Thanarajasingam, Uma

Abstract The immune checkpoint inhibition therapy induces various immune related adverse events (irAEs). The immunological basis of irAEs remains unclear. We recruited a cohort of patients with inflammatory arthritis irAE (IA-irAE), the most common form of rheumatic irAEs, together with matched patients with conventional rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cancer patients without irAEs. Comprehensive clinical and immunological investigations reveal an imbalance of T cell exhaustion and senescence in IA-irAE patients, and immunological similarities between IA-irAE patients and seronegative RA patients. These data suggest that IA-irAE and seronegative RA may have shared immunological mechanisms. Thus, our study identifies potential immunological underpinnings of IA-irAE and the relationship between IA-irAE and conventional RA. The results may have implications for managing irAE and seronegative RA patients. Supported byR01AR0077518 Arthritis National Research Foundation

ObjectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is marked by immune dysregulation linked to varied clinical disease activity. Using a unique longitudinal cohort of SLE patients, this study sought to identify optimal immune mediators informing an empirically refined flare risk index (FRI) reflecting altered immunity prior to clinical disease flare.MethodsThirty‐seven SLE‐associated plasma mediators were evaluated by microfluidic immunoassay in 46 samples obtained in SLE patients with an imminent clinical disease flare (preflare) and 53 samples obtained in SLE patients without a flare over a corresponding period (pre‐nonflare). SLE patients were selected from a unique longitudinal cohort of 106 patients with classified SLE (meeting the American College of Rheumatology 1997 revised criteria for SLE or the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 revised criteria for SLE). Autoantibody specificities, hybrid SLE Disease Activity Index (hSLEDAI) scores, clinical features, and medication usage were also compared at preflare (mean ± SD 111 ± 47 days prior to flare) versus pre‐nonflare (99 ± 21 days prior to nonflare) time points. Variable importance was determined by random forest analysis with logistic regression subsequently applied to determine the optimal number and type of analytes informing a refined FRI.ResultsPreflare versus pre‐nonflare differences were not associated with demographics, autoantibody specificities, hSLEDAI scores, clinical features, nor medication usage. Forward selection and backward elimination of mediators ranked by variable importance resulted in 17 plasma mediator candidates differentiating preflare from pre‐nonflare visits. A final combination of 11 mediators best informed a newly refined FRI, which achieved a maximum sensitivity of 97% and maximum specificity of 98% after applying decision curve analysis to define low, medium, and high FRI scores.ConclusionWe verified altered immune mediators associated with imminent disease flare, and a subset of these mediators improved the FRI to identify SLE patients at risk of imminent flare. This molecularly informed, proactive management approach could be critical in prospective clinical trials and the clinical management of lupus.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to describe differences in the clinical course of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)–positive compared with those who are ANA‐negative.MethodsThis was a retrospective population‐based cohort study of residents in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who first fulfilled 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA in 2009‐2014. Data were collected on first documentation of joint swelling. Data on rheumatoid factor or anti‐cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody testing and the ANA level were also collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by using χ2 and rank sum tests.ResultsIn this cohort, 64% of patients were tested for ANA within ±90 days of RA criteria fulfillment. In the161 patients with ANA testing, 25% were ANA‐positive. Patients who were ANA‐positive were younger, female, and less likely to be current smokers. ANA positivity did not differ between patients with RA who were seropositive and seronegative. In seropositive patients who were ANA‐positive, there was an increased time to fulfillment of RA criteria, increased time to treatment with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and increased likelihood of being treated with hydroxychloroquine as opposed to methotrexate. Other outcomes, including disease activity and mortality, did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionIn patients with RA, important differences exist between those who are ANA‐positive and ANA‐negative in terms of time to fulfillment of RA criteria and time to DMARD initiation as well as choice of initial pharmacotherapy. These findings could indicate a difference in clinical presentation or perception of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive. Further research is needed to study the long‐term outcomes of patients with RA who are ANA‐positive.

Introduction Immune-mediated hematologic disorders are relatively rare but potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAE) with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy (Shiuan, Beckermann et al 2017). The management strategy often relies on systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressant agents in steroid-refractory cases (Brahmer, Lacchetti et al 2018). We hereby describe our institution's experience in diagnosing and managing immune-related hematologic adverse events (ir-h-AE). Methods We retrospectively searched the electronic health record for all ir-h-AE diagnosed by treating providers and confirmed by study authors between 2015 and 2020. The search included patients on ICI and the following conditions: immune-related neutropenia (IRN), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), cold agglutinin disease (CAD), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), immune-related pancytopenia, aplastic anemia (AA), and pure red cell aplasia (PRCA). For AIHA, PRCA, and CAD, partial response (PR) was defined as hemoglobin greater than 10 g/dL but < 12 g/dL and 2 g/dL above the nadir without blood product transfusion. Complete response (CR) was defined as hemoglobin of ≥ 12 g/dL and 2 g/dL above the nadir without blood product transfusion (Peñalver, Alvarez-Larrán et al. 2010). For ITP, CR was defined as platelet count ≥ 100 × 109/L and absence of bleeding. PR was defined as platelet count ≥ 30 × 109/L and ≥ two-fold increase from the baseline count and absence of bleeding (Gómez-Almaguer, Tarín-Arzaga et al. 2013). For IRN, CR was defined as absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1500/ mm3 on 2 consecutive measurements separated by 7 days; PR was defined as ANC ≥ 500/ mm3 sustained over 7 days. JMP® 14.1 was used for data analysis. Results Seventeen patients were identified, 9 (52.9%) of whom were female (table 1). Median age was 68 years (range 26-78). The most common pre-existing malignancies were melanoma (6 patients, 35.3%), non-small cell lung cancer (4 patients, 23.5%), and gastrointestinal cancer (3 patients, 17.6%). The ir-h-AE included 7 patients (41.2%) with warm AIHA, 4 (23.5%) with ITP (1 had immune-related pancytopenia that resolved with ITP persisting), 3 (17.6%) with IRN, 1 with AA, 1 with CAD, and 1 with PRCA and mild ITP. All patients had received an ICI dose within 60 days of diagnosis (range 3-52 days, median 18 days). Only 1 patient had a concomitant chronic autoimmune disorder (antinuclear antibody-positive arthritis). Four patients (23.5%) were receiving chemotherapy. Sixteen patients (94.1%) required treatment and received corticosteroids. Eight out of 15 evaluable patients (53.3%) responded to corticosteroids only. Another 4 responders (26.7%) required additional therapies including intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) (4, 23.5%) and/or rituximab (4, 23.5%). Overall response rate was 71.4% for AIHA and 100% for IRN. ITP was likely underrepresented in our cohort, and the response rate of 66.7% is likely lower than the response rate in clinical practice. This could be related to the fact that many mild thrombocytopenia cases are not further evaluated in clinical practice. None of our patients died from the sequelae of an ir-h-AE. Two patients (11.8%) died within 30 days of ir-h-AE diagnosis (disseminated intravascular coagulation likely due to the underlying malignancy and sepsis from bacterial pneumonia). At the time of ir-h-AE diagnosis, the malignancy was showing evidence of response in 9 patients (52.9%), progression in 6 patients (35.3%), and stability in 2 patients (11.8%). ICI therapy was permanently discontinued in 9 patients (52.9%) and temporarily held in 6 patients (35.3%). Three of the 5 patients (60%), who were rechallenged with ICI therapy, had recurrence of the same ir-h-AE (AIHA) with adequate response to therapy. Non-hematologic irAE (7 patients, 41.2%) included 3 patients with hepatitis, 2 with thyroiditis, 2 with pneumonitis, 1 with colitis, and 1 with dermatitis. Conclusion Our clinical experience with ir-h-AE highlights the importance of exercising vigilance in assessing the hematologic parameters of patients receiving ICI therapy. While relatively rare, ir-h-AE may impact the clinical course of patients with cancer and their eligibility for therapies that have the potential of offering durable control of the underlying malignancy. ir-h-AE respond to classical therapies including corticosteroids, IVIG, and rituximab. Disclosures Block: Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Marker Therapeutics: Research Funding; Transgene: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding. Kottschade:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.

95 Background: The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with PD-1 antibodies (ICI) is reported at 28 - 36%. However, clinically relevant information on irAE onset, duration, or impact on ability to continue therapy in HL is lacking. Additionally, these incidence rates reflect CTCAE definition and grading, and not ASCO Clinical Practice Guidelines irAE-specific criteria (Brahmer et al, JCO 2018). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate and severity of irAEs in HL pts using ASCO criteria, to characterize irAE time profile and to assess their impact on continued therapy. Methods: HL pts who received a PD-1 inhibitor for the treatment of HL at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 2011 and March 1, 2018 were identified. We conducted a detailed, longitudinal retrospective chart review with definition and grading of irAEs in accordance with ASCO guidelines. Results: Fifty-one pts were identified (35% women, median age at ICI initiation 35 years [range: 19-87]). Median duration of follow up from ICI start was 30 months (range: 1-70). Thirty-one pts (61%) had any irAE. Most common irAEs were inflammatory/bullous dermatoses (23.5%/5.9% any grade/grade3-4; median onset/duration of 81/57 days[d]), followed by thyroiditis (22%/0%; 86/84 d), colitis (14%/8%; 82/106 d), pneumonitis (14%/10%; 241/182 d), and hepatitis (14%/4%; 71/35 d). Fifteen pts (29%) required treatment with steroids. Among the total cohort, ICI was held for an irAE 28 times (50% of 56 total irAEs). Median treatment cycles held was 2.5 and ICI was permanently discontinued due to irAE in 18%. The most common irAE leading to treatment discontinuation was pneumonitis, followed by neuritis (5.9%/3.9%; 179/374 d), colitis, and rash. Conclusions: The rate of irAEs of 61% in this cohort as defined by ASCO consensus criteria was higher than reported in trials. Most irAEs were characterized by delayed onset of several months and prolonged duration, particularly pneumonitis and neuritis. Treatment discontinuation due to irAEs was infrequent overall. Further studies are needed to determine whether the development or duration of irAEs is predictive of treatment outcomes in HL.

Background: Longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) accompanying systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is often due to coexisting aquaporin-4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder but has not been associated with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG (MOG-IgG). Objective and methods: Case report at an academic medical center. Results: A 32-year-old woman developed severe transverse myelitis (paraplegia) shortly after SLE onset in the post-partum period. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an LETM, cerebrospinal fluid showed marked inflammation, and testing for infections was negative. Serum live-cell-based assay for MOG-IgG was positive but aquaporin-4-IgG was negative. Conclusion: In patients with SLE and LETM, MOG-IgG testing should be considered, in addition to AQP4-IgG.

ObjectiveType I interferon (IFN) is important to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis, but it is not clear how chronic elevations in IFN alter immune function. We compared cytokine responses after whole blood stimulation with Toll‐like receptor (TLR) agonists in high‐ and low‐IFN SLE patient subgroups.MethodsSLE patients and nonautoimmune controls were recruited, and SLE patients were categorized as either high or low IFN. Whole blood was dispensed into tubes coated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), oligonucleotides with cytosine‐guanine repeats, Resiquimod, IFN‐α, and IFN‐α + LPS. Cytokine production in patient sera and after whole blood TLR stimulation was measured by multiplex assay, and type I IFN was assessed using a functional assay.ResultsCirculating plasmacytoid dendritic cell numbers were specifically reduced in high‐IFN SLE patients and not in low‐IFN SLE patients. In serum, we observed that the correlations between cytokines in serum differed to a much greater degree between the high‐ and low‐IFN groups (P < 0.0001) than the absolute cytokine levels differed between these same groups. In stimulated conditions, the high‐IFN patients had less cytokine production in response to TLR ligation than the low‐IFN SLE patients. LPS produced the most diverse response, and a number of interactions between type I IFN and LPS were observed.ConclusionWe find striking differences in resting and stimulated cytokine patterns in high‐ vs. low‐IFN SLE patients, which supports the biological importance of these patient subsets. These data could inform personalized treatment approaches and the pathogenesis of SLE flare following infection.

ObjectiveTo describe the prevalence, clinical presentation, and management of rheumatic immune‐related adverse effects (Rh‐irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.MethodsFrom a database of all patients who received any ICI at the Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota campus between January 1, 2011 and March 1, 2018, we retrospectively identified those with Rh‐irAEs, using diagnostic codes, search terms, and manual chart review.ResultsOf the 1,293 patients who received any ICI, Rh‐irAEs were clinically diagnosed in 43. Eighteen patients with Rh‐irAEs who received ICI therapy elsewhere were also analyzed. Clinical syndromes included inflammatory arthritis (n = 34 [prevalence 2%]), myopathy (n = 10), and other rheumatic syndromes (n = 17). Inflammatory arthritis was most commonly polyarticular, and glucocorticoid treatment was required in 26 patients (76%). The mean ± SD duration of treatment was 18 ± 18 weeks. Five patients (15%) also received disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs, and ICI therapy had to be discontinued in 3 patients (9%). Myopathy was treated with glucocorticoids in all cases (mean ± SD treatment duration 15 ± 17 weeks) and led to 2 deaths and permanent ICI discontinuation in 9 patients (90%). Other syndromes included connective tissue diseases, vasculitis, polymyalgia rheumatica–like syndrome, and flare of preexisting rheumatic disease. Most (71%) were treated with immunosuppression, with 12% requiring ICI discontinuation.ConclusionThis study represents the largest cohort of patients with Rh‐irAEs reported to date. Most patients received long courses of immunosuppressive treatment, although discontinuation of ICI therapy was required in only a minority.