Back to Authors

Smith, Steven A.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 42

A counseling strategy was better than usual care for adopting and maintaining physical activity in type 2 diabetes
Smith, Steven A., Vickers, Kristin S.

ACP Journal Club | February 17, 2022 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 69

10.7326/acpjc-2003-139-3-069 Get It

Atorvastatin reduced major cardiovascular disease events in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Gami, Apoor S., Smith, Steven A.

ACP Journal Club | February 17, 2022 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 29

10.7326/acpjc-2005-142-2-029 Get It

Review: Lifestyle or pharmacologic interventions prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in impaired glucose tolerance
Bhagra, Sumit , Smith, Steven A.

ACP Journal Club | January 18, 2022 | Volume: 147 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1

10.7326/acpjc-2007-147-1-001 Get It

Review: Long-acting insulin analogues do not improve glycemic control but do reduce nocturnal hypoglycemia in diabetes
Smith, Steven A., Murad, M. Hassan

ACP Journal Club | October 28, 2021 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 37

10.7326/acpjc-2008-148-2-037 Get It

Review: Tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, and capsaicin cream are effective treatments for diabetic neuropathy
Smith, Steven A., Murad, M. Hassan

ACP Journal Club | October 28, 2021 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 2

10.7326/acpjc-2008-148-1-002 Get It

Linear yellow papules following a cat scratch
Lehman, Julia S. , Nault, Ashley M., Smith, Steven A., McEvoy, Marian T., Lehman, Julia S

International Journal of Dermatology | February 16, 2018 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 862-863

10.1111/ijd.13944 Get It

Using claims data linked with electronic health records to monitor and improve adherence to medication
Lobo, Jennifer M. , Wilson, James R. , Shah, N. D., Smith, Steven A., Denton, Brian T.

IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering | June 29, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 194-214

10.1080/24725579.2017.1346728 Get It

Review: Metformin is linked to reduced mortality in type 2 diabetes with comorbid CKD and CHF
Jasim, Sina , Smith, Steven A.

Annals of Internal Medicine | April 18, 2017 | Volume: 166 | Issue: 8 | Pages: JC46

10.7326/acpjc-2017-166-8-046 Get It

Development and Validation of HealthImpact: An Incident Diabetes Prediction Model Based on Administrative Data
Nori, Vijay S. , Smith, Steven A., Hane, Christopher A. , McCoy, Rozalina G.

Health Services Research | February 21, 2016 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1896-1918

10.1111/1475-6773.12461 Get It

Objective To develop and validate a model of incident type 2 diabetes based solely on administrative data. Data Sources/Study Setting Optum Labs Data Warehouse (OLDW), a national commercial administrative dataset. Study Design HealthImpact model was developed and internally validated using nested case–control study design; n = 473,049 in training cohort and n = 303,025 in internal validation cohort. HealthImpact was externally validated in 2,000,000 adults followed prospectively for 3 years. Only adults ≥18 years were included. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Patients with incident diabetes were identified using HEDIS rules. Control subjects were sampled from patients without diabetes. Medical and pharmacy claims data collected over 3 years prior to index date were used to build the model variables. Principal Findings HealthImpact, scored 0–100, has 48 variables with c‐statistic 0.80815. We identified HealthImpact threshold of 90 as identifying patients at high risk of incident diabetes. HealthImpact had excellent discrimination in external validation cohort (c‐statistic 0.8171). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of HealthImpact >90 for new diagnosis of diabetes within 3 years were 32.35, 94.92, 22.25, and 96.90 percent, respectively. Conclusions HealthImpact is an efficient and effective method of risk stratification for incident diabetes that is not predicated on patient‐provided information or laboratory tests.
Mealtime Insulin Dosing by Carbohydrate Counting in Hospitalized Cardiology Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Thurber, Kristina M., Dierkhising, Ross , Reiland, Sarah , Pearson, Kristina K., Smith, Steven A., O’Meara, John G. , Dierkhising, Ross A, Reiland, Sarah A

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics | July 31, 2015 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 15-21

10.1089/dia.2015.0103 Get It

Background: Carbohydrate counting may improve glycemic control in hospitalized cardiology patients by providing individualized insulin doses tailored to meal consumption. The purpose of this study was to compare glycemic outcomes with mealtime insulin dosed by carbohydrate counting versus fixed dosing in the inpatient setting. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 225 adult medical cardiology patients who received mealtime, basal, and correction-scale insulin concurrently for at least 72 h and up to 7 days in the interval March 1, 2010–November 7, 2013. Mealtime insulin was dosed by carbohydrate counting or with fixed doses determined prior to meal intake. An inpatient diabetes consult service was responsible for insulin management. Exclusion criteria included receipt of an insulin infusion. The primary end point compared mean daily postprandial glucose values, whereas secondary end points included comparison of preprandial glucose values and mean daily rates of hypoglycemia. Results: Mean postprandial glucose level on Day 7 was 204 and 183 mg/dL in the carbohydrate counting and fixed mealtime dose groups, respectively (unadjusted P =0.04, adjusted P =0.12). There were no statistical differences between groups on Days 2–6. Greater rates of preprandial hypoglycemia were observed in the carbohydrate counting cohort on Day 5 (8.6% vs. 1.5%, P =0.02), Day 6 (1.7% vs. 0%, P =0.01), and Day 7 (7.1% vs. 0%, P =0.008). No differences in postprandial hypoglycemia were seen. Conclusions: Mealtime insulin dosing by carbohydrate counting was associated with similar glycemic outcomes as fixed mealtime insulin dosing, except for a greater incidence of preprandial hypoglycemia. Additional comparative studies that include hospital outcomes are needed.