Brearton, K

Abstract Introduction Limited data currently exist on the role and efficacy of additional series of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injections among Peyronie’s disease (PD) men who have previously failed a first series of injections. We sought to evaluate outcomes of a novel protocol for CCH injections among men who had previously failed 6-8 CCH injections using a traditional approach. Objective To evaluate whether additional rounds of CCH using a novel protocol in men previously unresponsive results in greater curve improvements. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT05108558) is ongoing. All participants previously failed to achieve ≥20% curvature improvement with 6-8 prior CCH injections. Men were randomized 3:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil (treatment) up front or initial observation followed by treatment (controls). Outcomes were compared between treatment and control groups. Key measures included objective curve improvements and standardized/non-standardized questionnaires, with assessments obtained at baseline, 6-weeks after completion of CCH (treatment arm), after the no treatment period (controls), and at 1 year. Results A total of 38/40 men have been randomized to date, with 22 having fully completed treatment. Mean age was 57 years, with a median PD duration of 22 months. Median composite baseline curvature was 65 degrees, with 40% having hourglass or indentation deformities, 8% calcification, median baseline IIEF-EFD 20, and 58% able to have penetrative intercourse. Median estimated improvement with the prior CCH series was 0% (IQR 0, 18.8), and the median number of prior injections was 8. The majority of men were dissatisfied with their prior series of CCH (58% vs 35% satisfied, 8% neutral). Of the 22 men who had completed the study protocol, 50% required 1 series, 14% 2 series, 29% 3 series, and 7% 4 series. Compared to the no treatment arm, treated men experienced significantly greater improvements (median 60 degrees vs 0, p = 0.01). IIEF-EFD was non-statistically higher in treated men (0 vs -5, p = 0.17). 92% of men reported a subjective major improvement in curvature, with the median subjectively estimated improvement 90%. 42% reported improved sensitivity (58% no change), while 63% reported improved or no change in erectile function, with 9% unsure, and 27% worse. Post-treatment, 92% of men were very satisfied with CCH as a treatment and 8% neutral. Conclusions Repeating CCH using a novel protocol after an initially unsuccessful course of CCH achieves significant improvements in curvature and patient satisfaction. Additional data, including external validation, are warranted. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceuticals. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: PathRight Medical.

Abstract Introduction Limited data exist on semen parameters post vasectomy reversal. Specifically, no studies have rigorously evaluated the likelihood of sperm return following discovery of azoospermia at some time point post vasectomy reversal. Objective To evaluate the rate of return of sperm among men who experience an azoospermia result post vasectomy-reversal. Methods A large, prospective dataset has been maintained of men undergoing vasectomy reversals at a single center from 2019 to the present. Men who had at least two post-operative semen analyses were included for review. The data were then analyzed in a manner to identify those who experienced a 0 count at varying time points and then either went on to continue to have 0’s beyond that point or who experienced a return of sperm. Results A total of 3414 men underwent a vasectomy reversal since 2019, with 2703 having semen analysis data available for review. Overall demographics demonstrated a mean age of 41, partner age 33, median time since vasectomy of 7 years, 92% first-time cases, and distribution of repair as noted: VV/VV (79%), VV/EV (12%), EV/EV (6%), VV/x (1%), EV/x (<1%), x/x (0%). Of men who had 0 sperm at varying time points, the percentages of those who experienced a return of sperm are noted as follows: 0 sperm at <2 months (52% experienced a return at some point, n = 349 used in calculation), 0 at 2-4 months (38% return, n = 210), 0 at 5-7 months (17% return, n = 206), 0 at 8-10 months (20% return, n = 133), 0 at 11-18 months (9% return, n = 107). The data are limited by the fact that relatively few men continued to send in semen analysis samples beyond 12 months (n = 403 with at least one result >12 months and n = 101 with results >24 months). Conclusions Men who experience azoospermia post-vasectomy reversal may experience a return of sperm over time, with the likelihood for return declining based on the duration of persistence of 0 sperm. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: PathRight Medical.

Abstract Introduction There has been significant ongoing debate on the role and utility of prednisone post-vasectomy reversal to improve sperm counts and long-term patency. However, there are relatively limited data available on the efficacy, with essentially no data available on pregnancy outcomes. Objective To report outcomes of randomized, clinical trial evaluating varying protocols for prednisone administration post vasectomy reversal. Methods A randomized, controlled trial was performed (NCT04788823) with an anticipated 100 men randomized to one of four prednisone protocols post vasectomy reversal: no treatment (Control), prednisone 20 mg taper over 1 month beginning the first month post-op and then every other month x 6 months (High Dose), prednisone 20 mg taper over 1 month if declining sperm counts or a 0 count were identified (PRN), and prednisone 5 mg daily x 1 week, followed by no treatment x 1 week, continued for 6 months (Low Dose). Randomization tables were created a priori to ensure an equal representation of differing durations of time since the original vasectomy as well as an equal distribution of VV/VV vs VV/EV vs EV/EV procedures. All men had semen analyses obtained monthly for a first 12 months. Surveys were sent periodically to follow-up on subsequent pregnancies. Inclusion criteria included having a female partner <36 years of age with no known fertility factors. Results A total of 75 men were ultimately enrolled due to interim findings suggesting inferiority of the High Dose and PRN treatment arms and decision to close those arms before completing full enrollment. Final enrollment included: Control (n=25), High Dose (n=14), PRN (n=11), and Low Dose (n=25). The mean patient age was 38.5 years, mean partner age 29.6, and mean time since vasectomy 6.3 years (SD 5.0). 82% of men underwent VV/VV, while 15% VV/EV, and 3% EV/EV. All men underwent successful anastomosis bilaterally with no cases of one-sided or no anastomosis performed. At a mean follow-up of 16.5 months (range 7.6 to 25.1), an overall patency (sperm observed on sample) rate of 93% was noted (Control 96%, High Dose 93%, PRN 100%, Low Dose 88%, p=0.41). The mean sperm concentration post-op was 34.4 million/ml (Control 24.0, High Dose 38.4, PRN 21.0, Low Dose 49.8, p=0.33). Patency rates at 6- and 12-months were: 6-months (Control 88%, High Dose 80%, PRN 83%, Low Dose 94%, p=0.75); 12-months (Control 75%, High Dose 71%, PRN 75%, Low Dose 91%). Mean sperm concentrations at 6- and 12-months were: 6-months (Control 15.7, High Dose 21.5, PRN 6.9, Low Dose 25.7, p=0.50); 12-months (Control 12.6 million/ml, High Dose 17.1, PRN 36.1, Low Dose 50.4, p=0.64) At the 6-month post-op time point, the overall rate of pregnancy was 47%, with notable differences between cohorts: Control 57%, High Dose 10%, PRN 38%, and Low Dose 67%, p=0.02. No patients discontinued prednisone due to side effects. Conclusions Prednisone taper protocols appear to reduce the likelihood for pregnancy following vasectomy reversal. Use of low-dose prednisone results in non-statistically higher rates of patency at 6- and 12-months, mean sperm concentration at 6- and 12-months, and pregnancy at 6-months. Overall results suggest superiority of either no prednisone post-vasectomy reversal or a low dose protocol but argue against the use of higher dosages at any time due to its negative impacts on pregnancy rates despite maintained sperm counts. Disclosure No.

Abstract Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie’s Disease (PD), there has been significant debate as to its role and comparable efficacy in relation to surgical therapies. Specifically, investigators have compared relative utilization, costs, and outcomes with varying conclusions. Objective To compare various objective and subjective outcome measures between men undergoing CCH or surgery for PD. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT04786106) is ongoing. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil or penile surgery (plication and/or incision and grafting) + traction + sildenafil for PD. Objective, standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]), and non-standardized assessments are obtained at baseline, and post-treatment at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Key outcomes include differences in standardized questionnaires, penile curvature, penile length, subsequent interventions, and non-standardized questionnaire responses. Curvature is measured in two planes and summed to provide a composite curvature. Penile length is measured from pubic symphysis to corona. All therapies were stopped prior to the 3-month time point (i.e. traction and sildenafil). Results A total of 40 men have been randomized, with 3-month data available on 27 men (CCH=14, surgery=13) and 12-month data on 15 men (CCH=5, surgery=10). Mean age at enrollment was 54.9 years, PD duration 36.6 months (mo), composite curvature 72.3 degrees (deg), and penile length 12.7 cm. All baseline variables were statistically similar between cohorts. Regarding the primary outcome, post-treatment, CCH men reported higher overall satisfaction (3-months: 100% vs 88% surgery, p=0.16; 12-months 80% vs 70%, p=0.52). For secondary outcomes at 3 months, the median differences between CCH and surgery respectively were: IIEF-EFD (+3.5 vs +7, p=0.64), PDQ-physical (-10 vs -7, p=0.47, note: lower is better for PDQ scales), PDQ-pain (-2 vs -0.5, p=0.21), PDQ-bother (-4.5 vs -8.5, p=0.60), length change (+1.0 vs -0.5 cm, p<0.01), curvature absolute change (-26 vs -65 degrees, p=0.01), and curvature percentage improvement (46% vs 84%, p<0.01). More CCH men felt that treatment improved sexual function (86% vs 79%, p=0.45), erectile function (64% vs 56%, p=0.04), penile length (36% vs 6%, p<0.0001), and had less impact on sensation (14% less sensation vs 56%, p<0.01), while surgery men were more likely to report satisfaction with curvature (75% vs 64%, p=0.52). 100% of men in both groups would recommend treatment to a friend at 3 months, whereas 100% of CCH vs 70% of surgery men would recommend their therapy at 12 months. When asked which treatment they would pick if they could start again, at 3 months 100% of CCH men reported CCH and/or traction, while 79% of surgery men indicated surgery. Conclusions Preliminary data suggests that, when compared to surgery, CCH results in higher overall satisfaction (not statistically significant), decreased curve improvement, improved penile length, and fewer impacts on erectile function and sensation. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Endo Pharmaceutical Clarification Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

ABSTRACT Introduction Since the FDA approval of Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) for the treatment of Peyronie's Disease (PD), there has been significant debate as to its role and comparable efficacy in relation to surgical therapies. Specifically, investigators have compared relative utilization, costs, and outcomes with varying conclusions. Objective To compare various objective and subjective outcome measures between men undergoing CCH or surgery for PD. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT04786106) is ongoing at ***. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either CCH + traction (RestoreX) + sildenafil or penile surgery (plication and/or incision and grafting) + traction + sildenafil for PD. Objective, standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire [PDQ]), and non-standardized assessments are obtained at baseline, and post-treatment at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Key outcomes include differences in standardized questionnaires, penile curvature, penile length, subsequent interventions, and non-standardized questionnaire responses. Curvature is measured in two planes and summed to provide a composite curvature. Penile length is measured from pubic symphysis to corona. All therapies were stopped prior to the 3-month time point (i.e. traction and sildenafil). Results A total of 32 men have been randomized to date (CCH=17, surgery=15), with 3-month data available on 8 men (CCH=4, surgery=4). Mean age at enrollment was 55.8 years (SD 14.4), PD duration 38 months (SD 49.5), curvature 74.1 degrees (SD 20.9), and penile length 12.5 cm (SD 1.5). All baseline variables were statistically similar between cohorts. Regarding the primary outcome, at 3 months post-treatment, CCH men reported higher overall satisfaction (not statistically significant; 50% very satisfied, 50% somewhat satisfied; surgery 100% somewhat satisfied, p=0.06). For secondary outcomes at 3 months, the median differences between CCH and surgery respectively were: IIEF-EFD (+4 vs +4, p=1.0), PDQ-physical (-10 vs -6.5, p=0.14, note: lower is better for PDQ scales), PDQ-pain (-12 vs 0.5, p=0.77), PDQ-bother (-9 vs -8, p=0.77), length change (+0.8 vs 0 cm, p=0.29), curvature absolute change (-22.5 vs -80 degrees, p=0.11), and curvature percentage improvement (41% vs 85%, p=0.11). An equal number of CCH and surgery men felt that treatment improved sexual function (75%) and their ability to have sex (100%) and were subjectively happy with their curvature (50%). Men in the surgery arm were more likely to report (note that some are not statistically significant) subjectively worsened erectile function (50% vs 0%, p=0.15), shorter penile length (75% vs 0%, p=0.02), lower satisfaction with penile length (50% satisfied vs 75%, p=0.46), improved hourglass (33% vs 0%, p=0.42), and were less likely to report that they would repeat treatment without reservation (50% vs 75%, p=0.11). When asked which treatment they would pick if they could start again, 100% of CCH men reported CCH and/or traction, while 50% of surgery men indicated surgery, 25% CCH, and 25% other (p<0.05). Conclusions The current data are too preliminary to draw any viable conclusions on differences between CCH and surgery for PD. Disclosure Work supported by industry: yes, by Endo Pharmaceutical.