Chappell, Ava G.

OBJECTIVE Triceps motor branch transfer to the anterior division of the axillary nerve (AXN) was originally described for patients with a loss of deltoid function secondary to upper trunk (UT) brachial plexus injuries but has evolved to restore deltoid function in isolated peripheral AXN injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare functional outcomes in patients who had undergone this procedure in the setting of UT brachial plexus injury versus peripheral AXN injury. METHODS The records of patients who had undergone triceps branch to anterior division of the AXN transfer at a single academic institution between 2001 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included in the study if they had either a UT or an AXN injury and were excluded if their follow-up was less than 2 years. Pre- and postoperative outcomes, including modified British Medical Research Council grade and range of motion, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Forty-two patients met the criteria for inclusion. Thirty cases were classified as UT injury and 12 cases as AXN injury. The mean postoperative abduction strength was significantly higher in the AXN injury group (3.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.007), as was the postoperative change in abduction strength (2.8 ± 1.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.4, p = 0.01). The mean postoperative forward flexion (136° ± 57° vs 79° ± 54°, p = 0.005) and abduction (129° ± 64° vs 59° ± 47°, p = 0.004) were significantly better in the AXN group, although postoperative changes in flexion and abduction were not different between the groups. Triceps strength preoperatively was similar to that postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with an AXN injury, compared to those with a UT injury, had better postoperative abduction strength and shoulder range of motion after triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN. Triceps strength was not significantly changed after the procedure in the two groups. The study findings suggest that the outcomes of triceps branch transfer to the anterior division of the AXN are different based on the location and type of injury, providing insight into prognosis while counseling patients.

Background: The American Board of Plastic Surgery has been collecting practice data on operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations since 2006, as part of its Continuous Certification program. Methods: Data on operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations from 2006 to 2014 were reviewed and compared with those from 2015 to 2020. National practice trends observed in these data were evaluated and reviewed alongside published literature and evidence-based medicine. Results: In total, 780 patients with flexor tendon laceration injuries were included. Mean patient age was 38 years; mean time between tendon injury and first evaluation was 4 days, and the mean time from injury to operative repair was 12 days. Four-strand sutures remain the most common technique of tendon repair (57%). In the recent cohort, there were significant decreases in tourniquet use (94% versus 89%), general anesthesia (88% versus 74%), and monofilament sutures (44% versus 35%), with a significant increase reported in preserving the A1 pulley (20% versus 29%). Postoperative movement was described as “almost full range of motion” or “good” in 70% of cases, and 74% of patients were satisfied with their results. Postoperative adverse events were reported in 26% of cases, with the most common complications being tendon adhesions (14%) and rupture (3%). Conclusions: Review of The American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data for operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations establishes a framework by which surgeons can evaluate how their current practice aligns with that of their peers, and whether their practice patterns remain current relative to recommendations from evidence-based medicine.