Smith, Caleb J.

Background Data on the safety profiles and clinical outcomes of patients with solid tumors and cardiac metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. Methods This is an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with cancer and cardiac metastasis at baseline. Patients who had received ≥1 dose of ICI were included. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event V.5.0. Objective response rates (ORR) were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 when available. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among 110 pts, median age at ICI initiation was 65 (IQR: 59–75). Median follow-up time since ICI initiation was 36 (95% CI: 26 to 51) months. Melanoma (38%, n=42) and non-small cell lung cancer (24%, n=26) were the most common. 68 (62%) patients received ICIs as first-line, and 29 (26%) patients were treated with combination anti-programmed death-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. The most common location of cardiac metastasis was in the atria (37%, n=41) and ventricles (35%, n=39). 15 patients (13.6%) had bilateral cardiac/pericardial metastasis, 44 (40%) had left-sided, and 43 (39.8%) had right-sided. At ICI initiation, 21% (n=23) had a cardiac thrombus. Cardiology referrals and cardiac MRIs at the time of cancer diagnosis were completed on 58 (53%) and 52 (47%) patients, respectively. Cardiac events occurred in 40 (36%) patients, including arrhythmias (n=14, 13%), arterial/venous emboli (n=4, 3.6%), and cardiac tamponade (n=3, 2.7%). 53 (47%) patients developed trAEs; most common were colitis/diarrhea (n=16, 15%), dermatitis (n=13, 12%), and hepatitis (n=9, 8.2%). ICI-related major cardiac trAEs occurred in 2 (1.8%) patients. 22 patients (20%) developed grade ≥3 trAE. Patients with multiple cardiac metastases had significantly lower responses to ICI-based regimens compared with patients with single cardiac metastasis (11% vs 63%, p=0.02). For melanoma, ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 38%, 9.0 months, and 28.9 months, respectively. 83% of patients with melanoma had concordant responses in overall disease burden and cardiac disease. 91 patients discontinued ICIs, and the main reason was progression or death in 55 (49%) patients. Conclusions Among patients with pre-existing cardiac metastasis, ICIs demonstrated meaningful clinical efficacy with no increase in safety signals. Most patients had concordant responses in the overall disease burden and cardiac mass. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial for the appropriate management of patients with cardiac metastasis.

TPS2699 Background: Despite the success in hematologic cancers, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are challenging to implement in solid tumors owing to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer from normal cells. MSLN expression normally is limited to the mesothelium of major body cavities but can be upregulated in diverse solid tumor types (TCGA 2022), making it a potential target for cancer therapy. MSLN-targeted cell approaches, including CAR T-cell and T-cell receptor fusion therapies, have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity including fatal events have occurred (1-3). A2B694 is an autologous logic-gated, MSLN-targeted Tmod CAR T-cell therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: an activating and blocking receptor. The activator recognizes MSLN present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker binds HLA-A*02 and prevents CAR T-cell activity. Thus, in patients with both germline HLA-A*02 and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). Through this unique discriminatory mechanism, A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 in adults with recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or other solid tumors with MSLN expression. Eligible patients should have received ≥1 line of prior therapy such as checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted, or chemotherapy. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), which identifies patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). Eligible patients enroll in the BASECAMP-1 study and undergo leukapheresis. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. 1. Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology. 2018. 2. Haas, et al. Mol Ther. 2023. 3. Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstract 9590. 4. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

TPS2698 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for treating solid tumors are challenging due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer from normal cells. Previous studies using CEA T-cell receptors and T-cell engagers have resulted in dose-limiting, on-target, off-tumor toxicities (1,2). A2B530 is an autologous logic-gated, CEA-targeted Tmod CAR T-cell therapy that addresses the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining a CAR-activating receptor with a blocking receptor to discriminate tumor from normal cells (3). The activator recognizes CEA on the surface of both tumor and normal cells while specificity for tumor cells is provided by a blocker that binds HLA-A*02. In patients with both germline HLA-A*02 and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells owing to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). HLA-A*02 LOH can be detected using next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc.). With this definitive discriminator target, A2B530 can potentially provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with CEA-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA LOH. Methods: EVEREST-1 (NCT05736731) is a seamless, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B530 in adult patients. Patients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA LOH at any time in the course of their disease. BASECAMP-1–eligible patients undergo leukapheresis and, when clinically appropriate, their banked T cells are manufactured for the EVEREST-1 study. The key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers associated with CEA expression: non-small cell lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancers. Patients should have received ≥1 line of prior therapy such as checkpoint inhibitor, molecular targeted, or chemotherapy. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B530 and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-escalation portion is based on the Bayesian optimal interval design. The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B530. Phase 2 will assess overall response rate per RECIST v1.1. As of January 29, 2024, 8 patients have been enrolled on EVEREST-1. A2B530 was successfully manufactured for all patients, and all patients have received A2B530 infusion, with the first patient dosed in May 2023. Dose escalation is ongoing. 1. Parkhurst, et al. Mol Ther. 2022. 2. Tabernero, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017. 3. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol. 2020. 4. Sandberg, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05736731 .

1604 Background: Diversity in clinical studies is essential to address health disparities, but racial and ethnic minorities are often underrepresented in clinical studies, especially in precision medicine studies using genetic data (1). BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) is an ongoing prescreening study to identify patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH for the EVEREST-1 and -2 Tmod chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy trials. When enrollment began in 2021, eligibility for Part 1 was restricted to patients with germline HLA-A*02:01 based on preclinical data. Additional analysis revealed the blocker in the Tmod construct had activity across HLA-A*02 subtypes (Mock, et al. Mol Ther Oncolytics.2022). Eligibility for Part 1 was then expanded to all HLA-A*02 subtypes, allowing enrollment of more diverse patient populations. HLA-A*02 allele subtypes vary by ethnicity and race; the frequency of HLA-A*02:01 is 96% in non-Hispanic Whites, but ranges from 53% to 73% in other ethnicities and races. The frequency of all other HLA-A*02 allele subtypes (HLA-A*02:XX) is <5% in non-Hispanic Whites but up to 66% in other ethnicities and races (2,3). Methods: Patients eligible for BASECAMP-1 were identified at United States study sites. All patients screened before January 16, 2024, for Part 1 were included for demographic and central lab HLA-A typing. The % increase in eligibility and % of heterozygous HLA-A*02 patients with HLA-A*02:XX were calculated by ethnicity and race. Results: A total of 1124 patients were screened for germline HLA-A*02 typing; 431 patients were HLA-A*02:01 heterozygous, of whom 37 (9%) were Hispanic, 14 (3%) African American (AA), 2 (<1%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 17 (4%) Asian or Pacific Islander (API), and 324 (75%) non-Hispanic White (Table). The eligibility expansion identified 62 patients with HLA-A*02:XX heterozygosity, of whom 6 (10%) were Hispanic, 6 (10%) AA, 19 (31%) API, and 25 (40%) non-Hispanic White. Conclusions: By expanding enrollment to include HLA-A*02:XX, 16% more Hispanic, 43% more AA, and 112% more API patients were identified, improving the diversity in this trial compared with that of initial enrollment. 1. Aldrighetti, et al. JAMA Netw Open 2021. 2. Ellis, et al. Human Immunol. 2000. 3. Gragert, et al. Human Immunol.2013. Clinical trial information: NCT04981119 . [Table: see text]

Pleural epithelioid mesothelioma (PEM) is divided into low and high grades based on nuclear atypia, mitoses, and necrosis in the tumor. Assessing mitoses and nuclear atypia tend to be labor-intensive with limited reproducibility. Ki-67 proliferation index was shown to be a prognostic factor in PEM, but its performance has not been directly correlated with tumor grade or mitotic score. This study evaluated the potential of Ki-67 index as a surrogate of tumor grade. We also compared the predictability of mitoses and Ki-67 index for overall survival (OS). Ninety-six PEM samples from 85 patients were identified from the surgical pathology file during 2000-2021 at our institution, and all glass slides were reviewed by 2 pulmonary pathologists to confirm the diagnosis and assign the tumor grade. Digital image analysis (DIA) was done for Ki-67 index. The agreement on tumor grading between 2 reviewers was moderate (kappa value = 0.47). The correlation between mitotic count (average count by 2 reviewers) and Ki-67 index was 0.65. The areas under the curve for predicting tumor grade by mitotic score and Ki-67 index were 0.84 and 0.74 (reviewer 1) and 0.85 and 0.81 (reviewer 2), respectively. High Ki-67 index and mitoses were significantly associated with poor OS (P=0.03 and 0.0005, using 30% and 10/2 mm2 as cutoffs, respectively). In conclusion, Ki-67 index by DIA was associated with tumor grade as well as mitotic count, and its predictability for OS was comparable to that of mitotic score, thus being a potential surrogate for tumor grade.

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene‐driven advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated.MethodsClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post‐protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted.ResultsTwenty‐three frontline trials in nononcogene‐driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first‐line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy.ConclusionThe rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first‐line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven improved overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life‐prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.

Background Screening for monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is often performed in the evaluation of anemia. While certain MGs may be associated with anemia, these are rare conditions. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS; prevalence of 8% among age &gt;50 years) is common, but rarely causes anemia in isolation. Therefore, abnormal results from MG screening may be unrelated to patient symptoms and result in both financial and psychological harm. Limited data exist to guide clinicians regarding the utility of MG testing for anemia. Aims This study aims to describe both the clinical utility of MG screening during the evaluation of anemia and the most common etiologies for anemia in patients whose workup included MG screening. Methods We reviewed medical records of patients who received MG screening to evaluate anemia at Mayo Clinic in 2021. Patients with a previously diagnosed MG were excluded. MG testing included serum protein electrophoresis and free light chain assessments. The following data were extracted: hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), calcium, creatinine, eGFR, and the final hematologic diagnosis related to the monoclonal protein. Clinician documentation was evaluated to determine the attributed etiology of anemia. Results Among the 271 patients with anemia who were screened for MG, 33 (12.2%) were found to have a newly diagnosed MG. Only 2 patients screened for MG were ultimately found to have anemia caused by MG. These included a case of multiple myeloma and one patient with cold agglutinin disease and secondary hemolysis. In all patients screened, their anemia was ultimately thought to be due to iron deficiency (31.7%), B12 deficiency (3.0%), anemia of chronic disease (ACD)/inflammatory anemia (14.4%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (3.7%), hemolysis (1.5%), hypogonadism (1.9%), idiopathic (21.0%), multifactorial: iron deficiency + ACD/inflammatory (3.0%), multifactorial: nutritional; iron deficiency + B12 deficiency (3.0%), multifactorial: ACD + CKD (5.2%), multifactorial: iron deficiency + CKD (1.8%), multifactorial: not otherwise specified (NOS) (6.6%), medications (0.4%), and other (2.6%). Both patients with newly diagnosed MG associated anemia presented with peripheral neuropathy as their primary symptom. Among these 2 patients diagnosed with dysproteinemia associated anemia, only one (0.4%) was placed on therapy for their MG. Summary/Conclusions In the evaluation of anemia, routine MG screening has low clinical utility. Less than 1 in 100 patients were found to have anemia attributable to MG. Furthermore, only 0.4 in 100 patients received MG-directed therapy. Most patients screened with SPEP for undifferentiated anemia were found to have anemia attributable to common causes including iron/nutritional deficiency, inflammatory processes, and CKD. Most patients with undifferentiated anemia would benefit from an anemia evaluation that focuses on the most common causes up front. Given the cost to healthcare and potential psychological harm to the patient of incidental MG diagnosis, further study is warranted to guide clinicians and limit the ordering of MG testing to individuals who are most likely to derive benefit.