Back to Authors

Peterson, Kevin

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-8586

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Governing Decisions of Probability Cutoffs in Clinical AI Deployment: A Case Study of Asthma Exacerbation Prediction
Zheng, Lu , Kshatriya, Bhavani Singh Agnikula , Ohde, Joshua W. , Rost, Lauren M. , Peterson, Kevin , Brereton, Tracey A. , Loufek, Brenna Tilka , Pereira, Tara V., Gai, Chenyu , Park, Miguel A., Hartz, Martha F., Fladager-Muth, Joy, Juhn, Young, Rost, Lauren M , Malik, Momin M. , Peterson, Kevin J. , Pereira, Tara, Muth, Joy Fladager, Wi, Chung‐Il , Tao, Cui , Garovic, Vesna D. , Juhn, Young J. , Overgaard, Shauna M.

No container title available | March 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.03.18.26348562 Get It

Abstract Models that estimate the probability of an adverse clinical outcome require an operational cutoff to translate continuous estimated probabilities into discrete labels that can trigger clinical action. Although statistical methods identify ‘optimal’ cut-offs, threshold selection ultimately reflects value judgments regarding harm tolerance, resource allocation, and workflow feasibility. We describe a governance-informed approach to selecting a deployment threshold for an asthma exacerbation (AE) prediction model integrated into clinical workflows. Using prevalence-adjusted performance metrics and real-world provider capacity modeling, we evaluated multiple candidate thresholds and quantified downstream workload and missed-event trade-offs. We demonstrate that statistically optimal thresholds may produce operationally infeasible alert volumes or unacceptable miss rates. We propose a structured threshold governance framework integrating statistical performance, clinical utility, stakeholder input, and human oversight safeguards. This case illustrates how threshold decisions should be treated as organizational governance processes rather than purely technical optimizations.
Quantitation Of Platelet Lysis, Platelet Consumption On Oxygenator And Stabilization Of Platelet Membrane With Prostacyclin And Ibuprofen During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery In Dogs
Dewanjee, Mrinal K., Vogel, S R, Kaye, Michael P., Peterson, Kevin

Thrombosis and Haemostasis | July 26, 2018 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1055/s-0038-1652777 Get It

Prostacyclin (PGI2) and Ibuprofen (IP) may preserve platelet integrity and function during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Platelet consumption on bubble and membrane oxygenator, platelet lysis, and platelet microembolism were studied in 7 control, 6 PGI2-, and 5 IP-treated dogs undergoing CPB. At 18 hours after I.V. administration of autologous In-Ill-labeled platelets (300 μCi), 7 heparinized dogs (300 u/kg), and 6 dogs treated with I.V. infusion of PGI2 (25 ng/kg/min) and heparin (100 u/kg), and 5 dogs with I.V. IP (12.5 mg/kg) 15 min prior to bypass procedure underwent CPB for 1 hour. In-111 in plasma obtained from platelet lysis was determined by centrifugation at 200,000 G of serial blood samples at 5-min intervals during CPB. Hemodilution was measured with I-125-labeled serum albumin (10 μCi). Platelet deposition on oxygenator was imaged with a gamma camera and quantitated with an ionization chamber. An insignificant amount of platelet (<0.2%) was found in the heat exchanger. In-111-labeled platelet level in blood of control dogs 20 min after CPB initiation decreased to 23 ± 5% of prebypass level, 38 ± 5% in PGI2 group, and 25 ± 5% in the IP group. Plasma In-111 increased to 34±7% in control, 15±5% in PGI2 group, and 17±3% in IP group (p< 0.01). Platelet deposition on the oxygenator amounted to 20±5% of In-111 platelets in control, 11±3% of PGI2, and 13±4% in IP group (p< 0.01). These results indicate that both PGI2 and IP significantly reduce platelet consumption in oxygenator and platelet lysis during CPB. Thus PGI2 may reduce postoperative bleeding. Ibuprofen, although preserving platelet function, has a longer duration of action and, hence, systemic administration prior to CPB is not practical. Surface coating of extracorporeal surfaces with IP might be beneficial.
Improving Diabetes Care in Practice
Peterson, Kevin , O’Connor, Patrick J. , Nyman, John A. , Prineas, Ronald J. , Smith, Steven A., Arneson, Thomas J., Corbett, Victor A., Weinhandl, Joyce C., Lange, Carol J., Hannan, Peter J., Radosevich, David M. , Corbett, V

Diabetes Care | September 22, 2008 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2238-2243

10.2337/dc08-2034 Get It

OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a multicomponent organizational intervention can produce significant change in diabetes care and outcomes in community primary care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This was a group-randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the practical effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention (TRANSLATE) in 24 practices. The intervention included implementation of an electronic diabetes registry, visit reminders, and patient-specific physician alerts. A site coordinator facilitated previsit planning and a monthly review of performance with a local physician champion. The principle outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving target values for the composite of systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt;130 mmHg, LDL cholesterol &lt;100 mg/dl, and A1C &lt;7.0% at baseline and 12 months. Six process measures were also followed. RESULTS—Over 24 months, 69,965 visits from 8,405 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were recorded from 238 health care providers in 24 practices from 17 health systems. Diabetes process measures increased significantly more in intervention than in control practices, giving net increases as follows: foot examinations 35.0% (P &lt; 0.0.001); annual eye examinations 25.9% (P &lt; 0.001); renal testing 28.5% (P &lt; 0.001); A1C testing 8.1%(P &lt; 0.001); blood pressure monitoring 3.5% (P = 0.05); and LDL testing 8.6% (P &lt; 0.001). Mean A1C adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity decreased significantly in intervention practices (P &lt; 0.02). At 12 months, intervention practices had significantly greater improvement in achieving recommended clinical values for SBP, A1C, and LDL than control clinics (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS—Introduction of a multicomponent organizational intervention in the primary care setting significantly increases the percentage of type 2 diabetic patients achieving recommended clinical outcomes.