Giardi, Davide

AbstractPhotodamage is caused by chronic sun exposure and ultraviolet radiation and presents as wrinkles, sagging, and pigmented spots. An increase in the ultraviolet index can increase a person's perceived age by worsening skin photodamage. However, since the ultraviolet index varies considerably between geographical regions, perceived age might vary substantially among them. This review aims to describe the differences in chronological and perceived age in regions of the world with different ultraviolet indexes. A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies analyzing perceived age and its relationship to sun exposure. Ultraviolet indexes from the included studies were retrieved from the National Weather Service and the Tropospheric Emission Monitoring Internet Service. Out of 104 studies, seven fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 3,352 patients were evaluated for perceived age. All studies found that patients with the highest daily sun exposures had the highest perceived ages for their chronological age (p < 0.05). People with high sun exposure behaviors living in regions with high ultraviolet indexes will look significantly older than same-aged peers living in lower ultraviolet index regions.

Background: Patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch have a high incidence of atrial arrhythmias. We sought to analyze the arrhythmia substrate, ablation strategies, and outcomes for catheter ablation in this population. Methods: An in-depth analysis of all clinical and procedural data in patients with D-transposition of the great arteries, atrial baffles, and atrial arrhythmia ablation was performed. Results: A cohort of 32 patients (72% male, mean age 38±7 years) underwent ablation for non-AV nodal reentrant tachycardia atrial arrhythmias, and 4 patients underwent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation. Cavotricuspid isthmus flutter (CTI-flutter) was the most common arrhythmia, encountered in 75% of patients, followed by scar-related intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 53%) and focal atrial tachycardia (focal atrial tachycardia, 6%). Among the 32 patients, 26 underwent 31 procedures at our institution. For patients with prior outside intervention, the index ablation at our institution revealed CTI-dependent flutter in 3/5 cases. However, redo ablation after an index ablation with demonstrated bidirectional CTI block revealed different/new arrhythmia substrates (80% non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 40% focal atrial tachycardia). Achieving bidirectional block across the CTI often required ablating on both sides of the baffle (retroaortic access, 81%; using a baffle leak, 11.5%; or transbaffle puncture, 7.7%). Combined approaches were necessary in 19% to reach the critical tissue. Acute procedural success was 81%, and recurrence was documented in 58% of patients. Despite recurrence, clinical arrhythmia burden was significantly reduced post-ablation ( P <0.001), with rare episodes, amenable to antiarrhythmic therapy. Redo ablation was required in 5 (19%) patients and uncovered new arrhythmia substrates. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation also required transbaffle approaches in 3/4 patients. Conclusions: CTI-dependent flutter was the most common arrhythmia in patients with Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries and atrial switch. Transbaffle approaches were often necessary, and, provided that bidirectional CTI block was achieved at the index ablation, late recurrence was due to different arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence, ablation was associated with significant clinical improvement.

Introduction: Atrial arrhythmias are common in patients with D-TGA and atrial switch. We sought to analyze the arrhythmia substrate and catheter ablation approaches and outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all clinical and procedural data in patients with D-TGA followed at a large tertiary care center. Results: In a cohort of 152 patients (mean age 30±11 years), atrial tachycardia was present in 69(45%) patients. Ablations were performed in 39(26%) patients: macro-reentrant atrial flutter (N=37), atrial fibrillation (N=4), and focal automatic atrial tachycardia (N=3). Detailed electrophysiology study data was available for 34 patients. At first ablation (N=28), cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent flutter (CTI, 23(82%)) was most common, followed by right atriotomy-related flutter (IART, 16(57%)) and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT, 1(3.5%)). Bidirectional CTI block often required ablation on both sides of the baffle to complete the isthmus line. Access to the pulmonary venous atrium was obtained in 82% of first-time ablations (via retrograde aortic access, 74%, baffle puncture, 6%, or baffle fenestration, 12%) and in 100% of redo procedures. The first ablation was acutely successful in 25 (89%) patients; the other 3 patients had either partial procedural success (1), failed ablation (1), or underwent an empirical ablation (1). Long-term arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 13(46%) after the first ablation and class III antiarrhythmic medications were utilized in 12 patients. At least one long-term recurrence occurred in 11(44%) patients. Importantly, clinical arrhythmia burden was significantly reduced post-ablation, with rare and short-limited episodes amenable to antiarrhythmic drugs or cardioversion. Repeat ablation was required in 3 cases. Long-term arrhythmia recurrence after a previously completed CTI line involved different arrhythmia mechanisms: scar-related reentry (80%) and automatic atrial tachycardia (40%). Conclusions: Atrial arrhythmia in patients with D-TGA often involves the CTI and atriotomy scars. Ablation of the CTI typically requires access to the pulmonary venous atrium to achieve bidirectional block. Despite late recurrence, the clinical arrhythmic burden is substantially improved.

AbstractWearable electronic devices are a convenient solution to pain intensity assessment as they can provide continuous monitoring for more precise medication adjustments. However, there is little evidence regarding the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Our primary objective was to examine the physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We initially inquired PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We updated our inquiry by searching on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. English peer‐reviewed studies were included, with no exclusions based on time frame or publication status. Of 348 articles that were identified on the first inquiry, 8 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of 179 articles that were identified on the last inquiry, only 1 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found articles evaluating wristbands, smartwatches, and belts. Parameters evaluated were psychomotor and sleep patterns, space and time mobility, heart rate variability, and skeletal muscle electrical activity. Most of the studies found significant positive associations between physiological parameters measured by wearable electronic devices and self‐reporting pain scales. Wearable electronic devices reliably reflect physiologic or biometric parameters, providing a physiological correlation for pain. Early stage investigation suggests that the degree of pain intensity can be discerned, which ideally will reduce the bias inherent to existing numeric/verbal scales. Further research on the use of these devices is vital.

Background Wearable devices and sensor technology provide objective, unbiased range of motion measurements that help health care professionals overcome the hindrances of protractor-based goniometry. This review aims to analyze the accuracy of existing wearable sensor technologies for hand range of motion measurement and identify the most accurate one. Methods We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating wearable sensor technology in hand range of motion assessment. Keywords used for the inquiry were related to wearable devices and hand goniometry. Results Of the 71 studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies evaluated gloves and 1 evaluated a wristband. The most common types of sensors used were bend sensors, followed by inertial sensors, Hall effect sensors, and magnetometers. Most studies compared wearable devices with manual goniometry, achieving optimal accuracy. Although most of the devices reached adequate levels of measurement error, accuracy evaluation in the reviewed studies might be subject to bias owing to the use of poorly reliable measurement techniques for comparison of the devices. Conclusion Gloves using inertial sensors were the most accurate. Future studies should use different comparison techniques, such as infrared camera–based goniometry or virtual motion tracking, to evaluate the performance of wearable devices.

Introduction: Patients with D-TGA palliated with atrial switch operations have the morphologic right ventricle in the systemic position. There is increased risk of atrial arrhythmias and systemic right ventricle (SRV) failure. We sought to analyze the long term outcomes of these patients. Methods: All patients with D-TGA and SRV followed in the Adult Congenital Heart Disease Clinic of a large tertiary care institution were reviewed. A comprehensive retrospective analysis of the medical record was performed, including consult notes, ECGs, echocardiograms and electrophysiology reports. Results: A total of 154 patients (63% male) aged 29±11 years were followed for a mean of 10±9 years (range 0-51). During follow-up, 3 patients underwent cardiac transplantation and 15 died; 5 had sudden death, 2 had cardiogenic shock, 5 had non-cardiac death (i.e., infective endocarditis, sepsis) and 3 had unknown causes of death. Heart failure symptoms were present in 53(34%) patients. Severe SRV systolic dysfunction occurred in 37(24%) patients, with a mean EF of 23±5.5%; moderate SRV dysfunction occurred in 67(44%) patients, mean EF 35±4%. Sinus node dysfunction was present in 75(49%) patients, complete AV block in 9(5%) patients, and a pacemaker placed in 60(39%) patients, with cardiac resynchronization therapy in 5. Atrial arrhythmias occurred in 94(61%) patients and ablations were performed in 47(31%) patients. An ICD was implanted in 37 patients; 5 patients had appropriate shocks, but 7 had inappropriate shocks due to atrial arrhythmias. Age (HR 1.07, p=001), heart failure symptoms (HR 4.9, p= 0.007), severe SRV enlargement (HR 3.7, p=0.03), severe systolic dysfunction (HR 5.4, p=0.003), severe systemic AV valve regurgitation (HR 5.2, p=0.002) and a QRS duration> 122ms (HR 3.7, p=0.02) were significant predictors of mortality. The 15 year probability of sudden death was 3.2%(95% CI 0-6.9%). Conclusions: Atrial arrhythmias are common after atrial switch operations secondary to atriotomy scars. Further studies will need to determine whether restoration of sinus rhythm or cardiac synchrony may prevent further deterioration of the systemic right ventricle. Severe SRV dysfunction and prolonged QRS duration >122ms were significantly correlated with mortality.