Reza, Nosheen

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a complex trait influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found common genetic variants associated with HF risk, but the extent that common and rare variants explain risk and implicate similar genes and pathways in HF remains less understood. Methods: For common variants, we meta-analyze existing GWAS of all-cause HF with data from the Million Veteran Program, including 207,346 individuals with HF and 2,151,210 without in diverse populations. We examine rare coding variants in the Penn Medicine BioBank (PMBB) using gene-collapsing association studies and burden heritability regression. We test for an interaction between a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on our GWAS meta-analysis and truncating variants in TTN (TTNtv). Results: GWAS meta-analysis identified 176 risk loci (146 previously unreported), implicating known risk factors for HF and genes involved in cardiac development. New signals at GIPR/ GLP1R highlight potential contributions of dysregulated glucose homeostasis and metabolism in HF. Gene collapsing studies identified associations between HF and rare loss-of-function variants in TTN (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.43-3.56) and MYBPC3 (OR 7.71, 95% CI 3.97-14.97) at exome-wide significance. HF heritability mediated through common variants (4.5%) was significantly higher than for rare variants (1.8%), but rare variant heritability was further enriched in cardiomyopathy genes compared to common variants (27-fold vs. 3.4-fold). We found a significant interaction between a new multi-ancestry HF-associated PRS (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.72-0.73) and TTNtv carrier status (interaction OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64). Conclusions: Common and rare variants contribute to HF heritability. Common variant HF heritability is highly polygenic, while rare variant burden heritability appears more concentrated in core cardiomyopathy genes. HF risk conferred by TTNtv carrier status is further increased by an individual’s polygenic contribution. Our results support the continued inclusion of cardiomyopathy genes in rare-variant genetic testing panels for HF but suggest a meaningful polygenic component to HF exists that is not currently captured by clinical genetic testing.

Background The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in authorship of manuscripts in select high‐impact cardiology journals during the early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Methods and Results All manuscripts published between March 1, 2019 to June 1, 2019 and March 1, 2020 to June 1, 2020 in 4 high‐impact cardiology journals ( Journal of the American College of Cardiology , Circulation , JAMA Cardiology , and European Heart Journal ) were identified using bibliometric data. Authors' genders were determined by matching first name with predicted gender using a validated multinational database (Genderize.io) and manual adjudication. Proportions of women and men first, co‐first, senior, and co‐senior authors, manuscript types, and whether the manuscript was COVID‐19 related were recorded. In 2019, women were first authors of 176 (22.3%) manuscripts and senior authors of 99 (15.0%) manuscripts. In 2020, women first authored 230 (27.4%) manuscripts and senior authored 138 (19.3%) manuscripts. Proportions of woman first and senior authors were significantly higher in 2020 compared with 2019. Women were more likely to be first authors if the manuscript's senior author was a woman (33.8% for woman first/woman senior versus 23.4% for woman first/man senior; P <0.001). Women were less likely to be first authors of COVID‐19‐related original research manuscripts ( P =0.04). Conclusions Representation of women as key authors of manuscripts published in major cardiovascular journals increased during the early COVID‐19 pandemic compared with similar months in 2019. However, women were significantly less likely to be first authors of COVID‐19‐related original research manuscripts. Future investigation into the gender‐disparate impacts of COVID‐19 on academic careers is critical.