Back to Authors

Parikh, Kaushal

0000-0002-3247-3676

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 7

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders
Fletcher, Kylie , Menzies, Alexander M., Johnson, Alexandra , Olsson‐Brown, Anna , Carlino, Matteo S. , Malgeri, Andrea , Singh, Aditi P. , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Long, Georgina V. , Challa, Pavan, Johnson, Douglas B. , Kim, So Yeon , Singh, Aditi, Long, Georgina V , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Kim, So Yeon , Machaalani, Marc , Chehade, Razane El Hajj , Nassar, Amin H. , Nawfal, Rashad , Manos, Michael P. , Menzies, Alexander M , Nana, Frank Aboubakar , Hassel, Jessica Cecile , Pinato, David J. , Johnson, Alexandra, Cortellini, Alessio , Parikh, Kaushal , Kim, So Yeon , Choueiri, Toni K. , Sharon, Elad , Shah, Shailee

JAMA Network Open | June 4, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e2513727

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13727 Get It

Importance Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious in many cancer types but can produce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As such, patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders are often excluded from clinical trials, although subsequent studies have shown that many of these patients have acceptable ICI tolerance. The safety and efficacy of ICIs among patients with preexisting neurologic autoimmune disorders (NAIDs) is not well characterized. Objective To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with ICI therapy among patients with NAIDs. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer who were treated with ICIs between October 2013 and May 2023 and had preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and other NAIDs as well as a control cohort of patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Exposure ICI therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures Demographic and clinical characteristics (neurologic disability, active or recent immunosuppression), ICI outcomes (response, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]), and safety outcomes (NAID exacerbation, irAEs) were collected. Results A total of 135 patients were included; the median (range) age was 72 (40-88) years, 84 (62%) were men, and 51 (38%) were women. A total of 45 patients had MS; 18, MG; 10, GBS; 5, another NAID; and 57, PD. Exacerbations occurred most frequently in MG (12 of 18 patients [67%]), often resulting in hospitalization (6 [50%]) or death (2 [17%]), with much lower rates in the MS cohort (8 of 45 patients [18%]). Ten patients with a history of GBS tolerated ICI without exacerbations, although 1 developed a fatal case of Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome following ICI treatment. No differences in response rate, PFS, or OS were observed between NAID groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of ICI use in NAIDs, patients with MG had frequent and more severe exacerbations, while those with MS had few exacerbations. No obvious differences in survival between groups were observed. ICI may be an option for many patients with appropriate oncologic indications and preexisting NAIDs.
Development of a prognostic score for stage IV NSCLC using advance machine learning algorithms: An international comparative study across South Korea, US, and France.
Lee, Daehwan , Hwang, Gyeongjo , Grossiord, Éloïse, Blanchon, Margot, Frau, Francesca , Hernández, Ramón Díaz , Sarkar, Somnath, Jung, Hyun Ae, Serra, Mercedes , Hernandez, Ramon, Sarkar, Somnath, Parikh, Kaushal , Jung, Hyun Ae

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.e20615 Get It

e20615 Background: Patients with Stage IV NSCLC have a poor prognosis, with approximately 25-30% succumbing to the disease within the first three months. However, survival outcomes can vary significantly depending on individual factors and advancements in treatment options. Therefore, it is crucial to identify patients at high risk of poor survival outcomes to tailor personalized treatment strategies and optimize clinical management. An international study has been conducted to generate prognostic scores for patients with Stage IV NSCLC. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using real-world data (RWD) from South Korea (ROOT-HEALTH database from Samsung Medical Center), the USA (COTA NSCLC dataset) and France (CIAN lung cohort from Centre Léon Bérard). Patients with stage IV NSCLC between January 2008 and December 2023 were included. The study's primary objective was to learn from patients ‘baseline characteristics affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to derive a prognostic score reflecting relative risk of death for given patient. A partition strategy was used, with 70% of the cohort for training and 30% for validation. Data-driven feature elimination has been applied to avoid overfitting of the models. Nested cross-validation reduced selection bias in hyperparameter tuning and model selection. Results: A total of 7,805 patients with NSCLC were included in the final analysis (USA: n=610, France: n=271, Korea: n=6,924). In the Korean dataset, the model achieved a C-index of 0.872 for OS using 35 selected variables. For the USA dataset, the model, based on 15 selected variables, demonstrated a C-index of 0.707 for OS. For PFS, the Korean dataset demonstrated a C-index of 0.823, the USA dataset achieved a C-index of 0.664, and the French dataset reported a C-index of 0.64, using 15 selected variables. The important predictors for OS included albumin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, bilirubin, and druggable mutations. For PFS, important predictors included LDH, albumin, hemoglobin, MET mutation, bilirubin, and BMI. The prognostic scores derived from these models allowed to identify patients with higher risk of death, than average, in each country. Conclusions: This study generates prognostic scores for OS and PFS in stage IV NSCLC using longitudinal international data from the USA, France, and South Korea throughout the cancer journey. It has the potential to support better treatment strategy for severe patients in clinical practice and early decision-making in clinical studies. Further research utilizing diverse international cohorts is essential to refine prognostic scores and enhance personalized treatment strategies for stage IV NSCLC patients.
Abstract 6614: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at recurrence has a “colder” tumor microenvironment than primary SCLC according to gene expression profiling
Kosari, Farhad , Ali, Mohamed A. Mohamed , Johnson, Sarah H. , Adjei, Alex A. , Molina, Julian R. , Shanshal, Mohamed , Luce, A., Schwecke, Anna J., Lensing, Janet L., Cheville, John C. , Vasmatzis, George , Leventakos, Konstantinos , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Dimou, Anastasios , Parikh, Kaushal , Smith, Katherine E. , Schwecke, Anna, Lo, Ying‐Chun

Cancer Research | April 21, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 8_Supplement_1 | Pages: 6614-6614

10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-6614 Get It

Abstract Recent studies have described the tumor microenvironment and the key transcription factors in untreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but less is known about the salient features in recurrent SCLC (rSCLC). This information could provide valuable insight about the effectiveness of second and later line therapies. In this study, we compared transcriptome profiles (by RNA-seq) of rSCLC against untreated primaries (pSCLC). rSCLC samples (n=23) were obtained from frozen biopsies in patients enrolled in our MC1923 (NCT04607954) phase 2 clinical trial whose disease progressed after chemoimmunotherapy. The pSCLC group (n=73) included publicly available data from fresh frozen primary tumors after surgical resections. Normalized expression data were used in immune deconvolution and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) in molecular signature database. Additional GSEA included gene sets describing ASCL1 (A), NEUROD1 (N), ASCL1 and NEUROD1 (AN), and POU2F3 (P) transcription factor activities which are used for subtyping of SCLC. Immune deconvolutions by multiple software algorithms suggested depletion of immune infiltrates in rSCLC compared with pSCLC including dendritic cells, B cells, CD8+ T cells, and M1 macrophages. Furthermore, we found decreased chemotaxis and increased apoptosis of dendritic cells, reduced TNF signaling, and reduced lymphocyte co-stimulation in rSCLC by GSEA. Additionally, in comparisons with pSCLC, rSCLC tumors had significantly lower enrichment scores for POU2F3 activity, representing the SCLC-P subtype (p < 0.007). Importantly, the SCLC-P was recently reported to be more immune inflamed than the other A, N, and AN subtypes. Altogether, our analyses provide strong evidence that the tumor microenvironment of rSCLC is significantly more immunosuppressed and with reduced immune cell infiltrates compared to pSCLC. Developing therapeutic strategies aimed at “warming” the tumor microenvironment and enhancing anti-tumor immune activity in ongoing multimodal therapies of recurrent SCLC will likely provide significant benefits to patients. Citation Format: Farhad Kosari, Mohamed Ali, Sarah H. Johnson, Alex Adjei, Julian R. Molina, Aaron S. Mansfield, Anastasios Dimou, Kaushal Parikh, Mohamed Shanshal, Katherine E. Smith, Ailsa G. Luce, Anna J. Schwecke, Janet Lensing, Ying-Chun Lo, John C. Cheville, George Vasmatzis, Konstantinos Leventakos. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) at recurrence has a “colder” tumor microenvironment than primary SCLC according to gene expression profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6614.
Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy for the treatment of patients with cardiac metastasis: a multicenter international retrospective study
Zarif, Talal El , Denu, Ryan , Abdel‐Wahab, Noha , Freeman, Dory , Hayeck, Salim, Anderson, Élizabeth , Goodman, Rachel , Johnson, Douglas B. , Grynberg, Shirly , Shapira, Ronnie, Kwan, Jennifer M. , Long, Georgina V. , Haykal, Tarek , Kojima, Yuki , Yonemor, Kan, Trevino, Alexandra , Hui, Gavin , Drakaki, Alexandra, El‐Am, Edward , Al‐Hader, Ahmad, Babu, P. Narendra , Li, Mingjia , Jones, N. , Herrera, M., Foderaro, Simone , Kim, Chul , Sackstein, Paul , Desai, Aakash , Smith, Caleb J. , Korolewicz, James , Lopetegui‐Lia, Nerea , Funchain, Pauline , Choudhary, Arrush, Asnani, Aarti , Stukalin, Igor , Gallegos, Jesús Antonio Ocejo , Nusrat, Sanober , Malvar, Carmel, McKay, Rana R. , Neilan, Tomas G. , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Baena, Javier , El Zarif, Talal , Goodman, Rachel S , Kim, Chul , Desai, Aakash P , Cortellini, Alessio , Pinato, David J , Navani, Vishal , Ocejo Gallegos, Jesus Antonio , Funchain, Pauline , Long, Georgina V , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Grynberg, Shirly , Espinar, Javier Baena , Alaiwi, Sarah Abou , Macaron, Walid , Vasbinder, Alexi L. , Woodford, Rachel , Dent, Susan , Kojima, Yuki, Tandon, Ankita, Akhter, Nausheen , Yang, Eric H. , Kozaily, Elie , Farhat, Elias Bou , Mittra, Arjun , Jones, Nicholas, Baena, Javier, Nana, Frank Aboubakar , Parikh, Kaushal , Cortellini, Alessio , Pinato, David J. , Meyers, Daniel E. , Trent, Jonathan C. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Korolewicz, James

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | March 3, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e009364

10.1136/jitc-2024-009364 Get It

Background Data on the safety profiles and clinical outcomes of patients with solid tumors and cardiac metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. Methods This is an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with cancer and cardiac metastasis at baseline. Patients who had received ≥1 dose of ICI were included. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event V.5.0. Objective response rates (ORR) were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 when available. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among 110 pts, median age at ICI initiation was 65 (IQR: 59–75). Median follow-up time since ICI initiation was 36 (95% CI: 26 to 51) months. Melanoma (38%, n=42) and non-small cell lung cancer (24%, n=26) were the most common. 68 (62%) patients received ICIs as first-line, and 29 (26%) patients were treated with combination anti-programmed death-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. The most common location of cardiac metastasis was in the atria (37%, n=41) and ventricles (35%, n=39). 15 patients (13.6%) had bilateral cardiac/pericardial metastasis, 44 (40%) had left-sided, and 43 (39.8%) had right-sided. At ICI initiation, 21% (n=23) had a cardiac thrombus. Cardiology referrals and cardiac MRIs at the time of cancer diagnosis were completed on 58 (53%) and 52 (47%) patients, respectively. Cardiac events occurred in 40 (36%) patients, including arrhythmias (n=14, 13%), arterial/venous emboli (n=4, 3.6%), and cardiac tamponade (n=3, 2.7%). 53 (47%) patients developed trAEs; most common were colitis/diarrhea (n=16, 15%), dermatitis (n=13, 12%), and hepatitis (n=9, 8.2%). ICI-related major cardiac trAEs occurred in 2 (1.8%) patients. 22 patients (20%) developed grade ≥3 trAE. Patients with multiple cardiac metastases had significantly lower responses to ICI-based regimens compared with patients with single cardiac metastasis (11% vs 63%, p=0.02). For melanoma, ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 38%, 9.0 months, and 28.9 months, respectively. 83% of patients with melanoma had concordant responses in overall disease burden and cardiac disease. 91 patients discontinued ICIs, and the main reason was progression or death in 55 (49%) patients. Conclusions Among patients with pre-existing cardiac metastasis, ICIs demonstrated meaningful clinical efficacy with no increase in safety signals. Most patients had concordant responses in the overall disease burden and cardiac mass. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial for the appropriate management of patients with cardiac metastasis.
Exhaled breath condensate contains extracellular vesicles (EVs) that carry miRNA cargos of lung tissue origin that can be selectively purified and analyzed
Mitchell, Megan I. , Shi, Miao , Sadoughi, Ali , Shah, Chirag , Siddiqui, T., Okorozo, A. , Gutiérrez, Martín , Unawane, Rashmi , Biamonte, Lisa, Spivack, Simon D. , Loudig, Olivier , Loudig, Olivier , Ben‐Dov, Iddo Z. , Ye, Kenny , Liu, Christina H. , Parikh, Kaushal

Journal of Extracellular Vesicles | April 25, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jev2.12440 Get It

Abstract Lung diseases, including lung cancer, are rising causes of global mortality. Despite novel imaging technologies and the development of biomarker assays, the detection of lung cancer remains a significant challenge. However, the lung communicates directly with the external environment and releases aerosolized droplets during normal tidal respiration, which can be collected, stored and analzsed as exhaled breath condensate (EBC). A few studies have suggested that EBC contains extracellular vesicles (EVs) whose microRNA (miRNA) cargos may be useful for evaluating different lung conditions, but the cellular origin of these EVs remains unknown. In this study, we used nanoparticle tracking, transmission electron microscopy, Western blot analyses and super resolution nanoimaging (ONi) to detect and validate the identity of exhaled EVs (exh‐EVs). Using our customizable antibody‐purification assay, EV‐CATCHER, we initially determined that exh‐EVs can be selectively enriched from EBC using antibodies against three tetraspanins (CD9, CD63 and CD81). Using ONi we also revealed that some exh‐EVs harbour lung‐specific proteins expressed in bronchiolar Clara cells (Clara Cell Secretory Protein [CCSP]) and Alveolar Type II cells (Surfactant protein C [SFTPC]). When conducting miRNA next generation sequencing (NGS) of airway samples collected at five different anatomic levels (i.e., mouth rinse, mouth wash, bronchial brush, bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] and EBC) from 18 subjects, we determined that miRNA profiles of exh‐EVs clustered closely to those of BAL EVs but not to those of other airway samples. When comparing the miRNA profiles of EVs purified from matched BAL and EBC samples with our three tetraspanins EV‐CATCHER assay, we captured significant miRNA expression differences associated with smoking, asthma and lung tumor status of our subjects, which were also reproducibly detected in EVs selectively purified with our anti‐CCSP/SFTPC EV‐CATCHER assay from the same samples, but that confirmed their lung tissue origin. Our findings underscore that enriching exh‐EV subpopulations from EBC allows non‐invasive sampling of EVs produced by lung tissues.
Clinical outcomes and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumors and paraneoplastic syndromes
Zarif, Talal El , Khalid, Ahmed Bilal, Rahme, Serena, Zhong, Caiwei , Salame, Marita , Freeman, Dory , El‐Am, Edward , Ravishankar, Arjun , Ahmad, Bachar , Nana, Frank Aboubakar , Kaldas, David , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , LeBoeuf, Nicole R. , Malgeri, Andrea , Gupta, Shruti , Al‐Hader, Ahmad, Sparks, Jeffrey A. , Linnoila, Jenny, McKay, Rana R. , Dilling, Thomas J. , Adib, Elio , Najem, Elie, Kim, So Yeon , Sonpavde, Guru , El Zarif, Talal , Gupta, Shruti , Marron, Thomas , Choueiri, Toni K , Adib, Elio , Kim, So Yeon , Sonpavde, Guru , Sparks, Jeffrey A , Aboubakar Nana, Frank , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Nassar, Amin H. , Kwak, Lucia , Farhat, Elias Bou , Sharon, Elad , Cortellini, Alessio , Hamnvik, Ole‐Petter R. , Mouhieddine, Tarek H. , Parikh, Kaushal , Choueiri, Toni K.

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | March 5, 2024 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: e008724

10.1136/jitc-2023-008724 Get It

Background Patients with paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are excluded from clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to safety concerns. Moreover, real-world data on efficacy and safety is scarce. Methods In this retrospective study, data were collected on patients with PNS and solid tumors receiving ICI between 2015 and 2022 at nine institutions. Patients were classified into: Cohort 1 (pre-existing PNS before ICI initiation), cohort 2 (PNS during ICI treatment), and cohort 3 (PNS after ICI discontinuation). Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (mNSCLC) from cohort 1 were matched to patients who were PNS-free at each institution up to a 1:3 ratio for age, sex, type of ICI, use of concurrent chemotherapy, and number of lines of systemic therapy prior to ICI initiation. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess overall survival (OS) and time-to-next treatment (TTNT). Results Among 109 patients with PNS treated with ICIs, median age at ICI initiation was 67 years (IQR: 58–74). The most represented cancer type was NSCLC (n=39, 36%). In cohort 1 (n=55), PNS exacerbations occurred in 16 (29%) patients with median time to exacerbation after ICI of 1.1 months (IQR: 0.7–3.3). Exacerbation or de novo PNS prompted temporary/permanent interruption of ICIs in 14 (13%) patients. For cohort 2 (n=16), median time between ICI initiation and de novo PNS was 1.2 months (IQR: 0.4–3.5). Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) occurred in 43 (39%) patients. Grade ≥3 trAEs occurred in 18 (17%) patients. PNS-directed immunosuppressive therapy was required in 55 (50%) patients. We matched 18 patients with mNSCLC and PNS (cohort 1) to 40 without PNS, treated with ICIs. There was no significant difference in OS or TTNT between patients with mNSCLC with and without PNS, although a trend was seen towards worse outcomes in patients with PNS. TrAEs occurred in 6/18 (33%) and 14/40 (35%), respectively. Grade ≥3 trAEs occurred in 4 (22%) patients with PNS and 7 (18%) patients without PNS. Conclusions Exacerbations of pre-existing PNS occurred in 29% of patients treated with ICIs and both exacerbations and de novo PNS occur early in the ICI course. TrAE from ICIs were similar between patients with and without PNS. Our data suggest that pre-existing PNS should not preclude consideration of ICI therapy although patients may not derive the same clinical benefit compared with patients without PNS.
448 Clinical outcomes and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with solid tumors and paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS)
Zarif, Talal El , Khalid, Ahmed Bilal, Rahme, Serena, Salame, Marita , Am, Edward El, Ahmad, Bachar , Kaldas, David , LeBoeuf, Nicole R. , Malgeri, Andrea , Linnoila, Jenny, McKay, Rana R. , Dilling, Thomas J. , Adib, Elio , Najem, Elie, Sonpavde, Guru , Nassar, Amin H. , Kwak, Lucia , Farhat, Elias Bou , Am, Edward El, Ravishankar, Arjun , Nana, Frank Aboubakar , Naqash, Abdul Rafeh , Sharon, Elad , Cortellini, Alessio , Gupta, Shruti , Sparks, Jeffrey A. , Hamnvik, Ole‐Petter R. , Parikh, Kaushal , Choueiri, Toni K. , Kim, So Yeon

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | October 31, 2023 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A498-A498

10.1136/jitc-2023-sitc2023.0448 Get It