Subramaniam, Anna

Background: Some patients with heart failure (HF) will go on to develop advanced HF, characterized by severe HF symptoms despite attempts to optimize medical therapy. The goals of this study were to examine the risk of developing advanced HF in patients with newly diagnosed HF, identify risk factors for developing advanced HF, and evaluate the impact of advanced HF on outcomes. Methods: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with a new clinical diagnosis of HF between 2007 and 2017. Risk factors for the development of advanced HF (2018 European Society of Cardiology criteria) were examined using cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression models. The associations of development of advanced HF with risks of hospitalization and mortality were examined using the Andersen-Gill and Cox models, respectively. Results: There were 4597 residents with incident HF from 2007 to 2017. The cumulative incidence of advanced HF was 11.5% (95% CI, 10.5%–12.5%) at 6 years after incident HF diagnosis overall and was 14.4% (95% CI, 12.3%–16.9%), 11.4% (95% CI, 8.9%–14.6%), and 11.7% (95% CI, 10.3%–13.2%) in patients with incident HF with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction, respectively. Key demographics, comorbidities, and echocardiographic characteristics were independently associated with the development of advanced HF. Development of advanced HF was associated with increased risks of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% CI, 2.7–3.4]; P <0.001), HF hospitalization (hazard ratio, 10.2 [95% CI, 8.7–12.1]), all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 5.0 [95% CI, 4.5–5.6]; P <0.001), and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 7.8 [95% CI, 6.7–9.1]). Conclusions: In this population-based study, development of advanced HF was common and was associated with markedly increased morbidity and mortality.

Introduction: Some patients with heart failure (HF) will go on to develop advanced HF, characterized by severe HF symptoms despite attempts to optimize medical therapy. Our understanding of advanced HF at a population level remains limited. The goals of this study were to determine the risk of developing advanced HF in patients with newly diagnosed HF, identify risk factors for developing advanced HF, and evaluate the impact of advanced HF on outcomes. Methods: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with a new clinical diagnosis of HF between 2007-2017. The primary outcome was development of advanced HF, defined using the 2018 European Society of Cardiology Criteria. Risk factors for development of advanced HF from the time of incident HF diagnosis were examined using cause-specific Cox proportional hazard regression models. The associations of development of advanced HF with risks of hospitalization and mortality were examined using Andersen-Gill and Cox models, respectively, with advanced HF treated as a time dependent covariate. Results: There were 4597 residents with incident HF from 2007 to 2017. The cumulative incidence of advanced HF was 6.0%, 9.1%, and 11.5% at 2, 4, and 6 years after incident HF diagnosis. Characteristics independently associated with development of advanced HF included older age, male sex, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, lower serum sodium, worse right ventricular function, left atrial enlargement, higher estimated filling pressures, and higher right ventricular systolic pressure (p<0.05 for each). Development of advanced HF was associated with increased risks of all-cause hospitalization (adjusted HR 3.00; 95% CI 2.65-3.41, p<0.001), HF hospitalization (HR 10.24, 95% CI 8.67-12.10), all-cause mortality (HR 5.00, 95% CI 4.46-5.59, p<0.001), and cardiovascular mortality (HR 7.84, 95% CI 6.74-9.12). Conclusions: In this population-based study, clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic characteristics at the time of incident HF diagnosis were associated with future risk of advanced HF. Development of advanced HF was associated with markedly increased morbidity and mortality.

Background The role of race and ethnicity in the outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is incompletely understood. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adult admissions with AMI‐CA from the National Inpatient Sample (2012–2017). Self‐reported race/ethnicity was classified as White, Black, and others (Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, Other). Outcomes of interest included in‐hospital mortality, coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, palliative care consultation, do‐not‐resuscitate status use, hospitalization costs, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. Of the 3.5 million admissions with AMI, CA was noted in 182 750 (5.2%), with White, Black, and other races/ethnicities constituting 74.8%, 10.7%, and 14.5%, respectively. Black patients admitted with AMI‐CA were more likely to be female, with more comorbidities, higher rates of non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, and higher neurological and renal failure. Admissions of patients of Black and other races/ethnicities underwent coronary angiography (61.9% versus 70.2% versus 73.1%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (44.6% versus 53.0% versus 58.1%) less frequently compared to patients of white race ( p <0.001). Admissions of patients with AMI‐CA had significantly higher unadjusted mortality (47.4% and 47.4%) as compared with White patients admitted (40.9%). In adjusted analyses, Black race was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99; P =0.007) whereas other races had higher in‐hospital mortality (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08–1.15; P <0.001) compared with White race. Admissions of Black patients with AMI‐CA had longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of palliative care consultation, less frequent do‐not‐resuscitate status use, and fewer discharges to home (all P <0.001). Conclusions Racial and ethnic minorities received less frequent guideline‐directed procedures and had higher in‐hospital mortality and worse outcomes in AMI‐CA.

Introduction: Anemia is associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular events, and decreased quality of life in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Iron deficiency may contribute to disease severity independent of effects on red cell mass. The hemodynamic consequences of anemia and iron deficiency in HFpEF remain unclear. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 313 consecutive subjects with HFpEF diagnosed by invasive hemodynamic assessment, and compared echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of anemic versus non-anemic subjects. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women. Iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <100 ug/L. Results: Compared to patients without anemia, HFpEF patients with anemia displayed higher NT-proBNP, elevated pulmonary artery (PA) pressures at rest and at peak exercise, and lower oxygen consumption at peak exercise (Table). There was no difference in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Patients with iron deficiency were more likely to be women. At rest, patients with iron deficiency displayed lower left ventricular (LV) mass, higher resting SVRI and lower cardiac index (CI), but there were not significant differences with exercise. Conclusions: Anemia in HFpEF is associated with greater evidence of congestion and more severe pulmonary hypertension, contributing to reduced exercise capacity. Iron deficiency in HFpEF is more common in women and associated with lower cardiac output at rest, but hemodynamics are otherwise similar. Further study is required to understand the mechanisms by which anemia and iron deficiency influence cardiac function and outcomes in HFpEF.

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease risks are significantly higher in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). There are limited data on the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in patients with HIV/AIDS> Methods: A retrospective cohort of AMI-CS during 2000-2017 from the National Inpatient Sample was evaluated for concomitant HIV and AIDS. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of cardiac procedures, hospital length of stay, hospitalization costs, use of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status, and palliative care use. A sub-group analysis was performed for those with and without AIDS within the HIV cohort. Results: A total 557,974 AMI-CS admissions were included, with HIV and AIDS in 1,321 (0.2%) and 985 (0.2%), respectively. The HIV cohort was younger (54.1 vs. 69.0 years), more often male, of non-white race, uninsured, from a lower socioeconomic status, and with higher comorbidity (all p <0.001). The HIV cohort had comparable multiorgan failure (37.8% vs. 39.0%) and cardiac arrest (28.7% vs. 27.4%) ( p >0.05). The cohorts with and without HIV had comparable rates of coronary angiography (70.2% vs. 69.0%; p =0.37), but less frequent early coronary angiography (hospital day zero) (39.1% vs. 42.5%; p <0.001). The cohort with HIV had comparable in-hospital mortality compared to those without (26.9% vs. 37.4%; adjusted odds ratio 1.04 [95% confidence interval 0.90-1.21]; p =0.61). The cohort with HIV had longer duration of hospitalization (10.8±10.1 vs 9.9±11.4 days), higher hospitalization costs (158±155 vs. 143±182 x1000 USD) and was discharged home (48.6% vs 41.8%) more often as compared to those without HIV (all p <0.005). In the HIV cohort, AIDS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (28.8% vs. 21.1%; adjusted odds ratio 4.12 [95% confidence interval 1.89-9.00]; p <0.001). Secondary outcomes were relatively comparable between those with and without AIDS. Conclusions: The cohort with HIV had longer hospital stay and higher hospitalization costs; however these were comparable between those with and without AIDS.

Background: There are limited data on acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) stratified by chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages. Objective: To assess clinical outcomes in AMI-CS stratified by CKD stages. Methods: A retrospective cohort of AMI-CS during 2005–2016 from the National Inpatient Sample was categorized as no CKD, CKD stage-III (CKD-III), CKD stage-IV (CKD-IV) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). CKD-I/II were excluded. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We also evaluated acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute hemodialysis in non-ESRD admissions. Results: Of 372,412 AMI-CS admissions, CKD-III, CKD-IV and ESRD comprised 20,380 (5.5%), 7367 (2.0%) and 18,109 (4.9%), respectively. Admissions with CKD were, on average, older, of the White race, bearing Medicare insurance, of a lower socioeconomic stratum, with higher comorbidities, and higher rates of acute organ failure. Compared to the cohort without CKD, CKD-III, CKD-IV and ESRD had lower use of coronary angiography (72.7%, 67.1%, 56.9%, 61.1%), PCI (53.7%, 43.8%, 38.4%, 37.6%) and MCS (47.9%, 38.3%, 33.3%, 34.2%), respectively (all p < 0.001). AKI and acute hemodialysis use increased with increase in CKD stage (no CKD–38.5%, 2.6%; CKD-III–79.1%, 6.5%; CKD-IV–84.3%, 12.3%; p < 0.001). ESRD (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.25 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.21–1.31]; p < 0.001), but not CKD-III (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.69–0.75); p < 0.001) or CKD-IV (OR 0.82 [95 CI 0.77–0.87] was predictive of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: CKD/ESRD is associated with lower use of evidence-based therapies. ESRD was an independent predictor of higher in-hospital mortality in AMI-CS.

Introduction: Racial disparities in outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiac arrest (CA) exist. This study assessed the racial differences in the management and outcomes of CA complicating AMI to better inform clinical care. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that racial minorities would have worse outcomes with AMI-CA as compared to white patients. Methods: During 2012-2017, AMI admissions with a concomitant diagnosis of CA were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Race was classified as white, black and others (Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, Others). The primary outcome was racial disparities in in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included racial disparities in invasive procedures and hospitalization characteristics. Results: We identified 3,504,225 admissions for AMI in the study period, of which 182,750 (5.2%) were complicated by CA. 74.8% were white, 10.7% were black and 14.5% belonged to other races. Black and other race AMI-CA admissions received less frequent early coronary angiography (41.4% vs 50.2% vs 52.8%), coronary angiography (61.9% vs 70.2% vs. 73.1% %), PCI (44.6% vs 53.0% vs 58.1%), CABG and mechanical circulatory support compared to white and other races. The mean time to coronary angiography was highest among blacks (3.4 ± 4.2 days) and lowest among whites (3.0 ± 3.7 days). Black and other races had significantly higher unadjusted mortality, however in a multivariable logistic regression analysis with white race as referent, black race was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.91-0.99]; p =0.007) whereas other races had higher in-hospital mortality (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.08-1.15]; p <0.001) compared to white race. AMI-CA admissions of black race had longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of palliative care consultation, less frequent DNR status use, and fewer discharges to home. Admissions of other races had higher use of DNR status and higher hospitalization costs compared to whites and blacks. Conclusions: Significant racial disparities exist in in-hospital mortality among AMI admissions complicated with CA. Further quantitative and qualitative research into the equitable care of racial minorities with AMI-CA is needed to address this disparity.

Background:There are limited data on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction–cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in patients with HIV infection and AIDS.Setting:Twenty percent sample of all US hospitals.Methods:A retrospective cohort of AMI-CS during 2000–2017 from the National Inpatient Sample was evaluated for concomitant HIV and AIDS. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality and use of cardiac procedures. A subgroup analysis was performed for those with and without AIDS within the HIV cohort.Results:A total 557,974 AMI-CS admissions were included, with HIV and AIDS in 1321 (0.2%) and 985 (0.2%), respectively. The HIV cohort was younger (54.1 vs. 69.0 years), more often men, of non-White race, uninsured, from a lower socioeconomic status, and with higher comorbidity (allP< 0.001). The HIV cohort had comparable multiorgan failure (37.8% vs. 39.0%) and cardiac arrest (28.7% vs. 27.4%) (P> 0.05). The cohorts with and without HIV had comparable rates of coronary angiography (70.2% vs. 69.0%;P= 0.37) but less frequent early coronary angiography (hospital day zero) (39.1% vs. 42.5%;P< 0.001). The cohort with HIV had higher unadjusted but comparable adjusted in-hospital mortality compared with those without [26.9% vs. 37.4%; adjusted odds ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.21);P= 0.61]. In the HIV cohort, AIDS was associated with higher in-hospital mortality [28.8% vs. 21.1%; adjusted odds ratio 4.12 (95% confidence interval: 1.89 to 9.00);P< 0.001].Conclusions:The cohort with HIV had comparable rates of cardiac procedures and in-hospital mortality; however, those with AIDS had higher in-hospital mortality.