Vasbinder, Alexi L.

Abstract Background There is limited data on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and known pericardial effusions. Methods This international multi-center observational retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC with or without pericardial effusions receiving ICIs. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards multivariable models assessed the association between survival outcomes and clinicopathologic variables, and an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model compared outcomes between the two groups. Results A total of 1248 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs across 13 institutions were included. Of these, 85 patients (6.8%) had pre-existing pericardial effusions. Compared to controls, patients with pericardial effusions were younger (median age 63 vs 67 years, P = .007), diagnosed more frequently with PD-L1 positive tumors (96% vs 76%, P < .001), and had a higher median number of baseline metastatic sites (3 vs 1, P < .001). IrAEs were similar between both groups (42% vs 38%), and no cardiac irAEs occurred in patients with pericardial effusions. PFS (median 5.6 vs 4.6 months, P = .3) and OS (median 10.2 vs 14.7 months, P = .50) were not statistically different between patients with pericardial effusions and the controls, respectively. In both multivariable and IPTW models, pericardial effusions were not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions Among patients with NSCLC and pre-existing pericardial effusions, ICIs demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit similar to those without effusions, with no new cardiac or severe toxicities.

Background Data on the safety profiles and clinical outcomes of patients with solid tumors and cardiac metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. Methods This is an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with cancer and cardiac metastasis at baseline. Patients who had received ≥1 dose of ICI were included. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event V.5.0. Objective response rates (ORR) were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 when available. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among 110 pts, median age at ICI initiation was 65 (IQR: 59–75). Median follow-up time since ICI initiation was 36 (95% CI: 26 to 51) months. Melanoma (38%, n=42) and non-small cell lung cancer (24%, n=26) were the most common. 68 (62%) patients received ICIs as first-line, and 29 (26%) patients were treated with combination anti-programmed death-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. The most common location of cardiac metastasis was in the atria (37%, n=41) and ventricles (35%, n=39). 15 patients (13.6%) had bilateral cardiac/pericardial metastasis, 44 (40%) had left-sided, and 43 (39.8%) had right-sided. At ICI initiation, 21% (n=23) had a cardiac thrombus. Cardiology referrals and cardiac MRIs at the time of cancer diagnosis were completed on 58 (53%) and 52 (47%) patients, respectively. Cardiac events occurred in 40 (36%) patients, including arrhythmias (n=14, 13%), arterial/venous emboli (n=4, 3.6%), and cardiac tamponade (n=3, 2.7%). 53 (47%) patients developed trAEs; most common were colitis/diarrhea (n=16, 15%), dermatitis (n=13, 12%), and hepatitis (n=9, 8.2%). ICI-related major cardiac trAEs occurred in 2 (1.8%) patients. 22 patients (20%) developed grade ≥3 trAE. Patients with multiple cardiac metastases had significantly lower responses to ICI-based regimens compared with patients with single cardiac metastasis (11% vs 63%, p=0.02). For melanoma, ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 38%, 9.0 months, and 28.9 months, respectively. 83% of patients with melanoma had concordant responses in overall disease burden and cardiac disease. 91 patients discontinued ICIs, and the main reason was progression or death in 55 (49%) patients. Conclusions Among patients with pre-existing cardiac metastasis, ICIs demonstrated meaningful clinical efficacy with no increase in safety signals. Most patients had concordant responses in the overall disease burden and cardiac mass. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial for the appropriate management of patients with cardiac metastasis.

Abstract Background Thromboembolic stroke risk remains a clinical challenge in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) patients with atrial fibrillation because of the increased prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombi irrespective of CHA2DS2-VASc score and a higher prevalence of factors that increase the risk of bleeding with anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective option in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, data describing a LAAC strategy for stroke prevention in patients with CA is limited. Among non-CA patients, procedural success and serious complication rates are around 98% and 3% respectively. Purpose In this multicenter retrospective study, we aimed to investigate whether left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) could reduce the risk of bleeding complications and ischemic cerebrovascular events in patients with CA. Methods In an international multi-center retrospective study, patients with CA that underwent LAAC were included. The diagnosis of CA was established on the basis of histologic confirmation or advanced multimodality cardiac imaging as per current consensus statements. Results A total of 28 patients (93% male; 87% ATTR-CA; 13% AL-CA; mean age 80 years) met inclusion criteria. At baseline, mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4 and 3 respectively, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 50%, and mean indexed left atrial volume was 58 mL/m2. 21% of patients had a prior history of ischemic stroke, 14% prior history of hemorrhagic stroke, 7% prior transient ischemic attack, and 54% had a prior history of major or minor bleeding. Procedural success was achieved in 26 patients (93%) with procedural complications occurring in 2 patients (vascular access site bleeding and cardiac tamponade). Regarding in-hospital and follow-up complications, 0% ischemic stroke, 0% hemorrhagic stroke, and major or minor bleeding in 4% of patients. During follow up, device thrombosis occurred in only 1 patient. Conclusion LAAC is a feasible and effective alternative to anticoagulation in patients with CA and excessive bleeding risk, with procedural success and complication rates similar to reported studies of non-CA patients.