Shill, Holly A.

Introduction: Lewy body dementia (LBD) is common, yet under-recognized and under-researched. To plan studies with the highest impact, engagement of the community personally affected by these conditions is essential. Methods: A web-based survey of people living with LBD and current and former caregivers of people with LBD queried research priorities through forced ranking and exploration of burden of LBD symptoms. Specific caregiving needs in LBD and perceptions of research participation were also investigated. Results: Between April 7, 2021 and July 1, 2021, 984 responses were recorded. Top research priorities included disease-modifying therapies and improved disease detection and staging. People with LBD were interested in pathophysiology and more bothered by motor symptoms; caregivers were interested in risk factors and symptomatic therapies and more bothered by neuropsychiatric symptoms. Few available LBD treatments and resources were rated as helpful, and many valuable services were never received. Previous participation in LBD research was infrequent, but interest was high. Discussion: People with LBD and caregivers highlighted the need for research across all aspects of LBD, from pathophysiology and disease modification to prognosis, education, symptomatic treatments, and caregiver support. Funders should increase support for all aspects of LBD research to target the many needs identified by individuals and families living with LBD.

AbstractBackgroundWe previously reported that in our autopsy‐confirmed cohort of Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), DLB with parkinsonism (DLB+Park) predicted faster progression of UPDRS‐III scores compared to PDD, DLB without parkinsonism (DLB‐Park), and AD. This study examined annualized rate of change of UPDRS‐III subscales in our cohort.MethodsData included were from participants in Arizona Study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases (AZSAND) with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n = 48), PDD (n = 98) or pure AD (n = 48), and longitudinal movement exams. Mixed effects model (accounting for age, education, and sex) was used to determine predicted mean UPDRS‐III and subscale scores (0‐4) for all groups. Individual UPDRS‐III subscale scores were derived for: Body Bradykinesia, Limb Bradykinesia, Gait, Postural Instability, Limb Rest Tremor, Neck Rigidity and Limb Rigidity. Where applicable, scores for multiple limbs involved were averaged.ResultsLongitudinal data was analyzed for over 1430‐participant years. Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB participants. PDD participants were more likely to be treated with dopaminergic agents (87.8%) compared to (p<0.001) DLB+Park (57.6%), DLB‐park (0%) and AD (2.1%). Frequency (29.4% vs. 29.0%) and severity (mean±SE = 0.4±0.07 and 0.4±0.12) of Limb Rest Tremor was similar for PDD and DLB+park. Limb Bradykinesia frequency and severity were PDD: 100%, 2.4±0.11, DLB+Park: 96.8%, 2.1±0.18, DLB‐Park: 20%, 0.4±0.23, and AD: 62%, 1.1±0.16. Frequency of gait abnormality was 98.5% in PDD, 90.3% in DLB+park, 60% in DLB‐Park and 57.8% in AD. Rigidity was most frequent in the PDD group (88.2%), followed by DLB+Park (71%), AD (19.6%), and none DLB‐park (0%). Over 8 years trajectories for limb bradykinesia and gait were greater for DLB+park than PDD (Figure 1, Cohen’s d range 0.89‐2.18 and 0.63‐1.99 over 8 years, p<0.001).ConclusionOur results suggest that DLB+Park group have faster motor progression predominantly related to gait abnormalities and limb bradykinesia. Future analyses will explore more convergent data, integrated effects of various measures and their differential contributions in this cohort.

Abstract Brains of 42 COVID-19 decedents and 107 non-COVID-19 controls were studied. RT-PCR screening of 16 regions from 20 COVID-19 autopsies found SARS-CoV-2 E gene viral sequences in 7 regions (2.5% of 320 samples), concentrated in 4/20 subjects (20%). Additional screening of olfactory bulb (OB), amygdala (AMY) and entorhinal area for E, N1, N2, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and S gene sequences detected one or more of these in OB in 8/21 subjects (38%). It is uncertain whether these RNA sequences represent viable virus. Significant histopathology was limited to 2/42 cases (4.8%), one with a large acute cerebral infarct and one with hemorrhagic encephalitis. Case-control RNAseq in OB and AMY found more than 5000 and 700 differentially expressed genes, respectively, unrelated to RT-PCR results; these involved immune response, neuronal constituents, and olfactory/taste receptor genes. Olfactory marker protein-1 reduction indicated COVID-19-related loss of OB olfactory mucosa afferents. Iba-1-immunoreactive microglia had reduced area fractions in cerebellar cortex and AMY, and cytokine arrays showed generalized downregulation in AMY and upregulation in blood serum in COVID-19 cases. Although OB is a major brain portal for SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 brain changes are more likely due to blood-borne immune mediators and trans-synaptic gene expression changes arising from OB deafferentation.

Abstract The Alzheimer disease (AD) neuropathological hallmarks amyloid β (Aβ) and tau neurofibrillary (NF) pathology have been reported in the olfactory bulb (OB) in aging and in different neurodegenerative diseases, which coincides with frequently reported olfactory dysfunction in these conditions. To better understand when the OB is affected in relation to the hierarchical progression of Aβ throughout the brain and whether OB pathology might be an indicator of AD severity, we assessed the presence of OB Aβ and tau NF pathology in an autopsy cohort of 158 non demented control and 173 AD dementia cases. OB Aβ was found in less than 5% of cases in lower Thal phases 0 and 1, in 20% of cases in phase 2, in 60% of cases in phase 3 and in more than 80% of cases in higher Thal phases 4 and 5. OB Aβ and tau pathology significantly predicted a Thal phase greater than 3, a Braak NF stage greater than 4, and an MMSE score lower than 24. While OB tau pathology is almost universal in the elderly and therefore is not a good predictor of AD severity, OB Aβ pathology coincides with clinically-manifest AD and might prove to be a useful biomarker of the extent of brain spread of both amyloid and tau pathology.

AbstractDecline of olfactory function is frequently observed in aging and is an early symptom of neurodegenerative diseases. As the olfactory bulb (OB) is one of the first regions involved by pathology and may represent an early disease stage, we specifically aimed to evaluate the contribution of OB pathology to olfactory decline in cognitively normal aged individuals without parkinsonism or dementia. This clinicopathological study correlates OB tau, amyloid β (Aβ) and α‐synuclein (αSyn) pathology densities and whole brain pathology load to olfactory identification function as measured with the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and clinical data measured proximate to death in a large autopsy study including 138 cases considered non‐demented controls during life. Tau pathology was frequently observed in the OB (95% of cases), while both Aβ (27% of cases) and αSyn (20% of cases) OB pathologies were less commonly observed. A weak correlation was only observed between OB tau and olfactory performance, but when controlled for age, neither OB tau, Aβ or αSyn significantly predict olfactory performance. Moreover, whole brain tau and αSyn pathology loads predicted olfactory performance; however, only αSyn pathology loads survived age correction. In conclusion, OB tau pathology is frequently observed in normally aging individuals and increases with age but does not appear to independently contribute to age‐related olfactory impairment suggesting that further involvement of the brain seems necessary to contribute to age‐related olfactory decline.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough parkinsonism is a core feature of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia (PDD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), its evolution is less delineated. We aimed to assess differences in severity and progression of parkinsonian motor symptoms and signs in a community autopsy cohort with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB, PDD or Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).MethodData included were from 194 participants in the Arizona study of Aging and Neurodegenerative Disorders with clinicopathologic diagnosis of DLB (n=48), PDD (n=98) (±AD co‐pathology) or pure AD (n=48), and at least two movement exams performed by movement disorders subspecialists who classified PD and parkinsonism according to MDS‐UPDRS criteria. DLB was subgrouped by presence or absence of parkinsonism at final exam (DLB+Park and DLB–Park). Between group trajectory of UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were explored using piecewise‐linear and non‐linear MMRM multivariate analysis.ResultOver 1435 participant‐years of longitudinal data were included in the analyses (Figure 1). Mean±SD age at baseline movement exam and death were 76.0±7.5 and 83.4±6.8 years, respectively. At baseline, most participants did not have dementia or substantial motor abnormalities (except motor abnormalities in PDD). DLB (73.9%) and PDD (69.2%) groups had more males than AD (33.3%). Parkinsonism was present in 65.6% of DLB at last exam. Piecewise‐linear MMRM analysis showed baseline UPDRS‐II and UPDRS‐III scores were highest (p<0.001) for PDD (mean±SE: 14.3±0.78 and 27.4±1.64), followed by DLB+Park (5.0±1.05 and 17.4±3.10), DLB‐Park (3.7±2.54 and 3.8±1.35) and AD (3.2±0.88 and 8.0±1.94). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐II was greatest for DLB+Park (1.44±0.20) and PDD (1.04±0.08), followed by DLB‐Park (0.89±0.18) and AD (0.30±0.11). Annual rate of increase in UPDRS‐III was highest for PDD and DLB+Park (2.12±0.20 vs 2.64±0.42), followed by DLB‐Park and AD (1.31 ± 0.38 and 0.64 ± 0.22). Preliminary non‐linear MMRM models (Figure 2) further supported substantial between group/subgroup differences in motor trajectories, and progression in DLB‐Park.ConclusionThese preliminary results in a large, well‐characterized clinicopathological community‐based autopsy cohort support that DLB+Park experience comparable, or greater, parkinsonian motor progression to PDD. Future modeling/sensitivity analyses will better delineate expected trajectories of motor progression to add prognostication value in clinic and design of DLB clinical trials.

Background: Braak and others have proposed that Lewy-type α-synucleinopathy in Parkinson’s disease (PD) may arise from an exogenous pathogen that passes across the gastric mucosa and then is retrogradely transported up the vagus nerve to the medulla. Objective: We tested this hypothesis by immunohistochemically staining, with a method specific for p-serine 129 α-synuclein (pSyn), stomach and vagus nerve tissue from an autopsy series of 111 normal elderly subjects, 33 with incidental Lewy body disease (ILBD) and 53 with PD. Methods: Vagus nerve samples were taken adjacent to the carotid artery in the neck. Stomach samples were taken from the gastric body, midway along the greater curvature. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were immunohistochemically stained for pSyn, shown to be highly specific and sensitive for α-synuclein pathology. Results: Median disease duration for the PD group was 13 years. In the vagus nerve none of the 111 normal subjects had pSyn in the vagus, while 12/26 ILBD (46%) and 32/36 PD (89%) subjects were pSyn-positive. In the stomach none of the 102 normal subjects had pSyn while 5/30 (17%) ILBD and 42/52 (81%) of PD subjects were pSyn-positive. Conclusion: As there was no pSyn in the vagus nerve or stomach of subjects without brain pSyn, these results support initiation of pSyn in the brain. The presence of pSyn in the vagus nerve and stomach of a subset of ILBD cases indicates that synucleinopathy within the peripheral nervous system may occur, within a subset of individuals, at preclinical stages of Lewy body disease.