Figueiredo, Jane C.

Abstract Background: The genotoxin colibactin, produced by Escherichia coli containing the pks island, is associated with a tumor single base substitution (SBS) mutational signature SBS88. It is unknown whether lifestyle and environmental factors related to gut dysbiosis impact colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and survival differently by colibactin signature status. Methods: Utilizing the resources of the Genetic Epidemiology of Colorectal cancer Consortium and Colon Cancer Family Registry (GECCO-CCFR), a consortium including both case-control and cohort study designs, SBS88 tumor mutational signature was measured in 4308 CRC cases who were microsatellite stable (MSS) and had at least five somatic single nucleotide variants for signature decomposition. Associations of 13 lifestyle and environmental factors with CRC risk by colibactin signature status were assessed using logistic and multinomial regression; associations with CRC survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 392 (9%) of the 4308 MSS tumors were positive for SBS88. Having a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (versus a BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) was strongly associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with the SBS88 signature, but not among those with SBS88 negative CRC [further adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47, 7.84, and HR = 0.97 95% CI 0.78, 1.21, respectively, P for heterogeneity = 0.066]. Associations of fruit intake with CRC risk may be differential by SBS88 status. In minimally adjusted models, those in the highest quartile of fruit intake (versus the first quartile) had 0.53 (95% CI 0.37, 0.76) times the risk of SBS88 positive CRC, as opposed to 0.75 (95% CI 0.66, 0.85) times the risk of SBS88 negative CRC (P for heterogeneity = 0.047). Among cohort studies specifically, associations between CRC risk and BMI, alcohol, and fruit intake also differed by SBS88 status (P for heterogeneity ranging 0.02-0.05). Conclusions: Higher BMI may be associated with worse CRC-specific survival among those with SBS88 positive tumors. BMI, alcohol, and dietary factors may be differentially associated with CRC risk based on SBS88 status. Citation Format: Claire Elizabeth Thomas, Peter Georgeson, Conghui Qu, Robert S. Steinfelder, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark A. Jenkins, Andrea Gsur, Jane C. Figueiredo, Polly A. Newcomb, Peter T. Campbell, Christina Newton, Caroline Y. Um, Lisa Boardman, Victor Moreno, Jenny Chang-Claude, Michael Hoffmeister, Marc J. Gunter, Andrew T. Chan, Shuji Ogino, Ellen L. Goode, Brigid Lynch, Yohannes A. Melaku, Steven Gallinger, Sonja I. Berndt, Wen-Yi Huang, Ulrike Peters, Amanda I. Phipps. Lifestyle and environmental factors in relation to colorectal cancer risk and survival by colibactin tumor mutational signature status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6453.

Abstract Colorectal cancer risk can be impacted by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, including diet and obesity. Gene-environment interactions (G × E) can provide biological insights into the effects of obesity on colorectal cancer risk. Here, we assessed potential genome-wide G × E interactions between body mass index (BMI) and common SNPs for colorectal cancer risk using data from 36,415 colorectal cancer cases and 48,451 controls from three international colorectal cancer consortia (CCFR, CORECT, and GECCO). The G × E tests included the conventional logistic regression using multiplicative terms (one degree of freedom, 1DF test), the two-step EDGE method, and the joint 3DF test, each of which is powerful for detecting G × E interactions under specific conditions. BMI was associated with higher colorectal cancer risk. The two-step approach revealed a statistically significant G×BMI interaction located within the Formin 1/Gremlin 1 (FMN1/GREM1) gene region (rs58349661). This SNP was also identified by the 3DF test, with a suggestive statistical significance in the 1DF test. Among participants with the CC genotype of rs58349661, overweight and obesity categories were associated with higher colorectal cancer risk, whereas null associations were observed across BMI categories in those with the TT genotype. Using data from three large international consortia, this study discovered a locus in the FMN1/GREM1 gene region that interacts with BMI on the association with colorectal cancer risk. Further studies should examine the potential mechanisms through which this locus modifies the etiologic link between obesity and colorectal cancer. Significance: This gene-environment interaction analysis revealed a genetic locus in FMN1/GREM1 that interacts with body mass index in colorectal cancer risk, suggesting potential implications for precision prevention strategies.

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence has increased in those 50 years or younger compared to older individuals in recent decades. While the intra-tumoral microbiome is a potent facilitator of tumorigenesis, the role of the microbiome in early onset (eo)CRC is unclear. Identification of the intra-tumoral microbiome may enhance prediction of adverse outcomes to improve survival of CRC overall age groups and eoCRC. Methods: We performed targeted sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA samples from 3695 colorectal cancer cases within the Genetics and Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Tumor DNA was extracted from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) or fresh frozen tissue. Normal tissue DNA was extracted from blood or normal surrounding colorectal tissue. We designed probes for the bacterial pathogens enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), polyketide synthase positive E. coli (pks+ EC), and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn). We used logistic regression to assess tumor-associated bacteria and clinical parameters, tumor molecular characteristics, and tumor stage adjusted for age, sex, and study and a Cox promotional hazard to assess association with CRC-specific survival, overall and in eoCRC, adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, mutational burden, and microsatellite instability (MSI) and stratified baseline hazards by study. Survival data were available for 2357 and 308 patients, overall and in eoCRC, respectively. Results: The prevalence of different bacteria in tumors differed slightly overall vs. in eoCRC tumors: ETBF (5.2%, 6.3%), pks+ EC (12.9%, 14.8%), and Fn (10.4%, 8.2%). Overall, men had a lower probability of tumors with Fn (odds ratio (OR)=0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-0.99, p=0.04) but higher odds of tumors with pks+ EC (OR=1.38, CI=1.14-1.68, p=0.001), compared to women. The odds of prevalent Fn were higher for proximal vs distal tumors (OR=1.76, CI=1.38-2.26, p<0.001), but there was no association between tumor site and pks+ EC or ETBF. MSI-high tumors were more likely to carry Fn (OR=2.79, CI=2.08-3.75, p<0.001) and less likely to carry pks+ EC (OR=0.63, CI=0.44-0.88, p=0.008) when compared to patients with MSS tumors. In patients with non-hypermutated tumors, we observed that pks+ EC positive tumors were associated with better CRC-specific survival (HR=0.73, CI=0.57-0.93, p=0.01), whereas ETBF positive tumors (HR=1.99, CI=1,18-3.36,p=0.009) and Fn positive tumors (HR=1.33, CI=1.04-1.72, p=0.03) were associated with poorer survival. In eo-CRC patients, Fn positive status was associated with poorer survival (HR=2.4, CI= 1.056 - 5.492, p=0.026). Conclusions: We showed that the intra-tumoral microbiome differs in distribution across patient populations and patient survival over all age groups and, specifically, in eoCRC. Citation Format: Meredith A. Hullar, Keith R. Curtis, Tabitha Harrison, Yi Lin, Robert Steinfelder, Sonja I. Berndt, Daniel D. Buchanan, Andrew T. Chan, David A. Drew, Jane Figueiredo, Amy J. French, Tabitha A. Harrison, Mark A. Jenkins, Johannes Melaku, Victor Moreno, Tomotaka Ugai, Shuji Ogino, Conghui Qu, Chenxu Qu, Steven Thibodeau, Syed Zaidi, Amanda I. Phipps, Ulrike Peters, on behalf of GECCO and CCFR investigators. Evaluation of intra-tumoral pks+ E. coli, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis and Fusobacterium nucleatum, overall and in early onset disease, in colorectal cancer cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3039.

Abstract Background: Tobacco smoking is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, genetically defined population subgroups may have increased susceptibility to smoking-related effects on colorectal cancer. Methods: A genome-wide interaction scan was performed including 33,756 colorectal cancer cases and 44,346 controls from three genetic consortia. Results: Evidence of an interaction was observed between smoking status (ever vs. never smokers) and a locus on 3p12.1 (rs9880919, P = 4.58 × 10−8), with higher associated risk in subjects carrying the GG genotype [OR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20–1.30] compared with the other genotypes (OR <1.17 for GA and AA). Among ever smokers, we observed interactions between smoking intensity (increase in 10 cigarettes smoked per day) and two loci on 6p21.33 (rs4151657, P = 1.72 × 10−8) and 8q24.23 (rs7005722, P = 2.88 × 10−8). Subjects carrying the rs4151657 TT genotype showed higher risk (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09–1.16) compared with the other genotypes (OR <1.06 for TC and CC). Similarly, higher risk was observed among subjects carrying the rs7005722 AA genotype (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07–1.28) compared with the other genotypes (OR <1.13 for AC and CC). Functional annotation revealed that SNPs in 3p12.1 and 6p21.33 loci were located in regulatory regions, and were associated with expression levels of nearby genes. Genetic models predicting gene expression revealed that smoking parameters were associated with lower colorectal cancer risk with higher expression levels of CADM2 (3p12.1) and ATF6B (6p21.33). Conclusions: Our study identified novel genetic loci that may modulate the risk for colorectal cancer of smoking status and intensity, linked to tumor suppression and immune response. Impact: These findings can guide potential prevention treatments.

Abstract Background: The microbiome in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors is now recognized as a potent facilitator of tumorigenesis. Identification of the intra-tumoral microbiome may provide an avenue to enhance prediction of adverse outcomes and ultimately lead to improved survival of CRC, the second leading cause of cancer death. Methods: We performed targeted sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA samples for 3695 colorectal cancer cases within the Genetics and Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR). Tumor DNA was extracted primarily from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) or from fresh frozen tissue. FFPE slides were dissected to ensure >70% tumor content. Normal DNA was primarily extracted from blood and otherwise normal surrounding colorectal tissue. We designed probes for bacterial pathogens including Bacteroides fragilis (ETBF), polyketide synthase positive E. coli (pks+ EC), enterotoxigenic and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn). Logistic regression was used to assess tumor-associated bacteria and various clinical parameters, tumor molecular characteristics, and tumor stage adjusted for age, sex, and study and a Cox promotional hazard to assess association with CRC-specific survival adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, mutational burden and microsatellite instability (MSI) and stratified baseline hazards by study. Survival data were available for 2357 patients. Results: The prevalence of patients with bacteria in tumors varied for ETBF (5.2%), pks+ EC (12.9%), and Fn (10.4%). Men had a lower probability of tumors with Fn (odds ratio (OR)=0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.64-0.99,p=0.04) but higher odds of tumors with pks+ EC (OR=1.38, CI=1.14-1.68,p=0.001). Patients with proximal tumors had higher odds of carrying Fn (OR=1.76, CI=1.38-2.26, p<0.001) as did patients with MSI high tumors (OR 2.79, CI=2.08-3.74) p<0.001). Patients with MSI-high tumors had lower odds of carrying pks+ EC (OR=0.63, CI=0.44-0.88, p=0.008) when compared to patients with microsatellite stable tumors. Among non-hypermutated tumors, we observed that tumors positive for pks+ EC were associated with better CRC-specific survival (OR=0.73, CI=0.57-0.93,p=0.01 whereas in patients with ETBF positive tumors had shorter survival (OR=1.99,CI=1,18-3.36,p=0.009) as did patients with tumors positive for Fn (OR=1.33, CI=1.04-1.72, p=0.03). Conclusions: In this largest investigation of intra-tumoral bacteria in CRC, we demonstrate that inclusion of pathogenic intra-tumoral microbiome may enhance prediction of survival and can identify a subset of patients with CRC that may benefit from targeted therapies that modulate the tumor microbiome. Citation Format: Meredith A. J. Hullar, Keith R. Curtis, Tabitha A. Harrison, Yi Lin, Robert S. Steinfelder, Sonja I. Berndt, Daniel D. Buchanan, Andrew T. Chan, David Drew, Jane C. Figueiredo, Amy J. French, Ellen L. Goode, Mark A. Jenkins, Yohannes A. Melaku, Victor Moreno, Shuji Ogino, Stephen N. Thibideau, Amanda I. Phipps, Ulrike Peters. Evaluation of intra-tumoral pathogenic bacteria pks+ E. coli, enterotoxigenic B. fragilis and fusobacterium nucleatum in 3695 colorectal cancer cases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr PR008.

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer has a strong epigenetic component that is accompanied by frequent DNA methylation (DNAm) alterations in addition to heritable genetic risk. It is of interest to understand the interrelationship of germline genetics, DNAm, and colorectal cancer risk. Methods: We performed a genome-wide methylation quantitative trait locus (meQTL) analysis in 1,355 people, assessing the pairwise associations between genetic variants and lymphocytes methylation data. In addition, we used penalized regression with cis-genetic variants ± 1 Mb of methylation to identify genome-wide heritable DNAm. We evaluated the association of genetically predicted methylation with colorectal cancer risk based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of over 125,000 cases and controls using the multivariate sMiST as well as univariately via examination of marginal association with colorectal cancer risk. Results: Of the 142 known colorectal cancer GWAS loci, 47 were identified as meQTLs. We identified four novel colorectal cancer–associated loci (NID2, ATXN10, KLHDC10, and CEP41) that reside over 1 Mb outside of known colorectal cancer loci and 10 secondary signals within 1 Mb of known loci. Conclusions: Leveraging information of DNAm regulation into genetic association of colorectal cancer risk reveals novel pathways in colorectal cancer tumorigenesis. Our summary statistics-based framework sMiST provides a powerful approach by combining information from the effect through methylation and residual direct effects of the meQTLs on disease risk. Further validation and functional follow-up of these novel pathways are needed. Impact: Using genotype, DNAm, and GWAS, we identified four new colorectal cancer risk loci. We studied the landscape of genetic regulation of DNAm via single-SNP and multi-SNP meQTL analyses.

Abstract Background The use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) may interact with genetic variants to influence colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Methods We conducted a genome-wide, gene-environment interaction between single nucleotide polymorphisms and the use of any MHT, estrogen only, and combined estrogen-progestogen therapy with CRC risk, among 28 486 postmenopausal women (11 519 CRC patients and 16 967 participants without CRC) from 38 studies, using logistic regression, 2-step method, and 2– or 3–degree-of-freedom joint test. A set-based score test was applied for rare genetic variants. Results The use of any MHT, estrogen only and estrogen-progestogen were associated with a reduced CRC risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 0.78; OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.79; and OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59 to 0.90, respectively). The 2-step method identified a statistically significant interaction between a GRIN2B variant rs117868593 and MHT use, whereby MHT-associated CRC risk was statistically significantly reduced in women with the GG genotype (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.72) but not within strata of GC or CC genotypes. A statistically significant interaction between a DCBLD1 intronic variant at 6q22.1 (rs10782186) and MHT use was identified by the 2–degree-of-freedom joint test. The MHT-associated CRC risk was reduced with increasing number of rs10782186-C alleles, showing odds ratios of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.70 to 0.87) for TT, 0.68 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.73) for TC, and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.60 to 0.74) for CC genotypes. In addition, 5 genes in rare variant analysis showed suggestive interactions with MHT (2-sided P < 1.2 × 10−4). Conclusion Genetic variants that modify the association between MHT and CRC risk were identified, offering new insights into pathways of CRC carcinogenesis and potential mechanisms involved.

Abstract Background: Currently known associations between common genetic variants and colorectal cancer explain less than half of its heritability of 25%. As alcohol consumption has a J-shape association with colorectal cancer risk, nondrinking and heavy drinking are both risk factors for colorectal cancer. Methods: Individual-level data was pooled from the Colon Cancer Family Registry, Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study, and Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium to compare nondrinkers (≤1 g/day) and heavy drinkers (>28 g/day) with light-to-moderate drinkers (1–28 g/day) in GxE analyses. To improve power, we implemented joint 2df and 3df tests and a novel two-step method that modifies the weighted hypothesis testing framework. We prioritized putative causal variants by predicting allelic effects using support vector machine models. Results: For nondrinking as compared with light-to-moderate drinking, the hybrid two-step approach identified 13 significant SNPs with pairwise r2 > 0.9 in the 10q24.2/COX15 region. When stratified by alcohol intake, the A allele of lead SNP rs2300985 has a dose–response increase in risk of colorectal cancer as compared with the G allele in light-to-moderate drinkers [OR for GA genotype = 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–1.17; OR for AA genotype = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.31], but not in nondrinkers or heavy drinkers. Among the correlated candidate SNPs in the 10q24.2/COX15 region, rs1318920 was predicted to disrupt an HNF4 transcription factor binding motif. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the association with colorectal cancer in 10q24.2/COX15 observed in genome-wide association study is strongest in nondrinkers. We also identified rs1318920 as the putative causal regulatory variant for the region. Impact: The study identifies multifaceted evidence of a possible functional effect for rs1318920.

AbstractDiabetes is an established risk factor for colorectal cancer. However, colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease and it is not well understood whether diabetes is more strongly associated with some tumor molecular subtypes than others. A better understanding of the association between diabetes and colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes could provide important insights into the biology of this association. We used data on lifestyle and clinical characteristics from the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO), including 9756 colorectal cancer cases (with tumor marker data) and 9985 controls, to evaluate associations between reported diabetes and risk of colorectal cancer according to molecular subtypes. Tumor markers included BRAF and KRAS mutations, microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype. In the multinomial logistic regression model, comparing colorectal cancer cases to cancer‐free controls, diabetes was positively associated with colorectal cancer regardless of subtype. The highest OR estimate was found for BRAF‐mutated colorectal cancer, n = 1086 (ORfully adj: 1.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.36‐2.05), with an attenuated association observed between diabetes and colorectal cancer without BRAF‐mutations, n = 7959 (ORfully adj: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19‐1.48). In the case only analysis, BRAF‐mutation was differentially associated with diabetes (Pdifference = .03). For the other markers, associations with diabetes were similar across tumor subtypes. In conclusion, our study confirms the established association between diabetes and colorectal cancer risk, and suggests that it particularly increases the risk of BRAF‐mutated tumors.

Abstract Background Observational studies have shown higher folate consumption to be associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding whether and how genetic risk factors interact with folate could further elucidate the underlying mechanism. Aggregating functionally relevant genetic variants in set-based variant testing has higher power to detect gene-environment (GxE) interactions and may provide information on the underlying biological pathway. Objective We investigated interactions between folate consumption and predicted gene expression on colorectal cancer risk across the genome. Methods We used variant weights from the PrediXcan models of colon tissue-specific gene expression as a priori variant information for a set-based GxE approach. We harmonized total folate intake (mcg/day) based on dietary intake and supplemental use across cohort and case-control studies and calculated sex and study specific quantiles. Analyses were performed using a mixed effects score tests for interactions between folate and genetically predicted expression of 4,839 genes with available genetically predicted expression. We meta-analyzed results across 23 studies for a total of 13,498 cases with colorectal tumors and 13,918 controls of European ancestry. Results We found suggestive evidence of interaction with folate intake for genes including glutathione S-Transferase Alpha 1 (GSTA1; p=4.3E-4), Tonsuko Like, DNA Repair Protein (TONSL; p=4.3E-4), and Aspartylglucosaminidase (AGA: p=4.5E-4). Glutathione is an antioxidant, preventing cellular damage and is a downstream metabolite of homocysteine and metabolized by GSTA1. TONSL is part of a complex that functions in the recovery of double strand breaks and AGA plays a role in lysosomal breakdown of glycoprotein. Conclusion We identified three genes involved in preventing or repairing DNA damage that may interact with folate consumption to alter CRC risk.