Akula, Ashok

Background: There are good data to support using a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) below the limit of detection of 5 ng/L to exclude acute myocardial infarction. Per the US Food and Drug Administration, hs-cTnT can only report to the limit of quantitation of 6 ng/L, a threshold for which there are limited data. Our goal was to determine whether a single hs-cTnT below the limit of quantitation of 6 ng/L is a safe strategy to identify patients at low risk for acute myocardial injury and infarction. Methods: The efficacy (proportion identified as low risk based on baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L) of identifying low-risk patients was examined in a multicenter (n=22 sites) US cohort study of emergency department patients undergoing at least 1 hs-cTnT (CV Data Mart Biomarker cohort). We then determined the performance of a single hs-cTnT<6 ng/L (biomarker alone) to exclude acute myocardial injury (subsequent hs-cTnT >99th percentile in those with an initial hs-cTnT<6 ng/L). The clinically intended rule-out strategy combining a nonischemic ECG with a baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L was subsequently tested in an adjudicated cohort in which the diagnostic performance for ruling out acute myocardial infarction and safety (myocardial infarction or death at 30 days) were evaluated. Results: A total of 85 610 patients were evaluated in the CV Data Mart Biomarker cohort, among which 24 646 (29%) had a baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L. Women were more likely than men to have hs-cTnT<6 ng/L (38% versus 20%, P <0.0001). Among 11 962 patients with baseline hs-cTnT<6 ng/L and serial measurements, only 1.2% developed acute myocardial injury, resulting in a negative predictive value of 98.8% (95% CI, 98.6–99.0) and sensitivity of 99.6% (95% CI, 99.5–99.6). In the adjudicated cohort, a nonischemic ECG with hs-cTnT<6 ng/L identified 33% of patients (610/1849) as low risk and resulted in a negative predictive value and sensitivity of 100% and a 30-day rate of 0.2% for myocardial infarction or death. Conclusions: A single hs-cTnT below the limit of quantitation of 6 ng/L is a safe and rapid method to identify a substantial number of patients at very low risk for acute myocardial injury and infarction.

Abstract Background Limited data exist on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) for risk-stratification in COVID-19. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational, US-based study of COVID-19 patients undergoing hs-cTnT. Outcomes included short-term mortality (in-hospital and 30-days post-discharge) and a composite of major adverse events, including respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest, and shock within the index presentation and/or mortality during the index hospitalization or within 30-days post-discharge. Results Among 367 COVID-19 patients undergoing hs-cTnT, myocardial injury was identified in 46%. They had a higher risk for mortality (20% vs 12%, P &lt; 0.0001; unadjusted HR 4.44, 95% CI 2.13–9.25, P &lt; 0.001) and major adverse events (35% vs. 11%, P &lt; 0.0001; unadjusted OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.50–7.40, P &lt; 0.0001). Myocardial injury was associated with major adverse events (adjusted OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.00–7.36, P &lt; 0.0001) but not mortality. Baseline (adjusted OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.00–1.007, P = 0.047) and maximum (adjusted OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.009, P = 0.0012) hs-cTnT were independent predictors of major adverse events. Most (95%) increases were due to myocardial injury, with 5% (n = 8) classified as type 1 or 2 myocardial infarction. A single hs-cTnT &lt;6 ng/L identified 26% of patients without mortality, with a 94.9% (95% CI 87.5–98.6) negative predictive value and 93.1% sensitivity (95% CI 83.3–98.1) for major adverse events in those presenting to the ED. Conclusions Myocardial injury is frequent and prognostic in COVID-19. While most hs-cTnT increases are modest and due to myocardial injury, they have important prognostic implications. A single hs-cTnT &lt;6 ng/L at presentation may facilitate the identification of patients with a favorable prognosis.

Abstract Background Several high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (cTn) assays have been cleared by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use. Although some of them have been used outside the US for some time, there is limited experience thus far across US sites. Following FDA clearance of the Roche 5th Gen cTnT assay in January 2017, a multicenter US regional healthcare system introduced this more sensitive cTnT assay into clinical practice in September 2018. Purpose To examine cTn testing patterns, incidence of acute myocardial infarction (MI), and resource utilization before and after implementation of the 5th Gen cTnT assay across a large US healthcare system. Methods Using electronic-health records reporting software (Cogito SlicerDicer, EPIC), administrative data was examined to evaluate the transition (4-months before and after implementation) from the 4th to 5th Gen cTnT assays across 16 hospitals but not the major hub hospital of the system that transitioned at a separate time. Adult patient visits (emergency and hospital encounters), cTnT testing, incidence of chest discomfort and acute MI, and resource utilization, including hospital admissions, were examined during the transition period. Results 98,558 adult ED patient visits occurred during an 8-month period across 16 hospitals, including 50,485 and 48,073 patient visits before (5/12/18 – 9/11/18) and after (9/12/18 – 1/11/19) implementation of the 5th Gen cTnT assay respectively. cTnT testing occurred in 20% (range 8.9–34.8%) of all ED visits, with testing performed in the absence of chest pain in 54% (range 37–67%) of cases. Acute MI was diagnosed in 5.6% (n=561) of cases using the 4th Gen cTnT assay as compared to 6.6% (n=608) of cases using the 5th Gen cTnT assay (absolute difference 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.32–1.68, p=0.004). Much of the increase in MI diagnoses were in women (2.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.008). The proportion of ED patients requiring hospital admission did not differ between pre- and post-implementation periods (24.1% vs. 23.6%, p=0.4); however, among the subset of patients with chest pain, fewer admissions occurred post-implementation (17.9% vs. 15.8%, p=0.006). There was no increase in echocardiography (9.3% vs. 8.4%), coronary angiography (2.9% vs. 3.1%), or cardiac consultations (7.3% vs. 7.3%) utilization post-implementation. Conclusions Cardiac troponin testing occurs in nearly 20% of ED visits in a large multicenter regional healthcare system. About half of all tests are ordered in the absence of chest pain, with a low MI rate observed among the patients undergoing testing. Following implementation of the 5th Gen cTnT assay, testing rates/patterns remained unchanged, with a small but significant increase in MI diagnoses, primarily due to more women being diagnosed with MI. Fewer ED patients with chest pain required admission. Despite using a more sensitive cTn assay, hospital admissions and resource utilization did not increase post-implementation.