Trost, Landon

Abstract Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie’s Disease (PD), there has been significant debate as to its role and comparable efficacy in relation to surgical therapies. Specifically, investigators have compared relative utilization, costs, and outcomes with varying conclusions. Objective To compare various objective and subjective outcome measures between men undergoing CCH or surgery for PD. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT04786106) is ongoing. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil or penile surgery (plication and/or incision and grafting) + traction + sildenafil for PD. Objective, standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]), and non-standardized assessments are obtained at baseline, and post-treatment at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Key outcomes include differences in standardized questionnaires, penile curvature, penile length, subsequent interventions, and non-standardized questionnaire responses. Curvature is measured in two planes and summed to provide a composite curvature. Penile length is measured from pubic symphysis to corona. All therapies were stopped prior to the 3-month time point (i.e. traction and sildenafil). Results A total of 40 men have been randomized, with 3-month data available on 27 men (CCH=14, surgery=13) and 12-month data on 15 men (CCH=5, surgery=10). Mean age at enrollment was 54.9 years, PD duration 36.6 months (mo), composite curvature 72.3 degrees (deg), and penile length 12.7 cm. All baseline variables were statistically similar between cohorts. Regarding the primary outcome, post-treatment, CCH men reported higher overall satisfaction (3-months: 100% vs 88% surgery, p=0.16; 12-months 80% vs 70%, p=0.52). For secondary outcomes at 3 months, the median differences between CCH and surgery respectively were: IIEF-EFD (+3.5 vs +7, p=0.64), PDQ-physical (-10 vs -7, p=0.47, note: lower is better for PDQ scales), PDQ-pain (-2 vs -0.5, p=0.21), PDQ-bother (-4.5 vs -8.5, p=0.60), length change (+1.0 vs -0.5 cm, p<0.01), curvature absolute change (-26 vs -65 degrees, p=0.01), and curvature percentage improvement (46% vs 84%, p<0.01). More CCH men felt that treatment improved sexual function (86% vs 79%, p=0.45), erectile function (64% vs 56%, p=0.04), penile length (36% vs 6%, p<0.0001), and had less impact on sensation (14% less sensation vs 56%, p<0.01), while surgery men were more likely to report satisfaction with curvature (75% vs 64%, p=0.52). 100% of men in both groups would recommend treatment to a friend at 3 months, whereas 100% of CCH vs 70% of surgery men would recommend their therapy at 12 months. When asked which treatment they would pick if they could start again, at 3 months 100% of CCH men reported CCH and/or traction, while 79% of surgery men indicated surgery. Conclusions Preliminary data suggests that, when compared to surgery, CCH results in higher overall satisfaction (not statistically significant), decreased curve improvement, improved penile length, and fewer impacts on erectile function and sensation. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceutical Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Objective To report open‐label phase data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), after previous data from that study showed improved penile length and erectile function among post‐prostatectomy men treated with Restorex penile traction therapy (RxPTT). Materials and Methods An RCT (NCT05244486) was performed to evaluate RxPTT vs no treatment (Tx) for 5 months, which was followed by a 3‐month open‐label phase. Men were stratified based on as‐treated data: Group 1 = No Tx; Group 2 = No Tx → Tx; Group 3 = Tx → No Tx; Group 4 = Tx. Assessments included stretched penile length and standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) and non‐standardized questionnaires. Results A total of 82 men were enrolled (mean age 58.6 years) with 9‐month data available in 45 of the men. Baseline characteristics were similar among the cohorts. Comparing Group 1 and Group 4 (respectively), notable differences included: IIEF Erectile Function domain (IIEF‐EF) score (−8 vs −0.5; P = 0.16), penile length (−0.1 vs +1.7 cm; P < 0.01), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 14%; P < 0.01), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 (50% vs 100%; P < 0.01), SEP Question 3 (33% vs 100%; P < 0.01). Men who crossed over to Tx (Group 2) failed to achieve equivalent improvements in length (+0.5 cm) or sexual function (IIEF‐EF score −6) compared to men treated early (Groups 3 and 4). Those who crossed over to no treatment after initial treatment (Group 3) experienced preserved length (+1.8 cm), and erectile function (IIEF‐EF score +0) despite therapy discontinuation. Conclusions Use of RxPTT beginning 1 month post‐prostatectomy results in improved penile length and erectile function, with benefits maintained after discontinuing therapy. If confirmed, these results represent the first postoperative therapy shown in a RCT to improve erectile function post‐prostatectomy. External validation is warranted.

AbstractBackgroundCollagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) has been proven effective in multiple subpopulations of PD men; however, no studies have evaluated its role with congenital penile curvature (CPC).AimTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of CCH in men with CPC.MethodsA prospective registry was queried of men undergoing CCH injections at our institution. Beginning in 2016, CCH was administered to CPC men using a similar protocol to PD. A comparative analysis was performed between cohorts to evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapy.OutcomesObjective measures included penile length and curvature, while subjective outcomes included standardized (International Index of Erectile Function and Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire) and non-standardized assessments. Curvature outcomes were categorized as follows: 1 – included all men, with the most recent assessment considered final, and 2 – only men who had completed eight CCH injections or stopped early due to satisfaction.ResultsFrom 2014 to Oct 2021, a total of 453 men (408 PD, 45 CPC) underwent one or more CCH injections. In comparing cohorts, CPC men were younger (33 vs 58 years, p&lt;0.0001), had lesser baseline curvatures (52.5 vs 65°, p&lt;0.01), more ventral curves (25.7 vs 9.2%, p&lt;0.01), and longer penile lengths (12.5 vs 12.0 cm, p=0.04). Following treatment, both cohorts experienced similar curvature improvements. Specifically, PD men experienced 20-25° or 33-35% improvements depending on definition compared to 25-30° or 40-50% in CPC men (all p-values &gt;0.05). CPC and PD men also demonstrated similar changes on standardized questionnaires, with the exception of the Psychological and Physical subdomain, which was more improved in CPC men (-11 vs -4, p&lt;0.01). Baseline curvature was positively correlated with greater absolute (degree) and relative (percent) improvements. Adverse events were similar between groups after controlling for confounders.Clinical ImplicationsCCH may be safely and effectively administered in men with CPC. These data provide the first evidence for the efficacy of a non-surgical therapeutic option in this cohort.Strengths and LimitationsStrengths – large, prospective series with standardized assessments; Limitations - non-randomized study, short-term follow-up, and lack of standardized method to differentiate CPC from PD.ConclusionsCCH may be safely and effectively administered to men with CPC, with similar success rates compared to PD. Increasing curvature was associated with greater absolute (degree) and relative (percent) improvements, supporting the role for CCH in men with mild, moderate, or severe curvatures. External validation is warranted prior to routine implementation.

AbstractBackgroundThe advent of antibiotic-coated devices has reduced the rate of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infections; however, this may have altered microbial profiles when infections do occur.AimTo describe the timing and causative organisms behind infection of infection retardant–coated IPPs in the context of our institution’s perioperative antimicrobial protocols.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing IPP placement at our institution from January 2014 to January 2022. In all patients, perioperative antibiotic administration was congruent with American Urological Association guidelines. Boston Scientific devices are impregnated with InhibiZone (rifampin and minocycline), and all Coloplast devices were soaked in rifampin and gentamicin. Intraoperative irrigation was performed with betadine 5% irrigation prior to November 2016 and with vancomycin-gentamicin solution afterward. Cases involving prosthesis infection were identified, and variables were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive and comparative statistics were tabulated to identify clinical characteristics, including patient comorbidities, prophylaxis regimen, symptom onset, and intraoperative culture result. We previously reported an increased infection risk with Betadine irrigation and stratified results accordingly.OutcomesThe primary outcome was time to infectious symptoms, while the secondary outcome was description of device cultures at the time of explantation.ResultsA total of 1071 patients underwent IPP placement over 8 years with an overall infection rate of 2.6% (28/1071). After discontinuation of Betadine, the overall infection rate was significantly lower at 0.9% (8/919) with a relative risk of 16.9 with Betadine (P &lt; .0001). Primary procedures represented 46.4% (13/28). Of 28 patients with infection, only 1 had no identified risk factors; the remainder included Betadine at 71% (20/28), revision/salvage procedure at 53.6% (15/28), and diabetes at 50% (14/28). Median time to symptoms was 36 days (IQR, 26-52); almost 30% of patients had systemic symptoms. Organisms with high virulence, or ability to cause disease, were found in 90.5% (19/21) of positive cultures.Clinical ImplicationsOur study revealed a median time to symptoms of just over 1 month. Risk factors for infection were Betadine 5% irrigation, diabetes, and revision/salvage cases. Over 90% causative organisms were virulent, demonstrating a microbial profile trend since antibiotic coating development.Strengths and LimitationsThe large prospectively maintained database is a strength along with the ability to follow specific changes in perioperative protocols. The retrospective nature of the study is a limitation as well as the low infection rate, which limits certain subanalyses from being performed.ConclusionIPP infections present in a delayed manner despite the rising virulence of infecting organisms. These findings highlight areas for improvement in perioperative protocols in the contemporary prosthetics era.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with prostate cancer suffer significant sexual dysfunction after treatment which negatively affects them and their partners psychologically, and strain their relationships.AimWe convened an international panel with the aim of developing guidelines that will inform clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies (PCT) on patients’ and partners’ sexual health, their relationships, and about biopsychosocial rehabilitation in prostate cancer (PC) survivorship.MethodsThe guidelines panel included international expert researchers and clinicians, and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995–2022) according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each statement was assigned an evidence strength (A-C) and a recommendation level (strong, moderate, conditional) based on benefit/risk assessment, according to the nomenclature of the American Urological Association (AUA). Data synthesis included meta-analyses of studies deemed of sufficient quality (3), using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).OutcomesGuidelines for sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer were developed, based on available evidence and the expertise of the international panel.ResultsThe guidelines account for patients’ cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity. They attend to the unique needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The guidelines are based on literature review, a theoretical model of sexual recovery after PCT, and 6 principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. Forty-seven statements address the psychosexual, relationship, and functional domains in addition to statements on lifestyle modification, assessment, provider education, and systemic challenges to providing sexual health care in PC survivorship.Clinical ImplicationsThe guidelines provide clinicians with a comprehensive approach to sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer.Strengths & LimitationsThe strength of the study is the comprehensive evaluation of existing evidence on sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation in prostate cancer that can, along with available expert knowledge, best undergird clinical practice. Limitation is the variation in the evidence supporting interventions and the lack of research on issues facing patients with prostate cancer in low and middle-income countries.ConclusionThe guidelines document the distressing sexual sequelae of PCT, provide evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation and outline areas for future research.

ABSTRACT Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie's Disease (PD), several investigators have reported outcomes of CCH, with improvements ranging from approximately 15-30%. More recently, we reported improved results (49% mean improvement) when CCH was combined with RestoreX penile traction therapy (RxPTT). Since then, we have made additional modifications to create a more aggressive injection / traction protocol to further optimize outcomes. Objective To report outcomes of a more aggressive CCH injection / traction protocol in men with PD. Methods A prospective database has been maintained of all individuals undergoing CCH injections since 2014. Our CCH injection protocol has evolved from the one described in the IMPRESS trials to a more aggressive use of injections and manual and mechanical traction. Currently, the protocol consists of injecting 0.9 mg of CCH in 0.7 ml of saline into approximately 15-20 sites around the point of maximal curvature (pharmacologically-induced erection performed with the first injection of each series). Injections are only performed on subsequent days (not 2-3 days apart), and very aggressive (i.e. 10-15 lbs of force) modeling is performed with the 2nd injection. Patients are counseled to begin RestoreX traction at 24-48 hours after the 2nd injection for 30-60 minutes daily, and to continue aggressive manual modeling for at least the first week post injection. Penile wraps are applied for 5 days post injection. A descriptive analysis was subsequently performed to review outcomes. Results A total of 320 men underwent at least 1 series of CCH and had baseline and follow-up curve assessment data available. Mean age was 55.8 (SD 10.4), with a mean PD duration of 27.8 months (SD 53) and a median baseline composite curvature of 64 degrees (IQR 45-80). Curvature improvements (most recent minus baseline) improved over time, correlating with increased injection experience and implementation of more aggressive traction protocols: 2014-2020 (20 degrees, 29% improvement) vs 2020-mid 2021 (27.8 degrees, 50%, p&lt;0.001). When men were stratified by those who either completed 8 injections or indicated that they were satisfied with outcomes (n=147), median results were more pronounced: 2014-2017 (29% improvement), 2018 (38%), 2019 (47%), 2020-mid 2021 (59%), p&lt;0.01. Conclusions Progressive implementation of a more aggressive CCH injection protocol has resulted in improved curvature outcomes. Given the specialized nature of technique modifications described, these results would argue for a center-of-excellence model for CCH administration to achieve optimal outcomes. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.

ABSTRACT Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie's Disease (PD), there has been significant debate as to its role and comparable efficacy in relation to surgical therapies. Specifically, investigators have compared relative utilization, costs, and outcomes with varying conclusions. Objective To compare various objective and subjective outcome measures between men undergoing CCH or surgery for PD. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT04786106) is ongoing at ***. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil or penile surgery (plication and/or incision and grafting) + traction + sildenafil for PD. Objective, standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]), and non-standardized assessments are obtained at baseline, and post-treatment at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Key outcomes include differences in standardized questionnaires, penile curvature, penile length, subsequent interventions, and non-standardized questionnaire responses. Curvature is measured in two planes and summed to provide a composite curvature. Penile length is measured from pubic symphysis to corona. All therapies were stopped prior to the 3-month time point (i.e. traction and sildenafil). Results A total of 32 men have been randomized to date (CCH=17, surgery=15), with 3-month data available on 8 men (CCH=4, surgery=4). Mean age at enrollment was 55.8 years (SD 14.4), PD duration 38 months (SD 49.5), curvature 74.1 degrees (SD 20.9), and penile length 12.5 cm (SD 1.5). All baseline variables were statistically similar between cohorts. Regarding the primary outcome, at 3 months post-treatment, CCH men reported higher overall satisfaction (not statistically significant; 50% very satisfied, 50% somewhat satisfied; surgery 100% somewhat satisfied, p=0.06). For secondary outcomes at 3 months, the median differences between CCH and surgery respectively were: IIEF-EFD (+4 vs +4, p=1.0), PDQ-physical (-10 vs -6.5, p=0.14, note: lower is better for PDQ scales), PDQ-pain (-12 vs 0.5, p=0.77), PDQ-bother (-9 vs -8, p=0.77), length change (+0.8 vs 0 cm, p=0.29), curvature absolute change (-22.5 vs -80 degrees, p=0.11), and curvature percentage improvement (41% vs 85%, p=0.11). An equal number of CCH and surgery men felt that treatment improved sexual function (75%) and their ability to have sex (100%) and were subjectively happy with their curvature (50%). Men in the surgery arm were more likely to report (note that some are not statistically significant) subjectively worsened erectile function (50% vs 0%, p=0.15), shorter penile length (75% vs 0%, p=0.02), lower satisfaction with penile length (50% satisfied vs 75%, p=0.46), improved hourglass (33% vs 0%, p=0.42), and were less likely to report that they would repeat treatment without reservation (50% vs 75%, p=0.11). When asked which treatment they would pick if they could start again, 100% of CCH men reported CCH and/or traction, while 50% of surgery men indicated surgery, 25% CCH, and 25% other (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions The current data are too preliminary to draw any viable conclusions on differences between CCH and surgery for PD. Disclosure Work supported by industry: yes, by Endo Pharmaceutical.

ABSTRACT Background Penile length loss and erectile dysfunction (ED) are common post-prostatectomy. Recent results from a randomized, controlled study (RCT) of RestoreX penile traction therapy (RxPTT) demonstrated preserved erectile function and penile length improvements in men post-prostatectomy. Objective To report outcomes of the open label phase (6-9 month time point) of the previously noted RCT comparing efficacy of RxPTT to control in men post-prostatectomy. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT03500419) has been completed of 82 men post-prostatectomy. Men were randomized 1-month post-prostatectomy to no therapy (control, n=27) or RxPTT (n=55) for 5 months. Participants then entered an open label phase for 3 months. Assessments included stretched penile length (corona), standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]), and non-standardized questionnaires. Comparisons were performed of men who utilized traction at least 15 minutes daily for both phases to men who were originally control and continued with no treatment (as-treated analysis). Analyses were also performed of men who crossed over from control to &gt;15 min daily (crossover to treatment) and those who were originally in the treatment group and continued with &gt;15 min daily use during the open label phase (ongoing treatment). Results Of the 82 men enrolled (mean age 58.6), 55 had 6-month, and 42 had 9-month data available to review. Baseline characteristics (IIEF scores, penile length) were similar between cohorts. In the as-treated analysis (no treatment n=7, RxPTT x 8 months n=12, respectively), differences were as noted: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -0.5, p=0.19), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -2, p=0.86), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0.5, p=0.09), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -0.5, p=0.31), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs 0, p=0.29), penile length (-0.1 vs +1.8 cm, p&lt;0.01), PDE5 use (86% vs 75%, p=0.57), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 17%, p&lt;0.01). Comparing men who did not use therapy at any time (n=7) to those who crossed over to RxPTT during the open label phase (n=8) demonstrated the following results: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -6, p=0.49), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -1, p=0.90), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0, p=0.55), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -1, p=0.45), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs -1, p=0.51), penile length (-0.1 vs +0.69 cm, p=0.39). Men who crossed over from RxPTT to no treatment (n=10) had relatively preserved improvements compared to those who continued with RxPTT during the open label phase (n=12) compared to baseline, respectively: IIEF-EFD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.95), IIEF-OFD (-3.5 vs -2, p=0.97), IIEF-SD (0 vs 0.5, p=0.18), IIEF-ISD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.87), IIEF-OSD (0 vs 0, p=0.66), penile length (+1.8 vs +1.8, p=0.99). Conclusions Although sample size and statistical power are limited, results from the open label phase confirm earlier findings of preserved sexual function and penile length in men treated with RxPTT compared to controls. Men who crossed over from controls to treatment experience benefits, although not as significant as those who were treated beginning at 1 month post-prostatectomy. Men who stopped therapy after 6 months demonstrated stable improvements from baseline, suggesting a preserved effect of RxPTT even after discontinuing use. If validated with external series, these findings would represent a significant advancement in the prevention of sexual dysfunction post-prostatectomy. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.