Romero, Jorge E.

Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an infiltrative cardiomyopathy characterized by myocardial granulomatous inflammation, leading to conduction system abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmias. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes in CS patients are controversial. The efficacy of CRT with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in these patients has not yet been elucidated. Objective To evaluate electrocardiographic, echocardiographic and long-term clinical outcomes after CRT with LBBAP in CS patients. Methods In this retrospective multicenter study, conducted between June 2020 and March 2024, patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of CS with an indication for CRT were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure related hospitalizations, implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and requirement of left ventricular assist device/heart transplant. The primary safety outcome was procedure-related complications. Secondary outcomes included pre- and post-procedural electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters and change in NYHA functional class. Results A total of 16 patients were included in the analysis (mean age 66.2 ± 9.4 years; 62.5% female; body mass index 30.4 ± 8.5 kg/m2). Four patients (25%) had isolated CS. The median follow-up was 579 [Q1: 295.5 – Q3: 797.5] days. Five patients (31.25%) experienced the composite outcome. Among these, two patients (12.5%) had acute heart failure related hospitalizations, two patients (12.5%) died due to severe pulmonary hypertension and sepsis complicated by cardiorenal syndrome, respectively; and one patient (6.25%) presented an episode of ventricular tachycardia that was successfully terminated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock. No patients required advanced heart failure therapies. There were no procedure-related complications. There was a significant improvement in paced QRS duration (Pre 156.8 ± 36.2 vs. Post 128.3 ± 22.3 milliseconds, p=0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (Pre 36.5 ± 10.6% vs. Post 50.4 ± 12.2%, p<0.001), left ventricular end systolic diameter (Pre 52 [39.5 – 84.3] vs. Post 41 [29 – 72] millimeters, p=0.011) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (Pre 66.7 [48 – 159] vs. Post 61 [44 – 135] millimeters, p=0.023). Ten (62.5%) patients exhibited an improvement ≥ I in NYHA functional class post procedure. Conclusion In CS patients, CRT with LBBAP was associated with significant improvements in electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, as well as NYHA functional class, alongside favorable long-term clinical outcomes by optimizing interventricular dyssynchrony.Graphical abstract ECG and Echo parameters

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at a high risk for developing cardiovascular complications. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) can detect early functional impairment before structural abnormalities develop. It remains unknown if reduced GLS is associated with reduced survival in patients with MM. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients diagnosed with MM between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 at our institution. Patients with a 2D transthoracic echocardiogram completed within 1 year of MM diagnosis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 40%, and no history of myocardial infarction prior to MM diagnosis were included. GLS was measured using an artificial-intelligence-powered software (EchoGo Core), with reduced GLS defined as an absolute value of <18%. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival since myeloma diagnosis. Our cohort included 242 patients with a median follow up of 4.28 years. Fifty-two (21.5%) patients had reduced average GLS. Patients with reduced GLS were more likely to have an IVSd ≥ 1.2cm, E/E’ > 9.6, LVEF/GLS > 4.1, higher LV mass index, and low-voltage ECG. A Total of 126 (52.1%) deaths occurred during follow-up. Overall survival was lower among patients with reduced GLS (adjusted HR: 1.81, CI: 1.07–3.05).

Background Bivalirudin may be an effective alternative anticoagulant to heparin for use in percutaneous peripheral interventions. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin as the procedural anticoagulant agent in patients undergoing percutaneous peripheral intervention. Methods For this meta-analysis and systematic review, we conducted a search in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane for all the clinical studies in which bivalirudin was compared to heparin as the procedural anticoagulant in percutaneous peripheral interventions. Outcomes studied included all-cause mortality, all-bleeding, major and minor bleeding, and access site complications. Results Eleven studies were included in the analysis, totaling 20,137 patients. There was a significant difference favoring bivalirudin over heparin for all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.39–0.87), all-bleeding (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), major bleeding (risk ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.96), minor bleeding (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.47–0.92), and access site complications (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51–0.84). There was no significant difference in peri-procedural need for blood transfusions (risk ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.57–1.08), myocardial infarction (risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.59–1.28), stroke (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.59–1.01), intracranial bleeding (risk ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.29–2.02), or amputations (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53–1.05). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that bivalirudin use for percutaneous peripheral interventions is associated with lower all-cause mortality, bleeding, and access site complications as compared to heparin. Further large randomized trials are needed to confirm the current results.