Bishop, Allen T.

OBJECTIVE The role of amputation and myoelectric prosthetic fitting for hand function in traumatic pan–brachial plexus injury (pBPI) continues to evolve. This study evaluated the function and activity performance of patients with traumatic pBPI who underwent amputation and prosthetic fitting with a myoelectric prosthesis (MEP) for hand function. METHODS A retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent elective amputation after sustaining a pBPI followed by MEP for hand function was performed. Demographics, mechanisms of injury, amputation details, and outcomes were collected from medical records. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure was used to evaluate the impact of impairment, the visual analog scale (VAS) to assess pain, and the Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA) to determine functional activity performance pre- and post-MEP usage. Follow-up time, prosthesis usage, satisfaction, and site of electrical signal used were recorded. Paired t-tests were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one adult patients with pBPI (90% male, mean age 32 years at the time of BPI) underwent amputations and were fitted with MEPs for hand function controlled by nonintuitive signals. Fifteen patients underwent a trans-radial amputation and 6 underwent a trans-humeral amputation. While all patients sought improved terminal grasp function, 3 patients subsequently declined prosthetic fitting after amputation. Of the 18 patients who underwent myoelectric prosthetic hand fittings, linear transducers activated by the contralateral shoulder protraction were used in 66% of patients, and traditional electrode signals from ipsilateral nonintuitive muscle were used in 33% to control MEP grasp function. Disability (DASH) and pain (VAS) scores significantly improved after amputation (p = 0.04 and p < 0.01, respectively). AM-ULA scores showed a significant improvement in activity performance after application of the MEP, with an average increase of 23 points from 0 points on a 40-point scale before amputation and prosthetic fitting (p < 0.0001). Daily users of the MEP averaged 6 hours per day and reported the prosthesis was useful during daily activities with great satisfaction at an average of 22 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Amputation followed by MEP fitting in adult traumatic pBPI significantly improved function, reduced pain, and had a high prosthetic usage. The AM-ULA, a tool for quantitatively evaluating activity performance, was applied to measure the bimanual functional activity performance of patients before and after using MEPs, which revealed a significant improvement. Patients reported using their prosthetics daily with a high satisfaction rate with functional terminal grasp and release.

ABSTRACT Iatrogenic spinal accessory nerve (SAN) injuries can occur as complications of posterior triangle of the neck surgery, resulting in lateral scapular winging and a shoulder droop. Rarely has this complication been described after a cosmetic rhytidectomy (face‐lift procedure). Here, we present two cases of iatrogenic SAN injuries that occurred after cosmetic rhytidectomies. The use of electrodiagnostic and ultrasound examinations provides invaluable information to assess peripheral nerve injuries. Electrodiagnostic testing can confirm the presence and severity of the injury, while ultrasound can provide additional anatomical information and direct visualization to confirm the continuity of the nerve and assess muscle denervation changes.

Case: An upper trunk brachial plexus injury patient underwent ulnar motor fascicular to biceps motor nerve transfer. At 6 months postoperative, the patient had trace biceps firing but was diagnosed with an unrecognized rupture of the distal biceps tendon, requiring reconstruction. Another patient with C5-T1 injury was noted to have distal biceps tendon rupture at the time of gracilis muscle transfer. Both patients had gravity-assisted elbow flexion at 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: Biceps rupture is an uncommon concomitant injury with brachial plexus trauma and challenging to diagnose in the context of a paretic limb. Thorough history and intraoperative biceps tendon palpation will ensure these injuries are identified.

Segmental bone loss reconstruction using frozen bone allografts has a great advantage over amputation. Unfortunately, frozen allografts are avascular, and their use often results in infection, non-union, or fracture. We have attempted to overcome these complications by revascularizing the bone using gene therapy. Segmental tibial bone transplants were performed in 16 Yucatan minipigs. An arteriovenous (AV) bundle was placed intramedullary inside the allografts, which were transfected with growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in 8 out of the 16 pigs. Survival time was set at 20 weeks. Bone remodeling and biomechanical properties were tested using histology, compression testing, bone mineralization, and gait analysis. In the growth factor group, five out of eight pigs developed cutaneous vascular tumors, causing excessive bleeding, which led to the exclusion of one pig. Bone remodeling was significantly more present in the VEGF group compared to the control group. This correlated with the amount of pressure the pig allowed on the operated leg for 10 weeks, which was also significantly more (p = 0.029) than the control. Both bone mineralization (p = 0.156) of the area inside the cortex and the amount of stress the allograft could endure before breaking (p = 0.078) seemed to be no different for the VEGF group compared to its healthy contralateral side, which was the control group. We have shown that growth factor-induced frozen allograft bone revascularization using an intramedullary AV bundle results in significantly more bone remodeling and better biomechanical bone properties. However, we encountered benign vascular cutaneous tumors in five out of eight pigs, making the clinical application of this technique impossible at this time.

The gracilis free functioning muscle transfer is an established procedure for reconstructing elbow, wrist, and hand function in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury patients. Elbow flexion or distal wrist or hand function can be compromised by gracilis bowstringing in up to 17.8% of patients. Two techniques for pulley reconstruction to correct bowstringing and improve the function of the gracilis transfer are described.

We aimed to describe outcomes, including shoulder motion, deltoid strength and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, in 19 patients with terrible triad shoulder injuries (anterior shoulder dislocation, rotator cuff tear or greater tuberosity fracture, and axillary nerve injury) who required axillary nerve reconstruction. The type of nerve surgery (grafting vs. nerve transfer), demographic factors and injury characteristics were not significantly associated with outcomes. The mean postoperative abduction and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were 95° and 28, respectively. Patients with rotator cuff tears had a higher Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (more disability) than those with isolated greater tuberosity fractures. We conclude that spontaneous recovery of the axillary nerve may not occur in patients with a terrible triad injury. Functional outcomes after axillary nerve repair are poor with respect to motion, strength and patient-reported outcomes compared with reported results for axillary nerve reconstruction in the absence of rotator cuff injury. Level of evidence: IV

OBJECTIVE Triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve (AXN) was originally described for patients with a loss of deltoid function secondary to upper trunk (UT) brachial plexus injuries but has evolved to restore deltoid function in isolated peripheral AXN injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes in patients who had undergone this procedure in the setting of UT brachial plexus injury versus peripheral AXN injury. METHODS The records of patients who had undergone triceps branch to anterior division of the AXN transfer at a single academic institution between 2001 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included in the study if they had either a UT or an AXN injury and were excluded if their follow-up was less than 2 years. Pre- and postoperative outcomes, including modified British Medical Research Council grade and range of motion, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Forty-two patients met the criteria for inclusion. Thirty cases were classified as UT injury and 12 cases as AXN injury. The mean postoperative abduction strength was significantly higher in the AXN injury group (3.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.007), as was the postoperative change in abduction strength (2.8 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.4, p = 0.01). The mean postoperative forward flexion (136° ± 57° vs 79° ± 54°, p = 0.005) and abduction (129° ± 64° vs 59° ± 47°, p = 0.004) were significantly better in the AXN group, although postoperative changes in flexion and abduction were not different between the groups. Triceps strength preoperatively was similar to that postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with an AXN injury, compared to those with a UT injury, had better postoperative abduction strength and shoulder range of motion after triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN. Triceps strength was not significantly changed after the procedure in the two groups. The study findings suggest that the outcomes of triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN are different based on the location and type of injury, providing insight into prognosis while counseling patients.

ABSTRACTBackgroundGlenohumeral arthrodesis is a demanding surgical procedure. However, it is an option for reconstruction an oncologic resection, especially for patients in whom the axillary nerve is compromised.MethodsWe reviewed 26 (12 male:14 female) glenohumeral arthrodeses (14 primary:12 revision) following an oncologic resection. The most common method of reconstruction was a free vascularized fibula autograft with a bulk allograft (n = 18). The median follow‐up was 22 years (IQR 19 years).ResultsMedian Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores and Toronto Extremity Salvage Scores at final follow‐up were 86% and 80%. MSTS scores were similar in patients receiving arthrodesis for primary versus secondary reconstruction. Fifteen (58%) patients had postoperative complications requiring reoperation. Most reoperations occurred with‐in the first 5 years postoperative, with two procedures occurring after 10‐years. Three patients were diagnosed with metastatic disease, one of which also had a local recurrence.ConclusionGlenohumeral arthrodesis provides satisfactory long‐term outcomes for primary and secondary management of shoulder girdle tumors. While early complication rates were high, long‐term complications were rare.