Vickers, Kristin S.

Objective: This report describes data regarding the acceptability of delivering a family-based behavioral lifestyle intervention for adolescent obesity in a brief, intensive onsite program (initial 3 sequential days + 1 follow-up day) combined with telephonic wellness coaching (WC). Methods: Four cohorts consisting of 7 adolescents aged 15–17 years (self-identifying as 4 male, 2 female, 1 transgender male; 6 White, 1 African American and White) and thirteen parents participated in a new clinical intervention consisting of 3 days onsite programming, 3-months telephonic wellness coaching, and 1 day onsite follow up. Enrollment, attendance, and retention were recorded. Participants provided quantitative and qualitative feedback regarding acceptability of the program during postintervention interviews. Results: Of 11 families invited, 8 enrolled. Seven families participated, with 1 family lost to follow up. Adolescents completed an average 5.6/9 planned WC sessions. Adolescents rated the program positively overall and liked experiential sessions best. However, participants reported the onsite program was too long, they encountered barriers to sustained engagement during wellness coaching follow up, and parents desired greater guidance and structure for their involvement. Conclusions: Combining in-person sessions with telephonic wellness coaching was acceptable to participants, but intervention refinement is needed. Future program development and research investigating hybrid models should consist of briefer in-person sessions, emphasize skill practice, and include ongoing guidance to parents to provide developmentally appropriate support. Implications for Impact Statement This new clinical program evaluation found that extending onsite family-based behavioral lifestyle intervention for adolescent obesity with telephonic wellness coaching was acceptable to participants, but that program refinement is needed. Feedback highlighted the importance of keeping onsite sessions brief, engaging adolescents with hands-on skill practice, and providing ongoing guidance to parents to support sustained adolescent engagement in behavior change.

Abstract Background: Despite widespread efforts to create wellness programming in medical schools, there is a paucity of literature examining students’ perception of wellness and perceptions of these programs. With the inaugural class at the Arizona campus of Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM-AZ), an opportunity arose to establish an empirically evaluated wellness curriculum that most inclusively and effectively enables medical students to flourish for years to come. The initial wellness offerings included mental health, academic success, and disability services, curriculum-embedded seminars, wellness committee driven programming, and student-proposed wellness activities. We aimed to improve the relevance and impact of medical school wellness curricula by soliciting in-depth and longitudinal perspectives of medical students themselves. As MCASOM-AZ opened in 2017, the student body at the time of study consisted of first- and second-year medical students. Methods: Employing a mixed methods analysis of qualitative and longitudinal quantitative data,first- and second-year students at a MCASOM-AZ were invited to respond to an anonymous, online year-long survey (baseline, six months and 12 months) during the 2018-2019 academic year and participate in a structured, in-depth and in-person, peer-to-peer interview about their conceptions of wellness and the MCASOM-AZ wellness curriculum and resources. Qualitative data was coded for themes using thematic analysis strategies by independent raters. Results: Nearly half of eligible students completed the baseline survey,1/3 completed all 3 time-points, and 1/5 participated in an in-depth interview. Participant age, gender, and year of school were representative of the larger student body. Although individual conceptions varied, Wellness was consistently highly valued. Family, Academic Performance, and Friends emerged as most important to well-being across time-points. Academic work arose as the largest barrier to wellness. Analysis of qualitative data revealed five themes. Despite individual differences in approaches to wellness, wellbeing was interrelated to the learning environment; mandatory wellness efforts that didn’t address the medical culture met with skepticism.Conclusions: Interview responses provided understanding and context by which to interpret questionnaire responses. Academics was critical to students’ identity and wellness, while also the largest barrier. Suggested curricular improvements include restructuring academic work, seamlessly integrating wellness within coursework, and offering optional individualized approaches.

Background: The increasing prevalence of heart failure (HF) and high associated costs has spurred investigation of factors related to adverse outcomes in these patients. Reports to date present discrepant evidence regarding the link between depression and HF outcomes, and only scarce data related to healthcare utilization in the form of emergency department (ED) visits are available. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship of depression with healthcare utilization and death among HF patients in the community. Methods: Residents of Olmsted, Dodge, and Fillmore, MN counties with HF were prospectively recruited between October 2007 and December 2010, and completed a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depression categorized as: none-minimal (PHQ-9 score 0-4), mild (5-9), or moderate-severe (≥10). Anderson-Gill models were used to determine if depression predicted hospitalizations and ED visits while proportional hazards regression estimated hazard ratios for death. Results: Among 411 HF patients (mean age 73±13, 58% male), 15% had moderate-severe depression, 27% mild, and 58% none-minimal. Over a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, 613 hospitalizations, 786 ED visits, and 75 deaths occurred. The risk of all adverse outcomes increased stepwise with increasing severity of depression (Table). After adjustment for key clinical characteristics, moderate-severe depression was associated with nearly a 2-fold increased risk of hospitalization and ED visits, and almost a 4-fold increased risk of death. These results are independent of coexisting comorbidities. Conclusions: Depression is frequent among HF patients in the community and independently predicts a significant increase in the use of healthcare resources and mortality. Greater attention to the recognition and management of depression in HF may improve clinical outcomes and decrease healthcare utilization and expenditures in these patients. Hazard Ratios (95%CI) for Hospitalizations and All-Cause Mortality by Severity of Depression None-Minimal Mild Moderate-Severe P for trend Hospitalizations Crude 1.00 (ref) 1.23 (0.91-1.66) 2.01 (1.39-2.89) <0.001 Fully-Adjusted * 1.00 (ref) 1.15 (0.86-1.54) 1.93 (1.37-2.71) 0.001 Emergency Department Visits Crude 1.00 (ref) 1.42 (1.03-1.96) 1.99 (1.42-2.79) <0.001 Fully-Adjusted * 1.00 (ref) 1.39 (1.00-1.93) 1.98 (1.40-2.79) <0.001 All-Cause Mortality Crude 1.00 (ref) 1.53 (0.87-2.68) 3.33 (1.95-5.70) <0.001 Fully-Adjusted * 1.00 (ref) 1.55 (0.88-2.74) 3.84 (2.21-6.68) <0.001 * Adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index

BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated in a randomized study the feasibility and effectiveness of telephone-based health coaching using motivational interviewing on decreasing hospital readmissions and improving quality of life at 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge. In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the health-coaching intervention as seen from the perspective of the participants who received the intervention and the coaches who delivered it. METHODS: Semistructured participant interviews ( n = 24) and a focus group of all health coaches ( n = 3) who participated in this study were conducted. Interviews and focus group were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using coding and categorizing techniques and thematic analysis. Mixed-method triangulation was used to merge quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: Content analysis revealed 4 predominant themes of the coaching intervention: health-coaching relationship, higher participant confidence and reassurance (most related to improvement in physical quality of life), improved health-care system access (most related to decreased hospital readmissions), and increased awareness of COPD symptoms (most related to improvement in emotional quality of life). The strongest theme was the relationship with the health coach, including coach style and motivational interviewing approach. Health coaches' focus group also noted the importance of the coaching relationship as the most significant theme. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided themes to further inform the delivery and implementation of health-coaching interventions in patients with COPD after hospital discharge. Health coaching forged partnerships and created a platform for patient engagement, which was confirmed by both participants and health coaches.

Abstract Rationale Hospital readmission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has attracted attention owing to the burden to patients and the health care system. There is a knowledge gap on approaches to reducing COPD readmissions. Objectives To determine the effect of comprehensive health coaching on the rate of COPD readmissions. Methods A total of 215 patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation were randomized at hospital discharge to receive either (1) motivational interviewing–based health coaching plus a written action plan for exacerbations (the use of antibiotics and oral steroids) and brief exercise advice or (2) usual care. Measurements and Main Results We evaluated the rate of COPD-related hospitalizations during 1 year of follow-up. The absolute risk reductions of COPD-related rehospitalization in the health coaching group were 7.5% (P = 0.01), 11.0% (P = 0.02), 11.6% (P = 0.03), 11.4% (P = 0.05), and 5.4% (P = 0.24) at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, compared with the control group. The odds ratios for COPD hospitalization in the intervention arm compared with the control arm were 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.77) at 1 month postdischarge, 0.37 (95% CI, 0.15–0.91) at 3 months postdischarge, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20–0.94) at 6 months postdischarge, and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.30–1.20) at 1 year postdischarge. The missing value rate for the primary outcome was 0.4% (one patient). Disease-specific quality of life improved significantly in the health coaching group compared with the control group at 6 and 12 months, based on the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire emotional score (emotion and mastery domains) and physical score (dyspnea and fatigue domains) (P &lt; 0.05). There were no differences between groups in measured physical activity at any time point. Conclusions Health coaching may represent a feasible and possibly effective intervention designed to reduce COPD readmissions. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01058486).

AbstractAbstract In a randomized trial of 130 surgical patients, use of a decision aid consisting of laminated cards with pros and cons of continuing smoking, attempting temporary abstinence, or attempting to quit smoking improved measures of decisional quality but did not change perioperative tobacco use behavior. Background: Decision aids can increase patient involvement in decision-making about health care. The study goal was to develop and test a decision aid for use by clinicians in discussion options for changing smoking behavior before and after elective surgery. Methods: In formative work, a decision aid was designed to facilitate patient–clinician discussion regarding three options: continue smoking, attempt a period of temporary abstinence, and attempt to quit smoking for good. A randomized, two-group pilot study was then conducted in smokers evaluated in preparation for elective surgery in a preoperative clinic to test the hypothesis that the decision aid would improve measures of decisional quality compared with usual care. Results: The final decision aid consisted of three laminated cards. The front of each card included a colorful graphic describing each choice; the reverse including two to three pros and cons for each decision, a simple graphic illustrating the effects of smoking on the body, and a motivational phrase. In the randomized trial of 130 patients, the decision aid significantly ( P < 0.05) improved measures of decisional quality and patient involvement in decision making (Cohen’s d effect sizes of 0.76 and 1.20 for the Decisional Conflict Scale and Observing PatienT involvement In decisiON-making scale, respectively). However, the decision aid did not affect any aspect of perioperative smoking behavior, including the distribution of or adherence to choices. Conclusions: Although the use of a decision aid to facilitate clinician–patient discussions regarding tobacco use around the time of surgery substantially improved measures of decisional quality, it alone did not change perioperative tobacco use behavior.