Kwan, Jennifer M.

Abstract Background There is limited data on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and known pericardial effusions. Methods This international multi-center observational retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC with or without pericardial effusions receiving ICIs. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards multivariable models assessed the association between survival outcomes and clinicopathologic variables, and an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model compared outcomes between the two groups. Results A total of 1248 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs across 13 institutions were included. Of these, 85 patients (6.8%) had pre-existing pericardial effusions. Compared to controls, patients with pericardial effusions were younger (median age 63 vs 67 years, P = .007), diagnosed more frequently with PD-L1 positive tumors (96% vs 76%, P < .001), and had a higher median number of baseline metastatic sites (3 vs 1, P < .001). IrAEs were similar between both groups (42% vs 38%), and no cardiac irAEs occurred in patients with pericardial effusions. PFS (median 5.6 vs 4.6 months, P = .3) and OS (median 10.2 vs 14.7 months, P = .50) were not statistically different between patients with pericardial effusions and the controls, respectively. In both multivariable and IPTW models, pericardial effusions were not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions Among patients with NSCLC and pre-existing pericardial effusions, ICIs demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit similar to those without effusions, with no new cardiac or severe toxicities.

Importance Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) have demonstrated cardiorenal benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, but their effectiveness in patients with MGUS remains unexplored. Objective To assess the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for primary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with MGUS and diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used a propensity score–matched analysis of data from the TriNetX Global Database, encompassing patients diagnosed with diabetes and MGUS between January 1, 2018, and January 13, 2023. Patients with prior heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease, coronary revascularization, or stroke or transient ischemic attack before MGUS diagnosis were excluded. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: GLP-1 RA users and nonusers at baseline. After 1:1 propensity score matching, GLP-1 RA users and nonusers were compared up to 5 years from the MGUS diagnosis date. Data analyses were completed January 19, 2025. Exposure GLP-1 RA use within 1 year before MGUS diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was MACCE, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, new-onset HF, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke or transient ischemic attack. Secondary end points included individual MACCE components, decompensated HF, and acute kidney injury or end-stage kidney disease. Results A total of 4871 patients with MGUS (mean [SD] age, 68.9 [10.1] years; 2366 [48.5%] male) were included (473 GLP-1 RA users and 4398 non-users). A total of 460 users were matched to 460 nonusers, with balanced characteristics (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [10.6] vs 65.1 [11.0] years; 229 [49.7%] male vs 234 [50.8%] male), including 14 patients (3.0%) vs 13 patients (2.8%) identifying as Asian, 8 (21.3%) vs 92 (20.0%) as Black or African American, 25 patients (5.4%) vs 20 patients (4.3%) as Hispanic or Latino, and 243 patients (52.8%) vs 250 patients (54.3%) as White. GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACCE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.93). Significant reductions were also observed in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.87), new-onset HF (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90), decompensated HF (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84), and acute kidney injury or end-stage kidney disease (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.92). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study of GLP-1 RA use vs no use in patients with MGUS and diabetes suggest the potential of GLP-1 RA for primary prevention of MACCE. These findings warrant further investigation in prospective randomized trials.

Background Data on the safety profiles and clinical outcomes of patients with solid tumors and cardiac metastasis treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited. Methods This is an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with cancer and cardiac metastasis at baseline. Patients who had received ≥1 dose of ICI were included. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event V.5.0. Objective response rates (ORR) were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 when available. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Among 110 pts, median age at ICI initiation was 65 (IQR: 59–75). Median follow-up time since ICI initiation was 36 (95% CI: 26 to 51) months. Melanoma (38%, n=42) and non-small cell lung cancer (24%, n=26) were the most common. 68 (62%) patients received ICIs as first-line, and 29 (26%) patients were treated with combination anti-programmed death-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. The most common location of cardiac metastasis was in the atria (37%, n=41) and ventricles (35%, n=39). 15 patients (13.6%) had bilateral cardiac/pericardial metastasis, 44 (40%) had left-sided, and 43 (39.8%) had right-sided. At ICI initiation, 21% (n=23) had a cardiac thrombus. Cardiology referrals and cardiac MRIs at the time of cancer diagnosis were completed on 58 (53%) and 52 (47%) patients, respectively. Cardiac events occurred in 40 (36%) patients, including arrhythmias (n=14, 13%), arterial/venous emboli (n=4, 3.6%), and cardiac tamponade (n=3, 2.7%). 53 (47%) patients developed trAEs; most common were colitis/diarrhea (n=16, 15%), dermatitis (n=13, 12%), and hepatitis (n=9, 8.2%). ICI-related major cardiac trAEs occurred in 2 (1.8%) patients. 22 patients (20%) developed grade ≥3 trAE. Patients with multiple cardiac metastases had significantly lower responses to ICI-based regimens compared with patients with single cardiac metastasis (11% vs 63%, p=0.02). For melanoma, ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 38%, 9.0 months, and 28.9 months, respectively. 83% of patients with melanoma had concordant responses in overall disease burden and cardiac disease. 91 patients discontinued ICIs, and the main reason was progression or death in 55 (49%) patients. Conclusions Among patients with pre-existing cardiac metastasis, ICIs demonstrated meaningful clinical efficacy with no increase in safety signals. Most patients had concordant responses in the overall disease burden and cardiac mass. Multidisciplinary teams are crucial for the appropriate management of patients with cardiac metastasis.

Abstract Purpose Physician–scientists have long been considered an endangered species, and their extended training pathway is vulnerable to disruptions. This study investigated the effects of COVID-19-related challenges on the personal lives, career activities, stress levels, and research productivity of physician–scientist trainees and faculty. Method The authors surveyed medical students (MS), graduate students (GS), residents/fellows (R/F), and faculty (F) using a tool distributed to 120 U.S. institutions with MD–PhD programs in April–June 2020. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare differences between groups. Machine learning was employed to select variables for multivariate logistic regression analyses aimed at identifying factors associated with stress and impaired productivity. Results The analyses included 1,929 respondents (MS: n = 679, 35%; GS: n = 676, 35%; R/F: n = 274, 14%; F: n = 300, 16%). All cohorts reported high levels of social isolation, stress from effects of the pandemic, and negative impacts on productivity. R/F and F respondents were more likely than MS and GS respondents to report financial difficulties due to COVID-19. R/F and F respondents with a dual degree expressed more impaired productivity compared with those without a dual degree. Multivariate regression analyses identified impacted research/scholarly activities, financial difficulties, and social isolation as predictors of stress and impaired productivity for both MS and GS cohorts. For both R/F and F cohorts, impacted personal life and research productivity were associated with stress, while dual-degree status, impacted research/scholarly activities, and impacted personal life were predictors of impaired productivity. More female than male respondents reported increased demands at home. Conclusions This national survey of physician–scientist trainees and faculty found a high incidence of stress and impaired productivity related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the challenges faced and their consequences may improve efforts to support the physician–scientist workforce in the postpandemic period.