP fitting in adult traumatic pBPI significantly improved function, reduced pain, and had a high prosthetic usage. The AM-ULA, a tool for quantitatively evaluating activity performance, was applied to measure the bimanual functional activity performance of patients before and after using MEPs, which revealed a significant improvement. Patients reported using their prosthetics daily with a high satisfaction rate with functional terminal grasp and release.

Background: Restoration of hand function after traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) remains a formidable challenge. Traditional methods such as nerve or free muscle transfers yield suboptimal results. Advancements in myoelectric prostheses, characterized by novel signal acquisition and improved material technology, show promise in restoring functional grasp. This study evaluated the ability of adults with a BPI injury to control an externally powered prosthetic hand using nonintuitive signals, simulating the restoration of grasp with a myoelectric prosthesis. It also assessed the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation in guiding treatment decisions. Methods: A multidisciplinary brachial plexus team assessed adults with compromised hand function due to BPI. The feasibility of amputation coupled with fitting of a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp reconstruction was evaluated. Participants' ability to control a virtual or model prosthetic hand using surface electromyography (EMG) as well as with contralateral shoulder motion-activated linear transducer signals was tested. The patient’s input and injury type, along with the information from the prosthetic evaluation, were used to determine the reconstructive plan. The study also reviewed the number of participants opting for amputation and a myoelectric prosthetic hand for grasp restoration, and a follow-up survey was conducted to assess the impact of the initial evaluation on decision-making. Results: Of 58 subjects evaluated, 47 (81%) had pan-plexus BPI and 42 (72%) received their initial assessment within 1 year post-injury. Forty-seven patients (81%) could control the virtual or model prosthetic hand using nonintuitive surface EMG signals, and all 58 could control it with contralateral uniscapular motion via a linear transducer and harness. Thirty patients (52%) chose and pursued amputation, and 20 (34%) actively used a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp. The initial evaluation was informative and beneficial for the majority of the patients, especially in demonstrating the functionality of the myoelectric prosthesis. Conclusions: The study indicates that adults with traumatic BPI can effectively operate a virtual or model myoelectric prosthesis using nonintuitive control signals. The simulation and multidisciplinary evaluation influenced informed treatment choices, with a high percentage of patients continuing to use the myoelectric prostheses post-amputation, highlighting its long-term acceptance and viability. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: A cohort of patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) underwent elective amputation following unsuccessful surgical reconstruction or delayed presentation. The results of amputation with and without a myoelectric prosthesis (MEP) using nonintuitive controls were compared. We sought to determine the benefits of amputation, and whether fitting with an MEP was feasible and functional. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with BPI who underwent elective upper-extremity amputation at a single institution. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, injury and reconstruction details, amputation characteristics, outcomes, and complications. Prosthesis use and MEP function were assessed. The minimum follow-up for clinical outcomes was 12 months. Results: Thirty-two patients with BPI and an average follow-up of 53 months underwent elective amputation between June 2000 and June 2020. Among the cases were 18 transhumeral amputations, 12 transradial amputations, and 2 wrist disarticulations. There were 29 pan-plexus injuries, 1 partial C5-sparing pan-plexus injury, 1 lower-trunk with lateral cord injury, and 1 lower-trunk injury. Amputation occurred, on average, at 48.9 months following BPI and 36.5 months following final reconstruction. Ten patients were fitted for an MEP with electromyographic signal control from muscles not normally associated with the intended function (nonintuitive control). Average visual analog scale pain scores decreased post-amputation: from 4.8 pre-amputation to 3.3 for the MEP group and from 5.4 to 4.4 for the non-MEP group. Average scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire decreased post-amputation, but not significantly: from 35 to 30 for the MEP group and from 43 to 40 for the non-MEP group. Patients were more likely to be employed following amputation than they were before amputation. No patient expressed regret about undergoing amputation. All patients in the MEP group reported regular use of their prosthesis compared with 29% of patients with a traditional prosthesis. All patients in the MEP group demonstrated functional terminal grasp/release that they considered useful. Conclusions: Amputation is an effective treatment for select patients with BPI for whom surgical reconstruction is unsuccessful. Patients who underwent amputation reported decreased mechanical pain, increased employment rates, and a high rate of satisfaction following surgery. In amputees with sufficient nonintuitive electromyographic signals, MEPs allow for terminal grasp/release and are associated with high rates of prosthesis use. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Case: This is a case of a 41-year-old man who sustained a traumatic proximal transfemoral amputation with loss of adductor function and inadequate soft tissue. Wound closure was achieved with split-thickness skin grafting. Subsequently, femoral lengthening was achieved with an internal magnetic lengthening nail. He underwent a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap to resurface the limb and provide more stable soft tissue, adductor repair, and further lengthening because of his prominent abduction contracture and inadequate soft tissue. This allowed independent ambulation with a prosthetic. Conclusion: Femoral lengthening with soft-tissue reconstruction improved prosthetic function and ambulation in a patient with a short transfemoral amputation.