Sampson, Maureen

Abstract Background Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is used to assess atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and to manage lipid-lowering therapy. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin (type 9) serine protease (PCSK9) inhibitors decrease LDL-C by up to 70% when used in conjunction with statins. Due to cost, insurance companies restrict their use. To be eligible for PCSK9 therapy, a patient must have pre-existing ASCVD and LDL-C > 70 mg/dL, while on a maximally tolerated dose of statins. Most clinical laboratories calculate LDL-C by the Friedewald Equation (FWLDL-C), which utilizes results from the standard lipid panel (total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)). However, this often leads to an underestimation of LDL-C, especially when TG concentrations are elevated. More accurate equations have recently been developed, such as the Martin (MLDL-C), Sampson-NIH (SLDL-C) and extended Martin (ext-MLDL-C) equations. Using LDL-C determined by the beta-quantification reference method (BQ), we developed the following enhanced version of the Sampson-NIH Equation (eSLDL-C), which includes apoB as an independent variable: eSLDL-C = TC/1.15-(HDL-C)/1.25-TG/6.98-(TG × NonHDL-C)/1115 + TG2/8903.23 + (TG × ApoB)/1237 + ApoB/4.54–4.73 Methods Results for clinically ordered ApoB, BQ, and lipid panels were used. To test the accuracy of the various equations, we compared BQLDL-C to FWLDL-C, MLDL-C, extMLDL-C, SLDL-C and eSLDL-C by regression analysis (N = 12 101, TG < 800). Accuracy of each equation was compared to the BQ reference method for classifying patients (LDL-C ≤ 150, n = 9374) as either being below or above the 70 mg/dL treatment decision threshold for PCSK9 therapy. Results The eSLDL-C equation performed substantially better than the other equations for estimating low LDL-C (BQLDL-C ≤ 100 mg/dL, TG 5–800 mg/dL, n = 4115), with a mean absolute difference (MAD) of 3.80 mg/dL (compared to SLDL-C: 6.05; FWLDL-C: 8.71; MLDL-C: 6.43; extMLDL-C: 6.39). It also had the best overall normalized Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient (nMCC) for the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients that are above the 70 mg/dL treatment threshold (eSLDL-C-94.7% (92.2% spec, 98.5% sen), SLDL-C-90.7% (94.8% spec, 95.5% sen), FWLDL-C-88.2% (98.0% spec, 92.7% sen), MLDL-C-90.3% (88.9% spec, 96.5% sen), and extMLDL-C-90.1% (88.4% spec, 96.5% sen)). In our dataset with 1125 subjects being below the 70 mg/dL threshold by BQLDL-C, FWLDL-C misclassified an additional 601 subjects below this threshold (Negative Predictive Value 65%). MLDL-C and extMLDL-C misclassified 289 subjects falsely low, whereas eSLDL-C only has 126 subjects falsely classified lower than the 70 mg/dL threshold. Conclusion We show that the enhanced Sampson-NIH equation, which includes apoB, estimates low LDL-C more accurately than other equations. The use of the new equation would improve access to those patients who might benefit from PCSK9 therapy but have falsely low LDL-C by the FWLDL-C equation or other LDL-C equations. The new equation is also more specific than the MLDL-C and extMLDL-C equations and would, therefore, also reduce the overutilization of PCSK9 therapy by these particular equations for those patients who do not require it, according to the reference BQ method and current guidelines.

Introduction: Over 6 million people in the U.S. have heart failure (HF), less than half are expected to survive beyond 5 years. The need to better stratify mortality risk in HF is recognized. Frailty is associated with mortality in HF but not routinely measured clinically. As frailty is linked to inflammation and malnutrition, we hypothesized that the Metabolic Vulnerability Index (MVX) a multimarker score of systemic inflammation (small HDL particles, GlycA) and malnutrition (leucine, valine, isoleucine, citrate), could serve as a biomarker of frailty to predict mortality risk. Methods: Clinical data and plasma were collected from 1,389 patients from a HF community cohort between 2003-2012. We measured frailty using the Rockwood Index as the proportion of deficits present out of 32 physical limitations and comorbidities. MVX was calculated from the nuclear magnetic resonance LipoProfile® test. Patients were categorized by frailty (0-0.15; 0.16-0.27; 0.28-0.78) and MVX (33.4-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-85.8) cutpoints. Cox models estimated the association of frailty and MVX assignment with mortality, adjusted for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score, a validated clinical risk score for HF mortality. Results: Frailty and MVX scores were available in 985 patients (median age 77, IQR: 67-84; 48% women). Higher frailty was associated with higher MVX (p-trend < 0.001). The highest frailty and MVX groups experienced large increases in risk of death, after adjustment for MAGGIC score (HR=3.3, 95% CI=2.6-4.2) and (HR=2.7, 95% CI=2.1-3.5), respectively. When adjusted for one another and MAGGIC score, MVX and frailty associations with death were only minimally attenuated: frailty (HR=3.2, 95% CI=2.5-4.0) and MVX (HR=2.4, 95% CI=1.9-3.2) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this community cohort of patients with HF, frailty and MVX are positively associated with one another. However, both indicators are independently associated with an increased risk of death and can contribute to risk stratification.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with metabolic alterations, including ketogenesis. However, determinants of ketogenesis and risk of mortality in HF is not defined. Total ketone bodies (KB) include β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and acetone and can be measured in plasma by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between KB and clinical characteristics in a community HF cohort and to assess the association between KB and all-cause mortality. Methods: A population-based cohort of 1,389 HF patients was prospectively enrolled between 2003 and 2012. Plasma KB was measured by LP4 NMR LipoProfile ® assay/test on the Vantera® NMR analyzer platform. A conditional inference tree method (ctree R Package) was used to determine optimal KB group cut points. Associations between clinical characteristics and KB were measured with Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Kaplan-Meier method estimated survival. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate associations between KB concentrations and mortality. Results: Among the 1,382 HF patients with KB measurements, the median age was 78 years (IQR 68-84) and 52% were men. Median KB was 180 μM (IQR 134-308). Patients were divided into two groups with lower KB (≤471.5 μM) and higher KB (>471.5 μM). Patients with higher KB (N=210) had lower BMI, higher BNP, and were more likely to be in the New York Heart Association class III-IV; however, these patients were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, coronary disease, or diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05). Age, sex, creatinine, ejection fraction, or Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score did not differ by KB group. Higher KB was associated with worse survival (figure). After adjustment for the MAGGIC score, higher KB was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48). Conclusions: In this community HF cohort, higher KB was associated with increased mortality, independent of the MAGGIC score.

New more effective lipid-lowering therapies have made it important to accurately determine Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) at both high and low levels. LDL-C was measured by the β-quantification reference method (BQ) (N = 40,346) and compared to Friedewald (F-LDL-C), Martin (M-LDL-C), extended Martin (eM-LDL-C) and Sampson (S-LDL-C) equations by regression analysis, error-grid analysis, and concordance with the BQ method for classification into different LDL-C treatment intervals. For triglycerides (TG) < 175 mg/dL, the four LDL-C equations yielded similarly accurate results, but for TG between 175 and 800 mg/dL, the S-LDL-C equation when compared to the BQ method had a lower mean absolute difference (mg/dL) (MAD = 10.66) than F-LDL-C (MAD = 13.09), M-LDL-C (MAD = 13.16) or eM-LDL-C (MAD = 12.70) equations. By error-grid analysis, the S-LDL-C equation for TG > 400 mg/dL not only had the least analytical errors but also the lowest frequency of clinically relevant errors at the low (<70 mg/dL) and high (>190 mg/dL) LDL-C cut-points (S-LDL-C: 13.5%, F-LDL-C: 23.0%, M-LDL-C: 20.5%) and eM-LDL-C: 20.0%) equations. The S-LDL-C equation also had the best overall concordance to the BQ reference method for classifying patients into different LDL-C treatment intervals. The S-LDL-C equation is both more analytically accurate than alternative equations and results in less clinically relevant errors at high and low LDL-C levels.

Abstract Cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cirrhosis, can lead to serum accumulation of lipoprotein X (LpX). LpX is a multilamellar particle high in cholesterol but lacking structural apolipoproteins A1 or B. The absence of ApoB results in no negative feedback on cholesterol biosynthesis and prevents LpX clearance from the liver. While clinical signs and symptoms typically precede laboratory findings, it is possible that in medically complex patients the identification of LpX could be the first observation of cholestatic liver disease. Traditional laboratory methods are insufficient to identify LpX as it is of similar density to low-density lipoprotein (LDL). LpX contains a high concentration of cholesterol which is erroneously reported as LDL-C by routine clinical methods. As LpX is a rare complication of liver disease, clinicians may presume the elevation is a coincidental familial hypercholesterolemia rather than a sequela of liver disease. Currently, lipoprotein gel electrophoresis is the only laboratory method to identify LpX. In this method only performed in specialty lipid laboratories, LpX is readily identified by its unique reverse electrophoretic mobility relative to other lipoproteins. The objective of this study was to characterize lipid panels from LpX-positive samples and develop a suitable mechanism to identify LpX-containing samples with good clinical validity. From 21,377 clinical electrophoresis results reported between Nov 2011 to Nov 2021, LpX was identified in 157 serum samples. Overall, patients with LpX were younger (median 44y vs. 55y, p&lt;0.0001) with significantly higher total cholesterol (812mg/dL vs 190mg/dL, p&lt;0.0001) and lower high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C; 3mg/dL vs 45mg/dL, p&lt;0.0001). Data were randomly split (70/30) into training (n=14,964) and testing (n=6,413) cohorts. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis identified optimal thresholds of 22.5 mg/dL HDL-C (AUC = 0.94) and 378.5 mg/dL total cholesterol (AUC = 0.91), as well as a nonHDL-C/HDL-C ratio of 9.2 (AUC = 0.995). Applying these cutoffs to the testing cohort achieved a sensitivity/specificity of 98%/81% for HDL-C, 96%/87% for total cholesterol, and 98%/94% for nonHDL-C/HDL-C ratio. A multivariate model combining these three parameters showed a sensitivity/specificity of 97%/85%, respectively. In conclusion, low HDL-C, elevated total cholesterol and a ratio of nonHDL-C/HDL-C &gt;9.2 are associated with the presence of LpX. The ratio of nonHDL-C/HDL-C is the most sensitive and specific predictor of LpX. If confirmed in other cohorts, laboratories could include a reporting comment on lipid panels with a nonHDL-C/HDL-C ratio &gt;9.2 cautioning a high suspicion for the presence of LpX and recommending confirmatory testing. It may also be prudent to caution that LDL-C results may not be accurate. In conclusion, identifying patients with high suspicion of LpX based on abnormal lipid panel results may aide in clinical diagnosis, even when an assay to detect LpX is not readily available.

Abstract BACKGROUND Dyslipoproteinemias can be classified by their distinct lipoprotein patterns, which helps determine atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and directs lipid management but this has required advanced laboratory testing. OBJECTIVE To develop a new algorithm for classifying lipoprotein disorders that only relies on the standard lipid panel. METHODS Lipid thresholds for defining the different lipoprotein phenotypes were derived for Non-High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (NonHDL-C) and Triglycerides (TG) to be concordant when possible with the current US Multi-Society guidelines for blood cholesterol management. RESULTS The new classification method categorizes patients into all the classical Fredrickson-like phenotypes except for Type III dysbetalipoproteinemia. In addition, a new hypolipidemic phenotype (Type VI) due to genetic mutations in apoB-metabolism is described. The validity of the new algorithm was confirmed by lipid analysis by NMR (N = 11,365) and by concordance with classification by agarose gel electrophoresis/beta-quantification (N = 5504). Furthermore, based on the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort (N = 14742), the lipoprotein phenotypes differ in their association with ASCVD (TypeV > IIb > IVb > IIa > IVa > normolipidemic) and can be used prognostically as risk enhancer conditions in the management of patients. CONCLUSIONS We describe a clinically useful lipoprotein phenotyping system that is only dependent upon the standard lipid panel. It, therefore, can be easily implemented for increasing compliance with current guidelines and for improving the care of patients at risk for ASCVD.