Lundy, Larry

Objectives: An unexpectedly low word recognition (WR) score may be taken as evidence of increased risk for retrocochlear tumor. We sought to develop evidence for or against using a standardized WR (sWR) score in detecting retrocochlear tumors. The sWR is a z score expressing the difference between an observed WR score and a Speech Intelligibility Index–based predicted WR score. We retrospectively compared the sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone asymmetry-based logistic regression models that incorporated either the sWR or the raw WR scores in detecting tumor cases. Two pure-tone asymmetry calculations were used: the 4-frequency pure-tone asymmetry (AAO) calculation of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery and a 6-frequency pure-tone asymmetry (6-FPTA) calculation previously optimized to detect retrocochlear tumors. We hypothesized that a regression model incorporating the 6-FPTA calculation and the sWR would more accurately detect retrocochlear tumors. Design: Retrospective data from all patients seen in the audiology clinic at Mayo Clinic in Florida in 2016 were reviewed. Cases with retrocochlear tumors were compared with a reference group with noise- or age-related hearing loss or idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss. Two pure-tone–based logistic regression models were created (6-FPTA and AAO). Into these base models, WR variables (WR, sWR, WR asymmetry [WRΔ], and sWR asymmetry [sWRΔ]) were added. Tumor detection performance for each regression model was compared twice: first, using all qualifying cases (61 tumor cases; 2332 reference group cases), and second, using a data set filtered to exclude hearing asymmetries greater than would be expected from noise-related or age-related hearing loss (25 tumor cases; 2208 reference group cases). The area under the curve and the DeLong test for significant receiver operating curve differences were used as outcome measures. Results: The 6-FPTA model significantly outperformed the AAO model—with or without the addition of WR or WRΔ variables. Including sWR into the AAO base regression model significantly improved disease detection performance. Including sWR into the 6-FPTA model significantly improved disease detection performance when large hearing asymmetries were excluded. In the data set that included large pure-tone asymmetries, area under the curve values for the 6-FPTA + sWR and AAO + sWR models were not significantly better than the base 6-FPTA model. Conclusions: The results favor the superiority of the sWR computational method in identifying reduced WR scores in retrocochlear cases. The utility would be greatest where undetected tumor cases are embedded in a population heavily representing age- or noise-related hearing loss. The results also demonstrate the superiority of the 6-FPTA model in identifying tumor cases. The 2 computational methods may be combined (ie, the 6-FPTA + sWR model) into an automated tool for detecting retrocochlear disease in audiology and community otolaryngology clinics. The 4-frequency AAO-based regression model was the weakest detection method considered. Including raw WR scores into the model did not improve performance, whereas including sWR into the model did improve tumor detection performance. This further supports the contribution of the sWR computational method for recognizing low WR scores in retrocochlear disease cases.

Objectives: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is defined as a defect in the bone overly the superior semicircular canal (SSC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pre-operative imaging examinations of patients who have undergone SSCD repair. We hypothesize that these patients will not have a supralabyrinthine air cell on the side of surgery. Material and Methods: Our group retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive pre-operative computed tomography (CT) temporal bone examinations who had confirmed SSCD on intraoperative examination and underwent repair for the presence of a supralabyrinthine air cell. Results: 100% of patients who had confirmed SSCD on intraoperative examination had no supralabyrinthine air cell on pre-operative CT of the temporal bone. Conclusion: This study shows that a supralabyrinthine air cell is not present in SSCD. When a supralabyrinthine air cell is present, the roof of the SSC is intact. CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are often performed together to evaluate for SSCD and exclude other etiologies. We propose that if a supralabyrinthine air cell is seen on MRI, no CT is necessary, thus avoiding unnecessary radiation exposure and additional imaging costs to the patient.

Purpose Cartilage cap resurfacing is a method to seal a superior semicircular canal dehiscence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detection of new bone formation after surgical placement of a cartilage cap over a dehiscent semicircular canal. Methods In this retrospective review, two neuroradiologists blinded to each other’s interpretation reviewed the temporal bones of 20 patients, five of which had a pre-operative computed tomography (CT) exam which was interpreted as unilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence and with new bone formation following repair on follow-up CT. There were also 15 control subjects. Each neuroradiologist was blinded to history, including post-operative changes, and asked to determine if there was a dehiscence or no dehiscence. Results Out of the 15 controls, there was 100% inter-observer agreement. On the five post-operative patients, there was agreement in 4/5 that there was no dehiscence post-operatively and 1/5 agreement of dehiscence post-operatively, but ectopic bone adjacent to the dehiscence. Conclusion Our results indicate that new bone formation can be seen at the site of cartilage cap placement over the dehiscence and be interpreted as bony closure of the dehiscence.

This combined American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, and American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation document aims to provide guidance during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) on 1) “priority” of care for otologic and neurotologic patients in the office and operating room, and 2) optimal utilization of personal protective equipment. Given the paucity of evidence to inform otologic and neurotologic best practices during COVID-19, the recommendations herein are based on relevant peer-reviewed articles, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 guidelines, United States and international hospital policies, and expert opinion. The suggestions presented here are not meant to be definitive, and best practices will undoubtedly change with increasing knowledge and high-quality data related to COVID-19. Interpretation of this guidance document is dependent on local factors including prevalence of COVID-19 in the surgeons’ local community. This is not intended to set a standard of care, and should not supersede the clinician's best judgement when managing specific clinical concerns and/or regional conditions. Access to otologic and neurotologic care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic is dependent upon adequate protection of physicians, audiologists, and ancillary support staff. Otolaryngologists and associated staff are at high risk for COVID-19 disease transmission based on close contact with mucosal surfaces of the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic procedures. While many otologic and neurotologic conditions are not imminently life threatening, they have a major impact on communication, daily functioning, and quality of life. In addition, progression of disease and delay in treatment can result in cranial nerve deficits, intracranial and life-threatening complications, and/or irreversible consequences. In this regard, many otologic and neurotologic conditions should rightfully be considered “urgent,” and almost all require timely attention to permit optimal outcomes. It is reasonable to proceed with otologic and neurotologic clinic visits and operative cases based on input from expert opinion of otologic care providers, clinic/hospital administration, infection prevention and control specialists, and local and state public health leaders. Significant regional variations in COVID-19 prevalence exist; therefore, physicians working with local municipalities are best suited to make determinations on the appropriateness and timing of otologic and neurotologic care.

AbstractIntroduction Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are slow growing tumors. Although there are a wide variety of available treatment options, these tumors are often initially observed. We aimed to establish the presenting symptoms and outcomes of patients treated with initial observation at our institution.Methods The medical records of patients with radiographically diagnosed VS were reviewed from 1989 to 2018. Actuarial estimates of radiographic tumor control and freedom of local therapy were calculated and compared using Cox regression analyses.Results A total of 360 patients were diagnosed with VS at our institution from 1989 through 2018 with a median age of 59.9 years. After radiographic diagnosis, 243 patients (67.5%) opted for initial observation. Local control at 1, 5, and 10 years was 91, 67, and 58%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with shorter time to radiographic tumor progression included younger patient age (p = 0.016) and tumors with an extracanalicular component (p = 0.032). Regarding time until definitive treatment only larger baseline American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) tumor size predicted for earlier initiation of therapy (p < 0.001), although this was restricted to tumors with an extracanalicular component (p = 0.004), as opposed to purely internal auditory canal tumors (p = 0.839).Conclusion Many patients who were initially observed continued to have satisfactory local control rates at 10 years. In patients with extracanalicular tumors, larger AAO-HNS tumor measurements were associated with earlier radiographic tumor progression and shorter time to local therapy, with 7 mm serving as a potential threshold value for extracanalicular tumors. Younger patients and tumors with primarily an extracanalicular portion may warrant closer observation.

AbstractGeniculate neuralgia (GN) is an uncommon, but severe, condition that is characterized by excruciating paroxysmal pain in the seventh cranial nerve's cutaneous distribution of general somatic afferent fibers carried through the nervus intermedius (NI). GN becomes a surgical disease in refractory cases of pain after exhaustive medical management. Surgical intervention in the form of microvascular decompression and nerve sectioning has been investigated with good patient outcomes. Despite this, there are limited guidelines on either technique's appropriateness in specific operative scenarios. In our 30‐year experience in GNs surgical management, we have found that a detailed knowledge of the NIs anatomy, variants, and intraoperative surgical anatomic findings are the key to choosing the most appropriate intervention, and may provide the answer to why some patients fail to experience pain relief after surgery. These anatomic variants also may explain why many patients commonly do not experience side effects related to the visceral efferent and special afferent fibers after nerve sectioning.

This article introduces the Consumer Ear Disease Risk Assessment (CEDRA) tool. CEDRA is a brief questionnaire designed to screen for targeted ear diseases. It offers an opportunity for consumers to self-screen for disease before seeking a hearing device and may be used by clinicians to help their patients decide the appropriate path to follow in hearing healthcare. Here we provide highlights of previously published validation in the context of a more thorough description of CEDRA’s development and implementation. CEDRA’s sensitivity and specificity, using a cut-off score of 4 or higher, was 90% and 72%, respectively, relative to neurotologist diagnoses in the initial training sample used to create the scoring algorithm (n = 246). On a smaller independent test sample (n = 61), CEDRA’s sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 80%, respectively. CEDRA has readability levels similar to many other patient-oriented questionnaires in hearing healthcare, and informal reports from pilot CEDRA-providers indicate that the majority of patients can complete it in less than 10 min. As the hearing healthcare landscape changes and provider intercession is no longer mandated, CEDRA provides a measure of safety without creating a barrier to access.

We describe a rarely encountered case of coexisting bilateral multicanal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and vestibular schwannoma in a 56-year-old woman. The patient had presented with a 10-year history of dizziness and imbalance, and her vestibular findings were perplexing. We decided on a working diagnosis of BPPV and began treatment. After several months of canalith repositioning maneuvers had failed to resolve her symptoms, we obtained magnetic resonance imaging, which revealed the presence of the vestibular schwannoma. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of differentiating between central and peripheral vestibular disorders, as well as central and anterior canal BPPV-induced down-beating nystagmus in order to establish the correct diagnosis and initiate appropriate treatment.

In this article we describe a new method of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator fixation using a resorbable poly (D,L) lactic acid mesh. We conducted a retrospective case review at a tertiary referral center; 10 pediatric and 4 adult patients had undergone cochlear implantation during the period from February to October 2008. Resorbable poly (D,L) lactic acid mesh and pins were used for fixation of the cochlear implant receiver stimulator. The receiver stimulator was assessed for stability/migration, and the scalp flap/incision were evaluated for allergic reactions, infections, and healing problems. With an average followup of 17.2 months, no patients had migration of the receiver stimulator, and there was no evidence of infection, wound dehiscence, or allergic reaction. Early results indicate that fixation of a cochlear implant receiver stimulator using resorbable mesh is well tolerated and provides good stability without device migration. Resorbable mesh fixation of the receiver stimulator is a reasonable alternative technique for cochlear implantation.

The duration of contact time of intratympanic steroids at the round window is a variable that can potentially affect the ultimate concentration within the cochlea. By placing Gelfoam saturated with dexamethasone directly over the round window, contact time is prolonged and potentially increases the dexamethasone concentration within the cochlea. This technique is simple, readily available with standard instruments and ingredients, and easily done in the office.