Back to Authors

Li, Haijing

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-8993

Mayo Clinic

Vanderbilt University

Citations 2

Identification of Coryneform Bacterial Isolates by Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis
Graevenitz, Alexander von, Waddington, Michael, Hopkins, Marlene K., Smith, Douglas H. , Li, Haijing , Kolbert, Christopher P., Montgomery, Stacy O., Persing, David H., Tang, Yi‐Wei

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | December 31, 2019 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1676-1678

10.1128/jcm.38.4.1676-1678.2000 Get It

ABSTRACT Identification of coryneform bacteria to the species level is important in certain circumstances for differentiating contamination and/or colonization from infection, which influences decisions regarding clinical intervention. However, methods currently used in clinical microbiology laboratories for the species identification of coryneform bacteria are often inadequate. We evaluated the MicroSeq 500 16S bacterial sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), which is designed to sequence the first 527 bp of the 16S rRNA gene for bacterial identification, by using 52 coryneform gram-positive bacilli from clinical specimens isolated from January through June 1993 at the Mayo Clinic. Compared to conventional and supplemented phenotypic methods, MicroSeq provided concordant results for identification to the genus level for all isolates. At the species level, MicroSeq provided concordant results for 27 of 42 (64.3%) Corynebacterium isolates and 5 of 6 (83.3%) Corynebacterium -related isolates, respectively. Within the Corynebacterium genus, MicroSeq gave identical species-level identifications for the clinically significant Corynebacterium diphtheriae (4 of 4) and Corynebacterium jeikeium (8 of 8), but it identified only 50.0% (15 of 30) of other species ( P < 0.01). Four isolates from the genera Arthrobacter , Brevibacterium , and Microbacterium , which could not be identified to the species level by conventional methods, were assigned a species-level identification by MicroSeq. The total elapsed time for running a MicroSeq identification was 15.5 to 18.5 h. These data demonstrate that the MicroSeq 500 16S bacterial sequencing kit provides a potentially powerful method for the definitive identification of clinical coryneform bacterium isolates.
Comparison of Protein A Gene Sequencing with Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and Epidemiologic Data for Molecular Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Waddington, Michael, Smith, Douglas H. , Manahan, Janice M., Kohner, Peggy C., Highsmith, Leanne M., Li, Haijing , Cockerill, Franklin R., Thompson, Rodney L., Montgomery, Stacy O., Persing, David H., Tang, Yi‐Wei

Journal of Clinical Microbiology | December 31, 2019 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1347-1351

10.1128/jcm.38.4.1347-1351.2000 Get It

ABSTRACT The epidemiologic relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates is currently determined by analysis of chromosomal DNA restriction patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). We have evaluated an alternative typing system (MicroSeq StaphTrack Kit; Perkin-Elmer Biosystems) based on the sequence analysis of the chromosomally encoded polymorphic repeat X region of the S. aureus protein A ( spa ) gene. A total of 69 clinical MRSA isolates were divided into 18 groups according to the number and nucleotide sequences of the spa repeats. Molecular typing results obtained both by spa sequencing and from the PFGE patterns were concordant except for one group, which contained 20 isolates recovered over a 2-year period from hospitalized patients at the Mayo Clinic. Although the spa typing patterns were indistinguishable for those isolates, PFGE analysis yielded seven related but distinguishable patterns. Further coagulase gene sequence analysis subtyped those 20 strains into four groups which followed distinct temporal and geographic distributions. During a 2-year epidemic period there were up to 7 fragment changes in PFGE patterns among epidemiologically related isolates, suggesting that PFGE may be unsuitable for long-term typing of strains involved in epidemics. Although more limited than PFGE in discriminatory power, spa sequencing analysis could be used as a screening method for typing of MRSA strains because of the shorter turnaround time, ease of use, and the inherent advantages of sequence analysis, storage, and sharing of information.