Thaden, J

Abstract Background Increased left ventricular (LV) stiffness (LVStiffn) was shown to be associated with mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), despite aortic valve replacement (AVR), and may contribute to future heart failure (HF) symptoms. The aim was to assess whether preoperative LVStiffn is a risk factor of HF in these patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was done in patients with severe AS who underwent AVR (93% surgical). LV end-diastolic pressure-volume relations (P=aVb) were reconstructed from LV end-diastolic volumes and estimated end-diastolic pressures (from E/e'); LVStiffn at 30 mmHg (CS30) and capacitance (V30) were then derived. Primary endpoint was development of symptomatic HF at >1 month post AVR. Results 1,837 patients were studied (age 76±10 years, 62% males, LVEF 61±12%; Table). Mean CS30 was 2.2±1.3 mmHg/mL and V30 64±17 mL/m2. Patients with higher CS30 ≥3 mmHg/mL were older, more frequently female, and had more comorbidities. During a median follow-up of 5.0 [3.0–7.9] years, 607 (33%) patients developed HF. A higher CS30 (≥3 mmHg/mL), but not V30 (P=0.32), was associated with higher risk of HF events (HR 1.86 [95% CI 1.52–2.27], P<0.0001), along with other clinical and echo predictors (Table). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, advanced NYHA class III–IV, creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, medication use, severity of AS, reduced LVEF <50%, diastolic dysfunction grade ≥2, right ventricular size and pulmonary hypertension, a higher CS30 ≥3 mmHg/mL remained independently associated with HF events (adjusted HR 1.61 [1.29–2.01], P<0.0001; Figure). Conclusion Increased LVStiffn in patients with severe AS undergoing AVR is associated with HF at follow-up, despite the benefits brought by AVR, and can help identify patients with poorer outcomes who may need closer monitoring/more intensive treatment of comorbidities Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Abstract Background The MITRAL Trial (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves) evaluates the safety and feasibility of balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter heart valves in patients with severe mitral valve disease with mitral annular calcification (MAC), failed surgical rings or failed bioprostheses. Purpose We sought to evaluate 4-year outcomes of patients enrolled in the MITRAL trial. Methods This is a prospective study that enrolled 91 high surgical risk patients at 13 sites in the U.S. 30 patients underwent Mitral Valve-in-Valve (MViV), 30 Valve-in-Ring (MViR) and 31 Valve-in-MAC (ViMAC). 4-year outcomes of these patients were evaluated in this analysis. Primary endpoints and key serious adverse events including deaths were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and echocardiographic images were evaluated by independent CT and Echocardiographic Core Laboratories. Results Mean age was 74.3±8.9 years. Most patients undergoing MViV and ViMAC were female (MVIV=63.3%, MViR=36.7% and ViMAC=71%). Mean STS score was 9.2±6.6% (MViV 10.2±6.5%, MViR 8.7±4.7%, ViMAC=8.6±8.2%). All-cause mortality at 4 years was higher for ViMAC and MViR: MViV=6.9% (cardiovascular 3.4%), MViR=48.1% (cardiovascular 18.5%), ViMAC=51.9% (cardiovascular 29.6%), p=0.002 (Figure 1). At 4 years, all survivors had ≤1+ mitral regurgitation and most had none or trace mitral regurgitation (MViV=87.5, MViR=33.3% and ViMAC=100%). Mean mitral valve gradients remained stable (MViV=5.9±2.2 mmHg, MViR= 6.6±5.1 mmHg, ViMAC=5.1±1.0 mmHg), Figure 2. Most survivors experienced significant improvement of symptoms and were in NYHA class I-II at 4-year follow-up (MViV=78.9%, MViR=66.7% and ViMAC=66.7%). Conclusions MViV is associated with excellent outcomes at 4 years. MViR and ViMAC were associated with higher mortality at 4 years. However, most survivors in all groups experienced sustained improvement of symptoms and stable THV performance at 4 years. Whether survival bias had an impact on THV performance and improved symptoms at follow-up is not known and deserves further evaluation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Unrestricted Research Grant from Edwards Lifesciences.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has long provided excellent diagnostic imaging of left-sided valvular pathology with an excellent safety profile; however, recent data has suggested an increased risk of injury related to TEE guidance. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the incidence and nature of TEE-related oropharyngeal or esophageal complications in patients undergoing TEE-guided structural heart procedures and identify associated risk factors. Methods We reviewed consecutive patients undergoing TEE-guided structural heart procedures from 2005-2020. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. TEE-related oropharyngeal or esophageal complications were defined as those occurring within 30 days of the procedure resulting in i) persistent dysphagia, odynophagia, or upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring prolonged endotracheal intubation, therapeutic endoscopic or surgical intervention, or diagnostic imaging that demonstrated oropharyngeal or esophageal injury. ii) upper gastrointestinal bleed requiring transfusion, hemodynamic compromise warranting mechanical or pharmacologic support; or iii) oropharyngeal or esophageal complications leading to death. For multivariate analysis, all variables with a p < 0.15 at univariate analysis were included in the model. Results Among 1229 adult patients undergoing TEE-guided structural heart procedures between 2005-2020, 274 underwent a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the remaining 955 undergoing either mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER, n = 278), mitral paravalvular leak closure (PVLC, n = 354), mitral valve-in-valve replacement (VIV, n = 41), or left atrial appendage closure (LAAO, n = 282). Of these, 6 (0.5 %) had TEE-related complications; 0% TAVR, 0% VIV, 0.36% LAAO, 0.28% PVLC, 1.41% mTEER (p = 0.14). Of the six patients with complications 3 required at least one day of prolonged tracheal intubation and one a blood transfusion. None required surgical repair. Factors associated with increased complication risk (Table) included a prior history of gastrointestinal bleed (Odds ratio 5.44 [0.98-30.04; p = 0.05]) and longer procedural time (OR per 30 min 1.15 [1.01-1.31, p = 0.03]). Patients undergoing mTEER had an increased risk of complication (OR 6.76 [1.23-37.1 p = 0.03]) and longer procedural time (OR per 30 mins 1.15[1.01-1.31, p = 0.04]) compared to other all other procedures. Conclusion(s): In a large series of patients undergoing cardiac structural interventions under general anesthesia with TEE-guidance, rates of TEE-induced injury were low. Risk of oropharyngeal or esophageal complications was increased with longer procedure times, prior gastrointestinal bleeding history, increased age, increased pre-procedural creatinine, procedural type being mTEER and in male patients, lower height. Abstract Table

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND Detection of immobile leaflets immediately following bioprosthetic valve implantation is a rare but important intraoperative finding. Restriction of leaflet movement can occur in the closed or open position, leading to abnormal prosthesis function. We sought to determine the clinical implications of immobile leaflets seen on intraoperative echocardiography. METHODS Patients with immobile leaflets identified on intra-operative/procedure echocardiography immediately post implantation between 2009-2020 were identified from an institutional database. All echocardiograms were reviewed de-novo to confirm immobile leaflets in the immediate post-implantation period. Identified cases were matched 1:2 to controls for age; sex; prosthesis position, model and size; and implantation approach (surgical vs. transcatheter). Nominal logistic regression and proportional hazards were used to analyze outcomes. RESULTS Thirty patients with immobile leaflets immediately post-bioprosthesis implantation were included. Clinical characteristics are summarized in the Table. Immobile leaflets were documented in procedural reports in only 18 (60%) patients. Moderate stenosis was present intraoperatively in 1 patient, none demonstrated ≥moderate regurgitation, and none resulted in immediate corrective action. In 3 (10%), valve re-intervention was required within 30 days due to symptomatic prosthesis dysfunction. Presence of restricted leaflet motion was associated with higher need for post-operative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use (odds-ratio 7.3, p = 0.02) and composite end-point of death, valve re-replacement, prosthesis thrombosis, or cardiac hospitalizations (risk ratio 2.1, p = 0.03, Figure). CONCLUSION Immobile leaflet(s) immediately post-bioprosthetic valve implantation is an uncommon, under-reported, and under-treated phenomenon. Even in the absence of significant prosthetic valve dysfunction, it can be associated with worse post-operative course as well as worse outcomes. Baseline characteristics Age 76 (67-84) Sex, male 10 (33%) Surgical approach 25 (83%) Aortic 5 (17%) Mitral 12 (40%) Tricuspid 12 (40%) Pulmonary 1 (3%) Re-intervention within 10 days 3 (10%) Numbers are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). Abstract Figure. Clinical outcome of stuck leaflets

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (Afib) leads to beat-to-beat variability in cycle length; however, whether there is associated beat-to-beat variability in the tricuspid annulus (TA) dimensions or variability in the time in cardiac cycle when TA reaches maximal size is unknown. Purpose We aim to assess the beat-to-beat variability in the TA dimensions in Afib compared with sinus rhythm (SR). Methods Images were obtained from 58 patients (29 in Afib, 29 in SR) undergoing either 3D TTE or TEE examination. We measured TA in 3–6 cardiac cycles per patient using commercially available software (TomTec 4MV). Results Median absolute difference in maximal TA area over 3–6 cardiac cycles was 1.60 cm2 (range 0.35 cm2 to 4.08 cm2) in Afib vs. 1.17 cm2 (range 0.32 cm2 to 2.19 cm2) in SR, p=0.0063. Median absolute difference in the maximal circumference was 0.79 cm (range 0.09 cm to 2.2 cm) in Afib vs 0.54 cm (range 0.12 cm to 1.43 cm) in SR, p=0.0175. A total of 118 cardiac cycles were analyzed in patients in SR and 147 in Afib. Timing of maximal TA area was most commonly recorded at end-diastole (80–100% of the R-R interval) in 62% of cycles in SR; however, it was distributed over a broad range in Afib, p<0.0001, [Figure]. Conclusion Afib leads to significant beat-to-beat variability in the maximal TA area, minimal TA area, maximal TA circumference, and in the time of maximal TA area. These findings suggest that accurate assessment of TA dimensions should be based on continuous tracking of the TA over several cardiac cycles, especially in patients with Afib. These observations have significant implications for device sizing in percutaneous tricuspid valve interventions. Timing of Maximal TA Area Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None