Adunka, Oliver F.

Objective To assess integration of a single-use robotic-assisted cochlear implant (RA-CI) electrode array insertion system into surgical workflows, identify potential challenges, and inform best practices. Study Design Survey. Setting Survey data from 16 surgeons across 10 US hospitals. Patients CI candidates 12 years and older with radiographically normal cochleae. Intervention CI surgery with single-use RA-CI insertion system during electrode array insertion. Main Outcome Measures Number of RA-CI to achieve proficiency, estimated additional time for RA-CI, and best practices to successfully incorporate the RA insertion system into CI surgery. Results A total of 121 RA-CI cases were performed. All surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons (62.5%) reported they would feel comfortable using the device within five cases. Eight (50%) reported use of the RA system added 5 to 10 minutes to the case, and seven (44%) reported an added 10–15 minutes. Providing adequate incision size to secure the unit base superior to the temporal line and maximizing exposure of the facial recess were the most recommended best practices. Additional recommendations included pulling the receiver/stimulator forward within the pocket to facilitate a full electrode array insertion and considering drive head placement and mastoidectomy size to maximize overall visibility during electrode array insertion. Conclusions Proficiency with an RA electrode array insertion system during CI surgery can be achieved with minor adjustments to the surgical approach, within relatively few use cases (generally <5) and with minimal time addition (between 5 and 15 min). Training to specific best practices is important before initial clinical use.

This combined American Neurotology Society, American Otological Society, and American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation document aims to provide guidance during the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) on 1) “priority” of care for otologic and neurotologic patients in the office and operating room, and 2) optimal utilization of personal protective equipment. Given the paucity of evidence to inform otologic and neurotologic best practices during COVID-19, the recommendations herein are based on relevant peer-reviewed articles, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 guidelines, United States and international hospital policies, and expert opinion. The suggestions presented here are not meant to be definitive, and best practices will undoubtedly change with increasing knowledge and high-quality data related to COVID-19. Interpretation of this guidance document is dependent on local factors including prevalence of COVID-19 in the surgeons’ local community. This is not intended to set a standard of care, and should not supersede the clinician's best judgement when managing specific clinical concerns and/or regional conditions. Access to otologic and neurotologic care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic is dependent upon adequate protection of physicians, audiologists, and ancillary support staff. Otolaryngologists and associated staff are at high risk for COVID-19 disease transmission based on close contact with mucosal surfaces of the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic procedures. While many otologic and neurotologic conditions are not imminently life threatening, they have a major impact on communication, daily functioning, and quality of life. In addition, progression of disease and delay in treatment can result in cranial nerve deficits, intracranial and life-threatening complications, and/or irreversible consequences. In this regard, many otologic and neurotologic conditions should rightfully be considered “urgent,” and almost all require timely attention to permit optimal outcomes. It is reasonable to proceed with otologic and neurotologic clinic visits and operative cases based on input from expert opinion of otologic care providers, clinic/hospital administration, infection prevention and control specialists, and local and state public health leaders. Significant regional variations in COVID-19 prevalence exist; therefore, physicians working with local municipalities are best suited to make determinations on the appropriateness and timing of otologic and neurotologic care.

Abstract Objective The main purpose of this article is to determine if vestibular schwannoma consistency as determined by tissue intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) is predictive of intraoperative experience and postoperative clinical outcomes. Study Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannomas who were treated with microsurgical resection. Intervention Diagnostic. Main Outcome Measures Intraoperative measures include totality of resection, surgical time and cranial nerve VII stimulation and postoperative measures include House–Brackmann grade and perioperative complications. Results Tumor consistency determined via tissue intensity on MRI was only found to correlate with surgical time, with a softer tumor being associated with a longer surgical time (p < 0.0001). However, this was primarily driven by tumor volume with larger tumors being associated with longer surgical time based on multivariate analysis. None of the other intraoperative or postoperative measures considered were found to correlate with tumor consistency. Conclusions Tumor consistency determined by MRI is not predictive of intraoperative experience or postoperative outcomes in vestibular schwannomas. Tumor volume is the strongest driver of these outcome measures as opposed to tumor consistency.