Lee, Ellen Y.

Case: An upper trunk brachial plexus injury patient underwent ulnar motor fascicular to biceps motor nerve transfer. At 6 months postoperative, the patient had trace biceps firing but was diagnosed with an unrecognized rupture of the distal biceps tendon, requiring reconstruction. Another patient with C5-T1 injury was noted to have distal biceps tendon rupture at the time of gracilis muscle transfer. Both patients had gravity-assisted elbow flexion at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Biceps rupture is an uncommon concomitant injury with brachial plexus trauma and challenging to diagnose in the context of a paretic limb. Thorough history and intraoperative biceps tendon palpation will ensure these injuries are identified.

Background: Secondary shoulder deformities are the most frequent sequelae of upper trunk-type brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Coracoid process dysplasia was recently described as being associated with glenoid retroversion and was recognized to block successful humeral head relocation. There are little to no reports on coracoid process deformity causing anterior shoulder pain. Our hypothesis is that coracoid process impingement causes anterior shoulder pain in BPBI, which is relieved by coracoid excision. This study presents the short-term results of this new technique in BPBI patients. Methods: A retrospective review identified BPBI patients who underwent coracoid excision from 2000 to 2022. Indications for this procedure include BPBI patients with anterior shoulder pain limiting the range of motion, localized tenderness over a prominent coracoid process, a dysplastic coracoid process seen on imaging, and persistent pain despite activity modification, medication, and therapy. Patient characteristics, preoperative shoulder pain score, range of motion, degree of glenohumeral subluxation, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) scores for pain interference, and physical and upper extremity function were collected from chart review. Postoperative pain scores, range of motion, and PROMIS scores were collected at an average of 1 year after excision. Results: Five upper trunk BPBI patients, ages 10 to 25 years old, with anterior shoulder pain underwent coracoid excision. All had statistically significant pain relief from 6.5–8.5/10 before to 0–3/10 after the procedure. Forward flexion and external rotation improved by an average of 18 degrees. The pain interference score decreased by 25%. There was a 33% improvement in physical function scores and a 31% increase in upper extremity function scores. No complications or recurrence were observed at 7.5 months to 1 year and 7 months after surgery. Conclusions: Coracoid excision is a simple procedure that can relieve localized shoulder pain caused by coracoid impingement in adolescent/adult BPBI. Continued follow-up of all patients will be undertaken to determine long-term recurrence rates and complications. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

The gracilis free functioning muscle transfer is an established procedure for reconstructing elbow, wrist, and hand function in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury patients. Elbow flexion or distal wrist or hand function can be compromised by gracilis bowstringing in up to 17.8% of patients. Two techniques for pulley reconstruction to correct bowstringing and improve the function of the gracilis transfer are described.

Small proximal pole scaphoid nonunions are challenging to treat. We describe a technique for replacing the proximal pole fragment with an osteochondral autograft transplant harvested from the ipsilateral femoral trochlea. This is indicated in nonunions where the proximal pole fragment is smaller than the scaphoid isthmus; the scapholunate ligament complex is intact on the distal fragment, and in nonunions without dorsal intercalated segment instability and radiocarpal arthritis. The osteochondral autograft transplant is press-fitted into the distal scaphoid and does not require implants for osteointegration. This provides an advantage during revision surgery of previously fixed proximal scaphoid fractures that are not united with an implant in situ.

Background: Restoration of hand function after traumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI) remains a formidable challenge. Traditional methods such as nerve or free muscle transfers yield suboptimal results. Advancements in myoelectric prostheses, characterized by novel signal acquisition and improved material technology, show promise in restoring functional grasp. This study evaluated the ability of adults with a BPI injury to control an externally powered prosthetic hand using nonintuitive signals, simulating the restoration of grasp with a myoelectric prosthesis. It also assessed the effectiveness of a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation in guiding treatment decisions. Methods: A multidisciplinary brachial plexus team assessed adults with compromised hand function due to BPI. The feasibility of amputation coupled with fitting of a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp reconstruction was evaluated. Participants' ability to control a virtual or model prosthetic hand using surface electromyography (EMG) as well as with contralateral shoulder motion-activated linear transducer signals was tested. The patient’s input and injury type, along with the information from the prosthetic evaluation, were used to determine the reconstructive plan. The study also reviewed the number of participants opting for amputation and a myoelectric prosthetic hand for grasp restoration, and a follow-up survey was conducted to assess the impact of the initial evaluation on decision-making. Results: Of 58 subjects evaluated, 47 (81%) had pan-plexus BPI and 42 (72%) received their initial assessment within 1 year post-injury. Forty-seven patients (81%) could control the virtual or model prosthetic hand using nonintuitive surface EMG signals, and all 58 could control it with contralateral uniscapular motion via a linear transducer and harness. Thirty patients (52%) chose and pursued amputation, and 20 (34%) actively used a myoelectric prosthesis for grasp. The initial evaluation was informative and beneficial for the majority of the patients, especially in demonstrating the functionality of the myoelectric prosthesis. Conclusions: The study indicates that adults with traumatic BPI can effectively operate a virtual or model myoelectric prosthesis using nonintuitive control signals. The simulation and multidisciplinary evaluation influenced informed treatment choices, with a high percentage of patients continuing to use the myoelectric prostheses post-amputation, highlighting its long-term acceptance and viability. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Traumatic adult brachial plexus injuries typically cause immediate loss of upper limb function. Timely multidisciplinary treatment in specialized centres often results in a useful helper arm. Both the patient and the surgical team can benefit from an open discussion to set realistic expectations. Surgical reconstruction is customized for each patient, considering their injury factors and functional objectives. Optimizing pain control, adherence to procedure indications and using meticulous surgical techniques help minimize the risk of failing to meet the patient’s goals. The need for potential alternative treatment(s) if the desired result is not achieved should be detailed before the initial reconstruction. This review discusses late treatment options, including tendon transfers, joint fusions, free functioning muscle transfers and prosthetics, for managing the failed primary reconstruction of the traumatic adult brachial plexus.

Case: Augmented scapholunate ligament reconstruction using polyether ether ketone anchors and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene synthetic tape has the theoretical advantage of improved stability, avoidance of K-wire fixation, and the potential for earlier mobilization. We present 3 cases of scaphoid and lunate osteolysis/fragmentation, operative and histologic findings at reoperation, and the sequelae of this technique. Conclusion: If planning to use suture anchors and synthetic tapes in small carpal bones, we recommend advising patients about the risk of osteolysis and monitoring closely patients who complain of pain with motion after surgery.