Back to Authors

García-Bautista, Andrea

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-3959

Mayo Clinic

Doctors Hospital at Renaissance

Citations 3

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case report and systematic review on management and outcomes
Serrano, Luis F. , Vallejo, Sebastián , Solis-Pazmino, Paola , García-Bautista, Andrea , Acosta, William , Ponce, Oscar J. , Salazar-Vega, Jorge , García, Cristhian, Solís-Pazmiño, Paola , Lincango, Eddy P., Ponce, Oscar Josue , Pilatuna, Eduardo A , Lincango-Naranjo, Eddy

Journal of Surgical Case Reports | May 27, 2024 | Volume: 2024 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jscr/rjad658 Get It

Abstract Primary thyroid lymphoma is a rare thyroid cancer, comprising ˂5% of thyroid neoplasms. Most cases are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Coexistence with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is extremely rare. This study presents a case of a 55-year-old woman with DLBCL and micropapillary thyroid cancer who underwent lobectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Additionally, we performed a systematic review of 10 cases, including the reported case. The risk of bias in case reports varied. DLBCL diagnoses were mainly made after surgery, with total thyroidectomy being the most common surgical procedure. Chemotherapy was administered in most cases, and radiotherapy was used in some cases. Long-term outcomes indicated a low recurrence rate. While some debate the role of surgery in thyroid lymphoma, this study suggests that surgery should be considered in selected cases. Further research is needed to determine optimal treatment strategies for DLBCL with PTC.
Appropriateness of Levothyroxine Prescription: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Ayala, Ivan Nicolas, Jacome, Cristian Soto , Toro-Tobón, David , García-Bautista, Andrea , Hidalgo, Jessica, Cordova-Madera, Sandra, Anbari, Raghda Al, R, Jessica Sohn, Ospina, Naykky Singh , Joseph, Marina, Brito, Juan P. , Soto Jacome, Cristian, Golembiewski, Elizabeth, Singh Ospina, Naykky , Brito, Juan P , Toro-Tobon, David , Ayala, Ivan N. , Golembiewski, Elizabeth H. , Maraka, Spyridoula

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism | September 1, 2023 | Volume: 109 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e765-e772

10.1210/clinem/dgad517 Get It

Abstract Context Levothyroxine is one of the most prescribed medications in the United States. Objective This study explores the appropriateness of levothyroxine prescriptions. Methods A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on adult patients who were prescribed levothyroxine for the first time between 2017 and 2020 at three academic centers in the United States. We classified each case of levothyroxine initiation into one of three mutually exclusive categories: appropriate (clinically supported), indeterminate (clinically unclear), or nonevidence based (NEB, not clinically supported). Results A total of 977 participants were included. The mean age was 55 years (SD 19), there was female (69%) and White race predominance (84%), and 44% had possible hypothyroid symptoms. Nearly half of the levothyroxine prescriptions were considered NEB (528, 54%), followed by appropriate (307, 31%) and indeterminate (118, 12%). The most common reason for NEB prescription was an index thyrotropin (TSH) value of less than 10 mIU/L without previous TSH or thyroxine values (131/528, 25%), for appropriate prescription, was overt hypothyroidism (163/307, 53%), and for an indeterminate prescription was a nonconfirmed subclinical hypothyroidism with TSH greater than or equal to 10 mIU/L (no confirmatory testing) (51/118, 43%). In multivariable analysis, being female (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7) and prescription by a primary care provider (OR: 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0) were associated with NEB prescriptions. Conclusion There is a considerable proportion of NEB levothyroxine prescriptions. These results call for additional research to replicate these findings and to explore the perspective of those prescribing and receiving levothyroxine.
A Single-Center Retrospective Evaluation of Decision-Making and Factors Motivating Hand Transplant Candidates
Boehmer, Kasey R. , Kennedy, Cassie C. , Hargraves, Ian , García-Bautista, Andrea , SANCHEZ, BRIANNA B.M. , Chokkalingam, Avudaiappan, Finnie, Dawn M., Miller, Adam R. , Moran, Steven L. , Smither, F. Clay , Garcia-Bautista, Andrea E, Sanchez, Brianna B , Smither, Fantley C, Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila, Kennedy, Cassie C , Griffin, Joan M. , Amer, Hatem , Jowsey‐Gregoire, Sheila G.

Progress in Transplantation | August 3, 2023 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 216-222

10.1177/15269248231189863 Get It

Introduction Advancements in vascularized composite allotransplantation have made hand transplants possible for persons living with upper limb loss. Hand transplantation is not a life-saving procedure, but rather a quality-of-life enhancing procedure; hence the risk of morbidity and mortality must be weighed against improvements in function and appearance. This study explored the decision-making process of patients evaluated for hand transplantation. Methods/Approach A qualitative case series study using retrospective chart data of evaluations was conducted between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020. Notes were extracted and read by three reviewers. Each case was summarized noting similarities and differences. Findings Nine patients underwent evaluation. Eight were no longer under evaluation and did not receive transplant; one was still undergoing evaluation. Patient motivations for evaluation were dissatisfaction with prostheses or self-image, chronic pain, performing activities of daily living, occupation, burden placed on caregivers, and concerns about overuse of non-affected limbs. Patients chose not to pursue transplantation due to rehabilitation time, immunosuppression, alternative treatments, and social and financial challenges. The clinical team discontinued evaluations due to unmet evaluation requirements, medical contraindications, or treatment alternatives. Different modes of shared decision-making were present depending on the party most heavily featured in the charts as driving decisions. Discussion This was an examination of shared decision-making with hand transplant candidates who did not proceed to transplant. Reasons for choosing alternative strategies for management were multifactorial. Lessons learned regarding patient motivations and shared decision-making can inform future interventions to better support patients.