Hathaway, Julie

Objective: This report describes data regarding the acceptability of delivering a family-based behavioral lifestyle intervention for adolescent obesity in a brief, intensive onsite program (initial 3 sequential days + 1 follow-up day) combined with telephonic wellness coaching (WC). Methods: Four cohorts consisting of 7 adolescents aged 15–17 years (self-identifying as 4 male, 2 female, 1 transgender male; 6 White, 1 African American and White) and thirteen parents participated in a new clinical intervention consisting of 3 days onsite programming, 3-months telephonic wellness coaching, and 1 day onsite follow up. Enrollment, attendance, and retention were recorded. Participants provided quantitative and qualitative feedback regarding acceptability of the program during postintervention interviews. Results: Of 11 families invited, 8 enrolled. Seven families participated, with 1 family lost to follow up. Adolescents completed an average 5.6/9 planned WC sessions. Adolescents rated the program positively overall and liked experiential sessions best. However, participants reported the onsite program was too long, they encountered barriers to sustained engagement during wellness coaching follow up, and parents desired greater guidance and structure for their involvement. Conclusions: Combining in-person sessions with telephonic wellness coaching was acceptable to participants, but intervention refinement is needed. Future program development and research investigating hybrid models should consist of briefer in-person sessions, emphasize skill practice, and include ongoing guidance to parents to provide developmentally appropriate support. Implications for Impact Statement This new clinical program evaluation found that extending onsite family-based behavioral lifestyle intervention for adolescent obesity with telephonic wellness coaching was acceptable to participants, but that program refinement is needed. Feedback highlighted the importance of keeping onsite sessions brief, engaging adolescents with hands-on skill practice, and providing ongoing guidance to parents to support sustained adolescent engagement in behavior change.

Abstract Background: Despite widespread efforts to create wellness programming in medical schools, there is a paucity of literature examining students’ perception of wellness and perceptions of these programs. With the inaugural class at the Arizona campus of Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (MCASOM-AZ), an opportunity arose to establish an empirically evaluated wellness curriculum that most inclusively and effectively enables medical students to flourish for years to come. The initial wellness offerings included mental health, academic success, and disability services, curriculum-embedded seminars, wellness committee driven programming, and student-proposed wellness activities. We aimed to improve the relevance and impact of medical school wellness curricula by soliciting in-depth and longitudinal perspectives of medical students themselves. As MCASOM-AZ opened in 2017, the student body at the time of study consisted of first- and second-year medical students. Methods: Employing a mixed methods analysis of qualitative and longitudinal quantitative data,first- and second-year students at a MCASOM-AZ were invited to respond to an anonymous, online year-long survey (baseline, six months and 12 months) during the 2018-2019 academic year and participate in a structured, in-depth and in-person, peer-to-peer interview about their conceptions of wellness and the MCASOM-AZ wellness curriculum and resources. Qualitative data was coded for themes using thematic analysis strategies by independent raters. Results: Nearly half of eligible students completed the baseline survey,1/3 completed all 3 time-points, and 1/5 participated in an in-depth interview. Participant age, gender, and year of school were representative of the larger student body. Although individual conceptions varied, Wellness was consistently highly valued. Family, Academic Performance, and Friends emerged as most important to well-being across time-points. Academic work arose as the largest barrier to wellness. Analysis of qualitative data revealed five themes. Despite individual differences in approaches to wellness, wellbeing was interrelated to the learning environment; mandatory wellness efforts that didn’t address the medical culture met with skepticism.Conclusions: Interview responses provided understanding and context by which to interpret questionnaire responses. Academics was critical to students’ identity and wellness, while also the largest barrier. Suggested curricular improvements include restructuring academic work, seamlessly integrating wellness within coursework, and offering optional individualized approaches.

A variety of obstacles can prevent persons or individuals with low vision from deriving the greatest possible benefit from the rehabilitation process, including inadequate understanding of their visual impairment, lack of knowledge about available services, and misconceptions about low vision devices. This study explores the use of a patient-education consultation to enable patients and their families to take better advantage of low vision services.

Background: Health and Wellness Coaching has been shown to enhance treatment outcomes in the primary care setting. However, little is known about the experience and perceptions of patients who worked with a wellness coach as an integrated member of their primary health-care team. Objective: This project assessed patients’ experience and obtained their perceptions on barriers and facilitators to participation in a primary care–based wellness coaching program. Method: A survey was mailed to 99 primary care patients with prediabetes who participated in a 12-week wellness coaching program. Results: Sixty-two (63%) completed the survey; responders felt that participation in the wellness coaching program helped move them toward healthier lifestyle behavior and created a personal vision of wellness. Major themes associated with participation were supportive coaching relationship, increased self-accountability, increased goal-setting, and healthy behavior strategies. No significant barrier to participation was reported. Conclusion: Participants reported highly positive experience with the program; how to best integrate health and wellness coaching into the primary care setting needs to be explored.

The time required to get a device to market is critical to a successful design, development, and manufacturing process [1]. Achieving status of the first device to market is often a priority for manufacturers and developers. Upon market introduction, it is well known that device performance must meet at least minimum standards in order to provide consumer satisfaction and be a successful product to prevent competitive devices from taking over the market [1]. However, if a design only meets minimum expectations, it may struggle to maintain market control. This demonstrates the tradeoffs of speed-to-market and performance, for which optimization has not been clearly defined [2]. Product performance and usability can be designed in, evaluated and enhanced in order to avoid user errors and achieve optimal profitability. For medical devices, clinical trials are a key step in preparing to take a device to market. Clinical trials can allow for analyses of the effectiveness of the device in the patient care process. For wearable medical devices, patient usability is crucial to patient adherence and safety since the device will be operated by non-medically trained individuals [3,4]. Without adequate usability, adherence and continuity of care are greatly reduced which will reduce the overall effectiveness of the device [5,6]. Human factors principles can best be incorporated in the design process to improve the usability of medical devices and patient safety [5,6,7], specifically for those used in telemedicine [4] and cardiovascular treatment [3]. The objective of this project was to evaluate a telemedicine heart rate monitoring device for patient usability in order to improve the next device’s performance and lead to greater patient adherence for the current version via an improved user manual.

BACKGROUND: We recently demonstrated in a randomized study the feasibility and effectiveness of telephone-based health coaching using motivational interviewing on decreasing hospital readmissions and improving quality of life at 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge. In this qualitative study, we sought to explore the health-coaching intervention as seen from the perspective of the participants who received the intervention and the coaches who delivered it. METHODS: Semistructured participant interviews ( n = 24) and a focus group of all health coaches ( n = 3) who participated in this study were conducted. Interviews and focus group were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using coding and categorizing techniques and thematic analysis. Mixed-method triangulation was used to merge quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS: Content analysis revealed 4 predominant themes of the coaching intervention: health-coaching relationship, higher participant confidence and reassurance (most related to improvement in physical quality of life), improved health-care system access (most related to decreased hospital readmissions), and increased awareness of COPD symptoms (most related to improvement in emotional quality of life). The strongest theme was the relationship with the health coach, including coach style and motivational interviewing approach. Health coaches' focus group also noted the importance of the coaching relationship as the most significant theme. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided themes to further inform the delivery and implementation of health-coaching interventions in patients with COPD after hospital discharge. Health coaching forged partnerships and created a platform for patient engagement, which was confirmed by both participants and health coaches.

Remote monitoring has the potential to improve patient care and satisfaction while reducing the cost of care and burden on the healthcare system for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients. However, the device must be convenient and easy for the population to use correctly. In this study, human factors and qualitative researchers evaluated the use of a remote cardiac monitoring device during a clinical trial with 74 CHF and AF patients. Human factors usability concerns centered on device use and the information presented in the manual. The key themes identified during the qualitative analysis were related to patient education. These findings were incorporated into device design, user manual, or education material updates. This study illustrates how these methods can infuse patient experience into device design to inform continued quality improvement and usability refinement specifically in devices to aid CHF and AF patients without added burden.

AbstractBackgroundPatients and clinicians do not often agree on whether a decision has been made about cancer care. This could be explained by factors related to communication quality and/or the type of decision being made.MethodsWe used a self‐developed coding scheme to code a random sample of 128 encounters in which patients and clinicians either agreed (n=64) or disagreed (n=64) that a cancer care decision was made and tested for associations between concordance and key communication behaviours. We also identified and characterized cancer care decisions by topic and level of patient involvement and looked for trends.ResultsWe identified 378 cancer care decisions across 128 encounters. Explicit decisions were most commonly made about topics wherein decision control could be easily delegated to a clear and present expert (eg either the patient or the clinician). Related to this, level of patient involvement varied significantly by decision topic. Explicit decisions were rarely made in an observable way about social, non‐clinical or self‐management related topics, although patients and clinicians both reported having made a cancer care decision in encounters where no decisions were observed. We found no association between communication behaviours and concordance in our sample.ConclusionsWhat counts as a “decision” in cancer care may be constructed within disparate social roles that leave many agendas unaddressed and decisions unmade. Changing the content of conversations to encourage explicit decisions about self‐management and life context‐related topics may have greater value in enabling shared understanding than promoting communication behaviours among already high‐performing communicators.