M, Y

Abstract Background The extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV-ICD) was designed to avoid lead-related complications associated with transvenous systems and deliver features such as anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and reduced generator size that provide an advantage over a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). As such, the EV-ICD is an attractive alternative for younger patients with genetic heart diseases (GHDs) who are not in need of permanent pacing. Objective To examine the indications, complications, and the clinical outcomes of patients with GHDs who received an EV-ICD. Methods A retrospective review of the electronic record was done for all GHD patients evaluated in genetic heart rhythm and/or cardiomyopathy clinics who had an EV-ICD implanted between 1/2021 and 2/2025. Basic demographic, ICD indications, complications, and therapy data were then extracted for all study patients. Results Overall, 23 patients (35% female; mean age 39 ± 16 years; 61% with a disease-causative genetic variant; mean LVEF 57%) with an underlying GHD (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 9, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy in 8, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in 3, dilated cardiomyopathy in 2, and long QT syndrome in 1) had an EV-ICD implanted. For the majority, an EV-ICD was implanted for primary prevention (15/23; 65%) and represented their first ICD system (21/23; 91%). The success rate of the procedure was 96% with only one abandoned procedure because of poor R-wave sensing. Inadvertent intraprocedural lead placement in the pericardial space occurred in 1 patient with previous thoracotomy and surgically placed epicardial lead without sequelae or need for revision. Over a mean follow-up of 8±9 months, the rate of complications was low (1/23; 4%) with one electrode displacement and this patient underwent defibrillation threshold testing (DFT), the device properly detected VF and emitted a successful shock 30 J. Thus far, 2 patients have received appropriate VT/VF-terminating therapies (3 ICD shocks, 0 ATP) with successful conversion to sinus rhythm. One patient died following an electrical storm. One patient had 3 inappropriate ICD shock for sinus tachycardia while exercising followed by 1 successful shock for VF. Conclusion In this early experience, EV-ICDs appear to be safe and effective in younger patients with genetic arrhythmogenic and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. Future studies are needed to better understand the utility of EV-ICDs in patients with cardiac channelopathies and advantages of EV-ICDs over transvenous and S-ICD systems in patients with an array of sudden death-predisposing GHDs.

Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy characterized by myocardial granulomatous inflammation, leading to conduction system abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in CS patients are controversial. The efficacy of CRT with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in these patients has not yet been elucidated. Objective To evaluate electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and long-term clinical outcomes after CRT with LBBAP in CS patients. Methods In this retrospective multicenter study, conducted between June 2020 and March 2024, patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of CS with an indication for CRT were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure related hospitalizations, implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and requirement of left ventricular assist device/heart transplant. The primary safety outcome was procedure-related complications. Secondary outcomes included pre- and post-procedural electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters and change in NYHA functional class. Results A total of 16 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 66.2 ± 9.4 years; 62.5% female; body mass index 30.4 ± 8.5 kg/m2). Four patients (25%) had isolated CS. The median follow-up was 579 [Q1: 295.5 – Q3: 797.5] days. Five patients (31.25%) experienced the composite outcome. Among these, two patients (12.5%) had acute heart failure related hospitalizations, two patients (12.5%) died due to severe pulmonary hypertension and sepsis complicated by cardiorenal syndrome, respectively; and one patient (6.25%) presented an episode of ventricular tachycardia that was successfully terminated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. No patients required advanced heart failure therapies. There were no procedure-related complications. There was a significant improvement in paced QRS duration (Pre 156.8 ± 36.2 vs. Post 128.3 ± 22.3 milliseconds, p=0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (Pre 36.5 ± 10.6% vs. Post 50.4 ± 12.2%, p<0.001), left ventricular end systolic diameter (Pre 52 [39.5 – 84.3] vs. Post 41 [29 – 72] millimeters, p=0.011) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (Pre 66.7 [48 – 159] vs. Post 61 [44 – 135] millimeters, p=0.023). Ten (62.5%) patients exhibited an improvement ≥ I in NYHA functional class post procedure. Conclusion In CS patients, CRT with LBBAP was associated with significant improvements in electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, as well as NYHA functional class, alongside favorable long-term clinical outcomes by optimizing interventricular dyssynchrony.Graphical abstract ECG and Echo parameters

Abstract Background Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) found in most implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) is an important therapy for painless termination of ventricular tachycardias (VT). In ICDs programmed to guideline-recommended detection and therapy settings typical ATP success rates are 50-70%.[1-3] The first closed-loop, automated ATP (AATP) algorithm, introduced in 2021, applies an S1 train derived from the detected VT, followed by an S2 derived initially from a refractory period estimator and then adjusted using analysis of the post-pacing interval if ATP fails. The termination efficacy of AATP in the real-world population is unknown. Purpose To assess the effectiveness AATP in a large real-world population. Methods A database of de-identified ICD transmissions from subjects in the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand was queried for AATP treated episodes. ICDs were randomly sampled, biased toward ICDs with multiple treated VT episodes. For rhythms classified as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, each AATP pulse train was reviewed for: rhythm at delivery, effect of ATP, and any non-capturing pulses. Acceleration was defined as a post-ATP decrease in MVT cycle length (VTCL) of at least 10% and at least 30ms. Acceleration to polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (PVT/VF) was assessed. Rates of termination and acceleration were calculated for all MVT and dichotomized using a 320ms VTCL cutoff. The method of generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to correct event rates for multiple episodes from a single patient. Results There were 2281 episodes of MVT in 340 patients; 63% of patients had 2 or more episodes. There were 724 episodes with initial VTCL <320ms and 1557 episodes with VTCL ≥320ms. The rate of termination of MVT by AATP was 78% for all VTCL [95% CI: 74%-81%]. In 300 patients (88%) AATP terminated at least one MVT. For MVT with VTCL ≥320ms the termination rate was 80% [95% CI: 75%-83%] and for VTCL <320ms the termination rate was 75% [95% CI: 69%-80%]. The rate of acceleration was 3.6% [95% CI: 2.7%-4.9%], with a 0.8% rate of acceleration to PVT/VF [95% CI: 0.4%-1.8%]. Acceleration led to shock therapy in 63% of accelerated episodes. All MVT accelerated to PVT/VF either spontaneously terminated (4/14) or were successfully converted by a single shock therapy (10/14). All accelerations that remained MVT were successfully treated by the device with either subsequent ATP (35%) or shock therapy (61%), or spontaneously terminated (4%). Conclusion In this large, real-world cohort analysis, automated ATP’s termination rate exceeded the typical success rate of burst ATP, particularly for MVT <320ms. Acceleration to PVT/VF was low and effective first-shock defibrillation was consistent. Subsequent ATP for accelerated MVT had incremental benefit, leading to successful termination one-third of the time. Additional data are currently being prospectively collected in a separate post-approval study.

Abstract Background Sex-specific outcomes may differ amongst patients receiving catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose Assess sex-specific outcomes in the patients randomized to catheter ablation or drug therapy in CABANA. Methods CABANA randomized 2204 pts with AF to catheter ablation or drug therapy (rate/rhythm-control). The outcomes of combined death, disabling stroke, severe bleeding, or cardiac arrest (intention to treat-ITT) or all-cause death were not different. But, ablation significantly improved combined death or CV hospitalization. This analysis compares clinical characteristics by sex and determines sex-specific hazard ratios based on a comparison of ablation vs drug therapy. Results Females were 37.3% of ablation and 37.0% of drug therapy patients. Females were older, more often white race, had less CAD, or sleep apnea, but had higher NYHA Class, higher CHA2DS2VASc, and more often had paroxysmal (v. persistent) AF, and prior AF hospitalization. (Table) HTN, CVA and diabetes were the same (Table). For the CABANA primary endpoint, an ITT comparison of ablation vs. drug therapy, showed a female hazard ratio (HR) of 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70–1.86), and a male HR of 0.74, (95% CI 0.52–1.06). For all-cause mortality, the female HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.41–1.40) and male HR was 0.91 (95% CI 0.59–1.40) and for all-cause mortality or CV hospitalization, the female HR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.75–1.09) and male HR was 0.79 (95% CI 0.69–0.92). All interaction p values were non-significant. Recurrent AF (post 90-day blanking) was significantly reduced for both females and males: female HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.51–0.82), male HR 0.46 95% CI 0.39–0.56), p=0.035 Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Baseline Characteristics Female (N=818) Male (N=1385) p-value Age: Median (Q1, Q3) 69 (65, 74) 66 (60, 71) <0.001 White 766 (93.9%) 1259 (91.0%) 0.015 CAD 92 (11.2%) 332 (24.0%) <0.001 NYHA ≥II 345 (42.4%) 433 (31.5%) <0.001 Sleep apnea 136 (16.6%) 372 (26.9%) <0.001 CHA2DS2-VASc: Median (Q1, Q3) 3 (3, 4) 2 (1, 3) <0.001 Paroxysmal AF 406 (49.6%) 540 (39.0%) <0.001 Persistent AF 412 (50.4%) 845 (61.0%) AF Hospitalization 353 (43.2%) 521 (37.7%) 0.011 Conclusion Significant sex-specific outcomes differences were not observed. Sex should not be used as a determining factor in selecting patients for AF therapy. Acknowledgement/Funding NIH, St Jude Medical Foundation and Corporation, Biosense Webster Inc., Medtronic Corporation, and Boston Scientific Corporation