Smither, Fantley C

OBJECTIVE The role of amputation and myoelectric prosthetic fitting for hand function in traumatic pan–brachial plexus injury (pBPI) continues to evolve. This study evaluated the function and activity performance of patients with traumatic pBPI who underwent amputation and prosthetic fitting with a myoelectric prosthesis (MEP) for hand function. METHODS A retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent elective amputation after sustaining a pBPI followed by MEP for hand function was performed. Demographics, mechanisms of injury, amputation details, and outcomes were collected from medical records. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was used to evaluate the impact of impairment, the visual analog scale (VAS) to assess pain, and the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA) to determine functional activity performance pre- and post-MEP usage. Follow-up time, prosthesis usage, satisfaction, and site of electrical signal used were recorded. Paired t-tests were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one adult patients with pBPI (90% male, mean age 32 years at the time of BPI) underwent amputations and were fitted with MEPs for hand function controlled by nonintuitive signals. Fifteen patients underwent a trans-radial amputation and 6 underwent a trans-humeral amputation. While all patients sought improved terminal grasp function, 3 patients subsequently declined prosthetic fitting after amputation. Of the 18 patients who underwent myoelectric prosthetic hand fittings, linear transducers activated by the contralateral shoulder protraction were used in 66% of patients, and traditional electrode signals from ipsilateral nonintuitive muscle were used in 33% to control MEP grasp function. Disability (DASH) and pain (VAS) scores significantly improved after amputation (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). AM-ULA scores showed a significant improvement in activity performance after application of the MEP, with an average increase of 23 points from 0 points on a 40-point scale before amputation and prosthetic fitting (p < 0.0001). Daily users of the MEP averaged 6 hours per day and reported the prosthesis was useful during daily activities with great satisfaction at an average of 22 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Amputation followed by MEP fitting in adult traumatic pBPI significantly improved function, reduced pain, and had a high prosthetic usage. The AM-ULA, a tool for quantitatively evaluating activity performance, was applied to measure the bimanual functional activity performance of patients before and after using MEPs, which revealed a significant improvement. Patients reported using their prosthetics daily with a high satisfaction rate with functional terminal grasp and release.

Introduction Advancements in vascularized composite allotransplantation have made hand transplants possible for persons living with upper limb loss. Hand transplantation is not a life-saving procedure, but rather a quality-of-life enhancing procedure; hence the risk of morbidity and mortality must be weighed against improvements in function and appearance. This study explored the decision-making process of patients evaluated for hand transplantation. Methods/Approach A qualitative case series study using retrospective chart data of evaluations was conducted between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. Notes were extracted and read by three reviewers. Each case was summarized noting similarities and differences. Findings Nine patients underwent evaluation. Eight were no longer under evaluation and did not receive transplant; one was still undergoing evaluation. Patient motivations for evaluation were dissatisfaction with prostheses or self-image, chronic pain, performing activities of daily living, occupation, burden placed on caregivers, and concerns about overuse of non-affected limbs. Patients chose not to pursue transplantation due to rehabilitation time, immunosuppression, alternative treatments, and social and financial challenges. The clinical team discontinued evaluations due to unmet evaluation requirements, medical contraindications, or treatment alternatives. Different modes of shared decision-making were present depending on the party most heavily featured in the charts as driving decisions. Discussion This was an examination of shared decision-making with hand transplant candidates who did not proceed to transplant. Reasons for choosing alternative strategies for management were multifactorial. Lessons learned regarding patient motivations and shared decision-making can inform future interventions to better support patients.

This case series aims to highlight the efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) in the treatment of phantom limb pain, as well as provide an alternative method for the treatment of this pain syndrome. In this report, we describe three amputee patients with severe phantom limb pain who obtained substantial analgesia and improvement in physical functionality after implantation of a temporary PNS device. Future studies should assess predictors of successful response or poor response to PNS therapy, such as mental health, environmental stressors, coping skills, and procedural factors. These factors may facilitate an individualized approach for each patient to ensure appropriate candidacy for PNS and better prognosis. Considering that patients in our cohort did not achieve long-lasting benefit after removal of temporary PNS, future research should assess if patients with phantom limb pain would benefit from permanent PNS, rather than temporary PNS.